April 30, 2006

Peru recalls ambassador to Venezuela over Chavez Remarks

LIMA
Apr 29
Peru recalled its ambassador to Venezuela on Saturday in protest of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez's "persistent and flagrant" interference in Peru's presidential elections.

"The government of Peru has decided to immediately remove its ambassador from the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela for the persistent and flagrant interference in internal affairs of Peru in clear violation of the principles and norms of international law," the Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

This is the second time this year that Peru has withdrawn its ambassador to Caracas, following a similar move in January after Chavez publicly voiced support for Peruvian presidential candidate Ollanta Humala ahead of Peru's April 9 elections.

Hands off Venezuela and Cuba!

Marce Cameron, Sydney

The Australia-Venezuela Solidarity Network (AVSN) and the Australia-Cuba Friendship Society have joined forces to call for a rally outside the US consulate in Sydney on May 20 as part of an international day of action in solidarity with the people of Venezuela and Cuba.

Speakers at the rally will include John Sutton, national secretary of the construction division of the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, and NSW Greens MP Sylvia Hale.

In the US, activists are planning a national convergence in Washington for a march on the White House, and while protest actions are also being planned in Brazil, Britain, Germany, Mexico and Russia.

Venezuela's Bolivarian revolution and socialist Cuba form an axis of hope, defiance and solidarity. Tens of thousands of Cuban health-care professionals and teachers are working in Third World countries from Venezuela to East Timor, while Venezuela delivers cheap oil to its Caribbean neighbours and to poor communities in the US. Together, the two popular revolutions head a growing rebellion against US domination throughout Latin America.

According to the April 22 Jerusalem Post, Venezuela’s socialist President Hugo Chavez told supporters in the capital Caracas that “if the US empire were to invade Cuba, Venezuelan blood would run in the defence of Cuba and its people”.

In an attempt to intimidate Venezuela and Cuba in the lead-up to the Venezuelan presidential election on December 3, US warships are currently engaged in naval war games in the Caribbean Sea.

The Sydney rally and march will demand “US hands off Venezuela!”, “End the US blockade of Cuba!” and “No Australian support for US aggression!”. The rally will also demand freedom for the five Cuban men jailed in the US for gathering information on the activities of right-wing terrorist organisations opposed to the Cuban Revolution.

Similar solidarity actions are also being planned in other cities. For more information visit .

April 29, 2006

Bolivia to join Cuba, Venezuela in trade pact to resist FTAA

HAVANA
Bolivian President Evo Morales joined Cuban President Fidel Castro and Venezuelan Presdient Hugo Chavez in Havana on Friday to endorse a trade alternative to replace the U.S.-backed free market trade pact.

The pact calls for shared trade and cooperation among Latin American countries, rejecting the U.S.-backed unsuccessful Free Trade Area of the Americas, or FTAA. Castro and Chavez called the bloc the U.S. attempt to "annex" Latin America.

Saturday's ceremony will mark a deepening political and economic alliance among the three nations, as they work toward their own idea for regional integration without U.S. influence.

Bolivia joining Cuba, Venezuela in anti-U.S. trade pact

HAVANA
Bolivian President Evo Morales was joining fellow leftist leaders from Cuba and Venezuela on Friday to endorse their concept for shared regional commerce that follows socialist principles and rejects U.S. control.

Morales has said on Saturday he will officially include his Andean country in the "alternative" trade pact presidents Fidel Castro of Cuba and Hugo Chavez of Venezuela devised a year ago.

So far, only Venezuela and Cuba are signatories to the Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas, which aims to offer shared trade and co-operation agreements among Latin American countries in lieu of Washington-led pacts based on capitalism.

The ceremony will mark a deepening political and economic alliance among communist Cuba and leftist Venezuela and Bolivia as the three countries work toward their own idea for regional integration without U.S. influence.

Castro greeted Morales at Havana airport when he arrived Friday afternoon, Cuba's Prensa Latina news service said. Chavez was expected later Friday. Cuban authorities released no details about Saturday's signing ceremony, including when and where it would be held.

The trade pact is named for the 19th-century South American revolutionary Simon Bolivar, who led independence wars in Venezuela, Colombia, Panama, Bolivia, Peru and Ecuador.

The agreement will allow Bolivia, Cuba and Venezuela to trade some products with zero tariffs and strengthen already close ties among the three countries, whose leaders are known for their strong opposition to U.S. policy.

"We don't want to be rich but we do want to live well, with dignity, as brothers, so there is no misery, so there is no poverty, so people are not excluded - that is among our fundamental objectives," Chavez said of the trade pact in Caracas on Friday, before leaving for Havana.

Chavez and Morales have warned in recent days their countries could withdraw from the Andean Community if fellow trade-bloc members Colombia, Peru and Ecuador go through with free-trade pacts with the United States.

Chavez said in his Caracas speech Friday said Venezuela and Cuba would happily buy all the soybeans Bolivia produces. Colombia - previously a key soybean market for Bolivia - recently signed a free-trade pact with the United States and can now buy soybeans at much lower prices, the Venezuelan president said.

Since a U.S.-backed hemispheric trade pact fell apart last year, Washington has signed nine free trade agreements with Latin American countries. Ecuador is currently in negotiations.

"Listen, as long as the free trade pact (with the United States) threatens the small and medium-sized soy producers in Bolivia, ALBA will save them," Chavez said, using the Spanish acronym for the alternative trade grouping.

"We'll take them by the hand and say: 'Come we us, we'll buy your soybeans, look at the difference.' "

In La Paz, Bolivian Foreign Minister David Choquehuanca said his government hopes new commerce with Cuba and Venezuela will make up for any lost trade with the United States and the Andean Community.

But the Bolivarian Alternative isn't just about trade.

Heavily political in nature, it also calls for co-operation programs among countries, such as the Operation Miracle program Cuba and Venezuela devised to offer free eye surgery to needy people from other Latin American countries.

Costa Rica seeks energy deal with Venezuela

Costa Rica may join Guatemala in seeking an oil agreement with Venezuela, said Costa Rican Environment and Energy minister Roberto Dobles.

Dobles told AP that the proposal could come next May 8th, when the new local government, headed by Oscar Arias, is taking office.

"Venezuela will be suggested this opportunity. The inauguration act is very special. The proposal could be made then, timely. Otherwise, we will do it later," he said.

Both President Hugo Chávez and Guatemalan ruler Oscar Berger are scheduled to attend Arias inauguration. A few days ago, Berger said he would make an energy proposal to Chávez on such occasion.

Costa Rica president-elect unveils new cabinet

Costa Rica's president-elect Oscar Arias on Thursday announced the name list of a new cabinet.

The new cabinet is made up of 18 ministers, including Minister of the Presidency Rodrigo Arias, Foreign Minister Bruno Stagno andMinister of Production Alfredo Volio.

Five women ministers will be serving in the cabinet.

A new ministry without portfolio is set up to coordinate the work of governmental departments. And the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock and the Ministry of Economy are integrated into one ministry.

Arias, who belongs to the National Liberation Party, defeated 13 other candidates in Costa Rica's Feb. 5 presidential election. He will be sworn in on May 8.

Alabama Congress favors trade

by Gabriel Molina
The Alabama state congress has approved a resolution urging the U.S. Congress to annul all trade, financial and travel restrictions related to Cuba.

The AP and AFP news agencies reported that trade agreements signed on April 26 by Cuba’s food import firm Alimport and Alabama Agriculture Commissioner Ron Sparks provide for $20 million worth of sales in agricultural goods to Cuba, and $7 million of that was concretized during a trade delegation’s visit to the island.

During the previous week, Alimport president Pedro Álvarez informed that U.S. food sales to Cuba now total more than $1.69 billion since 2001, when the U.S. Congress approved an amendment authorizing those transactions, which must be in cash, upfront without possibility of credit.

"All of those regulations create insecurity...and are detrimental to businessmen," Álvarez commented at the time.

The Alimport president most recently spoke during the signing of an agreement for $30 million in food imports from the state of Nebraska, with a delegation led by that state’s Lieutenant Governor Rick Sheehy and Agriculture Director Greg Ibach.

This year, Cuba has imported from the United States more than $151 million in products such as soy, chicken, rice, fruit, flour, wheat, corn, oil, grains, butter, powdered milk, eggs, cattle and supermarket products.

The George W. Bush administration has tried to block the implementation of these trade measures and the expansion of others, accepting the demands by Cuban-born Congressional members and other elements who control the politics and economy of the state of Florida. These sectors were attributed decisive importance to Bush’s two electoral victories. It was in this context that the Alabama state officials and legislators announced to the media the resolution passed by the state congress urging U.S. lawmakers in Washington to end the restrictions and freely allow those ties.

TRADE EXTREMELY IMPORTANT TO U.S. FARMERS

Senators and U.S. representatives hope that the resolutions serve as an example for other states.

When asked if he expected other states to follow suit, Sparks said Alabama was sending a message, the AP reported. The Alabama commissioner added that the southern state’s trade relations with Cuba have been "extremely important to the farmers of Alabama," who have sold $150 million worth of goods.

Sparks also said that the trade has been an important boost for port activities, and that it "ensures" the maintenance of 467,000 jobs in the agricultural sector, according to the AFP.

Alabama state Senator Hank Sanders said that the fact that his state legislature is conservative makes it feasible for similar resolutions to be approved other states and by Washington.

A second resolution passed by Alabama’s congress expressed thanks to Alimport’s Álvarez for his efforts toward normalizing bilateral relations.

The resolutions read out by Sparks were presented by nine legislators who traveled to Cuba together with the agriculture commissioner.

A Jewish Defector Warns America

by Benjamin H. Freedman
Introductory Note -- Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century.

Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was at one time the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States.

Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times.

This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense. Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman's essential message to us -- his warning to the West -- is more urgent than ever before. -- K.A.S. ---
...

April 28, 2006

Mexico proposes decriminalising pot and cocaine

MEXICO CITY
Owning marijuana, cocaine and even heroin will no longer be a crime in Mexico if the drugs are carried in small amounts for personal use, under legislation passed by the Congress.

Police will not penalise people for possessing up to 5 grams of marijuana, 5 grams of opium, 25 milligrams of heroin or 500 milligrams of cocaine, under a bill passed by senators late on Thursday and earlier approved by the lower house.

People caught with larger quantities of drugs will be treated as narcotics dealers and face increased jail terms under the plan.

The government says the measure allows police to focus on major drug dealers, and President Fox is expected to sign it into law.

"This law provides more judicial tools for authorities to fight crime," presidential spokesman Ruben Aguilar said on Friday.

Hundreds of people including several police officers have been killed in the past year as drug cartels battle authorities and compete with each other for control of lucrative cocaine, marijuana and heroin smuggling routes from Mexico into the United States.

The violence has raged mostly in northern Mexico but in recent months has spread south to cities like vacation resort Acapulco.

Under current law, it is up to local judges and police to decide on a case-by-case basis whether people should be prosecuted for possessing small quantities of drugs, a source at the Senate's health commission told Reuters.

"The object of this law is to not put consumers in jail, but rather those who sell and poison," said Sen. Jorge Zermeno of the ruling National Action Party.

Fifty-three senators voted for the bill with 26 votes against it.

Chavez Announces 10 Pct. Minimum Wage Hike

CARACAS, Venezuela
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez on Friday announced a 10 percent boost in the minimum wage starting Sept. 1 _ the second such increase this year.

"We have decided on an additional 10 percent minimum wage increase beginning Sept. 1," he said in a televised address to celebrate Labor Day.

Venezuela's minimum wage now at US$216 (euro172.29) a month will rise to US$238 (euro189.84) a month, the president said.

The wage hike will benefit 749,000 people, he said.

Chavez's government last raised the minimum wage in February by 15 percent.

Chavez also announced a series of labor law revisions as well as pension and wage increases in what he called another step in paying off the "social debt" the country owes to the poor.

The salaries of public school teachers will receive a 30 percent increase in pay starting May 1 and a further 10 percent starting Oct. 1, he said.

Chavez has promised to continue a generous redistribution of the country's windfall oil gains this year ahead of presidential elections in December.

Morales and Chavez in Cuba

Bolivia's President Evo Morales and Venezuela's Hugo Chavez are starting Friday a visit to Cuba and will be welcomed by President Fidel Castro.

Their arrival to Havana coincides with the first anniversary of the signing of agreements between Cuba and Venezuela for the implementation of the Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas (ALBA).

According to a note published by Granma newspaper, the aim of the visit is to sign documents allowing Bolivia's adherence to that integration model.

Such documents, states the daily, depict Morales' ideas on the Trade Agreements for the Peoples (TCP, in Spanish).

The ALBA, points out Granma, is an integration model based on cooperation, solidarity and common will, and seeks to satisfy the Latin American and Caribbean countries' needs and desires and preserve independence, sovereignty and identity.

Morales and Chavez' visit will reassert the three governments' willingness to continue working together for regional integration and strengthen excellent ties of friendship and solidarity among Cuba, Venezuela and Bolivia, the source reports.

Chavez and Morales are coming accompanied by their countries' delegations of ministers, their government's top officials and other figures.

Chávez says President Uribe is his friend

President Hugo Chávez said he would talk with his Colombian counterpart Álvaro Uribe on the withdrawal of Venezuela from the Andean Community of Nations (CAN.)

Chávez claimed he is a "friend" of Colombia and Uribe, with whom the Venezuelan ruler plans to keep "both trade and political ties," despite Chávez' disagreement with Colombia-US free trade agreement.

"It is a matter of State, a matter of sovereignty. I do respect Colombian sovereignty deeply, and the legitimacy of Uribe's Government. He knows that; everybody knows that. We are friends and I am sure that we will keep talking."

Venezuelan Vice-President José Vicente Rangel, however, branded as "contradictory" Uribe's statement that Venezuela does not need to enter into free trade agreements such as the one Colombia initialed with the US because Venezuela sells oil to the US.

"It is a contradiction. I have seen oil-producing countries that have signed free trade agreements with the US, such as Mexico. And there are countries that do not have oil and have not signed free trade agreements with the US, such as Uruguay," Rangel asserted.

Chavez Provides Cheap Oil To 181,000 US Families

Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez spoke this Sunday with visitors from the United States who have benefited from the program that provides fuel at solidarity prices sponsored by the CITGO oil company, an affiliate of PDVSA in that nation.

Representatives of a group of 65 individuals visiting Venezuela explained during the "Aló Presidente" radio-television program how that fuel was distributed in their communities.

They indicated that in many cases it was not only seen as economic aid but also inspired hope.

James Sapier, an indigenous representative, stated that his people live in the northernmost part of the country where temperatures are lower than 72 degrees Fahrenheit.

He added that this assistance will make it possible for them to endure the severe winters, given that the U.S. authorities disregard their living conditions.
...

Maine tribal delegation thanks Chavez

Representatives of Maine's Indian tribes, part of a delegation of more than 60 Americans who recently visited Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, expressed gratitude for the South American leader's consideration of poor people beyond his country's borders.

In the contracts signed in January at Indian Island, the U.S.-based Citgo Petroleum Corp., the national petroleum company of Venezuela, agreed to sell discounted oil to the Maliseet, Micmac, Passamaquoddy and Penobscot tribes in Maine.
...

April 27, 2006

Lula Appeases CAN Crisis

La Paz
The mediation of Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva in the Andean Community of Nations´ (CAN) crisis has awakened Bolivia´s expectations that the project could be saved.

The Brazilian arbitration, confirmed in that country by presidential advisor Marco Aurelio Garcia, has been held with discretion, with talks between Presidents Alvaro Uribe, Colombia, and Hugo Chavez, Venezuela.

Bolivian President Evo Morales supported and encouraged Lula´s intervention, hoping it helps to save and strengthen the Andean bloc formed by Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Venezuela in 1969.

On Monday, Morales asked the presidents of Colombia, Peru, and Venezuela to rise above their unyielding attitudes to save CAN. However, he only had positive reply from Venezuela.

Morales said Bolivia will do as much as possible to help CAN recover the basic principles of its foundation, aimed at strengthening the economies of member countries as well as mutual trade.

"Those who make unilateral negotiations with the US, allowing the reinforcement of transnationals without protecting Andean economies, are wrongly weakening CAN," he stressed.

For Chavez, the commercial deals some of its members have inked or are negotiating with Washington weaken unity by associating with the failed US-boosted Free Trade Area of the Americas.

Chavez says pipeline will create one million jobs

[I love the unity and breaking free of US ties with this pipeline, but I say that without having investigated the environmental impact of this pipeline]
*
São Paulo - The construction of what is being called the Great Southern Gas Pipeline (Grande Gasoduto do Sul), linking Venezuela-Brasil-Argentina, will create a million jobs, says the president of Venezuela, Hugo Chávez, following meetings with presidents Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and Néstor Kirchner, of Argentina, in São Paulo, yesterday.

Chavez enthusiastically declared that the pipeline will be built. "We will have our gas pipeline... Venezuela has 5% of the world's petroleum reserves and 80% of the natural gas in South America," he added. [translator's note: Venezuela has proven reserves of 75 billion barrels of petroleum and 4.2 trillion cubic meters of natural gas].

Chavez went on to say the pipeline was an essential element in the region's independence and development. He said he was officially inviting all the nations of South America to join the project.

A very important member of any project integrating South American energy resources is Bolivia, which already has a gas pipeline linking it with Brazil [Bolivia has proven petroleum reserves of 460 million barrels and 680 billion cubic meters of natural gas]. Chavez declared that he has a scheduled meeting with the president of Bolivia, Evo Morales, on Saturday, April 29, when he will discuss the matter with him. "The presence of Bolivia is a priority. They have the second biggest reserves of oil and gas in South America," said Chavez.

Translation: Allen Bennett

CIA terrorist Luis Posada Carriles


Paid FBI weapons witness told Cuba about CIA terrorist Luis Posada Carriles

...
Prosecutors also disclosed for the first time that the FBI informant, Gilberto Abascal, traveled by boat with Posada's benefactor and other friends last year to pick up the CIA-trained Posada in Mexico and bring him back to the United States illegally.
...

So, why isn't Bush extraditing Posada Carriles back to Venezuela to face justice?

*

[Not to mention that he has applied for US Citizenship now....]

The world has seen the American people fall victim to their own government

Reference Charles Dewey's Secret Communist/Socialist plot ... a conspiracy to undermine the United States... this kind of fantasy he preaches is no longer going to fool anyone in this day and age when people have access to the internet and more realistic news.

These lies worked during the cold war and during second world war.

Even though the international media is dominated by a few people, and they all have the same boss, the internet is allowing us to find out the truth.

The American People are victims of their own government, it’s obvious that the people who rule the USA today have no love for their country, the world has seen the American people fall victim to their own government. Do you know why CD? Those who rule the US are no real Americans, these guys hate America, they are trying to repeat what they did in Germany. Listen to Benjamin Freeman speech in 1961.

There is no other explanation to this. Do you want to know the truth about 9/11? Or are you part of the clan working against the USA? Go see these sites and make your own conclusions, scientist are proofing Bush wrong about 9/11.

Just the fact that the Bush administration closed the files on the biggest disasters in US history means that 9/11 was an inside job.

Here you can find plenty of proof in details.

* Listen to Kay Giggs (the wife of a marine corps colonel) interviewed by Pastor Rick Strawcutter and find out how grotesque these people are.

* Visit a 9/11 hero’s site at www.reopen911.org and learn how this World Trade Center maintenance worker survived and how he feels about it.

Racial hatred spread in Venezuela?

Mr. CD anyone can access Venezuelan TV (run by the government) via internet and see for themselves that there is no hatred against the US. Just because Chavez talks against the Empire it doesn’t mean the USA as a country but the Bush administration and those who control it.

Just yesterday on 'Alo Presidente' (Chavez' weekly TV program) he had an American congregation as guests in the show, including pastors and preachers from the Bronx and Indian Chiefs, it was a clear show of solidarity with the American people. These are people who benefited from the oil discount program Venezuela provided to poor Americans, just like Venezuela provides to many Caribbean, South and Central Americans countries.

* Have you wondered why EXXON, CHEVRON, TEXACO etc which have made record profits (billions of $) have not given a cent to help the poor in the USA?

Mr. CD, the answer is the same, these guys don’t give a damn about your country, they hate America ... your country has been stolen from you.

You wrote: Please... If you aren't smart enough to figure it out, the world doesn't need another September 11th. The world doesn't need another war.

Mr. CD, I hope and pray tragedies like 9/11 never happen again, but those in control of the biggest killing machine in history have other plans and many predict similar if no worse disasters will happen, 9/11, the London explosion, the train bombing in Spain are all connected and manipulated by the same people .. not the Al Qaeda BS they fed the world. Osama and his nuclear donkey from a cave in the mountains of Afghanistan did it! Yeah right!

Most likely the oil vampires are going after Iran, this will be the fall of the empire, I predict that if Iran is attacked, Venezuela will stop oil flow to the US and many other countries will raise against the USA.

I can hear you say “Bring them on" ... we can kick everyone’s butt! Right Mr.CD

Mr. CD if you aren’t smart enough to figure it out, I must assume you have fallen victim of the illegal imported commodity that affect around 10% of your population.

Government Immigration Detention Facilities

US free trade deals leave bitter taste with Latin Americans

BOGOTA, Colombia
With the rise of China and stiff competition from Europe, the United States has been flexing its economic muscle in its own backyard.

Since 2003, when attempts to secure a hemispheric free trade zone broke down, U.S. negotiators have signed bilateral, free trade agreements with nine Latin American nations. Two more, with Ecuador and Panama, are in the pipeline.

Despite skepticism among U.S. labor groups and Congress, those agreements have been an unqualified success for American exporters. For example, U.S. exports to Chile have almost doubled, to US$5.2 billion last year, in the two years since the two countries signed a deal, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative said.

But among Latin Americans, the dollar diplomacy has left a bitter taste.

"Nobody who sat across the negotiating table from the United States came out of the talks feeling they got a fair deal," said Peter Hakim, president of the nonpartisan Inter–American Dialogue think tank in Washington. "And many feel they’ve been outright cheated."

Part of the failure to impress is attributable to a surge of leftist leaders in Latin America, who’ve deftly capitalized on the region’s traditional protectionism and mistrust of Washington.

But even economists concede that free trade has barely helped the region reduce widespread poverty, which has remained stagnant for decades.

Moreover, the pacts may end up hurting farmers and rural peasants who make up almost half of Latin America’s 500 million people. By permanently locking in trade preferences, countries entering trade deals are effectively turning a blind eye to the US$17 billion that U.S. farmers receive annually in government subsidies, making it extremely tough to compete.

Not surprisingly, support for U.S. free trade deals in Latin America may be turning.

In Ecuador, Indian protesters last month paralyzed much of the country for nearly two weeks demanding that President Alfredo Palacio suspend trade talks with the United States that have been ongoing for years.

And even the signing of a deal is no guarantee of its implementation. Legislatures in Costa Rica and Peru have yet to rubber stamp recent deals even as calls by opposition politicians for national referendums have grown louder.

Still, despite the push by Argentina and Brazil to create a South American trade zone, for much of the region the price of saying no to Uncle Sam remains too high. Even if that means betraying popular goals of regional solidarity.

The experience of the Andean Community trade bloc – comprised of Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela – is a case in point.

The recent trade deals by Colombia and Peru with the United States sounded the death knell for the 39–year–old trade bloc, at least in spirit. For example, in providing a quota for American soy products, Colombia effectively shut out Bolivia from what has been until now its top soy market, worth US$170 million a year.

Citing Peru and Colombia’s defections, President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, a staunch opponent of U.S. free–trade deals, announced last week that he was pulling out of the trade bloc.

It remains to be seen how strongly the Venezuelan pullout could affect the US$8 billion in annual trade among bloc members, and Venezuela’s commerce minister said over the weekend that the withdrawal would be gradual, over five years.

The Andean Community says that trade among member countries has risen on average by 13.5 percent a year since 1990, when it began gradually lifting tariffs and liberalizing trade.

Let's read about the ignorant people in our country now...ok?

Boycott targets CITGO
BY TOM JOHNSTON, STAFF WRITER
President George Bush said in this year's State of the Union address he would push policies to help the United States kick its addiction to foreign oil, but some citizens are taking matters into their own hands.

Some people are boycotting CITGO because it's owned by Venezuela's national oil company and they don't want their money funding President Hugo Chavez's aim to end American "imperialism."
...

Leaders push S America pipeline

Venezuela, Argentina and Brazil have agreed to push on with plans for a 10,000km (6,215 mile) gas pipeline from Venezuela to Argentina.

Leaders of the three countries held a one-day summit in Sao Paulo, Brazil, to discuss the project, as well as other plans for regional integration.

Critics say the pipeline is over-ambitious and too costly.

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez says the $20bn project, planned for 2007-2017 could create a million jobs.

At the summit, he called for the expansion of plans to include Bolivia.

Bolivia's gas reserves of 48.7 trillion sq ft (4.5 trillion sq metres) are second in the continent to Venezuela's 151 trillion sq ft (14 trillion sq metres).

"Bolivia is a priority," Mr Chavez said.

"This project will guarantee energy... for all South American countries in the 21st Century and beyond."

The regional leaders also discussed ways of solving a crisis in the Andean Community trade bloc.

Venezuela has said it is pulling out the bloc now that a number of member countries have signed trade deals with the US.

Bolivia, Cuba and Venezuela will sign a "trade agreement of the people" in Cuba on Saturday in an attempt to counter free trade agreements Latin American countries are signing with the US government, Bolivian President Evo Morales said.

Mexico-US, San Diego-Tijuana, Zapatista!

...
From June 17-19th, Delegate Zero of the Zapatistas will be coming to Tijuana as part of La Otra Campana. People will converge on San Diego and Tijuana from all over the US for this historical opportuniy to meet the Zapatistas first hand and take part in La Otra Campana, a new campaign aimed at radically transforming politics through coordination of groups on the left organizing outside of electoral politics against capitalism. A member of the o.r.g.a.n.i.c.* collective will speak about the plans for June and what you can do to help!
...

April 26, 2006

US Government Working to Prevent Ortega Victory in Nicaraguan Election

From UpsideDownWorld
Apr 23
On Monday, April 17 the US Ambassador in Nicaragua met with right wing parties in the country to discuss their opposition strategy against Sandinista leader Daniel Ortega in the November 5 presidential elections. Support for Ortega is growing, and many expect him to win the race. The US has called on Nicaraguans to not vote for Ortega.
Reuters reported that U.S. envoy Paul Trivelli is lobbying right-wing parties to join forces and pick a single candidate to represent them in the election, to reduce the chances of a Sandinista victory. He said his intention was "to see if we can push the democratic unification of this country a little more."

Stratfor.com reports that

Eduardo Montealegre of the right-wing Nicaraguan Liberal Alliance represents Nicaragua's future, U.S. Ambassador to Nicaragua Paul Trivelli said April 19. Trivelli met with representatives from the country's right-wing parties, including the prominent Liberal Constitutionalist Party, on April 17-18 to discuss potential candidates to oppose former Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega of the left-wing Sandinista National Liberation Front in Nicaragua's Nov. 5 election.

In another Reuters article, 60-year-old war Sandinista war veteran Daniel Sauro, referred to 16 years of pro-Washington governments that took power after Sandinista leader Daniel Ortega's electoral defeat in 1990: "We need a change. It's been bad, bad, bad."

"We need to give Ortega another chance to show he can govern in times of peace," Sauro said. Like many Nicaraguans, he complains about crime, corruption and low wages and looks back with nostalgia to the heady revolutionary days of 1979.

Ortega and others came to power in 1979 in a socialist revolution in Nicaragua which was met with violence from the US-funded Contras throughout the 1980s.

The Nicaragua Network says

[A] concrete way that the US government hopes to influence the Nicaraguan election is through funding a variety of Nicaraguan organizations for election-related projects. In the light of Ambassador Trivelli’s comments, this funding will unfairly influence Nicaragua’s choice of candidates.

A letter-writing campaign against US intervention in the elections has been started by The Nicaragua Network.

April 25, 2006

Antonia Juhasz: The Bush Agenda

Antonia was on Democracy Now this morning...check in later to the DN site for the full transcript. She explains, (the obvious) fact that the Bush admin and his oil cronies are gouging the public with gas prices, and making huge profits based on the myth that we have high prices due to the war.

http://thebushagenda.org/

The Iraqi government has resolved a four-month political stalemate with the appointment of a new Prime Minister. Shiite leader Jawad Maliki will replace Ibrahim Jaafari. Jaafari stepped down after a lengthy dispute with Sunni and Kurdish leaders, who refused to back his leadership. Several analysts say the United States also played a pivotal role in replacing Jaafari. Steven Simon, a Senior Fellow for Middle Eastern Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, said: "[The Iraqi government] wouldn"t have consented to it if it weren't for the very heavy pressure that the United States was bringing to bear."

Our guest today is an author who has been tracking the Bush administration's goals in Iraq since the invasion. Antonia Juhasz has written about them in a new book. It's called "The Bush Agenda: Invading the World, One Economy at a Time." The book tracks the radical neo-liberal economic program the Bush administration has tried to impose on Iraq, which threatens to leave Iraq's economy and oil reserves largely in the hands of multinational corporations. It's an agenda, the book says, that the Bush administration is trying to bring to all corners of the globe.

[Excerpt from the interview]

AMY GOODMAN: We’re talking to Antonia Juhasz, author and activist, wrote The Bush Agenda: Invading the World, One Economy at a Time. Now, gas is over $3 in many places. What's the connection?

ANTONIA JUHASZ: Well, here's the connection. The Bush administration is the most beholden administration probably in American history to the oil and gas industry. This is the first time in history that the President, Vice President and Secretary of State are all former energy company officials. In fact, both Bush and Rice have more experience as energy company officials than they do as government leaders. Cheney outbeats them. He’s spent 30 years working for government. However, his five years at Halliburton have been so profitable that you might say that his Halliburton years outweigh their oil years, because Bush was a very bad oil company executive. But their links to the oil sector are deep.

The oil industry provided more than 13 times more money to the Bush-Cheney ticket in the first round of elections than it did to his competitor, nine times more in the second. And this industry has been absolutely coddled by the Bush administration: enormous tax subsidies, deregulation, and, I would argue, a war waged on their behalf.

Now, there's two intimate connections between the war and the price of gas. But first, I think it’s very important for people to understand that the vertical integration of the oil industry, which has been absolutely exacerbated under the Bush administration. For example, ChevronTexaco and Unocal merging into one company, the completion of Exxon and Mobil's merger, all of these little companies merging into enormous behemoths, so that you have ExxonMobil being the company that has received the highest profits of any company in the world, over the last two years, ever in the history of the world. That is because of the vertical integration and monopoly power of these companies. That means that they control exploration, production, refining, marketing and sales.

The price of oil at the pump is about 50% the price of a barrel of oil, about 25% taxes, and then the rest is marketing and just the price determined by the company at the pump. So that means that about 18% to 20% is absolutely determined by the oil companies themselves and governed by the companies themselves. So they could reduce the price of oil and reduce their profit margin, or they could jack up the price of oil and increase their profit margin. They have chosen to do the latter.

And one of the things that has helped them do that is, first of all, the United States is receiving a tremendous amount of oil from Iraq. Oil is down in overall export and production, but not tremendously so. We were -- at prewar was 2.5 million barrels a day. We’re now at about 2 or 2.2 million barrels a day. But 50% of that, on average, is coming to the United States, and it’s being brought to the United States by Chevron and Exxon and Marathon. The myth of dramatically reduced supply has helped them create an argument to the American public, which is, you know, it’s a time of war, we’re suffering, gas prices are going to go up, everyone needs to come in and support this because this is war. Well, that's just not true. The companies are using that as a myth to help make it okay for them to receive these utterly ridiculous profits.

Garcia to the Peruvian presidential run off May 28

Ultra nationalist leader Ollanta Humala and former president Alan Garcia will be disputing the Peruvian presidential run off next May 28, according to the latest figures from the country’s Electoral Process Board, ONPE.

The figures from the April 9 round show Mr. Humala and his Union for Peru party with 30.72% of the votes, followed by Mr. Garcia and his APRA party with 24.33% and Conservative Lourdes Flores with 23.64%.

Even with 2% of the April 9 ballots to count and no official statement from ONPE, Garcia's lead over Lourdes Flores is described as “insurmountable”. ONPE is scheduled to make the official announcement Tuesday.

Elected Conservative Congress member Rafael Rey acknowledged that “it’s all over. It’s impossible for Lourdes to surpass the 83.000 vote difference”.

Mr. Garcia, 56, a social democrat, ruled from 1985-90 and was also responsible for leading Peru into one of its worst economic crisis in decades. His administration was wracked by corruption and Garcia himself spent several years in self-exile to avoid prosecution in his homeland.

He has since then become a more stabilizing force in the always turbulent Peruvian politics and in 2000 was defeated in the run off by President Alejandro Toledo.

In claiming victory over Ms Flores, Mr. Garcia predicted he would win the runoff and promised that his next administration would be "broad based, non-sectarian” and respectful of contracts and foreign investment.

Kirchner to talk Mercosur with Lula today

The leaders of Argentina and Brazil are meeting in Sao Paulo this evening to discuss the future of the embattled Mercosur trade bloc, which is undergoing the worst political crisis since it was created 15 years ago.

President Néstor Kirchner will meet his Brazilian counterpart Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva at 7pm.

Both foreign ministries say the meeting is designed to “reaffirm” the good bilateral relationship between the two countries. But sources also agree that the presidents will look into the increasing protest of smaller Mercosur nations, which complain they are not taken into account when it comes to decision-making.

Argentina’s row with Uruguay over the construction of two paper pulp mills is also expected to be part of the agenda.

Tomorrow, Kirchner and Da Silva will be joined by Venezuela’s President Hugo Chávez. Venezuela last year became a full member of Mercosur, although its role is largely political until the fine print of its trade participation is agreed upon.

Chavez last week attended a meeting in Asunción that gathered the leaders of the smaller Mercosur nations, Paraguay and Uruguay, and Bolivia, who is an associate member of the bloc.

Evo Morales blames Venezuela’s withdrawal from CAN on free trade agreements

LA PAZ
Bolivian President Evo Morales has blamed the free trade agreements (FTAs) signed by Colombia and Peru with the United States for Venezuela’s withdrawal from the Andean Community of Nations (CAN).

He agreed with the reasons put forward by Venezuela, indicating that the reason was very clear, and announced that the Bolivian government is seeking a meeting with Caracas to obtain more information about the latter’s withdrawal from the CAN.

Morales expressed his conviction that the FTAs with Washington are destroying the Andean Community bloc, and noted that by entering that FTA, Colombia has snatched an important market for Bolivia’s oil exports.

He noted that the question of the CAN presidency – which goes to Bolivia via rotation, after Venezuela’s withdrawal – is to be resolved after Venezuela’s exit becomes official.

Morales said it was regrettable that countries are unilaterally entering trade negotiations and destroying the integrationist bloc, and that his colleagues Presidents Alvaro Uribe of Colombia and Alejandro Toledo of Peru have signed those treaties.

In addition, the president of the National Oil Producers Association expressed regret over the fact that an effort of more than 40 years, involving countless investments, is collapsing due to hasty decisions and a lack of community vision, while at the same time admitting that it is not worth saving the CAN under the present conditions.

U.S. residents benefiting from fuel exchange with Chávez

Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez spoke this Sunday with visitors from the United States who have benefited from the program that provides fuel at solidarity prices sponsored by the CITGO oil company, an affiliate of PDVSA in that nation.

Representatives of a group of 65 individuals visiting Venezuela explained during the "Aló Presidente" radio-television program how that fuel was distributed in their communities.

They indicated that in many cases it was not only seen as economic aid but also inspired hope.

James Sapier, an indigenous representative, stated that his people live in the northernmost part of the country where temperatures are lower than 72 degrees Fahrenheit.

He added that this assistance will make it possible for them to endure the severe winters, given that the U.S. authorities disregard their living conditions.

The visitors were from eight regions receiving the benefits of this plan, and they organized this visit themselves to thank President Chávez for the idea of distributing heating fuel at economic prices.

Beginning November 2005, the agreement supplies subsidized fuel at a 40% discount, as well as 150 gallons to 20 homeless shelters, principally for heating.

The agreement is for more than 40 million gallons of oil, of which 14 million have been delivered to date, and which will benefit some 181,000 families.

After learning the truth about Venezuela, U.S. religious representatives say that they have taken it upon themselves to talk with people in their communities to counter the disinformation being spread in the United States.

Priest Patrick Perrin, of Jamaican origin, said that he emigrated to the United States: "I went in search of a government by the people and of the people and did not find it," only upon arriving here can I see what that means.

Chávez pointed out that it is an obligation for Venezuela to cooperate with those in need as he thanked them for, "permitting us to fulfill this obligation."

He announced that Haiti is to be incorporated into PETROCARIBE, through which fuel is distributed to Caribbean countries.

He explained that storage installations are being built in those nations, adding that they will pay 60% of the cost and the other 40% will be compensated in goods or services.

"This is what is called integration," he emphasized, "it is the only way that we can truly unite; those of us who have certain advantages must help the rest," he affirmed.

Likewise, the visitors met with Cuban doctors cooperating in the Barrio Adentro Mission, which the president described as a plan of solidarity and collaboration that guarantees free healthcare to the Venezuelan population.

Can you imagine $3-a-gallon gas price in the United States of Wonderland?

by Dr. Sohbet Karbuz
Apr 24
On April 6, 2006, a bipartisan group of the US Senate Judiciary Committee members led by Chairman Senator Arlen Specter (Republican-Pennsylvania) introduced a legislation, “Petroleum Industry Antitrust Act of 2006” (S.2557), and asked it to be enacted by the Senate and House.

It is basically the same bill proposed (S.2270) in the US Senate on April’s Fool Day in 2004. Already two hearings (February 1 and March 14) were held this year to examine the issue and review the draft legislation.

The proposed bill aims at strengthening oil and gas antitrust laws. For that it defines and prohibits energy price gouging by withholding hydrocarbons unilaterally in order to raise prices or create market shortages, places restrictions on future petroleum industry mergers, and fosters competition by requiring the US Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission to consider whether future consolidations need closer scrutiny.

But the bill also permits OPEC Members to be sued in US courts (which in fact would displace sovereignty protection of those countries) for conspiring to control output and for fixing crude oil prices.

Hitler would have called it USA Uber Alles! (above all things).

The Senate has already passed anti-competitive provisions in this bill that stem from the NOPEC (No Oil Producing and Exporting Cartels) Act approved by the Judiciary Committee several times, but have never been passed by the House of Representatives and signed into law.

In Senator Specter’s words the motive of the bill is “to protect the American consumer from enormous increases in gasoline prices and oil prices” He later on specifies that this enormous increase could be as much as $3 per gallon of gas. And supposedly that legislation is needed to ensure that Americans are paying a fair price at the pump.

Can you imagine $3 a gallon gas price in the United States of Wonderland?

In fact, there are two primary targets in the bill -- oil & gas companies and OPEC.

Oil & gas companies are target because they are blamed for reaping record profits while gasoline prices are skyrocketing ... and OPEC is the target because they think that it is an evil cartel. That's why Democrat Senator Patrick Leahy claimed that “OPEC has America over a barrel, and we should fight back.”

In a letter to President Clinton on April 11, 2000, signing senators (including Specter) said “we should explore every possible alternative to stop OPEC and other oil-producing states from entering into agreements to restrict oil production in order to drive up the price of oil.”

This is not all.

They also suggested to Clinton to make new law at the international level by giving “consideration to bringing a case against OPEC before the International Court of Justice at the Hague.”

Not finished.

In another letter to President Clinton on June 15, 2000, they say “OPEC ministers seem to now believe the United States and the world will accept, and economically sustain, oil prices at $30 per barrel and above. Mr. President, it is simply unacceptable for us to allow our economy, and the world's economy, to be placed in jeopardy by a foreign oil cartel. With razor thin oil inventories and soaring gas prices coupled with new reports of a looming shortage of natural gas, we may be at the beginning of a serious and prolonged energy crisis that could send a chill through every economic sector of our country. The time to act is now.”

* Since then almost 6 years have passed by ... oil prices reached $70 per barrel and yet the US economy and the world economy have been registering record growth rates.

Senators conveyed their same message to President Bush with a letter dated April 25, 2001.

US Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter has put reducing US reliance on foreign oil, particularly from OPEC as one of his top priorities. He argues that “to rely on unstable regions, such as the Middle East, for our energy needs is to court disaster.”

In fact what he has been doing with NOPEC bill is the disaster to court.

On his website he argues “I have urged President Bush and then-President Clinton to take legal action against OPEC and its oil-producing nations to prevent them from entering into agreements to restrict oil production in order to increase oil prices. I cosponsored … the NOPEC Act, which would state explicitly that the price fixing activities of OPEC nations, insofar as they affect American consumers, are actionable under U.S. antitrust laws.“

In addition to NOPEC

Act, Specter continues, “we have to use other means to get tough with OPEC, which I believe is an illegal cartel.”

* By the way, he also asserted seven claims about the assassination of JFK and is the inventor of the “magic bullet” theory, which was proved to be wrong. But he believed.

Open the other eye

To encourage competition and prevent oil and gas companies manipulate the market at the expense of consumers either by withholding their oil and gas or by having a monopoly power is a good endeavor. But the US Senators should first try to get things right at their home country. OPEC Members, at least Venezuela and Iran, are not colonies of the US.

“Nothing special will come out of it” asserts the most respected oil industry magazine Oil and Gas Journal’s Editorial in April 2006. The editorial adds that “the NOPEC bill will waste public money and distract officials from real energy problems.”

The bill should have sufficient resistance in the US anyway, since the US oil majors argue that restrictions on mergers would be a disadvantage for US companies in competing with state owned companies. That is also a behind the door reason why the US oil majors lobby governments and international organizations to push some OPEC countries, where the cheapest oil lie, to open their reserves to foreigners. If they cannot access then some time in the future they will have to face the same future as Standard Oil -- split.

The proposed bill is also another proof of American Chameleon Policies. No country’s courts besides the US’s can have right to sue an American soldier but the US courts have right to sue foreign countries. It shouldn’t be hence surprising if the US later on proclaims that oil is a public good and cannot be monopolized. But intellectual property right can still be monopolized!

It is a US political habit to look for scapegoats always outside the United States.

Effects of depreciation of the US dollar, rumors, gossips, announcements, interviews, Wall Street traders and funds are mostly overlooked. We are forced to believe that today prices are determined by supply and demand fundamentals in free markets. This is tried to be justified as prove, evidence and fact by dirty use of some numbers, even though the number say contrary.

Since 'intelligent' mainstream media could not explain why oil prices hit $75 dolar they had to be creative, for example on April 20 -- Car bomb in Nigerian military barracks drove the prices higher. This is how they deceive the world.

On June 1, OPEC will hold its 141st (Extraordinary) meeting in Caracas. This is an opportunity for President Chavez to send a few messages to the so-called developed countries ... he should tell the United States that if Americans want to continue their irresponsible patriotic oil consumption, they should pay the real price at gas pumps.

If they want to reduce the price of oil, they should close down the futures markets ... or restrict types of players in the market. They should tell their beloved mainstream media not to make the news but report the news.

* Concerning the NOPEC bill, they should think of something else that would make sense.

In fact, if the bill were serious it would have added fuels derived from nonconventional oil, from coal and gas, and ethanol. Oopps, but that would hurt especially US companies...

Americans should stop looking at the world with only one eye open.

Open the other eye!

Venezuela plans more oil discounts

by By Susan Milligan
CARACAS
2 from Mass. play role in deal for region
Leftist President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela said yesterday he would greatly expand the discounted home heating oil program he started last year for needy people in Massachusetts and other northeastern states.

Chavez, a firebrand populist who has clashed repeatedly with President Bush, said in an interview with the Globe that he would extend the program for next year and increase the amount of cheaper oil available. Former US representative Joseph P. Kennedy II, who was among a group that negotiated the deal with Chavez, said customers would have more direct access to the heating oil and would be subject to looser eligibility rules.

Chavez made the pledge in an interview after meeting with a group including Representative William D. Delahunt, Democrat of Quincy, and Kennedy, who is now chairman of Citizens Energy, a nonprofit Massachusetts group. The two had played a key role in negotiating the initial deal with Chavez last year that sent 12 million gallons of reduced-cost heating oil to Bay Staters this winter, which assisted about 45,000 needy families. Several other states negotiated similar deals.

That program set off sharp criticism from some Republicans who said Delahunt was playing into the hands of Chavez and undermining US foreign policy by dealing with an anti-American populist with a questionable human rights record. The initiative to renew the discount oil program for the coming winter is certain to intensify the political battles in the United States over how to respond to the high price of gasoline and home energy costs -- including whether the US government is itself doing enough to help the poor confront soaring fuel costs.

While Chavez did not say how much more oil would be made available this year, he said in an interview after meeting the delegation that he will move to a ''second stage, an expansion and deepening of the project." The oil will again be provided by CITGO, the US distribution arm of the Venezuelan state oil company, Petroleos de Venezuela.

While the controversial Venezuelan leader has irked the administration and other critics with his anti-Bush rhetoric, he said yesterday that he had no problems with the American people. ''The only things we feel about the American people are affection, caring, and the willingness to improve relations," Chavez said in the interview in his Miraflores presidential palace.

This past winter, Venezuela made 9 million gallons of heating fuel available to Massachusetts families, and another 3 million to institutions that serve the poor. Families got a 200-gallon shipment -- enough to last about three weeks -- for about $276, which means a savings of about $184. The discounted fuel was available through the Citizens Energy nonprofit organization to families eligible for federal fuel oil assistance, which offers an annual subsidy of $550.

he expansion of the Venezuelan cut-rate oil offering is part of an effort to begin to repair US-Venezuelan relations after years of confrontation, Chavez said after his meeting with Delahunt, Kennedy and US Representative Gregory W. Meeks, a Democrat from Queens, N.Y.

Kennedy and the two congressmen hailed the agreement as critical relief to low-income families facing growing energy costs. The three dismissed suggestions that they were giving Chavez yet another opportunity to tweak the US president, whom Chavez has called ''Mr. Dangerous" and a ''murderer."

Longtime Massachusetts Republican consultant Charles Manning, refering to Chavez as ''the most . . . anti-American government leader in South America," called the relationship between the Venezuelan president and the proponents of the heating oil program unsavory and hypocritical.

''If Hugo Chavez wants to play politics in our country by giving us low-cost oil while he's short-changing the people of Venezuela, that's fine with me," Manning said last night. ''But it shows you what type of bad guy he is, and I don't understand why Delahunt and Kennedy would want to do business with someone like that."

Under the ''second stage" of the program, the oil will be delivered more directly to consumers and the eligibility terms will be broadened, Kennedy said. Details and amounts of the fuel to be involved in the second phase were not disclosed.

Kennedy said he had written to every major company in the US oil business -- an industry now enjoying record profits -- and asked for discounted oil for the poor, but was turned down by all of them. Only Venezuela agreed to provide cut-rate home heating oil, he said.

Delahunt also shrugged off criticism of the program, and accused Republicans of failing to give enough funding to the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), which provides cash assistance to needy families for heating and cooling homes.

''We want to get more [discounted Venezuelan oil], particularly when we're looking at $3 a gallon at the pump and $70 a barrel" for oil, Delahunt said. ''We want to extend the deal because we don't have confidence in the administration and the Republican Congress to deliver adequate dollars for the LIHEAP program." Congress has repeatedly failed to come through with the full amount of money it has promised for LIHEAP.

The move served to boost the goals of all the parties in the negotiations: Delahunt and Meeks got lower-cost heating oil for their districts; Kennedy got a promise of cheaper oil for his customers, and Chavez got another opportunity to needle Bush.

In the interview, Chavez said he was willing to rebuild relations with the current administration, which he believes participated in the April 2002 coup attempt that briefly ousted Chavez from power. The Bush administration appeared to embrace the coup when it happened, but denied it had any role in the uprising. Chavez was restored to power that month by the military.

But the Venezuelan leader hinted that he could not fully re-establish warm relations with Washington until after Bush was gone, calling the administration ''transitional."

''I think our relations with the US administration couldn't be worse. That's positive," Chavez said with a chuckle, and said things could only get better. ''Did you ever have a problem with your husband or your friend, where you throw dishes" at each other? Chavez asked. After some talking, ''it gets better," he said.

Despite Chavez's bad relationship with the Bush administration, Americans who can't afford to heat their homes don't care about the politics of the situation, said Meeks.

''I just had a town hall meeting, and when I said I was coming here [to ask for reduced-cost oil], they all applauded," said Meeks, adding that several other members of Congress have approached him about getting a similar deal for their districts.

American consumers who were flown to Caracas by CITGO to thank the Venezuelan government agreed.

''We're talking about basic needs. It's not like Mafia money or drug money," said Linda Kelly, a 45-year-old Quincy homemaker. She was among 61 heating oil consumers who were taken to Venezuela by CITGO, a journey that was separate from the congressmen's trip. ''Maybe you don't like his [Chavez's] politics, but who are we to say?" she added.

Peggy Longueil of Brattleboro, Vt., said the discounted oil is critical to covering her household budget. ''It gives us a chance to not have to worry about whether we're going to pay for food or oil, or medicine or oil," said the 64-year-old, who was at a dinner Sunday night for the heating oil beneficiaries.

Chavez came to power in 1998 in a democratic election, but human rights groups have accused him of thwarting press freedom and loading the judicial branch with judges sympathetic to him.

The Venezuelan leader has used his nation's surging oil revenues to help the Venezuelan poor, a move that has contributed to his popularity at home. But critics warn that Chavez is playing a risky financial and political game by relying on high oil prices that may one day fall, potentially leaving him with a discontented populace and a national budget problem.

Ralph Ranalli of the Globe staff contributed to this report in Boston.

Haiti President pays 24-hour visit to Venezuela

Haitian President elect Rene Preval Monday is paying a 24-hour visit to Venezuela and is meeting with President Hugo Chávez, Preval's Office informed.

"This is a friendly visit. President Preval is to seize the opportunity to set the grounds for future discussions with President Chávez," the source told AFP.

During the visit, both Preval and Chávez are to address Petrocaribe, an oil initiative Venezuela is implementing to sell cheap oil to Central America and Caribbean countries, and which Haiti has recently joined, the source added.

April 24, 2006

Colombia suggests FTA with Venezuela

Colombian authorities on the border with Venezuela have proposed Colombian President Álvaro Uribe and his Venezuelan counterpart Hugo Chávez to negotiate a bilateral Free Trade Agreement in exchange for the Andean Community of Nations (CAN).

Luis Morrelli, the Governor of Colombian Department Norte de Santander, one of the regions liable to be most affected when Venezuela's withdrawal from CAN comes into force, suggested a bilateral treaty to overcome the crisis affecting the Andean integration.

"As a matter of fact, we could discuss with Venezuela about the Colombian goods that should have a preferential tariff treatment, and Colombia could act accordingly with Venezuela. Thus, a direct deal could be made," the official told reporters.

The Chamber of Trade of bordering Cúcuta called Monday an emergency meeting to explore the effects of Venezuela's withdrawal from CAN, DPA reported.

Venezuela reiterated Sunday the decision of leaving CAN due to a trade agreement entered into by Colombia and the United States.

Colombian-Venezuelan trade accounts for USD 3.2 billion a year and provides about one million jobs on both sides of the borderline.

Chavez May Consider Venezuela's Return to Andean Pact

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said he would consider returning to the Andean Community of Nations trade bloc provided Colombia and Peru reconsider trade agreements with the U.S.

Chavez said yesterday Venezuela's withdrawal from the Andean Community was irrevocable and that he plans to raise trade barriers against Colombia and Peru.

``I would be willing to reconsider Venezuela's measure if Colombia and Peru reconsider the free trade agreement,'' Chavez said in a televised news conference in Caracas.

Chavez, 51, said that free-trade agreements between the U.S. and Andean countries would endanger the viability of the organization, which was founded in 1969 and also includes Ecuador and Bolivia.

Bolivia's President Evo Morales today asked Peru and Colombia to scrap free trade agreements with the U.S. in a bid to ``save'' the Andean Community, whose members had trade of almost $9 billion last year.

``It's important not to abandon the people who fight against the U.S. free trade agreement,'' Morales said in the statement posted to the presidential Web site. ``We must save the Andean Community. To pull out would mean abandoning our people.''

Peru signed an agreement with the U.S. April 12, while Colombia wrapped up negotiations in February. The agreements need congressional approval in all three countries.

``We're out of the Andean Community,'' Chavez said. ``The trade agreements among us will continue for five years but we may seek to end those agreements sooner.''

Colombia and Venezuela are the two largest members of the Andean free-trade group. Colombian-Venezuelan trade was about $2.5 billion in 2004.

Venezuelan joined the Mercosur trade block, which includes Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay, in January as a special member, meaning it can't vote on group decisions.

Venezuela to Sign Oil Deal with Nicaragua

President Hugo Chavez announced in his weekly radio and TV live address "Alo Presidente" an agreement with Nicaragua to ease the massive power cuts starting next week due to fuel shortage.

Chavez will sign the agreement Tuesday in Caracas with the Mayor of Managua Dionisio Marenco, and issued invitation to ex President Daniel Ortega (1985-1990) among other Sandinista officials.

Venezuela"s state-run PDVSA company will supply fuel to the Asociacion de Municipios de Nicaragua (Amunic), made up of Nicaraguan mayors from the Sandinista National Liberation Front.

Nicaragua gets a 90-day credit facility to pay 60 percent the cost of oil purchased to Venezuela and 25-year deadline to pay for the other 40 percent.

Guatemala´s President Oscar Berger said he is arranging a meeting with Chavez for similar ends adding that all of Central America hopes to turn to Venezuela to escape the world market rocketing fuel prices.

Evo: Sovereign Sea Access!

La Paz
Bolivian President Evo Morales told reporters Monday that only an independent access to the sea will solve Bolivia´s long-standing bilateral dispute with Chile, as this is “the resounding clamor of the people.”

The Bolivian president referred to recent remarks by Chilean Foreign Minister Ignacio Walker, who stated his government could consider granting a sovereign maritime outlet to the Pacific, and Morales said this illustrates concurrence and now they just need to define the solution.

He recalled that prior talks about sea access failed because of the issue of sovereignty. “One cannot give up on that,” he contended.

Morales said a government commission is working on a proposal to resolve the bilateral difference through “the peoples”, but preferred not to elaborate on this to avoid a political or opportunistic manipulation of the matter.

He also did not elaborate on last week´s visit to La Paz by Organization of American States Secretary General Miguel Angel Insulza, and said he wished to keep wished to keep “a low profile” on this topic.

“If we are progressing on the sea access issue, we owe it to the commitment of people in Chile, its workers and many sectors,” he maintained.

Venezuela Launches Primary Health Program for Extreme Poor

Apr 22
by Michael Fox
Caracas, Venezuela
The Venezuelan government, yesterday, began a diagnostic primary health project for the homeless, drug addicts, and at-risk individuals as part of the “Negra Hipolita Mission,” the social program that is aimed at taking care of Venezuelans in situations of critical poverty.

According to the project, developed by the Ministry of Popular Participation and Social Development (MINPADES), the consultations, exams, and health treatment which began yesterday in Caracas and Miranda State will cost a little over $150,000 to treat the approximate 1400 people who have been “rescued” and have been receiving attention in the Negra Hipolita Mission since its formation 3 months ago.

According to MINPADES, “The people in rehabilitation will be attended to by diverse health specialists and will receive a General Medical Examination, Lab Exams, Immunological Study, Medical Prescriptions, Gynecology, Cytology, Obstetrics, Birth Control, Vaccination… Psychology.”

The Secretary of Health of the Metropolitan Mayor’s office, Asia Villegas, added that the participants will be given reproductive and sexual health advice. Those testing positive for Tuberculosis, HIV, and AIDS will receive the corresponding medicines and treatments free of charge.

Negra Hipolita Mission

The Negra Hipolita Mission was formed on January 23 of this year in order to reincorporate the traditionally most excluded Venezuelans, by treating the high incidence of homelessness, drug-addiction, and extreme poverty in Venezuelan society. Tomorrow marks the 100th day of the Mission, which is named after the wet nurse of Venezuela’s independence hero Simon Bolivar.

“This is the first time in the history of Venezuela that the government is taking responsibility for the social-psychiatric problems of the country…” said Father José María Rivolta, who is collaborating with the Negra Hipolita Mission, “I have spent 35 years [working] with drug addicts, of which I lived 4 years partially in the centers. I know what a drug addict is from the beginning to the end and I can say that this is the first time in Venezuela.”

The Negra Hipolita Mission is focused on four major areas: Prevention, Initial Attention, Rehabilitation Centers, and Garbage Dumps.

Prevention: Over 3,800 Social Protection Committees have been formed over the last few months in neighborhoods around the country. According to MINPADES Minister Jorge Luis Garcia Carneiro, these Committees will work with the recently formed 10,700 state-sponsored Community Councils “to promote talks, family education, principals, values…. and find the way so that thousands of members of the community have the right to demand what they deserve.”

Initial Attention: Over the last three months, MINPADES has begun to send five mobile support buses across Caracas to bring food, clothing, and medicine to those on the streets. According to MINPADES Vice-Minister Lidice Navas, over the first three days of the program, they were able to attend to 1271 people. “The idea is to develop a process with those in need,” she continued. ”Maintain a connection with them, through the Street Educators, in order to gain their confidence and to convince them of the possibility that their rehabilitation can really begin in these rehabilitation centers.”

207 Street Educators, most of whom were once on the streets themselves, are working with the Negra Hipolita Mission to bring support to those most in need.

Rehabilitation Centers: Through MINPADES, the Venezuelan government has opened or is supporting several rehabilitation centers across the country. Most, for now, are in or around Caracas.

Garbage Dumps: In Venezuela, thousands of families live off the 28 garbage dumps across the nation. “There are families that live there, that eat from there, from what they find in the dump, and they are beginning to be attended to, in an integral way, through the different State institutions,” said Vice-Minister Navas.

Minister Garcia Carneiro affirmed that they want to be able to be able to carry out the same project that was realized at “El Rodeo” garbage dump in Miranda state. Of the 99 families living in and off of “El Rodeo,” 71 were given decent housing, and the school-aged children were brought to school. Some of them are receiving grants to study.

According to Minister Garcia Carneiro, even with these important first steps, there are still approximately 4,000 at-risk “nomads” living on the streets of Caracas alone. But nevertheless, Garcia Carneiro proclaimed yesterday, “In 2007, we shouldn’t even have one compatriot in the street, but rather with us, studying, working, and with a family.”

The goal is not an easy one. Minister Garcia Carneiro himself related yesterday that a good friend with years of experience with at-risk populations had told him, “The drop out rate is high. Don’t lose faith, because you will recuperate 120, and 30 will remain…. Don’t lose faith; that happens and it will continue to happen.” Of the 165 participants who began the program at the Bejarano Rehabilitation Center just under three months ago, 108 remain.

Bejarano Rehabilitation Center

Ramon Antonio Aguilar, 39, is a tall Venezuelan of African descent and a recovering drug-addict of six years, during which time he left his home and his family. He has been off drugs for almost three months including 10 days of initial Negra Hipolita attention on the streets of Caracas before arriving to Bejarano. He has been here 2 ½ months. He arrived just after the center opened, immediately following the inauguration of Mission Negra Hipolita in January.

“This is my first time in a Center—well this isn’t a Center this is a program,” Aguilar declared, “because I saw various companions come and go to centers and many of them ended up even worse. My family once wanted to bring me to a Center, but I said no thanks...”

Aguilar’s case is typical of those at Bejarano, but this is not your typical rehabilitation center. The main dining hall is set beside a stream fed from a nearby waterfall, which runs through a lush forest in the area of Coche, on the outskirts of Caracas. Participants live further up the hill. The group receives classes, workshops and have plans to begin to grow vegetables and raise animals. According Vice-Minister Navas, the eventual goal is to have various centers across the Nation at different levels of the rehabilitation process.

Interestingly, religion plays an integral role at nearly all of the rehabilitation centers now formed or supported by the government. Biblical readings and religious classes are part of the daily activities. “I am clear that this [addiction] is a spiritual problem…” Aguilar standing beside the river in Bejarano explains, “If you don’t find god, you’re lost. It could be the best center of the world, but you are never going to leave cured.”

The 11 year old Evangelical Center “Oasis” has just begun to receive support from the government for its successful work in rehabilitating drug addicts, and through Negra Hipolita, they recently received over a hundred new participants from the streets of Caracas.

“It is important to highlight the following,” said Vice-Minister Navas, staring back at the Bejarano rehabilitation center tucked in to its lush valley, “this effort, which we are developing, has this important impact, because it is a well planned project, between diverse state institutions which are constitutionally obliged to contribute with all of their might, with their resources, and specialized personnel in this Negra Hipolita Mission.”

A National event for the Negra Hipolita Mission is now being planned for the end of May. Negra Hipolita is one of 14 social programs or “missions,” as they are called in Venezuela, constituted by the Venezuelan government since 2003. The Venezuelan government recently declared that it has destined $4.5 billion for the missions this year. According to the Caracas daily El Universal, this represents an increase in the mission’s budget of 70%. Expenses on personnel represent a 36% increase. According to El Universal, accompanying the increase in the cost of the Missions is also an increase in the financial resources for the programs. The budget for the missions will no longer come solely from the state-owned oil company PDVSA, but also from resources through “additional credits by way of the National Development Fund (FONDEN).”

The Story That Cries Out to be Told to the American

Apr 21
by José Pertierra
The Montreal Convention's Article 7 gives the US no discretion. It must either extradite or prosecute Posada Carriles for 73 counts of first degree murder in relation to the downing of the airliner. Deporting him to a third country is not an option and neither is releasing him to the community. The story of CU-455 cries out to be told to the American people. If the American people hear the true story of how those 73 people were murdered in cold blood by terrorists whom the United States prefers to shelter rather than prosecute, they'll not stand for it.

Three days ago in Miami, Luis Posada Carriles' accomplice in the downing of the Cuban passenger plane that was blown out of the sky with 73 innocent people on board on October 6, 1976 was interviewed by Juan Manuel Cao of Channel 41 in Miami. His name is Orlando Bosch.

I read you verbatim excerpts from the television interview

Juan Manuel Cao: Did you down that plane in 1976?

Orlando Bosch: If I tell you that I was involved, I will be inculpating myself . . . . and if I tell you that did not participate in that action, you would say that I am lying. I am therefore not going to answer one thing or the other.

Juan Manuel Cao: In that action 76 persons were killed (the correct figure is 73, including a pregnant passenger)?

Orlando Bosch: No chico, in a war such as us Cubans who love liberty wage against the tyrant, you have to down planes, you have to sink ships, you have to be prepared to attack anything that is within your reach.

Juan Manuel Cao: But don't you feel a little bit for those who were killed there, for their families?

Orlando Bosch: . . . Who was on board that plane? Four members of the Communist Party, five north Koreans, five Guyanese, (JP: there were really 11 Guyanese passengers) . . . concho chico, four member of the Communist Party chico!!! Who was there? Our enemies . . .

Juan Manuel Cao: And the fencers? The young people on board?

Orlando Bosch: I was in Caracas. I saw the young girls on television. There were six of them. After the end of the competition, the leader of the six dedicated their triumph to the tyrant etc etc. She gave a speech filled with praise for the tyrant. We had already agreed in Santo Domingo, that every one who comes from Cuba to glorify the tyrant had to run the same risks as those men and women that fight alongside the tyranny.

Juan Manuel Cao: If you ran into the family members who were killed in that plane, wouldn't you think it difficult . . . ?

Orlando Bosch: No, because in the end those who were there had to know that they were cooperating with the tyranny in Cuba.

Bosch's answers to those five questions give us a glimpse into the mind of the kind of terrorist that the United States government harbors and protects in Miami: terrorists that for the last forty-seven years have waged a bloody and ruthless war against the Cuban people.

What happened to Cubana de Aviación 455 almost thirty years ago is no secret. We need simply examine the CIA's own declassified cables. At the time, this was the worst act of aviation terrorism in history, and the first time that a civilian airliner was blown up by terrorists.

More than three months before CU-455 was blown out of the sky over Barbados on that sunny Wednesday afternoon of October 6, 1976, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) informed Washington that a Cuban exile extremist group planned to place a bomb on a Cubana de Aviación flight.

The State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research reported to Secretary of State Henry Kissinger that a CIA source had overheard Luis Posada Carriles say less than a month prior to the bombing that "we are going hit a Cuban airliner."

Neither Washington nor the CIA alerted Cuban authorities to the terrorist threat against their planes.

The bombing was carried out by Luis Posada Carriles, Orlando Bosch, Hernán Ricardo and Freddy Lugo. Final preparations for the terrorist act began with the arrival of Orlando Bosch in Caracas on September 8, 1976. Bosch is a Cuban-born terrorist who was the acknowledged leader of an organization called Coordinación de Organizaciones Revolucionarias Unidas (CORU).

According to the FBI, CORU was an umbrella group of Cuban exile organizations that was formed to "plan, finance and carry out terrorist operations and attacks against Cuba." (FBI cable dated June 29, 1976).

When Bosch arrived in Caracas on the 8th of September of that year, Posada Carriles was there to greet and make available to him his right hand man: trusted confidante Hernán Ricardo, who has admitted under oath to be a CIA operative. In 1976, Ricardo was also an employee of Luis Posada Carriles at a private intelligence firm that the latter founded and ran in Caracas: Investigaciones Comerciales e Industriales (ICI). Ricardo says that Posada Carriles introduced him to Orlando Bosch at the ICI offices in Caracas.

To help him with the special operation that Bosch and Posada planned for him, Ricardo in turn recruited Freddy Lugo. A Venezuelan citizen, Lugo has also admitted under oath to be a CIA operative.

We know that the foursome of Posada, Bosch, Ricardo and Lugo met together at least four times to plan the downing of the plan.

At the meetings, the terrorists agreed upon the coded words they would use to describe the success of the operation. The plane would be known as the "bus", and the passengers would be called the "dogs." "The rest is up to you," Posada told Lugo and Ricardo.

The C-4 explosives were carried on board the aircraft by Ricardo and Lugo in a tube of toothpaste and in a camera.

Freddy Lugo and Hernán Ricardo boarded the CU-455 flight in Trinidad at 12:15 PM bound for Barbados. Ricardo traveled under a forged passport using a false name. They sat in the middle of the plane. During the flight, they placed the C-4 explosives in two separate places in the plane: the rear bathroom and underneath the seat belonging to Freddy Lugo. Lugo and Ricardo got off the plane during its brief stopover at Seawell Airport in Barbados. They later admitted under oath that they had each received special training in explosives from the CIA.

Aboard CU-455 were 73 persons. 57 of the passengers were Cubans. 11 of them were Guyanese medical students in Cuba. The remaining five passengers were Koreans. Those on board averaged only 30 years of age.

Traveling with the group were 24 members of the Cuban fencing team, many of them teen-agers, fresh from gold medal victories at the Youth Fencing Championship in Caracas. They proudly wore their gold medals on board the aircraft. One of the young fencers, Nancy Uranga, was only twenty-three years old and pregnant. She wasn't supposed to be on board. That spot on the fencing team belonged to a pretty little twelve-year old fencer, unusually tall for her age, named María González. María had planned to participate in the Caribbean Games, and was on the tarmac at Havana's José Martí Airport ready to board the plane that would take the team to the Games, when one of her coaches gave her the bad news that international amateur rules prevented twelve year olds from competing. María reportedly was devastated, and she went to her home in Havana's neighborhood called La Víbora, and cried for three days, refusing to watch the games on Cuban television because it hurt her so much not to be there. Nancy Uranga was summoned to the Airport and took María's place on the ill fated trip to the Caribbean Games.

The fencing team was a roaring success at the Games. They won gold, silver and bronze medals. They were to return home on October 6, 1976. The athletes proudly wore their medals dangling over their clothes, as they boarded the aircraft. Cubana de Aviación 455 stopped first in Trinidad at 11:03 AM, and then touched down again in Barbados at 12:25 PM.

Nine minutes after take-off from Barbados, the bombs exploded and the plane caught fire. The passengers on board then lived the most horrifying ten minutes of their lives, as the plane turned into a scorching coffin.

The cockpit voice-recorder captured the last terrifying moments of the flight at 1:24 PM: "Seawell! Seawell! CU-455 Seawell. . . ! We have an explosion on board. . . . . We have a fire on board." The pilot, Wilfredo Pérez (affectionately known as "Felo"), asked Seawell Airport for permission to return and land, but the plane and its passengers were already doomed. As the plane approached the shore, it was rapidly losing altitude and control. "Hit the water, Felo, Hit the Water," said the co-pilot. Rather than crashing into the white sands of the beach called Paradise and killing the beachgoers, Felo courageously banked the plane toward the water where it crashed in a ball of fire one mile north of Deep Water Bay.

Pieces of bodies were slowly recovered from the sea. Most of them too grotesquely disfigured to be identified by their family members. There were no survivors.

After deplaning, Lugo and Ricardo hurriedly left Seawell Airport in Barbados and checked into a local hotel under assumed names.

From the hotel, Hernán Ricardo called his bosses in Venezuela: Orlando Bosch and Luis Posada Carriles. Unable to find Posada at his desk, he left a message with Posada's secretary. He then called Caracas again and asked a mutual friend, Marinés Vega, to deliver the following message to Posada: "We are in a desperate situation, the bus was fully loaded with dogs . . . they should send someone I can recognize . . . I will be waiting in a soda fountain near the embassy just in case something happens and I need to ask for asylum there."

Ricardo was able to communicate with Bosch who allegedly said to him: "my friend we have a problem here in Caracas. An aircraft is never blown up in midair . . .", implying that the plan had been for the bomb to explode while the plane was on the ground before take-off.

Sensing how hot things were getting for them in Barbados, Lugo and Ricardo boarded a return flight to Trinidad on British West Indies Airlines that very evening. On the flight, Ricardo said to his buddy: "Damn it, Lugo, I'm desperate and feel like crying. I had never killed anyone before."

In Port of Spain, the terrorists checked into the Holiday Inn with false identities and made more desperate calls to Caracas, trying to reach Posada Carriles.

Their nervous demeanor at the airport and at the hotel, as well as their conversations in the taxis they took in Barbados and later in Trinidad, led the police to zero in on them as the primary suspects in the bombing. They were arrested and interrogated by detectives from the Trinidad police department.

Both confessed to Commissioner Dannis Ramdwar who took their written depositions. Lugo and Ricardo each admitted to being CIA operatives. Ricardo described in detail how he could detonate C-4 explosives and pointed to a pencil on Ramdwar's desk that was similar to the timer he used to detonate the explosive on board the plane. Ricardo also told the police in Trinidad that he worked for Luis Posada Carriles. He told Ramdwar that the head of CORU was Orlando Bosch and drew for the police an organizational chart of CORU and said that the terrorist organization was also known as Condor.

Upon hearing of the confessions of Lugo and Ricardo, the police in Caracas moved in and arrested Posada and Bosch. They also obtained a warrant and searched the offices of Posada Carriles where they confiscated weapons and sophisticated electronic monitoring equipment. The police also found a schedule of Cubana flights in Posada's Caracas office.

In one of the very first reports on the October 6, 1976, downing of Cubana Flight 455, the FBI Venezuelan bureau cables that a confidential source has identified Luis Posada and Orlando Bosch as responsible for the bombing. "The source all but admitted that Posada and Bosch had engineered the bombing of the airline," according to the report.

During the television interview three days ago in Miami, Bosch talked about an agreement reached between terrorists in Santo Domingo in June of 1976.

The FBI itself tells us about that secret agreement. According to an FBI report, Orlando Bosch, Luis Posada Carriles and other terrorists formed an umbrella terrorist organization called CORU at a meeting in the Dominican Republic. The FBI report details how at that meeting in the Dominican Republic, CORU planned a series of bombing attacks against Cuban entities, as well as the murder of Communists in the Western Hemisphere. On page 6, the report relates in great detail how Orlando Bosch was met in Caracas on September 8, 1976, by Luis Posada and other anti-Castro exiles and a deal was struck as to what kind of activities he could organize on Venezuelan soil.

After the arrests of Lugo, Ricardo, Bosch and Posada, Trinidad, Barbados, Guyana and Cuba ceded jurisdiction over the downing of the passenger plane to Venezuela, and all four were prosecuted in Caracas for murder.

Prosecuting terrorists has a price. The Judge who issued the initial arrest warrants for the four terrorists, Delia Estava Moreno, received several death threats and attempts at blackmail as reprisals for her conduct. As a result, she was forced to recuse herself. The presiding judge of the military court, Retired General Elio Garcia Barrios, also received death threats and in 1983, his son and chauffeur were murdered during a Mafia-style hit intended to even the score and intimidate those who dared legally prosecute the murderers.

Eventually, Lugo and Ricardo were convicted, but before the Court could reach a verdict regarding his case, Luis Posada Carriles escaped from the prison at San Juan de los Moros in the State of Guárico where he had been confined after two unsuccessful escape attempts.

Posada escaped with the help of at least $50,000 from a right wing extremist group in Miami.

Fifteen days after his escape from jail, Posada was smuggled out of Venezuela bound for Aruba on a shrimp boat. He spent a week in Aruba and was then flown by private plane to Costa Rica and then San Salvador. He immediately started working alongside Felix Rodriguez, a high ranking CIA member, at the Ilopango Airbase. Posada's job in San Salvador was to supply the Nicaraguan Contras with arms and supplies obtained through the sale of narcotics. This Operation became a scandal known as Iran-Contra. Felix Rodriguez was the CIA's point man in Central America for the Iran-Contra scandal, hired for the job by an old friend from the CIA Donald Gregg who was Vice-President Bush's National Security Advisor. According to Anna Louise Bardach who interviewed Posada while she was a reporter for the New York Times, "Posada noted with a certain pride that George Bush had headed the CIA from November 1975 to January 1977" -- a period that covered some of the most violent crimes committed by Cuban exiles and Operation Condor: including the Letelier assassination and the downing of the passenger plane.

Posada spent the next several years in Central America working for the security services of El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras. But in the early 90s he turned his attention once again to Cuba which was struggle to jump start a tourist industry in order to offset a dramatic economic downturn after the demise of the Soviet Bloc. From his lair in Central America he recruited Salvadoran and Guatemalan mercenaries to smuggle explosives to Cuba, and in 1997 bombs began to blow in the finest hotels and restaurants of Havana -- killing an Italian tourist named Fabio DiCelmo and wounding several others.

Cuba learned that the campaign of terror against its tourist industry was being financed by Miami exile organizations and orchestrated by Luis Posada Carriles in Central America. Faced with the FBI's refusal to reign in the terrorists in Miami, Cuba sent some very brave men to penetrate these terrorist organizations and gather information with the purpose of asking President Clinton to intervene and order the Feds to arrest the terrorists.

After gathering enough evidence to determine the source of the terror campaign, on May 1, 1998 Fidel Castro sent a personal emissary to Washington with a handwritten message to President Clinton: the emissary was none other than Nobel Prize for Literature Gabriel García Márquez. President Clinton was out of town for several days in California, and after waiting him out at the Hotel Washington for several days, García Márquez finally met with White House Chief of Staff Mac McLarty and gave him the letter. García Márquez recounts McLarty's reaction to the letter and quotes McLarty as saying to him: "We have enemies in common: terrorists".

In the wake of the Garcia Marquez visit, the U.S. sent an FBI team to Cuba a month later to discuss collaboration with Cuba on a "War On Terror". Cuba handed over to the FBI tapes of 14 telephone conversations of Luis Posada Carriles with details on the series of bombs that had exploded in Cuba in the 90s. Cuba also gave the FBI Luis Posada Carriles' addresses in El Salvador, Honduras, Costa Rica, Guatemala and Panama. Also tapes of conversations with Central American detainees in Cuba who admitted Posada is their boss. All together, Cuba turned over 60 sets of documents with information about 40 terrorists based in Miami, including their addresses, and evidence of their ties to terror.

Cuba then waited . . . and waited . . . and waited. Cuba waited to the FBI to start arresting terrorists. But instead the FBI arrested on September 12, 1998, the men now known as the Cuban Five: the men who had come to Miami to penetrate the Miami exile terrorist organizations.

According to El Nuevo Herald, the first persons that were notified of the arrests of the Cuban Five were Cong. Lincoln Diaz Balart and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen of Miami.

The Five were charged with 62 counts of violating federal laws. Their arrests illustrates Washington's double standard when it comes to its so-called war on terror: a war that the U.S. government chooses to fight a la carte, distinguishing between terrorists it likes and those it doesn't.

The Five were placed in solitary confinement for the next 17 months, until the start of their trial. They were convicted of several charges and received the maximum sentences possible. Gerardo Hernandez received a double life sentence and Antonio Guerrero and Ramon Labañino on life sentence each. Fernando Gonzalez and René Gonzalez, got 19 and 15 years respectively.

They were sent to maximum security prisons across this country, and two of them have been denied visits from their wives for the past seven years in violation of U.S. laws and international law.

On August 9, 2005, a 3 judge panel of the Court of Appeals published a 93 page decision that reversed the convictions and sentences, ruling that the Five did not receive a fair trial in Miami and acknowledging evidence produced by the defense at trial that revealed terrorist actions by Miami exile groups against Cuba. The Court of Appeals even cited in a footnote the role of Luis Posada Carriles and correctly referred to him as a terrorist. The tree-judge panel found that "a perfect storm" of prejudice prevented the Cuban Five from having a fair trial in Miami.

The Bush Administration, through its Solicitor General, made a formal appeal to all 12 judges of the Eleventh Circuit in Atlanta, and out of apparent deference to the unusual request from the Department of Justice the Court of Appeals nullified the three-judge panel decision and agreed to hear the case en banc.

Attorney Leonard Weinglass who represents Antonio Guerrero said recently: "The Five were not prosecuted because they violated American law, but because their work exposed those who were. By infiltrating the terror network that is allowed to exist in Florida they demonstrated the hypocrisy of America's claimed opposition to terrorism."

As the Five were being prosecuted in Miami, the campaign of terror against Cuba continued. In November 2000, Posada Carriles was arrested in Panama along with three accomplices before they could carry out the plan to blow up an auditorium filled with students at the University of Panamá where Cuban President Fidel Castro was to speak. The four were convicted by a Panamanian Court, but on August 26, 2004, in one of her last acts as President, Mireya Moscoso pardons them in violation of Panamanian law. The three accomplices, all Cuban-Americans, go to Miami to be welcomed home. Posada Carriles who is neither a U.S. citizen nor a lawful permanent resident, goes underground in Honduras and begins to scheme a plan to go to the home of terrorism: Miami.

In March of 2005 he shows up in Miami and applies for asylum. For weeks he lives openly in that city, even going shopping at the mall. Before he is detained by anyone, Venezuela requests his preventive detention for the purpose of extraditing him to Venezuela to stand trial for 73 counts of first degree murder relating to the downing of the passenger plane in 1976.

Rather than exercising an extradition detainer on him, the Department of Homeland Security instead did nothing. It wasn't until Posada called a bizarre press conference in Miami on May 16, 2005 where he openly boasted that the DHS wasn't even looking for him, that government officials felt they had no choice but to detain him. He was detained immediately after the press conference and gingerly escorted in a golf cart with no handcuffs to a waiting helicopter.

Posada was charged with illegal entry into the United States and thus began the legal charade designed to divert attention from the extradition request that remains unattended by the Department of Justice.

As relief from deportation, Posada first claimed he was still a permanent resident of the U.S. In the alternative, he asked for asylum and protection from removal under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Although it is true that he had been a permanent resident in the 60s, Posada long ago abandoned that status. After all, he has spent the last almost forty years living and killing abroad. Because of his long curriculum of terror, as a matter of law he does not qualify for asylum. That left him only with the possibility CAT relief.

It was then that we witnessed one of the sorriest episodes of legal maneuvering ever by Department of Homeland Security attorneys. Those handling the immigration matter of Posada Carriles at the Immigration Court in El Paso, Texas set the table for Posada to win CAT relief.

Posada called only one witness in his immigration case. A so-called expert on Venezuela who testified that in his expert opinion, Posada would be tortured if returned to Caracas. The witness testified that Venezuela tortures prisoners and that Posada would be surely tortured if sent back. That witness was none other than Joaquín Chaffardet, friend, business partner and lawyer of Luis Posada Carriles in Venezuela. Chaffardet had also been Posada's boss at the DISIP in the early 1970s, a man that Posada has been close to for the past forty years. The DHS never even cross-examined this guy! Its attorney never even raised the possibility that Chaffardet was not an objective, disinterested witness -- but instead was biased in favor of his friend, partner and client. Other than Chaffardet's questionable testimony, no other evidence in support of the theory that Posada would be tortured in Venezuela was presented.

DHS' tactic worked. Immigration Judge William Abbott credited Chaffardet's testimony as credible and found a "clear probability" that Posada would be tortured if returned to Venezuela. Judge Abbott ordered his removal from the United States, but not to Venezuela or Cuba because he would be tortured there. DHS declined to appeal the decision, and began a quest to find a third country that would take him. A few months earlier the DHS had appealed an Immigration Judge's decision to grant CAT relief to two Venezuelan officers. In that appeal, the same DHS attorney who litigated the Posada case argued that there is no evidence that Venezuela tortures prisoners. Now in the Posada case, DHS took a decidedly different position. Why? You figure it out.

More than six months have passed since the immigration decision. Since it has thus far refused to slap an extradition detainer on him (as Venezuela has requested numerous times), the U.S. government has to either release Posada or declare him a threat to the community. In a letter to Posada dated March 22, 2006, DHS decided to continue to detain him on immigration charges. The letter told Posada that he has a "long history of criminal activity and violence in which innocent civilians were killed." His release from detention concludes ICE in its letter to Posada, "would pose a danger to both the community and the national security of the United States."

In support of its interim decision to continue to detain him, ICE cites Venezuela's pending extradition case against Posada and the fact that Posada fled from a Venezuelan prison while his trial for the downing of a passenger plane in 1976 was pending. "Your past also includes your escape from a Venezuelan prison which was accomplished after several attempts utilizing threats of force, explosives and subterfuge," says ICE in its Decision.

ICE goes on to cite Posada's own statements to link him to the "planning and coordination of a series of hotel and restaurant bombings that occurred in Cuba . . . in 1997." These bombings resulted in the murder of an Italian tourist and the wounding of several others. ICE also cites Posada's conviction in Panama for "crimes against national security," in reference to his attempt to assassinate Cuban President Fidel Castro in 2000 with C- 4 explosives as President Castro was to speak to an auditorium with full of students.

So finally the US government recognizes that Posada is a bad guy! Without actually saying the dreaded word, the letter from ICE virtually calls him a terrorist. The law forced the United States to make this admission. Although it's clear that Washington doesn't want to extradite him to Venezuela, it is not prudent to release him. The only way that he can continue to be detained without an extradition detainer is with a government finding that he is a danger to the community.

But the extradition case is not going to go away. It's there, very much alive. Unless Posada has a heart attack and dies in prison, the law is eventually going to force the US government to proceed with the extradition case. A lot of people think that Judge Abbott's finding that Posada may not be deported to Venezuela is a ruling on Venezuela's extradition request. That is not the case. Extradition rulings trump immigration decisions.

Moreover, even if Secretary of State Rice decides in her discretion not to extradite Posada, the treaties and conventions signed by the US government in the past obligate this country to prosecute him for downing of the plane in the United States -- where noooooooooooo prisoners are ever tortured: right?

Listen to the language of the Montreal Convention on Civil Aviation.

"Article 7

"The Contracting State in the territory of which the alleged offender is found shall, if it does not extradite him, be obliged, without exception whatsoever and whether or not the offence was committed in its territory, to submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution. Those authorities shall take their decision in the same manner as in the case of any ordinary offence of a serious nature under the law of that State."

The Montreal Convention's Article 7 gives the US no discretion. It must either extradite or prosecute Posada Carriles for 73 counts of first degree murder in relation to the downing of the airliner. Deporting him to a third country is not an option and neither is releasing him to the community.

The story of CU-455 cries out to be told to the American people. If the American people hear the true story of how those 73 people were murdered in cold blood by terrorists whom the United States prefers to shelter rather than prosecute, they'll not stand for it.

Few people in this country know that Orlando Bosch was released from immigration custody by President George Bush Sr. in 1990, and that he now sits on the dais whenever President Bush Jr. delivers speeches in Miami. Bosch's lawyer, who happens to be Fulgencio Batista's grandson, was appointed four years ago by Jeb Bush to Florida's Supreme Court.

The fate of the Cuban Five is in the hands of 12 judges, but the judges must be put under the microscope of public opinion. Despite your best efforts, Americans still don't know who the Five are or why they went to Miami. It's important that you continue to make sure that their story is told: that the U.S. prosecutes and condemns anti-terrorists, yet shelters and protects terrorists.

It's up to the American people to put a stop to impunity, and it's up to you to make sure the American people learn the truth about these cases and this government.

It's up to you to bring the truth to the American people about Cuba and about Venezuela.

The US government conducts a hypocritical war on terror, while it shelters and rewards the terrorists it prefers. Washington lectures other governments about human rights, while it blockades Cuba, using hunger as a foreign policy tool, in order to try and starve 11 million people into submission.

We cannot sit idly by while the U.S. government blockades and invades countries that have never attacked it, tortures prisoners and takes their pictures as if the victims were curiosity pieces rather than human beings, as it spies on Americans without a warrant, and tramples the civil rights of its citizens with a law whose authors dared title "Patriotic."

In 2002, Washington helped organize a failed coup against a democratically elected government in Venezuela in order to prop up a typical puppet government in Caracas. Thanks to the Venezuelan people, the coup failed and President Chávez was restored to office.

The blockade against Cuba didn't work and neither did the coup in Venezuela. Cuba and Venezuela are now stronger than ever.

The Bush Administration's policies at home and abroad have woken a sleeping and silent giant throughout this continent. And, yes: America is one continent and not two as some U.S. textbooks would have us believe.

We are in the midst of a new social movement that is shaking this continent to its core. On the 30th anniversary of Operation Condor's bloodiest year, we are witness that the people Latin America have taken back their countries from the grip of terror. Argentina, Uruguay, Venezuela, Brazil, Chile and Bolivia have governments that respond to the needs of their own people, rather than to the interests of US corporations. Other countries in will soon join them. This is an election year in America. The people of Latin America are taking back their governments.

It's high time that the people of the United States did the same.
*
*José Pertierra is an attorney, practicing in Washington, D.C. He represents the Venezuelan government in the case of Luis Posada Carriles.

Congress chair: Islamic world backs Venezuela

Apr 20
Pro-government deputy Nicolás Maduro, president of the National Assembly, Wednesday ensured that in the event that the United States launched a military attack against Venezuela, Hugo Chávez' Government would have full support from Islamic countries.

"If the United States touched Venezuela, the whole Middle East will be set in fire. They will be left without oil from both Latin America and the Middle East."

Maduro recently returned from a visit to Iran. The Iranian Parliament invited Maduro to attend the Third Conference on Solidarity with the Palestine People. During his activity, Maduro said proudly, the leaders of the Muslim world expressed their solidarity with President Chávez, particularly from the presidents of the parliaments of more than 16 Middle East countries attending the event, including Indonesia, Malaysia, Algeria and Lebanon.

Petkoff pulls off 60-second PR candidacy launching stunt

Apr 21
by Patrick J. O'Donoghue
Venezuelan opposition presidential candidate, Teodoro Petkoff has pulled off an PR stunt last night to announce his candidacy.

In an obvious attempt to criticize President Chavez Frias' overexposure on national TV, Petkoff asked viewers for just one minute and no more of their time to announce that he will run for the presidency.

* The usually loquacious Talcual tabloid editor has sent out a simple message, insisting that Venezuela wants peace and an end to confrontation ... "no more anguish, division and fear."

The reason for running, Petkoff declares, is based on the conviction that things cannot continue as they are.

The spin was directed at the middle classes and the so-called "neither-nors," neither with the government nor against.

Referring to existing sectarianism in pro-government sectors, the candidate has leveled his fire at the so-called Tascon and Maisanta lists that have barred people from getting public service jobs.

"What right i s there to deny jobs and bread for political reasons."

The government's splashing around of a huge amount of financial resources, Petkoff claims, has not lifted people out of poverty ... "no jobs have been created and nobody feels safe on the streets or at home."

Calling for clean elections, the new candidate says he wants an honorable and able government that represents all Venezuelans, including opponents.

This afternoon Petkoff returned to loquacious form with a full blown press conference proposing an oil food ticket (cestaticket), using a percentage of oil income to finance educational, health and hosuing costs.

Divided Peru set for tough election


Former Pte. Alan Garcia
Alan Garcia, Peru’s controversial former president, looks almost certain to face Ollanta Humala, the radical nationalist, in a presidential run-off election.

The official count of votes cast in the first round on April 9 has been slow but by Sunday, with more than 97 per cent of the ballots tallied, Mr Humala had 30.75 per cent and Mr Garcia 24.34 per cent. Lourdes Flores, the most market-friendly candidate, trailed in third place with 23.62 per cent.

The results set up a contest between one of Peru’s most experienced political campaigners and a fiery political neophyte. Pre-election polls showed the electorate divided in the event of a Humala-García contest. “It will be a tight race,” said Luis Benavente, a pollster at the University of Lima.

Mr Humala enjoys strong support in the south, while Mr Garcia is popular in the traditional strongholds of his Apra party in the north.

The main battleground for the second round will be Lima. The capital, with more than a third of the country’s votes, was a rich source of support for Ms Flores.

Mr Humala will seek to play on his status as an “outsider” in a country in which the institutions of government are held in low regard. In Mr Garcia he will have an easy target: the Apra leader’s 1985-1990 presidency was marked by economic chaos and a guerrilla campaign by Shining Path rebels.

Mr Garcia is more likely to pick up support from middle-class voters scared by Mr Humala’s populist rhetoric.

April 23, 2006

Chavez: U.S. Diplomat Welcome in Venezuela

CARACAS, Venezuela
Venezuela's president said Sunday that he would welcome a visit by a top U.S. State Department official and hopes to build close ties with like-minded Americans despite his vehement opposition to President Bush.

Hugo Chavez said Thomas Shannon, assistant secretary of state for Western Hemisphere affairs, had called his foreign minister to say he wanted to visit, and that Chavez did not object.

However, ``he shouldn't come to cause problems, to provoke,'' Chavez said. ``If he shows respect we'll respect him.''

The Venezuelan president spoke after meeting with a group of visiting Americans who thanked him for shipping discounted heating oil to low-income U.S. communities this winter.

Chavez didn't say when Shannon would visit, and U.S. Embassy officials said they had no comment.

The visiting Americans were treated as guests of honor during Chavez's weekly radio and television program, broadcast from the eastern town of El Tigre.

``We want to thank you personally for what you're doing for people,'' said James Sappier, a chief of the Penobscot Indian tribe near Bangor, Maine, who gave Chavez a carved prayer staff and prayed with him.

He was among more than 60 Americans who visited from New York, Vermont and other northeastern states where Venezuela's U.S.-based Citgo Petroleum Corp. arranged for delivery of millions of gallons of discounted heating oil.

Chavez, a fierce critic of Bush, insists the U.S. government has systematically sought ways to overthrow him in order to seize Venezuela's vast oil reserves. U.S. officials have denied that and accuse the Cuban-allied Chavez of posing a threat to democracies in the region.

Chavez Sunday also accused Washington of trying to undermine newly elected Bolivian President Evo Morales. The guests on his program included Sandinista presidential candidate Daniel Ortega of Nicaragua, who accused the U.S. of interfering in his country's upcoming elections.

VENEZUELA: Power to the people

by Federico Fuentes
With 80% of the population living in poverty, Venezuela’s Bolivarian revolution, led by President Hugo Chavez, has faced an enormous challenge. For Chavez, the only way to get rid of poverty was to give power to the people. On April 9, on Chavez’s weekly Alo Presidente TV program, the Bolivarian revolution took another important step forward with the enactment of a new law on communal councils.

According to the text of the law, communal councils will “represent the means through which the organised masses can take over the direct administration of policies and projects that are created in response to the needs and aspirations of the communities, in the construction of a fair and just society”.

This is not the first attempt at giving people greater control over the running of their communities. Several years ago, the government attempted to make the Local Councils of Public Planification (CLPP) a reality at the level of the municipal governments. The idea was for elected community spokespeople to work side-by-side with the elected government officials to discuss the council’s budget. Yet this project didn’t ever get off the ground, largely because the political parties only gave representation to fellow party members, turning them into rubber stamps for the municipal council. It was also difficult to have genuine election and control by the community when spokespeople were expected to voice the concerns of up to 1 million people in some municipal councils.

Taking the idea of the communal councils from the CLPP law, a pilot project was launched by a group of revolutionaries who previously belonged to the Socialist League in the city of Cumana. From there the concept was taken up nationally and placed in the hands of the newly created Ministry for Popular Participation and Social Development (MINPADES), which explained in its information pamphlet that “just as a house can collapse easily if its base is not sufficiently strong, this can also happen to our new democracy that we are constructing: it will only be invincible if its base is strong and its base is the communal councils”.

Already more than 4000 communal councils exist, with the projection for more than 15,000 to be active across all of Venezuela by the end of the year.

Based on 200 to 400 families in urban areas, or 20 in rural areas, the principal decision making body of a communal council is the citizens’ assembly. All members of the community above the age of 15 can participate in these assemblies, which have the power to elect and revoke community spokespeople to the communal council, as well as put forward projects and a development plan for the community.

The citizens’ assembly is also required to set up a financial management unit, a unit of social control to monitor and watch over the work of the communal council, as well as a variety of work committees, each with its respective spokesperson. The aim is to draw upon voluntary work by community members, along with promoting cooperatives, in order to carry out the projects, relying on the skills and resources of the community rather than private companies or state bureaucracies.

Iruma Sanchez, the general coordinator of the Bolivarian House in Petare, explained on the January 15 Alo Presidente that the councils are not a substitute for existing organisational forms, “because we already have land committees, health committees, Bolivarian cirles, UBEs [units of electoral battle], even party militants inside the communities, but each of us carried out our work on our own, doing in some cases the same work” but organised separately. “So for us the communal council is the maximum instance of planning, of organisation of the community.”

The law states that another task of the communal council is to “promote the birth of new organisations wherever it may be necessary, in defence of their collective interests and the integral development of the communities”.

David Velasquez, Venezuelan Communist Party deputy to the national parliament and president of the commission of citizen’s participation, noted in an interview published on the Venezuelan ministry of communications website that the functions of the communal council also “go beyond the management of resources to resolve their problems. Among these is the recuperation of shut-down factories, because in a great number of industrial zones — located in the communities — there are abandoned buildings that belong to companies, factories or commercial areas. They will also participate in the full exercise of the defence of sovereignty and territorial integrity of Venezuela through the territorial guards.”

One part of the new law that has caused some controversy is the autonomy the communal councils have in regards to the existing governmental structures. In the initial law on CLPPs, the communal councils were envisaged as the lowest level of a national system that worked side by side with all levels of government. Under the new law, a commission will be responsible for monitoring and approving the formation of communal councils, ensuring that they are set up with real legitimacy. The pre-existing local and municipal councils will have no power in relation to the projects or funding of the communal councils.

According to the new law, the communal councils will be funded by a new National Fund Company for a Popular Government, which has already been allocated an initial US$1 billion.

Chavez was quoted by Prensa Presidential on April 9 as saying that the communal councils are “not about, as some are trying to say, a parallel power, rather it is the same power of revolutionary democracy”, adding that the work of the communal councils needs to go hand in hand with that of the regional and local authorities.

According to Velasquez, “the communal councils are instances of constituent power that need to complement the constituted power. These new institutions will strengthen the new state apparatus that needs to emerge from the Bolivarian revolutionary process. This would imply that we need to restructure the functioning of the mayor’s offices, municipal councils and local councils. If we want to create a socialist society, we need to create a superstructure of the state that is obedient to this new reality.”

This is the essence of the communal councils — a power built from below becoming the foundations of Venezuela’s new “socialism of the 21st century”. This move comes after the complete victory of the Bolivarian forces in last December’s national assembly election and as the self-organisation of the masses continues to move forward in leaps and bounds.

From Green Left Weekly, April 26, 2006.

April 22, 2006

Bolivia's Morales threatens to bar some US visitors

LA PAZ, Bolivia
Bolivia's President Evo Morales threatened to bar some U.S. citizens from visiting his Andean nation on Friday, after Washington denied a second Bolivian official permission to enter the United States.

The U.S. government refused to grant a visa this week to Bolivia's deputy minister of basic services, Rene Orellana, who was scheduled to travel on official government business, in the second such awkward incident.

"I am asking the (U.S.) ambassador to provide us with a list of deputies, senators, ministers and deputy ministers that do not have a visa, so we can avoid problems," Morales said during a speech to Latin American indigenous lawmakers.

"But the moment they give me that list, I will also pass a list to the U.S. ambassador naming the North Americans that have no visa for Bolivia. This is a question of defending our people's dignity," said Morales, a leftist and Bolivia's first indigenous president.

Currently, Americans are not required to apply for a visa to travel to Bolivia.

U.S. Ambassador David Greenlee in Bolivia was quick to minimize the incident, emphasizing it had no political motive whatsoever.

"This is an administrative issue, it is not a political signal. We have to find out why our electronic system rejected the application, there may be a very simple answer, it could be a mix-up," Greenlee told local radio station Fides.

Morales also protested in February when Washington canceled a visa issued to one of his closest confidantes, Sen. Leonilda Zurita. A leader of coca farmers like Morales, Zurita said the U.S. government suspected her of terrorism.

U.S. officials did not comment on that, but did say the visa was revoked long before Morales became president.

Colombian Rebels Ambush Army Convoy

BOGOTA, Colombia
Leftist rebels ambushed a military convoy in remote northeastern Colombia, killing 16 soldiers and secret police officers in the deadliest attack on security forces this year, the army said Friday.

The attack took place Thursday in Norte de Santander province, 260 miles northeast of the capital, Bogota. Ten of those killed were DAS secret police officers, Colombia's hybrid equivalent of the CIA and FBI. The other six were soldiers.

The agents and soldiers had been carrying out operations against the country's largest rebel group, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, when explosives were detonated alongside their convoy. Rebels then attacked the survivors.

The province of Norte de Santander is one of Colombia's most violent.

Venezuela denounces assassination plans to international entities

CARACAS
Nicolás Maduro, president of the National Assembly of Venezuela, announced on April 20 that he will present public accusations before several international bodies regarding assassination plans against President Hugo Chávez.

He stated that they intend to release to the public evidence of a meeting held to plan the president’s assassination, and explained that this will be one of the National Assembly’s objectives.

He described the evidence as serious, and noted that it has been silenced by the media.

Venezuela has requested an investigation by Colombia via Claudia Blum, president of the Colombian Parliament, who communicated the request to the Colombian Attorney General.

Maduro announced that a special commission will be organized that will gather the proposals that emerge from the meetings, from which a work agenda will be devised aimed at investigating the accusations concerning the assassination plot.

The commission will analyze the most recent revelations made by Rafael García, former director of Informatics for Colombia’s Administrative Department of Security (DAS).

Those accusations were published in the Colombian magazine Semana and Cambio, and subsequently circulated by the majority of the Venezuelan media.

According to García, one participant in the assassination plans against Chávez and other leaders is Jorge Noguera, former director of the secret service and current Colombian Consul in Milán, as well as former government officials and paramilitaries.

President Alvaro Uribe ordered Noguera to return to Colombia to respond to these accusations.

CIA and/or similar covert operators are in full action in Venezuela as we speak

by Oscar Heck
I believe the CIA and/or similar covert operators are in full action in Venezuela as we speak ... trying to destabilize Venezuela once again ... as in 2002 and 2003. Not only are these bloodsucking criminals doing their dirty work in Venezuela ... but their incestuous cousins in the North American and European mainstream media are also doing their "appointed" part in creating of Venezuela another "dangerous and volatile country."

Preparations are surely underway to subvert Venezuela's upcoming democratic presidential elections ... elections that anyone in their right state of mind will know are to be won by Hugo Chavez Frias, Venezuela's present and beloved President.

The fact that Chavez was elected by the majority of Venezuelans (about 58%), and his presidency re-approved through a national referendum (about 59%) in August 2004, means nothing to the bald eagles in Washington or to the Venezuelan elite and mid-to-upper classes who had had the "privilege" of running (ruining) Venezuela for the last 40 years or so ... pillaging the country to the point where close to 80% of its population lived in desperation, in vast slums, on slave-like wages, struggling from day to day to feed themselves and their children ... with no possibility to set themselves free of the US-based capitalist exploitive grasp on Venezuela ... until Chavez came into the picture in 1998.

The attacks on Venezuela are on many fronts, a situation very similar to pre-Iraq-invasion ... and now, pre-Iran-invasion.

The written word

Anti-Venezuela newspaper articles are flooding the mainstream media with "alarmist" "news."

* ... the use of the phrase "the Venezuela connection" in describing to the general public how Venezuela has become (the number one drug transit country in Latin America).

* ... how (Venezuela protects) the Colombian FARC, a Colombian non-governmental military organization which the USA has officially labeled "terrorist."

* ... or the (shocking news) that the Venezuelan government sides with Iran in their program for uranium refinement.

In a recent UK Financial Times article published on Vheadline.com and written by a person called Andy Webb-Vidal, he, for example, states, "Venezuela is becoming the leading transit country through which the bulk of the world's cocaine is smuggled to the US and Europe, according to foreign law enforcement officers."

* However, in the article, he never says who those foreign law enforcement officers are. Why?

It is critical for readers to always question any writing that claims certain things without providing the sources of what is being claimed. This is a basic rule of thumb ... in order to know whether or not what is being claimed is possibly untrue. In almost all cases, if something is true, the writer will provide the names (and other details) to substantiate the claim. Most mainstream media writers (they get a salary, you know) at some time or other (when convenient to the powers that be) do not provide information about where they obtained their information or who specifically said what is being claimed. This is a typical tactic used to deceive the general public. Hey, if the writer writes for a supposedly respected media outlet, then, hey, he/she must be telling the truth, right? Furthermore, if no one questions the veracity of the material, then it's gotta be the truth ... and nothing buuut the truth! I swear! Just like Iraq!

I don't know this Webb-Vidal character ... but I do know that Aleksander Boyd, the person who operates a site called Vcrisis.com (a rabid anti-Chavez site) publishes some of Andy-Webb Vidal's articles when the articles can put Venezuela in bad light ... anything to throw rocks at Chavez ... by throwing rocks at Venezuela as a whole (a very cruel way to do things -- like throwing rocks at a large crowd in order to assure hitting the person we want to hit -- or like throwing bombs on innocent Iraqis in order to assure the killing of the ones we want killed!).

It is important to note that Aleksander Boyd has publicly called for the use of violence to get rid of Chavez ... and so has at least one of the other writers who is often published by Boyd, Gustavo Coronel, who once upon a time wrote for VHeadline.com. (Unfortunately I do not have a copy of what Gustavo Coronel wrote where he specifically called for the use of violence to get rid of Chavez. I have been hacked into so many times that I have lost much information, including the article in question and the link information.)

And they call themselves "civilized" and "democratic."

But who is Webb-Vidal? It appears that he works for the "reputable" UK Financial Times (out of Venezuela) ... but ... let us see what he says (according to OAI Press) . From an article (May 27, 2004) published on Vcrisis.com, alarmingly (!) entitled, "Venezuela's Chavez aims at warlike conflict scenarios to stay in power" ... "Based on a possible Colombo-Venezuelan conflict, journalist Andy Webb-Vidal, in a press release published yesterday by the Financial Times of London, stated the worrisome intentions of Hugo Chavez of causing an arms race with Colombia. As written by Webb-Vidal, he maintains that Venezuela has launched a weapon procurement spree to gain advantage, is its military balance, over Colombia, thus edging the two countries into an arms race."

Where is that "arms race?"

Almost two years have passed since the comments above were made. As far as I can see, the above "news" was meant only to further destabilize the Chavez government. This is one of hundreds of examples I can refer to.

Let's try one more quote, again from Vcrisis.com, again by Webb-Vidal. "Venezuela is preparing to take political control of private banks as part of a drive to spread 'revolutionary' government control over the economy of the world's fifth largest oil exporter."

The above was published on September 1, 2005 ... another "scare," of course.

I don't see any government action to take control of private banks. Even if there were some sort of "action" taken "against" the private banks, it would not be action taken unilaterally by the Venezuelan government, or by Chavez himself (as so many anti-Chavez articles often claim ... Chavez did this, Chavez did that, etc.). Such actions would be approved through the elected Venezuelan National Assembly! Hello? Andy? Are you there? Hey, want happened to the arms race? The banks? How about the FARC?

I believe that Andy Webb-Vidal is a vicious opponent of Chavez ... or should I say, an avid supporter of the violent anti-Chavez gang, which of course, includes Aleksander Boyd and Gustavo Coronel ... and Maria Corina Machado, and Patricia Poleo ... and CAP ... and Henrique Capriles Radonski ... and Pedro Carmona ... and Carlos Ortega and Carlos Fernandez ... and many more members of the Venezuelan elite and mid-to-upper classes who supported and/or participated in the US-financed, elite-drive coup against democratically-elected Chavez in April 2002.

Civilized, democratic and educated (as they so arrogantly claim themselves to be)?

Some readers may not know who the above-mentioned people are. You don't really have to know them ... just imagine that you are being violently raped by a large gang of bloodthirsty, yelling psychopaths, eyes bulging with lust and rage. in my opinion they are the rapists ... they raped, and violently so, the country and its people. Blood for show included, the grins to accompany their morbid acts.

I could go on and on giving examples of the manipulation of information by the violent anti-Chavez sectors and by the mainstream "western" media ... how "shocking" and "alarming" "news" is concocted for no other purpose than to help destabilize Venezuela ... in order to get rid of Chavez. Media and information manipulation is an acceptable method to dishonest people ... and Andy Webb-Vidal appears to aptly confirm this. Not providing names or sources to substantiate claims is also acceptable to these people ... especially if it is successful at diverting the general public's attention away from the facts. Iraq comes to mind again.

CIA and other covert operations

On another front, we know that the violent anti-Chavez Venezuelan crowd is financed by the US government through the NED and USAID ... and by perhaps other organizations which divert US taxpayers' money for covert operations abroad. (There is much written about this by myself and others, with details and the substantiating evidence. You can use the VHeadline.com search engine and type in: NED. You will access many articles on the subject, dating back to about October 2003, when it was first discovered that the US government was financing the violent Venezuelan opposition to Chavez.)

We also know that the US government, like the violent Venezuelan anti-Chavez gang, is capable of using whatever criminal and ruthless tactics necessary to achieve its goal. There is no need to question this fact. The evidence is out there for everyone to see, Iraq. Therefore, it is quite obvious that part of the tactics to attempt to destabilize Venezuela before the upcoming December 2006 presidential election, include the creation of fear through the use of violence ... and extreme violence at that.

Violence creates fear. Fears creates panic. Panic creates chaos. Chaos calls for extreme measures (such as an invasion of Venezuela by the USA) ... which leads to repression and helpless resignation of the general public ... which in turn leads to control of the masses ... which then leads to exploitation of the masses ... and mass enrichment of the ruling classes.

Exactly what the US and the Venezuelan elite want!

As I see it, this step of the plan has begun ... the murder of a Venezuelan businessman in Venezuela ... next, the kidnapping of three children from a wealthy Venezuelan-Canadian family ... in Venezuela (of course!) ... and their subsequent violent assassinations ... and ... the assassination of a photographer from an opposition-run newspaper chain (El Mundo and Ultimas Noticias) ... in Venezuela (of course!).

More such gruesome events will occur ... unfortunately ... but, hey, the US government doesn't give a flying fling about who gets killed or how they receive their death sentence or who delivers it ... and neither does the violent Venezuelan opposition to Chavez. The years 2002 and 2003 are definite proof that the use of violence is not a problem for most Venezuelan Chavez-haters.

(For readers who do not know what happened in 2002 and 2003 ... the Venezuelan opposition to Chavez led a coup against Chavez and organized violent protests which left many people dead or injured and millions of innocent Venezuelans jobless and destitute after an elite-driven, three-month employer lockout. Bombings and assassination were also orchestrated by the anti-Chavez sectors ... all this keeping in mind that most of the violent Venezuelan anti-Chavez movement was -- and probably still is -- financed by the US government. I will never forget ... and there is much written on VHeadline.com about these events. You can use the search engine - type in words like coup, strike, lockout, bombing, NED, sabotage, PDVSA ...)

Who is committing these recent crimes?

Some vagabond street-criminals? I don't think so.

It could be, as is typical in Venezuela, that the assassinations are a matter of settling of accounts ... but maybe not.

Danilo Anderson, the head government prosecutor assigned to the April-2002-coup-against-Chavez trials, was assassinated in November 2004, shortly after taking on the role. Was someone trying to destabilize the prosecution process of the Venezuelan criminals who were involved in the coup? Certainly!

Most, if not all of the accused (or investigated), are members of Venezuela's elite .. the filthy rich who mostly made their money through massive corruption, tax evasion ... and at the expense of the lives and the blood of the majority 80% poorer citizenry.

The Venezuelan church elite (the Venezuelan Episcopal Conference) was also instrumental and deeply involved, both subversively and overtly, in the coup and in the subsequent sabotage of the country in 2002 and 2003.

Keep reading the news about Venezuela ... here on VHeadline.com, the best English-language source of real news about Venezuela.

I can assure you that we have only begun the precarious trek through the leech-infested realm of the CIA and its Venezuelan traitors-and-criminals par excellence!

Fairtrade and Global Justice

by James O'Nions
Gone are the days when fair trade goods were available only at charity shops and church bazaars. Fair trade - or Fairtrade, as it has branded itself - is now big business.You can choose Fairtrade coffee in high-street outlets like Starbucks and Prêt a Manger, and local authorities are starting to declare themselves Fairtrade councils. More than 1,000 products are now certified as Fairtrade in the UK and, on an international level, the industry estimates it benefits five million producers worldwide.

Yet with multinationals moving to cash in, and supermarkets approaching fair trade (with or without the Fairtrade Foundation certification mark) as just another niche market, can it avoid being co-opted by the market system it was set up to challenge?

The idea of fair trade has been around since at least the 1950s. Originally called 'alternative trade', and dealing not in foodstuffs but in crafts, it was pioneered by Mennonites in North America and Oxfam in Britain.The first certification label, Max Havelaar, was launched in the Netherlands in 1988; and, since 1997, the Fairtrade Labelling Organisations International has sought to establish common guarantees of 'fairness'.

For instance, in the case of products from small farmers, importers must agree to trade directly with producers' co-operatives, cutting out middlemen.They must also demonstrate a long-term commitment to the producers and guarantee a minimum price no matter the fluctuations of the market.This price must allow the producers to cover their costs and meet their daily needs.The producers' co-operatives themselves must also demonstrate that they are democratically managed and their agriculture is sustainable. Only if all these conditions are satisfied is a product permitted to carry the Fairtrade mark.

The aftermath of the December 1999 Seattle protests against the WTO saw Fairtrade coffee consumption skyrocket in the US.Yet this was not the 'hidden hand of the market' at work as demand for Fairtrade products increased supply. In fact, it was mainly down to the direct intervention of activists, specifically San Francisco-based Global Exchange, which launched a campaign to persuade Starbucks to offer Fairtrade coffee at all of its 2,300 US outlets.

With peaceful protests for Fairtrade outside its stores to add to the public relations catastrophe it had suffered as the bogeyman of the anti-capitalist movement, Starbucks soon capitulated. Since then, big food corporations have started to see limited forays into Fairtrade as a useful PR move, similar to what environmentalists call 'greenwash'. McDonalds recently announced it would serve Fairtrade coffee in 650 of its US east coast stores; and Nestlé, which for years has derided Fairtrade for violating 'free-trade principles', launched its own 'Partners Blend' last October.

The Nestlé decision caused an understandable furore, with critics arguing that Nestlé's application should have been turned down to prevent the false impression that the widely-boycotted company was now an ethical choice. As one of the world's largest coffee retailers, Nestlé has been directly responsible for paying the kind of low prices that make Fairtrade such a necessity. The World Development Movement, which helped set up the Fairtrade Foundation, was more than a little concerned, saying: "If Nestlé really believes in Fairtrade coffee, it will alter its business practices and lobbying strategies and radically overhaul its business to ensure that all coffee farmers get a fair return for their efforts. Until then Nestlé will remain part of the problem, not the solution."

Yet for Harriet Lamb, of the Fairtrade Foundation, the decision is a 'turning point'. "Here is a major multinational listening to people and giving them what they want - a Fairtrade product," she says. Justifying the Nestlé decision, the Foundation refers to the recent slump in prices on the world coffee market, which has led to undoubted hardship, but speaks almost as though 'the market' is a natural phenomenon over which major multinationals such as Nestlé have no power.

For many of the originators of Fairtrade, the aim was not just to create a successful niche market but to lay the basis for an alternative system of trade altogether. While some of these 'alternative trading organisations are little different from conventional companies, others, such as Equal Exchange in the US, reflect this more radical aspiration in their own structures by being workers' co-operatives.

Yet all of them at least apply fair trade principles to everything they do, unlike the multinationals who are now entering the market. That's why the International Fair Trade Association has launched a 'Fair Trade Organisation' label that certifies the company rather than the product, and is therefore a much more reliable indicator. These organisations face difficult decisions when it comes to distributing their products, as supermarkets become increasingly hard to avoid. Tesco now takes one pound in every eight spent by UK consumers and other chains are doing everything they can to catch up; pushing down prices by squeezing producers and buying up local competition in the grocery market. Even the most political of fair trade organisations have turned to supermarkets to maximise the good that selling their product is doing. Yet by courting the supermarkets, they are strengthening the very companies that are undermining the bargaining power of producers.

This is not the only dilemma that the Fairtrade label throws up.While products such as coffee require democratic producers' co-operatives to qualify for certification, traditional plantations can also qualify if they meet minimum standards of pay and conditions. And while trade unions must be allowed under Fairtrade rules, they are not required for certification. Some do have strong unions, and the Fairtrade Foundation highlights the instance of two Kenyan rose farms, where certification was followed by recognition of the Kenya Plantation and Agricultural Workers' Union.

On the other hand, the central American banana workers' federation COLSIBA has levelled accusations of the 'systematic violation of workers' and union rights' by plantation owners who benefit from Fairtrade.While the TUC and British trade unions have been generally supportive of Fairtrade, they have also pointed out that trade union organisation can be a better guarantee of workers' rights.

Meanwhile, Marks and Spencer has just launched lines of Fairtrade cotton socks and t-shirts.When they see the Fairtrade label, most consumers would assume they were buying a wholly ethical product.Yet it is only the cotton itself that has been certified, with no guarantees about conditions where the clothes were manufactured.These kinds of problems only serve to highlight the extent to which Fairtrade is merely fiddling at the edges of an international system that perpetuates huge inequalities of power and wealth.

More radical alternatives do exist. Coffee grown in the Zapatistas'autonomous zones' in Chiapas, Mexico, can now be bought from activists involved in the social centre movement in Britain, while the Working World Market is offering the products of Argentina's worker-run factories to north American consumers. These initiatives stand in a tradition that saw activists in the 1980s sell Nicaraguan coffee in solidarity with the Sandinista revolution. What marks these projects out is that they aim to support people who have to some degree broken with the logic of the capitalist market. Zaytoun, which imports Palestinian olive oil to Britain to help break the economic stranglehold of the Israeli occupation, could also be seen as 'solidarity fair trade', even if its objectives are more about the occupation than about trade itself.

Trade as solidarity is an attractive concept, but its usefulness may be limited to quite specific political situations.The Movimento Sem Terra (MST) is Latin America's largest social movement, organising landless rural workers and urban slum dwellers to occupy and cultivate unused land. Its innovative and highly effective tactics (it has settled 580,000 families) have won admirers across the world and it would surely have a ready-made market for a very political form of Fairtrade-endorsed products. Yet its concern has always been with feeding Brazil's population, and the MST specifically rejects the export-led agribusiness model, encouraging mixedcropping rather than the monoculture required by international markets (see box). For them and other organisations in the global peasants' coalition,Via Campesina, this concept of 'food sovereignty' is much more relevant than Fairtrade.

MST activist Marcelo João Alvares was a guest at War on Want's annual conference in the UK in February, and gave us his personal take on Fairtrade.

'For Brazilians, Fairtrade is a distant concept. There are so many people living in shanty towns, so many street children; people don't even have their basic rights to food and shelter. For the MST, feeding Brazilians is our priority, so certification has not even been discussed, not least because we see quality food not as a niche market, but as something we should provide as part of a wider strategy of food sovereignty. This requires policies that work to guarantee people freedom to produce their own quality food with respect to their own culture. We aren't opposed to exports, but we don't agree with the agribusiness model of valuing exports over the needs of domestic consumption. Primarily, food sovereignty is about feeding the people.'

The current popularity of Fairtrade is a sign of a growing understanding of the fundamental unfairness of global trade, but it risks being reduced to a branding exercise for multinationals - or, at best, a set of niche products that helps a small minority of producers but fails to affect the structure of the market as a whole.Yet if Fairtrade is embedded in a wider critique of the market, and is part of a movement of real solidarity with the global South, it still holds the potential to help us move towards a fundamentally different global economy.While we might continue to buy Fairtrade products where we can, it is not as consumers that we can determine the future direction of Fairtrade, but as activists building opposition to neoliberalism and corporate control.

Castro addresses audience in by cellphone

Carcas, Venezuela
When Cuba's Fidel Castro couldn't Honor an invitation to join Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez in a speech on Friday, Chavez called Castro on a cellphone from a packed Caracas theatre and broadcast the conversation through the microphone.

"Brother, give your regards to the people gathered here," Chavez said.

The crowd broke into applause as Castro's raspy voice came crackling across the microphone.

"You've put me on three times and I keep saying the same thing," said Castro, lamenting the bad connection.

Chavez held the event to Honor Cuban doctors sent to Venezuela to help the nation's poor residents in exchange for crude from the world's No 5 oil exporter.

When the phone call cut off, Chavez joked that his arch-rival US President George Bush was responsible.

"It looks like Mr Danger intervened there," Chavez said, using his nickname for the US president.

Chavez, elected in 1998, has strengthened relations with Cuba as part of a promised socialist "revolution" to end poverty. Increased economic ties have helped revive Cuba's economy, which was devastated in the 1990s by the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Former maid new justice minister

by Fiona Smith
LA PAZ, Bolivia
At age 13, Casimira Rodriguez left her hardscrabble rural home, hoping to escape poverty by taking a job as a housemaid in the city.

What she got instead was a nightmare of virtual slavery, and a first-hand view of the injustice many poor Bolivians experience.

Barely an adolescent herself, Rodriguez cooked, cleaned and looked after the children for an extended family of 14 people. She was not paid and was allowed out only to buy groceries down the street, she says.

After two years, Rodriguez escaped and brought her case for wages owed before a rural court. The judge asked her to be patient. A quarter century later, she's still waiting.

It's possible Rodriguez, 40, might finally get some satisfaction.

She is Bolivia's new justice minister, intent on overhauling one of Latin America's most overburdened, corrupt and inefficient judicial systems.

The former domestic workers' union leader and Quechua Indian has no law degree or legal training. She would be a striking figure in any government: She wears layers of velvet skirts under fitted cotton blouses and has her hair in traditional Indian braids.

Nearly three months after taking office, she has yet to offer a plan for overhauling Bolivia's judiciary.

Her detractors say she lacks the necessary experience — a maid for 18 years, she earned a high-school degree at night and has studied anthropology in college while running the union. The National Association of Bolivian Lawyers, which represents Bolivia's 30,000 attorneys, has demanded her resignation.

Evo Morales, the left-leaning president who appointed her, says he has no intention of letting that happen.

advertising
Rodriguez is unfazed. She says she hopes to humanize and build trust in the judiciary while strengthening traditional Indian justice systems that depend on community elders rather than courts.

"I know the laws and all their articles, but life has forced us to also live injustice and we can feel the pain and thirst for justice of every Bolivian sister and brother," Rodriguez said.

Bolivian police regularly demand bribes from crime victims before pursuing their cases. The country's criminal courts refuse to hear 96 percent of the cases that come before them, and those that do go forward often end up delayed to the point that the courts lose their credibility, the Washington-based nonprofit Partners of the Americas said in a 2005 study.

A full 64 percent of Bolivians have little or no faith in their justice system, according to a February survey by the Apoyo Opinión y Mercado firm, which says the figure was as high as 84 percent just two years ago.

That indicates some faith that Morales, who named Rodriguez to the justice post, may improve matters.

But it is a daunting task.

For one, a jury system introduced in the last decade isn't working very well.

"The vast majority of [legal] conflicts don't reach the system," said Cristian Riego, academic director of the OAS's Justice Center of the Americas. Those who suffer most are indigenous people and workers in the informal economy.

Rodriguez says she'll fight to boost spending for the judiciary and make it work for the poor, who account for more than 60 percent of Bolivians.

She also wants greater respect for traditional Indian justice systems, still used in much of the country, where community elders hear cases and decide on sentences that can include corporal punishment.

"Community justice is so different from the ordinary justice system," said Rodriguez, "because you don't spend money and even though it's not legally recognized, it resolves cases in hours, or at the most in a week and doesn't add to the quarrel. It's more fraternal."

Such pronouncements have fueled calls for Rodriguez to step down.

"We don't believe she's the appropriate person to make serious policy," said Jaime Hurtado, vice president of the National Association of Bolivian Lawyers. He contends Rodriguez has no idea how to manage a modern judicial system.

Such attacks are unfair and often racially motivated, says Diana Urioste, secretary of the nonprofit Women's Coordination, an umbrella group of women's rights organizations in Bolivia.

"She's a person of high integrity," Urioste said of Rodriguez. "She's humble but has clear ideas, and people need the chance to show what they're really capable of."

Rodriguez, who is single and has no children, lives in a poor part of the city in a room in the local office of Bolivia's National Federation of Domestic Workers, which she spent years building up. She remains president of the federation of Domestic Workers of Latin America and the Caribbean.

She said that although she has heard the family she worked for continues to recruit young women from poor villages, she has no intention of going after them specifically. Instead, she said, she wants to address the general problem of poor Indians being victimized by the wealthy elite.

Rodriguez acknowledges her lack of legal experience but defends Morales' decision to name her justice minister, part of the president's pledge to bring more diversity to government.

Until Morales' election, the country's politics were dominated by Bolivia's European-descended elite.

"This is recognizing a sector that has been passed over, disdained," Rodriguez said. "I think it was hard to name a traditional Indian woman, a domestic worker, and it's offended some, but many people have celebrated. Flowers are still arriving at my office."

Bolivia expels Brazilian steel group

by Hal Weitzman in Lima and Jonathan Wheatley in São Paulo
Bolivia has ordered a Brazilian steelmaker to leave the country, the first expulsion of a foreign investor since Evo Morales, the leftwing president, took office in January.

The government's action is intended to settle a power struggle between the Morales administration in La Paz and local interests in the south-eastern Amazon region that resulted in the kidnapping of three cabinet ministers and the closure of the international border.

The government said EBX had failed to secure environmental permission to build a $148m (€120m, £83m) pig-iron plant at Puerto Suarez, about 1,120km south-east of La Paz on the border with Brazil. It also said the plant violated a ban on foreign companies operating within 50km of Bolivia's borders.

"The decision is firm. A company that does not respect the law has to leave," said Vice-President Álvaro García.

"EBX has not, and they are also encouraging conflict between Bolivians," he added. EBX denied breaking any laws, claiming its Bolivian subsidiary had complied with all regulations, including those covering investments in a tax-free zone near the border designed for exporting companies.

It said the Bolivian government had distorted the facts, refused to discuss the project constructively and "denied us access to the procedures necessary to obtaining an environmental licence".

It also condemned the brief kidnapping of three ministers by local people protesting at the threat to jobs posed by government opposition to the plant.

Had the pig-iron project gone ahead successfully, EBX said it would have been followed by a further $120m investment to build a steel plant, providing 620 direct and 5,000 indirect jobs.

The dispute comes as the government continues to negotiate with international investors in the gas sector, the second largest in the region.

Relations have deteriorated with energy groups such as Petrobras, which called off last month a planned $5bn investment in Bolivia, and Repsol, which is being investigated for oil smuggling.

By attempting to have the last word on the EBX affair, the government hopes to send a message to foreign investors that it is not afraid to take a hard line, and to local opponents that it will not cave in to protest.

The EBX dispute has brought to the boil a long-simmering dispute between local leaders and La Paz. The plant is located in the department of Santa Cruz, a stronghold of Bolivia's right wing and a region in which Mr Morales does not have strong support.

Local civic committees have called an indefinite strike and set up roadblocks until EBX is granted permission to operate.

They called on Mr Morales "to govern for all Bolivians" and said the government had "left hundreds of Bolivians without jobs, without employment and livelihood for their families, and has generated an economic depression in this region".

Q n A

Q. What chemicals give cocoa its health benefits?

A. Cocoa has been linked to better health since the 18th century, but it wasn't until recently that scientists pinned that effect on flavanols, which have been linked to lower blood pressure.

April 21, 2006

Chavez proposes a “new equals configuration” for Mercosur

Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez is sponsoring a “new configuration” for Mercosur to help overcome the current asymmetries among members which are threatening the cohesion of the block.

“President Chavez made the informal proposal to President Lula da Silva” during his brief visit to Brazil on Thursday when the two leaders shared a late meal, revealed Venezuela’s Communications minister William Lara.

Venezuela is in the process of becoming a full member of Marcosur, a block which is currently under strong strain because the two smaller members Paraguay and Uruguay are disenchanted with the way Brazil and Argentina are handling affairs, and they are looking for other trade and investment options.

“Venezuela would like to see an equals relation inside Mercosur”, advanced Mr. Lara adding that Chavez is proposing a “new integration configuration based in trade complementation and solidarity so as to help overcome the current asymmetries in the integration process”.

Chavez initiative will be officially considered next Wednesday during a regional presidential summit in Sao Paulo with the participation of leaders from Venezuela, Argentina and Brazil.

“If this finally takes on it will not only mean the re-launching of Mercosur but also its consolidation and will help as the foundation for the Americas Bolivarian Alternative or ALBA (dawn in Spanish)”, an initiative cherished by President Chavez as an option to the United States sponsored Free Trade Association of the Americas.

Last Wednesday Chavez announced Venezuela was abandoning the Andean Community of Nations, CAN, in disagreement with Colombia and Peru’s decision to negotiate and sign bilateral free trade agreements with United States.

“CAN is dead, our option is a new Mercosur”, highlighted Mr. Lara quoting on President Chavez’s new regional foreign policy focus.

President Chavez announcement actually sent shockwaves to political and business sectors in Peru, Colombia and Venezuela, which together with Bolivia and Ecuador belong to the block created in 1969.

From Peru, President Alejandro Toledo called on Mr. Chavez “to reconsider his words…I humbly ask him to reconsider the situation”.
However the greatest reaction came from Colombia’s private sector. Colombian Industry Confederation president Luis Carlos Villegas said he hoped President Chavez words “are a political statement and not reality”.

Colombian president Alvaro Uribe said the issue must be addressed “with extreme calm”.

Similarly in Venezuela where the Industry Confederation also expressed concern and cautioned that such a move would have negative consequences for the Venezuelan economy “with a fall in activity and loss of jobs”.

Only Bolivian president Evo Morales seemed to agree with Chavez, “I feel CAN is dead”, he pointed out.

Trade among CAN countries reached 9 billion US dollars in 2005.

Brazil meets oil needs with rig

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has opened a vast new oil rig which will enable the country to be self-sufficient in oil production.

Costing more than $600 million (£337m), the platform will generate 180,000 barrels a day.

The total amount of oil produced by Brazil now exceeds the amount consumed by its people.

In the past, South America's largest country had been painfully dependent on imported oil.

Friday's opening of the rig was greeted with some patriotic fanfare.

For decades Brazil relied on other countries to supply it with oil - a dependency that proved disastrous during the two oil shocks of the 1970s.

Then, as prices soared, the Brazilian government had to borrow heavily to meet its energy needs, triggering a destructive cycle of debt and inflation.

Proud moment
Against that backdrop, Friday's opening of the rig off the coast of Rio de Janeiro is being seen as a major step forward in the nation's development.

Dressed in orange overalls, Lula personally flipped the switch to start production.

As the flow began, the president gleefully drenched his hands in Brazilian oil.

The state-controlled energy company, Petrobras, says the new rig will increase national production to 1.9m barrels of oil a day - slightly more than the quantity Brazil consumes.

Self-sufficiency is quite an achievement for a country that only discovered off-shore oil 30 years ago.

And with global prices on Friday hitting $75 a barrel, it has come at an opportune moment.

"It's an extraordinary achievement, a privilege only a few countries have," Lula said.

Looking ahead, Brazil now hopes to become a net exporter of oil, taking advantage of deep-sea drilling technology that is considered some of the best in the world.

Our Beautiful New World?

Even as the United States wages a war in the Persian Gulf that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice describes as a central front in an epic "generational struggle" in defense of Western values and freedoms, another geopolitical threat has been massing on its southern flank. Over the course of the past seven years, Latin America has seen the rebirth of nationalist and socialist political movements, movements that were long thought to have been dispatched by cold war death squads. Following Hugo Chávez's 1998 landslide victory in Venezuela, one country after another has turned left. Today, roughly 300 million of Latin America's 520 million citizens live under governments that either want to reform the Washington Consensus--a euphemism for the mix of punishing fiscal austerity, privatization and market liberalization that has produced staggering levels of poverty and inequality over the past three decades--or abolish it altogether and create a new, more equitable global economy.

This year, that number is likely to grow. Latin America is in the middle of an election cycle that has already seen Evo Morales win in Bolivia and Michelle Bachelet, a single mother and socialist, win a third term for Chile's center-left Concertación Coalition. On April 9 in Peru, Ollanta Humala, a nationalist former military officer backed by Chávez and Morales, came from behind to force a runoff. In the months ahead, Colombia, Mexico, Brazil, Ecuador, Nicaragua and Venezuela will hold presidential elections. And with center-leftist Manuel López Obrador ahead in Mexico, the Sandinistas poised to make a comeback in Nicaragua and Chávez's re-election all but certain, the Bush Administration is nervous. It has responded by trying to drive a wedge between what Rice describes as the "false populism" that is spreading throughout the Andes and the pragmatic reformism of Chile, Uruguay and Brazil--in other words, between the "statesmen" and the "madmen," as Chávez recently put it.

There are, in fact, important differences among Latin American leftists--between, say, Brazil's Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who has opted to pursue reform through market-led growth, and Chávez, who is more willing to mobilize the left's social base, allow the state a greater role in the economy and pick fights with international capital. But they are also highly dependent on one another, especially in their dealings with the United States. For Chávez, besieged during the first three years of his administration, the election of sympathetic regional allies, starting with Lula in 2002, came just in time to help him shore up his position and push back his domestic and foreign opponents. In return, the confrontational Chávez provides cover to his more circumspect counterparts, drawing Washington's anger. If it were not for its quarrel with Venezuela, the United States would certainly be less tolerant of what Rice calls its "differences with friends," which include Brazil's opposition to the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (FTAA) and Chile's refusal to support the invasion of Iraq.

But more than just giving one another room to maneuver, Latin America's new leftists have produced over the last couple of years their own consensus, a common project to use the centrifugal forces of globalization to loosen Washington's unipolar grip. Brazil's Lula has been central to this project, especially insofar as he has helped to awaken international financial institutions to the downsides of free-market orthodoxy. When he was elected, he was hailed as Latin America's great hope, not just by the poor but, once he promised to maintain a high budget surplus, by the officials of institutions like the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank. His campaign took place in the shadow of Argentina's financial meltdown, the latest in a series of international financial crises that led globalization's managers to emphasize the importance not only of freeing markets but of strengthening institutions that could stabilize those markets. If a man of the left such as Lula could achieve "growth with equity"--which by Brazil's 2002 vote had become the World Bank's new mantra--in Latin America's largest economy, it would go a long way toward defining the post-Washington Consensus consensus. Lula, said former World Bank president James Wolfensohn in an interview last year, is leading the "most important experiment in Latin America today."

As Lula approaches the end of his first, and possibly only, term, the results of this experiment have been disappointing. Extreme poverty has decreased somewhat, but this has less to do with his showpiece "zero hunger" program than with steady economic growth driven by high commodity prices. Still, after emerging as a spokesperson for developing countries on trade issues and leading the opposition to the FTAA over subsidies and concerns about intellectual property rights, he did begin to represent an alternative, if not to free trade then to Washington's stranglehold over the way free trade was proceeding in the Americas.

Under Lula, Brazil has played a key role in fostering the economic links that have begun to wean the region from its dependence on the United States. Buoyed by Argentina's and Uruguay's turn left, and anchored by Brazil's enormous market and advanced agricultural, pharmaceutical, heavy equipment, steel and aeronautical sectors, the countries of South America have taken a number of steps to diversify the hemisphere's economy. They courted non-US trade and investment, particularly from Asia. Fueled by a consuming thirst for Latin America's raw materials--its oil, ore and soybeans--the Chinese government has negotiated more than 400 investment and trade deals with Latin America over the past few years, investing more than $50 billion in the region. China is both Brazil's and Argentina's fourth-largest trading partner, providing $7 billion for port and railroad modernization and signing $20 billion worth of commercial agreements. South American leaders have also sought to deepen regional economic integration, primarily by expanding the Mercosur--South America's most important commercial alliance--and embarking on an ambitious road-building project. These efforts appear to be working. In December Lula claimed that Brazil's trade with the rest of Latin America grew by nearly 90 percent since the previous year, compared with a 20 percent increase with the United States.

One sign that economic diversification is gaining force was the success last year of Argentine President Néstor Kirchner's take-it-or-leave-it offer of 30 cents on every dollar owed on its $100 billion external debt, to be paid in long-term, low-interest bonds. In the past, financial markets would have severely punished such insolence, but with Asian investment pouring in and the economy rebounding at a steady clip, a majority of lenders had no choice but to make the deal. For its part, the IMF, fearing either a complete default or a successful agreement made without its imprimatur, was forced grudgingly to sanction the bid. It was, according to Knight Ridder Business News, the "biggest sovereign debt restructuring in history, with international creditors accepting unprecedented losses." "For the first time in history," a triumphal Kirchner said in a speech to Congress reporting on the transaction, "a restructuring process has culminated in a drastic reduction of the indebtedness of the country."

Asian investment, road building and common markets are not what Fidel Castro had in mind when in the 1960s he rallied third-world youth to take up arms against Yankee imperialism. Yet the rise and maintenance of the United States as a world power has long been predicated on claiming Latin America as its own. On the eve of the cold war, for instance, even as Harry Truman was promoting the United Nations and pushing for open markets elsewhere, his envoys in Latin America were negotiating an alliance that gave preferential treatment to US corporations and allowed Washington to mobilize the region as a bloc in its struggle against the Soviet Union.

In the past few years, however, the region's most consequential nations have refused to be conscripted into Bush's "war on terror." And unlike the way they lined up to quarantine Cuba during the cold war, they have rebuffed Washington's calls to pursue an "inoculation strategy" against Chávez, as Secretary of State Rice put it to Congress in February. Last year, Bush even saw his nominee to head the Organization of American States bested by a candidate backed by Venezuela. If Latin America's new left achieves nothing else, it has at least broken the political bonds of this proprietary relationship.

The FTAA is the US government's gambit to turn things around. It is meant to do for Latin America what the North American Free Trade Agreement did for Mexico: ratify its status as a US province within an increasingly globalized economy. Under NAFTA the United States has come to dominate Mexican trade, muscling out other Latin American countries. The same is expected to occur when the Chilean and Central American free-trade pacts are fully implemented. Call it "market polygamy," whereby the United States can have multiple partners but each of those partners must remain faithful to it alone.

Hopes that Brazil could counter the gravitational pull of the United States have been diminished by the corruption scandals that in the past ten months have rocked Lula's Partido dos Trabalhadores (PT) and shattered its Congressional coalition. While Lula has not yet announced whether he will stand for re-election in October, recent polls indicate that if he does, he will most likely face a tough fight. There is still time for him to pull through. He has recently raised the minimum wage, increased social spending and cut interest rates, all in the hopes of boosting the economy in the run-up to the election. But even if he does win a second term, he will govern from a greatly weakened position.

As Lula recedes, Chávez proceeds. Until his victory in the August 2004 recall, it was easy to dismiss the Venezuelan president as the latest in a long line of Latin American Bonapartists, a strongman who emerged to restore order after Venezuela's two-party system collapsed under the weight of its own venal incompetence. During Chávez's first six years in office, his fiery rhetoric did little to diminish economic inequality or challenge the generous contracts his predecessors gave to petroleum multinationals. But whereas Lula started with high expectations only to disappoint, Chávez has moved in the opposite direction. He has rebounded from the recall fight to quicken the pace of reform. With the economy booming, unemployment falling, the opposition in disarray and his Fifth Republic Movement in control of Congress and regional posts, he has accelerated the distribution of expropriated land, nationalizing industries and diverting Central Bank reserves to diversify the economy.

For Washington, the most immediate threat posed by Venezuela is not the spread of "false populism" in Latin America but Chávez's emergence as the motor behind the left's attempt to advance economic and political multilateralism. He has turned out to be a skilled rope-a-dope artist, making at times preposterous political pronouncements--in March Chávez requested that the legislature have the white horse on Venezuela's flag face left instead of right, so that it would no longer be an "imperialist horse"--while playing a nimble Great Game of geopolitics. He has capitalized on the rise of China and India as alternative sources of investment and trade--Venezuelan exports to India tripled over the past year, while oil sales to China are expected to double this year and increase fivefold by 2010--and parlayed the 2004 election of Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero into a strategic victory. Under Zapatero's predecessor, José Aznar, Madrid not only backed Bush's "war on terror" but helped enforce neoliberalism in Latin America through Spain's powerful banking sector. That has changed as Zapatero and Chávez have joined their respective countries into a corridor linking South America and the European Union. Although Washington may yet scuttle the deal, Spain recently agreed to sell Venezuela $2 billion worth of transport planes and patrol boats, while Caracas has offered a long-term agreement to supply Spain with gas and oil.

Chávez has cultivated alliances across the ideological spectrum, buying arms from Russia and negotiating a deal with Colombia's conservative President Alvaro Uribe to build a natural gas pipeline connecting the two countries--the first step in what observers believe will give Venezuela access to the Pacific and lower export costs to China. Venezuela has also managed to secure the tacit endorsement of Chile's just inaugurated Bachelet for its bid to become a nonpermanent member of the UN Security Council, which surely will contribute to John Bolton's anger issues.

Last December Venezuela scored another diplomatic coup, joining Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay and Paraguay as a full member in Mercosur. When Mercosur was founded in 1991, it was to be little more than a tool to groom individual countries for eventual absorption into the US market. But reformers in recent years have worked to transform it into a real alternative to Washington's FTAA. The entrance of Venezuela, South America's third-largest economy, comes just at the moment when Lula's troubles are threatening to derail this project. Serious obstacles to trade and tariff standardization remain, yet at the same meeting where it approved Venezuela's petition for admission, Mercosur established a Parliament modeled on the European Union, agreeing to cooperate on a range of issues, including multilateral trade agreements with countries like China. Caracas has promised billions of dollars to develop northern South America's transportation and commercial infrastructure and has even floated the idea of a "Bank of the South," along with a common Latin American currency, which would provide an alternative to US-controlled financial institutions like the IMF and dollar-denominated financial and commodity transactions. Venezuela has already become an important regional creditor, purchasing more than $1 billion of Argentine debt last year, which allowed Buenos Aires to pay off its IMF tab in full.

Venezuela is making cheap oil available to a majority of its neighbors, including a quid pro quo with Paraguay for support of its bid to join Mercosur. But oil does more than grease Chávez's diplomatic wheels: Energy integration, he insists, will lay the foundation of Latin American unity. Kirchner, Chávez and Lula have announced plans to build a 5,000-mile pipeline that will transport Venezuelan natural gas through Brazil to Argentina; Buenos Aires and Brasilia just signed a deal whereby Argentina will ship 1.5 million cubic meters of gas to Brazil in the summer and Brazil will provide Argentina with 700 megawatts of electricity in the winter. In March the government-owned Petróleos de Venezuela (PDVSA) announced that it would spend $3 billion to buy thirty-six oil tankers from a Brazilian shipbuilder. The deal, which is the largest foreign order of Brazilian vessels to date, is expected not only to create 10,000 new jobs but, as a prime example of Chávez's realpolitik, to help Lula's re-election prospects. In addition, over the last year Venezuela and Brazil have signed a number of energy deals and have begun the construction of a joint oil refinery in the Brazilian state of Pernambuco. And while US pundits have dismissed Chávez's provision of cheap oil to poor urban neighborhoods in New England and Chicago as a public relations stunt, this innovative form of diplomacy lets him bypass unsympathetic national governments and build alliances directly with local political movements. In March he reached an agreement with a group of FMLN mayors in El Salvador, including the mayor of San Salvador, to supply them with petroleum under preferential terms, allowing Chávez to strike into a region firmly under US control and giving the leftist mayors access to an important resource independent of the national government, which is headed by the FMLN's main rival, the ultraconservative ARENA Party.

Much of this activity is taking place under the umbrella of three Chávez-brokered oil alliances--PetroAndina, PetroCaribe and PetroSur--through which Venezuela is not only offering a reliable stream of petroleum at a set price but cheap credit, processing capabilities and financing to expand gas and oil production in the respective regions. Caracas has allowed fifteen Caribbean countries to pay part of their oil bills up front, spreading the balance out over twenty-five years at low interest rates, and has even let some nations pay their debt in kind, with bananas, sugar or, in the case of Cuba, doctors. This past September, twelve Latin American energy ministers met in Venezuela and voted to pursue the unification of the three oil alliances into one PetroAmerica, which if it comes into being would allow petroleum exporting countries to negotiate collectively with the United States, generate price competition through the creation of new regional markets, and help buffer economies from energy price spikes.

Chávez's oil diplomacy extends beyond Latin America. Perhaps his most consequential initiative upon taking office in early 1999 was to end Venezuela's role as a rate-busting OPEC member and to work with Iran and other petroleum-exporting countries to enforce production quotas, which, well before Bush's invasion of Iraq and the current troubles in the Middle East, began a steady rise in world oil prices. Last year, taking advantage of increased global demand, Chávez forced seventeen foreign companies to increase royalty payments and convert their operating contracts into joint ventures with PDVSA, which not only means that the state now owns at least 51 percent of all oil production but that the multinationals will be picking up the bill for modernizing the country's drilling and refining capacities. When ExxonMobil balked at Chávez's New Year's deadline to become PDVSA's junior partner, Spain's Repsol-YPF stepped in and bought out its holdings under Venezuela's terms. A similar diversification of demand may help Morales renegotiate Bolivia's existing contracts with foreign natural gas companies, if not to nationalize production then perhaps to set up something similar to Venezuela's joint ventures. With Malaysian, Indian and Chinese gas companies eager to get in, firms already operating in Bolivia, including Repsol, will have to consider seriously whatever offer Morales puts on the table.

Just recently, Russia's Gazprom struck a preliminary deal with the Morales government to invest in joint exploration, production and refining operations--which would give one of the world's largest energy companies its first significant toehold in Latin America--while Brazil's state-owned Petrobras has signaled its willingness to renegotiate existing contracts, backed up by an announcement that it would help jumpstart Bolivia's moribund state energy company.

The Bush Administration may well face the following scenario by the end of the year, starting closest to home and working downward: A likely López Obrador win in Mexico in July, possibly supplemented by a Sandinista victory in Nicaragua, would bring Latin America's left renaissance to the United States's doorstep. Since signing NAFTA, Mexico has been one of Washington's few sure regional allies, countering Chávez's oil diplomacy by spearheading its own effort to integrate Mesoamerican and Colombian energy production and consumption. Markets are betting that López Obrador will speak like Chávez but govern like Lula. Yet Lula has demonstrated that being "fiscally responsible" in the eyes of the global financial community no longer means complete submission to Washington's will. López Obrador has not yet taken a stand on PetroAmerica, but he has invoked Mexico's long tradition of petro-nationalism, pledging not to privatize the state-owned industry and to reduce foreign influence in its operations. He has also promised to renegotiate NAFTA--particularly a provision scheduled to go into effect in 2008 that completely opens the Mexican market to US corn--and allying with Venezuela could strengthen his hand at the bargaining table. And while few welcome the possible return of the now corrupt Daniel Ortega, there are still worthy grassroots social movements within the Sandinista coalition, and a victory might begin to thaw Washington's icy grip on Central America.

Further south, with Morales in Bolivia and Chávez-style candidates on the march in Peru and Ecuador, the United States could confront a mobilized Andean rim, which could put access to cheap natural resources in danger and leave Colombia, its one trusted lieutenant in the region, isolated. Chávez's re-election, which seems assured, would give him at least another six years to consolidate Venezuela's position as a strategic hub, connecting the Andes, the Caribbean and southern South America to Spain and the EU, Russia, the Middle East, India and China. And PT militants in Brazil may look to the success of Chávez's Fifth Republic Movement to renovate their party. But Latin American solidarity historically has been honored more in the breach than in the observance. Entrenched political and economic rivalries will probably slow, if not stall, Mercosur and PetroAmerica integration. If the dollar declines and shrinks demand for imports, if global interest rates go up and swell Latin American debt, or if China slumps, leading to a fall in commodity prices and Asian investment, the economic growth that has underwritten regional cooperation over the past few years could end abruptly. Yet even if a pro-FTAA candidate wins in Brazil in October, and Peru and Ecuador remain firmly in Washington's camp, the United States would still confront opposition from Argentina, open defiance from Venezuela and, most likely, skepticism from Mexico--three of Latin America's four largest economies and critical to any successful free-trade deal.

As its political and economic influence in the region wanes, Washington has given up trying to convince Latin America to join the "war on terror," while its trade envoys are now reduced to signing bilateral deals with negligible economies like Paraguay and Ecuador to dilute opposition to the FTAA. The White House, under the sway of neocon ultras, has further backed itself into a corner by encouraging Chávez's adversaries to go for broke. Rather than patiently broadening a base of opposition and accumulating grievances, they have pursued an increasingly desperate series of actions--a coup attempt, an oil strike, the recall and, most recently, a boycott of legislative elections--that have left their nemesis strengthened and themselves discredited. Washington may be laying the groundwork for the same all-or-nothing strategy against Morales, having just announced that it is cutting off 96 percent of its military aid to Bolivia, a move that seems calculated to provoke the armed forces to act. The Bush Administration now promises to wage a battle for the "future of Latin America," but with few options left--except, of course, the military one--it is unclear if it will have any more success in what used to be the United States's backyard than it is having now in the Middle East.

Chavez: oil could reach $100 per barrel

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez on Thursday said the price of oil could reach $100 per barrel just a day after prices reached a record $74 amid supply concerns.

Speaking to reporters in Brazil, Chavez said the price of oil "could reach $100, it depends."

The leftist Chavez said U.S. threats of sanctions against Iran for its nuclear program are contributing to record energy prices.

Venezuela, the world's No. 5 oil exporter, has consistently sought to boost oil prices by supporting OPEC output cuts.

IMF suggests reforms in Argentina’s utility sector

Argentina needs to introduce reforms in the utility sector including the liberalisation of prices and raise investment in infrastructure to avoid the emergence of supply bottlenecks suggested the IMF in its annual World Economic Outlook.

Argentina’s economic expansion remains strong and broad based, bolstered by buoyant domestic demand and robust export growth, adds the IMF.

But looking ahead with capacity constraints likely to become increasingly evident and inflation beginning to erode competitiveness, growth is expected to moderate, forecasts the report.

However IMF corrected its previous 2006 growth forecast for Argentina from 4.2% last September to 7.3%, as well as its estimate for 2005 which was increased from 7.5% to 9.2%. Regarding 2007, the IMF estimate is 4%.

Argentina’s fiscal policy in 2005 performed better than budgeted as strong revenue growth offset a significant increase in government spending, but going forward a combination of larger than budgeted fiscal surpluses, higher interest rates and a greater exchange rate flexibility will be needed to manage domestic demand pressures and contain accelerating inflation, projected to average 13% in 2006.

Therefore, points out IMF, authorities will need to introduce reforms in the utility sector, including the liberalization of prices and raise investment in infrastructure to avoid the emergence of supply bottlenecks and thus pave the way for higher medium term growth.

IMF mentions that both Argentina and Brazil reflecting stronger external positions have repaid all outstanding IMF obligations, 15.5 and 9.6 billion US dollars.

Cuban detained with more than 1,000 weapons confesses to being a member of the Alpha 66 terrorist group

by Jean-Guy Allard
CUBAN Robert Ferro, arrested with an arsenal of more than 1,000 weapons in a house in Upland, California, claims to be a member of Alpha 66, a U.S.-based terrorist group with offices in Miami, with a long history of criminal actions against Cuba.

However, authorities have not yet pressed charges invoking anti-terrorism laws. Ferro is being charged only with arms trafficking. Neither have the leaders of Alpha 66 been questioned in relation to this spectacular capture.

Ferro, a retired member of the U.S. Army Special Forces, was accused in the early 90’s of running a paramilitary camp on a chicken farm in Pomona, California. He then bragged about being dedicated to “overthrowing” the Cuban Revolution. On that occasion, the authorities found five pounds of C-4, a potent military explosive.

The Alpha 66 member was then convicted, in 1992, for “possession of illegal explosives” and sentenced to two years in prison.

Now, at 61 years old, he was arrested after authorities raided his house and found hundreds of rifles, machine guns and pistols. It was then when Ferro told federal investigators that he belongs to the commando group Alpha 66, according to a judicial statement presented before a federal court by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms.

Chávez: Colombia-US trade pact killed the Andean Community

A Free Trade Agreement (FTA) Colombia initialed with the United States killed the Andean Community of Nations (CAN) and has forced Venezuela into withdrawing from the bloc, said Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez Thursday during a speech in Paraná, Brazil, where he entered 27 accords to reinforce bilateral integration.

On Wednesday, Chávez claimed his country would leave CAN, saying that the bloc was "deadly wounded."

In Brazil, on Thursday, the Venezuelan ruler argued that the pacts both Colombia and Peru signed with the United States amounted to a sort of small Free Trade Areas of the Americas (FTAA) that harmed Andean integration. Chávez further said such agreements run counter regional trade conventions.

Reply
Colombia rejected Chávez' assertions. The Colombian Ministry of Industry and Commerce, in a document forwarded to El Universal, said the Colombia-US FTA was executed with "respect for Andean regulations and for the sensibilities of the partners."

"Under the FTA, CAN is protected. The Andean legal framework prevails over the FTA, as expressly provided for in the final text of the FTA," said Colombia Commerce minister Jorge Humberto Botero in the document.

Venezuela, however, did not include a similar provision when it officially sought its entrance to the Southern Common Market (Mercosur) in 2005.

Colombia claims it requested each partner under CAN to provide information on the products they deemed sensitive to the FTA.

Regarding Venezuela, bilateral trade was protected by implementing a seven-year tax relief treaty for Venezuelan petrochemical exports to the United States, a 10-year tax relief treaty for Venezuelan iron and steel exports. Likewise, in the automotive sector, a number of special terms and trade preferences were set.

No reproaches
Botero added that late on March the CAN Secretariat General forwarded a letter certifying that Colombia met all requirements and obligations vis-à-vis the Andean countries when entering into the FTA.

"In this sense, no reproaches are valid," Botero told Caracol Radio, adding he ignored the implications of Chávez' move.

"It is noteworthy that Colombia does not object Venezuela plans to create a free trade area with Mercosur, even if such a move could involve -and will certainly involve- Colombia facing a very serious competition with Brazil and Argentina."

No idea
The implications of Chávez' announcements are not known to Venezuelan officials either, at least not officially. Venezuelan Foreign Affairs minister Alí Rodríguez Araque told his Colombian counterpart Carolina Barco he was not aware of Chávez' decision.

Barco "called minister Rodríguez and he told her he did not know the implications of President Chávez' words," Botero told Colombian media, AFP reported.

"The Venezuelan Foreign Affairs vice-minister (Pável Rondón), who was in Brussels with CAN secretary general and Colombian Foreign Affairs vice-minister (Camilo Reyes), had no information on the implications of President Chávez' assertions either," Botero added.

Calm
Meanwhile, Colombian President Alvaro Uribe said Chávez' announcement should be "addressed carefully and calmly," Efe reported.

"We want an open CAN that is able to overcome poverty. Therefore, we want to address this issue with reasoning and calmly, in analytical debates, based on the principle that we are going to find ways for all of us to do fine."

Meanwhile, Alan Wagner, secretary general of CAN, proposed holding a presidential summit to deal with Chávez' decision to withdraw from the bloc, AFP reported.

Teodoro Petkoff to run against Chávez in presidential election

Teodoro Petkoff Thursday officially launched his candidacy for next December 3rd presidential election.

In a very brief pre-taped message broadcast by a number of local private TV networks, Petkoff, editor of evening daily Tal Cual, said he made the move "to build a Venezuela without fear."

Petkoff Friday noon is scheduled to offer a news conference to provide details on this candidacy.

"Things in Venezuela cannot continue this way. Anguish, divide, fear must be stopped. You cannot live amidst permanent conflict," said the veteran political leader.

"You cannot make any progress and move forward if people are discriminated based on the Tascón List and the Maisanta List (two rolls comprising the names of the people who signed to request recall votes against Hugo Chávez and pro-government lawmakers.) Why should anyone have the right to deny others work and food based on political reasons? Despite the huge amounts of money the Government is spending, it is not creating jobs, and today no one is safe neither at home nor in the streets."

Unofficial sources said Petkoff's candidacy is supported by most leaders of socialist Movimiento al Socialismo (MAS), a party Petkoff, among others, founded. But officially, MAS has not endorsed Petkoff's candidacy.

Fidel ordered Chávez’s ‘rescue’

by Ignacio Ramonet

“They attempted to execute Chávez but the firing squad refused to shoot”

In the book “Fidel Castro, a two-voiced biography,” published by the Debate Publishing House, the Cuban president told Ignacio Ramonet information not previously released about the events of April 2002 in Venezuela.

Castro states that he phoned Miraflores Palace before Chávez surrendered and told him: “Don’t kill yourself, Hugo. Don’t do like Allende, who was a man alone. You have most of the Army on your side. Don’t quit, don’t resign.”

Later, Fidel directed Cuban Foreign Minister Felipe Pérez Roque, to fly to Caracas in one of two planes to pick up Chávez and fly him to safety.

Castro contacted “a general who sided with [Chávez]” to tell him that the world knew the president had not resigned and to ask the general to send troops to rescue the president.

Fidel Castro, who delivers so many speeches, has granted very few interviews. Only four long conversations with him have been published in the past 50 years. The fifth such interview, with the editor of Le Monde Diplomatique, Ignacio Ramonet, has become the book “Fidel Castro, a two-voiced biography,” a summary of the life and thoughts of the Cuban chief of state, distilled from 100 hours of conversation. The first interview was held in late January 2003; the final one, in December 2005.

Published in these pages is an excerpt from the interview in which Castro talks about the Venezuelan conflict that occurred on April 11, 2002. As the Comandante says, he will remain in office “as long as the National Assembly, in the name of the Cuba people, wishes.” The book, soon to appear, is published by the Debate Publishing House.

Progreso Weekly is pleased to translate and reproduce excerpts from the interview, published in Koeyú Latinoamericano.

Ignacio Ramonet (IR):You have said you feel a great admiration for Hugo Chávez, President of Venezuela.

Fidel Castro (FC):Well, yes. There we have another Indian, Hugo Chávez, a new Indian who is, as he himself says, “an Indian mixture,” mestizo, with a little white, he says. But you look at Chávez and you see an autochthonous son of Venezuela, the son of a Venezuela that itself is a mixture. But he has all those noble features and an exceptional, truly exceptional talent.

I make it a point to listen to his speeches. He feels proud of his humble origin, of his mixed ethnic background, which has a little of everything, mainly of those who were autochthonous people or slaves brought from Africa, with a mixture of Indian origin. That’s the impression. Maybe he has some white genes, and that’s not bad. The combination always is good, it enriches humanity, the combination of the so-called ethnic backgrounds.

IR: Have you followed closely the evolution of the situation in Venezuela, particularly the attempts to destabilize President Chávez?

FC: Yes, we have followed events with great attention. Chávez visited us after being released from prison before the 1998 elections. He was very brave, because he was much reproached for traveling to Cuba. He came here and we talked. We discovered an educated, intelligent man, very progressive, an authentic Bolivarian. Later he won the elections several times. He changed the Constitution. He had the formidable support of the people, of the humblest people. His adversaries have tried to asphyxiate him economically.

In the 40 famous years of “democracy” that preceded Chávez, I estimate that about $200 billion fled from the country. Venezuela could be more industrialized than Sweden and enjoy Sweden’s levels of education, if in truth there had been a distributive democracy, if those mechanisms had worked, if there had been some truth and credibility in all that demagoguery and all that publicity.

From the time that Chávez took office until currency controls were established in January 2003, I estimate that about $30 billion flew out of the country—capital flight. So, as we maintain, all those phenomena make the order of things unsustainable in our hemisphere.

IR: On April 11, 2002, there was a coup d’état against Chávez in Caracas. Did you follow those events.

FC: When we learned that the demonstration by the opposition had changed direction and was nearing Miraflores [Palace], that there were provocations, shootings, victims, and that some high officials had mutinied and come out publicly against the president, that the presidential guard had withdrawn and that the army was on its way to arrest him, I phoned Chávez because I knew that he was defenseless and that he was a man of principle, and said to him: “Don’t kill yourself, Hugo! Don’t do like Allende! Allende was a man alone, he didn’t have a single soldier on his side. You have a large part of the army. Don’t quit! Don’t resign!”

IR: You were encouraging him to resist, gun in hand?

FC: No, on the contrary. That’s what Allende did, and he paid heroically with his life. Chávez had three alternatives: To hunker down in Miraflores and resist to death; to call on the people to rebel and unleash a civil war; or to surrender without resigning, without quitting. We recommended the third choice, which was what he also had decided to do. Because history teaches us that every popular leader overthrown in those circumstances, if he’s not killed the people claim him, and sooner or later he returns to power.

IR: At that moment, did you try to help Chávez somehow?

FC: Well, we could act only by using the resources of diplomacy. In the middle of the night we summoned all the ambassadors accredited to Havana and we proposed to them that they accompany Felipe [Pérez Roque], our Foreign Minister, to Caracas to rescue Chávez, the legitimate president of Venezuela. We proposed sending two planes to bring him here, in case the putschists decided to send him into exile.

Chávez had been imprisoned by the military putschists and his whereabouts were unknown. The television repeatedly reported the news of his “resignation” to demobilize his supporters, the people. But at one point, they allow Chávez to make a phone call and he manages to talk to his daughter, María Gabriela. And he tells her that he has not quit, that he has not resigned. That he is “a president under arrest.” And he asks her to spread that news.

The daughter then has the bold idea to phone me and she informs me. She confirms to me that her father has not resigned. We then decided to assume the defense of the Venezuelan democracy, since we had proof that countries like the United States and Spain—the government of José María Aznar—who talk so much about democracy and criticize Cuba so much, were backing the coup d’état.

We asked María Gabriela to repeat it and recorded the conversation she had with Randy Alonso, the moderator of the Cuban TV program “Mesa Redonda” [Round Table], which had great international repercussion. In addition, we summoned the entire foreign news media accredited to Cuba—by then it must have been 4 o’clock in the morning—we informed them and played them the testimony of Chávez’s daughter. CNN broadcast it at once and the news spread like a flash of gunpowder throughout Venezuela.

IR: And what was the consequence of that?

FC: Well, that was heard by the military people faithful to Chávez, who had been deceived by the lie about a resignation, and then there is a contact with a general who is on Chávez’s side. I talk to him on the phone. I confirm to him personally that what the daughter said is true and that the entire world knows Chávez has not resigned.

I talk with him a long time. He informs me about the military situation, about which high-ranking officers are siding with Chávez and which are not. I understand that nothing is lost, because the best units of the Armed Forces, the most combative, the best trained, were in favor of Chávez. I tell that officer that the most urgent task is to find out where Chávez is being detained and to send loyal forces there to rescue him.

He then asks me to talk to his superior officer and turns me over to him. I repeat what Chávez’s daughter has said, and stress that he continues to be the constitutional president. I remind him of the necessary loyalty, I talk to him about Bolívar and the history of Venezuela. And that high-ranking officer, in a gesture of patriotism and fidelity to the Constitution, asserts to me that, if it’s true that Chávez has not resigned, he continues to be faithful to the president under arrest.

IR: But even at that moment nobody knows where Chávez is, true?

FC: Meanwhile, Chávez has been taken to the island of La Orchila. He is incommunicado. The Archbishop of Caracas goes to see him and counsels him to resign. “To avoid a civil war,” he says. He commits humanitarian blackmail. He asks [Chávez] to write a letter saying he is resigning.

Chávez doesn’t know what’s happening in Caracas or the rest of the country. They’ve already tried to execute him, but the men in the firing squad have refused and threatened to mutiny. Many of the soldiers who guard Chávez are ready to defend him and to prevent his assassination. Chávez tries to gain time with the bishop. He writes drafts of a statement. He fears that once he finishes the letter, [his captors] will arrange to eliminate him. He has no intention of resigning. He declares that they’ll have to kill him first. And that there will be no constitutional solution then.

IR: Meanwhile, was it still your intention to send planes to rescue him and take him into exile?

FC: No, after that conversation with the Venezuelan generals, we changed plans. We shelved Felipe’s proposition to travel with the ambassadors to Caracas. What’s more, shortly thereafter we hear a rumor that the putschists are proposing to expel Chávez to Cuba. And we immediately announce that if they send Chávez here, we shall send him back to Venezuela on the first available plane.

IR: How does Chávez return to power?

FC: Well, at one point we again get in contact with the first general with whom I had spoken and he informs me that they’ve located Chávez, that he’s on the island of La Orchila. We talk about the best way to rescue him. With great respect, I recommend three basic steps: discretion, efficacy and overwhelming force. The parachutists from the base at Maracay, the best unit of the Venezuelan Armed Forces, who are faithful to Chávez, carry out the rescue.

Meanwhile, in Caracas, the people have mobilized, asking for Chávez’s return. The presidential guard has reoccupied Miraflores [Palace] and also demands the president’s return. It expels the putschists from the palace. Pedro Carmona, president of the management association and very temporary President-usurper of Venezuela, is almost arrested right there at the palace.

Finally, at dawn on April 14, 2002, rescued by the faithful soldiers, Chávez arrives in Miraflores amid a popular apotheosis. I almost did not sleep the two days of the Caracas coup, but it was worthwhile for me to see how a people, and also patriotic soldiers, defended the law. The tragedy of Chile in 1973 was not repeated.

IR: Chávez is a representative of the progressive armed forces, but in Europe and Latin America many progressives reproach him precisely because he is a military man. What opinion do you have about that apparent contradiction between progressiveness and the military?

FC: Look, in Venezuela we have an army playing an important role in the Bolivarian revolution. And Omar Torrijos, in Panama, was an example of a soldier with conscience. Juan Velasco Alvarado, in Peru, also carried out some notable acts of progress. Let’s not forget, for example, that among the Brazilians, Luis Carlos Prestes was an officer who led a march in 1924-26 almost like the march led by Mao Zedong in
1934-35.

Jorge Amado wrote about the march of Luis Carlos Prestes in a beautiful story, “The Gentleman of Hope,” one of his magnificent novels. I had an opportunity to read them all, and that march was something impressive. It lasted more than two and a half years, covering enormous territories in his country, and he never suffered defeat.

In other words, there were prowesses that came from the military. Let’s say, I’m going to cite a Mexican military man, Lázaro Cárdenas, a general of the Mexican Revolution, who nationalized petroleum. He is very prominent, carries out agrarian reform and gains the support of the people. When one talks about affairs in Mexico, one mustn’t forget the roles played by personalities like Lázaro Cárdenas. And Lázaro Cárdenas originated in the military.

One mustn’t forget that the first people in Latin America to rise up in the 20th Century, in the 1950s, were a group of youths who rebelled, young Guatemalan officers, who gathered around Jacobo Arbenz and participated in revolutionary activities. Well, you can’t say that’s a general phenomenon but there are several cases of progressive military men.

In Argentina, Perón also came from military origins. You need to see the moment when he emerges. In 1943, he was appointed Minister of Labor and drafted such good laws that when he was taken to prison the people rescued him—and he was a military chief. There was also a civilian who had influence over the military men, he studied in Italy, where Perón also had lived; he was Jorge Eliécer Gaitán, and they were popular leaders.

Perón was an embassy attaché. He worked in Rome in the 1930s during the Mussolini period and was impressed by some of the forms and methods of mass mobilization he witnessed. There was influence, including in some processes, but in those cases where I mention that influence, Gaitán and Perón used it in a positive sense, because the truth is that Perón carried out social reform.

Perón commits, let us say, a mistake. He offends the Argentine oligarchy, humiliates it, strips it of its symbolic theater and some symbolic institutions. He worked with the nation’s reserves and resources and improved the living conditions of the workers. And the workers were very grateful, and Perón became an idol of the workers.

April 20, 2006

Venezuelan, Uruguayan leaders call for reform of Mercosur

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and his Uruguayan counterpart Tabare Vazquez on Wednesday stressed the necessity of reforming the Common Market of the South (Mercosur), said reports from Paraguay's capital Asuncion.

Chavez said that Mercosur need reform to ensure its continued function.

Uruguayan President Vazquez said that Paraguay and Uruguay had severe problems within Mercosur, adding that integration of the bloc and the region were important.

"We have to improve things because this is not the Mercosur that either Uruguay or Paraguay wants," he said.

The two presidents were in Asuncion to meet their counterparts Nicanor Duarte Frutos of Paraguay and Evo Morales of Bolivia at the Energy Summit which would end on Thursday.

Mercosur consists of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay. Bolivia is an associate member of Mercosur and Venezuela is on track to a full membership of the trade bloc.

Bolivia Holds Firm on Green Decision

La Paz
Apr 19
Bolivia's decision to not cave-in to pressure, despite kidnapping of three officials, and to stand fast against the illegal operations of Brazilian mining company EBX has earned great support and respect.

Jaime Solares, executive secretary of Central COB union (Obrera Boliviana), denounced the environmental damage EBX inflicts and its manipulation of the Puerto Suarez Civic Committee.

The Committee began a protest on behalf of the company claiming that it provides employment, but Planning Minister Carlos Villegas announced an emergency job program for the border town, with talks to be held in La Paz.

Tuesday the Committee took Villegas, Production and Small Business Minister Celinda Sosa and Mining Minister Walter Villarroel hostage and they were freed with minimal military force Wednesday.

Ombudsman Waldo Albarracin called the kidnapping and other measures of force illegal and backed the official defense of the Constitution.

Analysis: Latin America's new left axis

A series of left-leaning leaders have consolidated their power across Latin America. Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez sees this as an historic opportunity to create a new power bloc in Latin America to rebuff US influence.

The BBC's Emilio San Pedro travelled across the region for Radio 4's A New Axis of Power, to see just how close Latin America's leaders are to each other.

Lisandro Perez is the leader, or jefe civil, of the 23 de Enero district of the Venezuelan capital, Caracas. If you were looking for a place to confirm an impression that a red tide is sweeping South America a visit to his office would leave you in little doubt.

Pictures of socialist and communist revolutionaries past and present adorn the walls. The pile of paperbacks on his desk includes ones about Vladimir Lenin and Karl Marx. Next to the books lies a hood - it is the emblem of his violent left-wing guerrilla past as a member of the Tupamaro movement.

The movement is now an active social militia, Mr Perez says. And that has seen him on the streets, notably to defend President Chavez against the coup attempt in 2002.

"We need people who are fighters and who believe in social change and above all in socialism," he says.

Mr Perez's nickname - the one I heard him called as we walked around his impoverished district on the hills of Caracas - is a blast from the revolutionary past: Mao.

"I consider myself to be a Marxist-Leninist and I follow a very specific path which includes the teachings of Mao Zedong," he tells me.

"I always carry his writings along with me and they form a part of my daily life. I would say I'm a follower of his in the same way that I follow President Chavez."

Lula conservative?

Two thousand seven hundred miles away, in Brazil's biggest city, Sao Paulo, newspaper columnist Clovis Rossi is teasing his editor.

Mr Rossi works for the Folha de Sao Paulo newspaper, which says it has the biggest readership in Brazil. "We need to print a correction!" he says.

Why? Mr Rossi says that a headline the paper printed when working-class hero Lula Inacio da Silva became president in 2002 is wrong.

"It says 'First leftist elected in Brazil', but his government is miles from being leftist," he says.

"I would even say if you take the word conservative, as meaning preserving the status quo... Lula is the most conservative of the presidents we have had since redemocratisation 20 years ago."

Lula's maintenance of the economic regime of his predecessor has earned him the devotion of bankers, Mr Rossi says. "One of the most important bankers in Brazil told us that he would like to erect a statue to Lula in front of his bank's building!"

Mr Chavez and Lula are part of the shift to the left, but in many ways they could be described as worlds apart. You could say the same of Evo Morales, Bolivia's president, and Michele Bachelet, newly-installed as president of Chile.

For Lula and his government, the pursuit of economic stability is necessary to tackle poverty and inequality, and they cite success in both, backed by a range of social programmes.

In Bolivia and Venezuela you are much more likely to find business people - especially from international oil firms - worrying that the climate for making money is being soured by those respective governments.

But there are trends that seem to be sweeping the region, and on which politicians and analysts alike seem to share a similar perspective: that the concerns and plight of the poor and marginalised have become part of the political mainstream.

'Political vacuum'

Margarita Lopez Maya is a Caracas-based academic who is sympathetic to Mr Chavez. In the light of Mr Morales's electoral success in Bolivia she says:" What's happening in Latin America, from my historical perspective is that we are finally arriving to the point where we are going to have a social revolution. We are finally going to see that the people are equal.

"That's what we are trying to accomplish. We tried to do that in the 20th Century. But the immense majority of the people were still not citizens. They were second class citizens or non-citizens if you talk about the indigenous people," she argues.

In the trendy dockland area of Puerto Madero in Buenos Aires, political consultant Felipe Noguera bemoans the politics of Mr Chavez and his Argentine counterpart, President Nestor Kirchner.

President Kirchner has attacked the IMF for the woes his fellow country people have suffered as a consequence of the 2001-2002 economic crisis.

The IMF is a whipping boy for Mr Chavez as well - representing what he describes as "neo-liberalism", an exploitative form of capitalism that impoverishes rather than enriches ordinary people.

Mr Noguera says that this is populism. But he admits it is filling a political vacuum, with sentiments that have echoes of the thoughts of Ms Lopez Maya in Caracas.

"I don't think we've had the same growth of an international idea of how to tackle poverty. Therefore, it has been very easy for the populist rhetoric to establish an 'Us versus them' message," he says.

Mr Noguera says he disagrees with the idea that the Washington Consensus - a set of policies put forward by some economists as a formula for promoting economic growth - or the IMF policies failed.

"They succeeded in what they set out to do, which was to stop the macro-economic crisis and to regenerate some growth and some sense into the economies.

"What they failed to do was establish the new objectives of fighting poverty."

He says populist politicians are being supported by the high price of commodity prices - for example, oil exports in Venezuela and agricultural produce in Argentina - and that historically this recipe has failed.

'Hope'

Mercedes Marco del Pont is an Argentine deputy in Mr Kirchner's Front for Victory Movement, and a long-standing critic of the IMF. Not surprisingly, she disagrees.

Popularity is not the same thing as populism, she says.

"It's true that the president enjoys a very high level of popular support, but this isn't the result of him taking populist measures. It is owing to the fact that we have a president who maintains fiscal discipline and gets involved directly in negotiations with various social and economic players," she says.

"It is important to recognise this as a necessary characteristic in countries such as Argentina, where the state disappeared from the centre-stage for a long time," Ms Marco del Pont argues.

Whatever their differences in policy execution, what the left-leaning presidents of various hues are doing is tapping into and articulating the hopes and aspirations of those that could be seen as dispossessed or marginalised.

It was brought home to me, when I climbed up the narrow steps between the ranchos - the shanty dwellings - back in Mao's 23 de Enero district in Caracas.

I met Mercedes, whose father built her shack 48 years ago.

She and her family are hoping to have the rudimentary and flimsy structure of hardboard and corrugated iron replaced by a building of bricks. They are on a government waiting list for the home.

Under President Chavez, says Mercedes, they at last have hope. Yes their conditions are precarious, but things improve little by little.

And of Venezuela's great oil wealth that gives President Chavez the spending power for his social programmes, she has this statement: "The oil is ours!"

Chavez taking decisive steps to turn off oil taps to the United States of America

by Dr. Joe Duarte
Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez is taking decisive steps to turn off the oil taps to the United States of America.

Venezuela's state owned oil company PDVSA has inked a key deal with India, taking the first key step away from the U.S. as its major oil buyer.

At the same time, PDVSA has announced that it will no longer reveal oil statistics to the SEC after paying off its debts.

The India deal and the refusal to disclose information are not just strategic, but also send a message to the US about Venezuela's future plans with regard to supplying the US with oil.

No More Disclosure

According to the BBC: "Venezuela's state oil firm has said it will no longer disclose information to US financial regulators after paying off debts in the US. PDVSA said it was no longer obliged to be regulated by the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) after buying up $83 million in US-traded bonds."

At the same time Venezuela has begun to ship two million barrels of oil to India per month, making use of India's heavy crude refineries, for which Venezuela's sulfur laden oil is no problem.

According to Stratfor.com: "While the new deal with India is relatively small, given that Venezuela produces more than 2 million barrels of oil in a single day, it nevertheless represents a step down a sustainable path toward diversifying Caracas' oil markets."

Venezuela has been working on diversifying its dependence on US oil purchases for some time, having nurtured relationships with Iran and China, as well as India. But because the US and India are two of the few countries with existing refineries able to process heavy crude, the Chavez regime has had a difficult time getting beyond the conceptual stage with the strategy.

The India deal is small, considering the fact that Venezuela ships 1.5 million barrels of oil to the US per day ... but it is a big signal, nevertheless.

According to Stratfor: "the April 12 deal with India is just one part of a nascent multi-tier cooperation between the two nations in which Venezuela is helping India develop its own heavy crude fields, and India is in turn purchasing Venezuelan heavy crude and investing in the facilities necessary to refine heavy crude."

The Chevron Wildcard

The oil world, though, takes strange turns, as Chevron recently announced a stake in an Indian refinery that will be processing heavy crude shipped from Venezuela, and will provide products to Asia.

According to the BBC: "5% of Reliance Petroleum, a company set up by Indian conglomerate Reliance Industries to operate a new export refinery in north-west India. The 580,000 barrels-per-day site in Jamnagar will process heavy crude and is due to open in December 2008."

There has been no mention of any intention of Chevron's intentions to divert any gasoline from its India projects toward the US.

Conclusion

There are several key factors in this story, not the least of which is the international aspect of the oil market, and the effect of unintended consequences of any one party's actions.

PDVSA cuts a deal with an Indian oil company in order to move away from the US as its primary source of oil revenues. Yet, Chevron, a US company, slipped into the deal through the back door. Chevron is playing it cool, noting that this venture will concentrate on providing oil to Asia. Yet, all gasoline looks, feels, and smells similarly, which means that while ideologues will try to manipulate the markets, money will always win out.

Who's to know where the gasoline we put in our gas tank in 2008 will come from?

The only thing that is certain is that because of geopolitics, it will take a lot more money to take oil out of the ground, send it somewhere to get refined, and eventually deliver it to gas stations.

Futures markets predict even higher prices ahead

The mainstream press has finally tuned into the fact that crude oil is selling above $70 per barrel, but they have yet to note that the December 2006 crude contract is now testing the $75 area.

Meanwhile, gasoline and heating oil prices remain above $2 and natural gas has made a bottom, and looks to be heading higher as well.

A look ahead in natural gas shows that the December Natural gas contract is trading near $11 while the May contract is working on the $8 mark. In other words traders are starting to place a significant premium for energy into the winter months, as they begin to speculate on potential supply disruptions.

Venez Denies US Alleged Nuke Deals

Caracas
Apr 18
Venezuela defends the peaceful use of nuclear energy, such as that of Iran, Foreign Minister Ali Rodríguez affirmed Tuesday.

Addressing the TV program "En Confianza," the minister denied US accusations of alleged deals between Venezuela and Iran for the stockpile of nuclear missiles in the South American country.

"We have no arms deal with Iran, and the country´s military relations are totally clear and public," Rodriguez assured, adding any country has the right to use nuclear energy with peaceful goals.

"With such statements, the George W. Bush administration aims to create regional conflicts, and as in the Iraq case, use the alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction as a pretext for intervention," the official stressed.

Referring to the US military maneuvers in Caribbean waters, Rodriguez pointed out they aim to intimidate both Cuba and Venezuela, but discarded an aggression, since he considers the White House is not ready to wage another war.

A U.S. Intelligence Hoax on Venezuela?

by Michael Fox
Apr 19
Yesterday morning, Caracas awoke to the news in the Venezuelan daily paper, 2001, that US intelligence sources had reported the existence of a secret agreement between Iran and Venezuela whereby Iran will be sending nuclear weapons to Venezuela and Cuba.

Venezuelan Minister of Foreign Relations, Ali Rodriguez Araque, was up before the Caracas morning traffic had begun, denying the claim as “absurd” in an interview with Venezuelan Television. “It tops a chain of absurdities that have been unloaded on Venezuela in recent years," Rodriguez continued. "We have no arms deal with Iran, and the country’s military relations are totally clear and public."

He indicated that Venezuela believes in the elimination of all weapons of mass destruction in the world, although he added that any country should have the right to use nuclear energy with peaceful goals. He went on to condemn the intense US propaganda campaign to portray Iran as a “dark beast.”

Curiously, yesterday’s 2001 article, which caused the stir, is no longer available online.[1] In its place is an article on the Minister’s reaction.[2] A reaction, which has been covered by over 80 media outlets around the world. But according to the AP, which reported only a tiny blurb on the piece, “other papers did not carry the [original] report and the newspaper did not give any details about how it obtained the information.”

A deeper investigation, however, reveals an uncanny similarity between yesterday morning’s 2001 article and the information found in an article by former self-proclaimed criminal and current US law-enforcement collaborator Kenneth Rijock.

Kenneth Rijock

According to Washington Technology, “Kenneth Rijock [was a] former banking lawyer and money-launderer in Miami in the 1980s, who spent two years in jail for his crimes and is now teaching law enforcement how financial criminals work and think.”

In 2000, he proudly testified before the House Subcommittee on Financial Institutions, that he is “a veteran of over one hundred domestic and international bulk cash smuggling operations.”[3]

But lately, it seems, he’s been busy doing anything he can to defame Latin America, Cuba, and especially Venezuela. Writing for various websites under the tagline of “Financial Crime Consultant” or “Investigative Reporter,” over the past three months, he has written articles accusing President Chavez of money-laundering Venezuelan funds offshore and of promoting a foreign policy that “can only result in an armed conflict in the Caribbean.” Of course, as Rijock explained in one of his recent articles, his sources “must remain anonymous for their own safety.” Which explains why rarely is anyone cited.

Last month Rijock charged the director of the Venezuelan daily paper, Diario Vea, Guillermo Garcia Ponce with arranging to buy nuclear missiles from North Korea. Garcia adamantly denied the charges and according to Prensa Latina, “added that such lies are part of the US drive to destabilize the Chavez administration, and recalled that weapons of mass destruction were the pretext to justify the war on Iraq.”

Rijock vs. Brando

Rijock’s article is entitled “Chavez Assists Castro In Moving Offensive Weapons Into Cuba,” and is found on Ryan Mauro’s worldthreats.com.[4] Although the page cites petroleumworld.com as the primary source for the article, Petroleum World editors have confirmed that they have never published a Rijock article by that name. Which is not surprising, considering that this does not seem to be the only sourcing problem the website has. Rijock’s article is undated. There also appears to be a Spanish version of the article, published under a different title, at La Nueva Cuba on March 13.[4a]

Yesterday morning’s article in 2001 was written by veteran journalist Jesus Eduardo Brando, and entitled “Iranian Missiles for Venezuela.” Beyond talk of the Venezuelan delegation that visited Tehran last week, for the “Third International Conference in Support for the Rights of the Palestinian People” and a brief explanation of the Iranian nuclear program, the bulk and most tantalizing meat of this article is the nearly top-secret information that it claims that US intelligence agencies have reported.

However, with a close comparison of the Rijock and Brando articles, it becomes impossible to negate the fact that not only does all of the supposed “US intelligence” information from the Brando article come directly from Rijock’s piece—even down to an off-hand reference to the Chernobyl disaster—but, moreover, that Brando is actually referring to the Rijock article when he cites “sources of US intelligence.”

In the opening paragraph of yesterday’s 2001 article, Brando writes:

“US Intelligence agencies report.... Nuclear weapons would be transported in oil tankers in order to evade satellites and spy planes. This would enormously increment the offensive capacity of the Cuban regime and of true threat to the security of the United States.”[5]*

Rijock writes in “Chavez Assists Castro In Moving Offensive Weapons Into Cuba”:

“It is believed that Venezuelan oil tankers will be the method of shipment, thereby concealing the cargo from any prying overhead spy satellites or American aircraft. These missiles will give the Castro regime an offensive capability that, in essence, will affect the balance of power in the Caribbean, and pose a threat to the US.”

Towards the end of his article, Brando writes:

“The reports add that this would constitute a nightmare for the Western Hemisphere that should be seriously considered. They warn against the danger of accidental detonation or the release of radioactive material as occurred at the Russian plant Chernobyl.”[6]

Rijock writes:

“That nightmare should make all of us in the Western Hemisphere wake up in the middle of the night, but there is another alternative threat to consider.... Will there be an accidental detonation... that would make the Chernobyl disaster seem tame.”

In his last paragraph, Brando writes:

“[The reports] suggest that Washington take a moment of attention, in the middle of its focus on Iraq to ‘insure that those missiles never get to Venezuela.’ At the same time they ask questions about whether it is once again time to toughen positions against Cuba including the possibility of a new blockade and “action against Venezuela and Señor Chavez.”[7]

Rijock writes in one of his last paragraphs:

“The real issue is whether the United States will take a moment from its focus on Iraq and insure that those missiles never get to Venezuela.... Is it time for a hard look at another blockade of Cuba? Other alternatives include external action against Venezuela, so Senor Chavez' tenure as President of his country could soon to come to an end.”

The comparison can be made for the entire article, but it is probably not necessary. It is fairly clear that the so-called “US intelligence agencies”, “sources of US intelligence” and “US intelligence reports” all refer to Rijock’s article from worldthreats.com.

This leads us to the question of whether Rijock is on the take from the US government. Rijock’s history of work with US Law Enforcement after his time in jail is adequately documented, so it wouldn’t be out of the question. But considering his outrageous reports, undocumented claims, and criminal history, it is most likely he is being paid to disseminate misinformation, disinformation, and lies, and not to actually collect “intelligence.” As VEA director Garcia Ponce responded last month to Rijock’s accusations against him, “such lies are part of the US drive to destabilize the Chavez administration.”

As for veteran journalist Jesus Eduardo Brando, it is hard to believe that he was unaware that Rijock’s article was not in-fact “a US intelligence report.” Even given the benefit of the doubt, the use of unconfirmed information written by a self-proclaimed criminal at best results in an absolute disregard for journalistic ethics and at worst; misinformation, manipulation and outright lies.

US denies claims that naval maneuvers are intended to intimidate

The United States Tuesday rejected claims that naval maneuvers in the Caribbean are intended to intimidate President Hugo Chávez' Government or other administrations in the region, and insisted that the two-month deployment "Partnership of the Americas" has been launched for purposes of training and cooperation in the region.

"I know this (Venezuelan) Government has voiced concern, but all I can tell you is that Partnership of the Americas is not focused on any particular country," lieutenant Chris Loundermon, a spokesman for the US Southern Command based in Miami, told AFP.

The deployment of a combat group including aircraft carrier USS George Washington and other three warships, and 6,500 sailors, until the end of May comes at a time of increasing US concerns about Chávez' attempts at politically influencing the region.

Maneuvers are "focused on the region, on promoting cooperation with the Armed Forces of other nations so that they can learn on how we conduct sea operations, and for us to see how they conduct maritime operations, and also for training purposes," Loundermon said.

The operation involves different levels of military cooperation with Colombia, Dominican Republic, Nicaragua, Jamaica and Trinidad & Tobago.

The US Navy is “not going to intimidate us”

Venezuelan Vice President Jose Vicente Rangel said Wednesday that the United States military exercises in the Caribbean "are not going to intimidate us".

"If they want to intimidate us, they are going to fail, because they are not going to achieve their purpose”, insisted Mr. Rangel.

A U.S. Navy battle group that includes the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS George Washington is on maneuvers in the Caribbean Sea. Dubbed "Partnership of the Americas" the exercises are sponsored by the U.S. Army's Southern Command and include more than 6,500 servicemen from the USS George Washington Carrier Strike Group.

"Intimidation times in the world are over. We're going to see how close (to Venezuela) the ships sail" Rangel told reporters after a ceremony marking the 196th anniversary of the beginning of the independence movement in Venezuela.

The U.S. naval exercise in combination with forces from other regional countries began early this month and is scheduled to end in May.

In response to a question about forces from other Caribbean states taking part in the exercises, Rangel said those vessels were "canoes" compared to the U.S. carrier group.

Venezuela Reaches Landmark 75% Debt Retirement

After almost a year of buying billions of dollars in Argentine bonds, Venezuela moves to buy back its own, saving, according to the Ministry of Finance, $676 million in debt repayments in 2006.

Venezuela announced in late February it would retire 3.9 billion dollars in Brady bonds, which would have matured in 2020. Last week the Ministry of Finance announced that 75 percent of the purchase had been made. The remaining sum is expected to be bought back by the end of May.

According to the Ministry, the retiring of bonds will lead to the reduction of total public debt as a percent of GDP to 32 percent, falling over a three and a third percentage points. This, along with the payback of $779 million to multilateral organizations, is part of Venezuela’s overall plan a 15 percent reduction in external debt to 21 percent of GDP by the end of the year, the Minister of Finance told the press in February. At the end of 2005, external debt stood at 23 percent.

“The goal of this plan to reduce public debt the freeing up of monetary flows which will be used to increase the disposable resources for public investment, support of private sector activity, and, even more importantly, the possibility to expand the programs of social spending in education, health and food access,” said an April 12 Finance Ministry press release.

Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez has criticized the effects of indebtedness in Latin America, calling it an “unchanging and inextinguishable” because of high interest rates and an “evil burden” that takes away from social spending.

The Venezuelan government has also committed to helping Argentina rebuild its reserves after paying back the IMF early. Thus far the government has bought over $2 billion in Argentine debt over the past year, and is expected to buy more. The moves away from regional external debt seem to be part of a movement toward Latin American financial stronghold independent of Washington. Between 1980 and 2000, under the guidance of the IMF, the region saw an almost 8 fold decrease in economic growth over the previous 20 years, according to a study of the Washington-based Center for Economic and Policy Research.

Venezuela’s ability to pay down debt is due in part to a rapidly growing economy, which has flourished in the wake of high oil prices and generous government social spending.

I will never forget what the USA did to millions of innocent people

by Oscar Heck
I have been gone for several days ... away from home and internet ... on the road. Many things had been going through my mind, one of which was to respond to all the people who have emailed me recently ... and that is a substantial number. Finally, after many hours, I have been able to respond to everyone ... except for two anti-Chavez people from whom my responses bounce back. In other words, I respond to them, but they will never receive my answer. I asked my wife the other day, why is it that some people (only anti-Chavez, coincidentally) write me letters, insulting me and throwing their raging, conscienceless spit at me ... yet I cannot respond to them because my emails bounce back? She replied that it is because they block my emails or they are simply using forged aliases.

Boy, am I naive or what! "Dum-dum!"

Here I am spending hours responding, as I believe I should, no matter how disgusting and violent some emails may be ... but I am essentially wasting my time. Some of the letter-writers actually expect me to not answer them! Why then do they write to me? I don't understand. What are they afraid of? My response to them? I rarely swear (although they often do) and I rarely use condescending words or phrases, even when addressing letter-writers who promise to have me, "the scum," assassinated.

Oh well, such is life.

Now ... I would like to bring up a subject which I believe is important. I do not appreciate people putting words in my mouth, thinking they are "so smart." (I can clearly picture them grinning like devilish imps, bragging to their psycho-friends about how they "outsmarted" Oscar Heck and sent him away scurrying like an injured rat!)

There's a letter-writer, Charles Dewey, on which I will only expend a few words, who recently wrote, "According to Mr. Heck, it is alright for a man to beat his wife, steal from his neighbor, or commit murder, as long as he keeps his activities contained to the poor side of town."

I never said nor implied any such thing!

I say to anyone out there who thinks they are so "smart" and wish to "outsmart me" or stomp me to the ground or set me on fire, do not put words in my mouth. It is dishonest and without-conscience. What I mean is simple ... if someone reads Dewey's article without reading mine, the reader may incorrectly assume that Dewey, the liar (not an insult, the truth!), is telling the truth. Dewey, as most rabid anti-Chavez people I have dealt with for close to 4 years, uses such tactics ... deception.

Yes, there are times when such people finally come to the point of self-destruction in terms of their credibility ... but the important thing here is the fact that through their use of deception, they are negatively affecting innocent people ... mostly, the innocent people who voted for Chavez ... the majority of the Venezuelan population ... the majority of whom are poor ... who are striving to create a more equitable Venezuela.

The use of deception can be compared to the USA's use of deception to invade Iraq. There were no "Weapons of Mass Destruction," just as I never said what Dewey claims I said.

On to another issue. I received many emails, almost exclusively from proponents of the violent anti-Chavez movement. Most of these emails were related to the article I wrote recently about how the opposition (opposition to Chavez) is using "increased violence in Venezuela" as a Chavez punching bag ...

Every such letter was, as usual, unsigned. The following are some excerpts. It again shows, as usual, the depth of violence which these people so fluidly project. Have fun.

Letter No.1
"No subject: Listen, the FACTS speak for themselves all over the world: CHAVEZ is no NO GOOD to anybody, any country,to Venezuela: He and his gang have destroyed the very essence of what Venezuela is. From your lack of reason i infer that you are getting paid good money to defend the beasts. I hope you do not regret your possition when your time comes."

For readers: I do not get paid by anyone to write what I write. I wish I did, I could spend much more time investigating and writing ... supporting true democracy in Venezuela, supporting the traditionally exploited Venezuelan majority ... those Venezuelans who have been traditionally exploited and abused by the majority of the people who hate Chavez ... the minority wealthy, mostly racist and mostly whiter-skinned, mid-to-upper classes.

Letter No.2
"Subject - retardation: You really must be insane,there are many problems with the USA but it is pure trash to blame everything that goes wrong Americans,grow up,clean your own doorstep,stop thinking you live in Paradise,I believe that people who throw mud at someone else all the time have more to hide than the ones they are throwing it at."

Hey, I, "the retard" (?), do throw mud at the USA ... and I will continue to do so. If this letter-writer had seen what I saw in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia during the Gulf War in 1991, he/she might also throw mud, and perhaps boulders at his/her own "grand" USA, murderers par excellence!

Letter No.3
"Ni siquiera los mediocres articulos que leo en su pagina web que de paso esta tan mal disenada. Ni eso puede usted hacer bien, o los que trabajan para usted. Soy una ciudadana comun profundamente decepcionada de un gobierno inutil, barato, indecente, mediocre, hostil, mentiroso y escaparate de atrocidades ... Solo es el reflejo de una cantidad de Venezolanos muy pobres que viven en cerros y que no tiene ni la menor idea de lo que estan haciendo ... Siga viviendo en su burbuja de jabon Sr Oscar, lo felicito."

Translation: "Not even the mediocre articles that I read on your web page, which by the way, is so badly designed ... even that, you cannot do well, or those who work for you. I an a common citizen profoundly disappointed in a government (he/she refers to the Chavez government) which is useless, cheap, indecent, mediocre, hostile, lying and a showcase for its atrocities ... It is only a reflection of a (large) quantity of very poor Venezuelans who live on the hills (he/she means slums) and who have no idea what they are doing ... Keep on living in your soap bubble Mr. Oscar, congratulations."

The above letter-writer started off the letter rather calmly, but by the end it became a typical anti-Chavez letter. Most anti-Chavez people use terms (usually adjectives, for lack of logical argument) designed to insult or debase others ... words like mediocre, useless, etc. ... and/or sarcasm, such as, "congratulations!"

Letter No.4
"Oscar 'tinfoil hat' Heck needs to quit trying to minimize the problem of crime (and others) in Venezuela. An interesting point is he claims that innocent people are rarely killed, yet says a large number of murders result when victims of mugging do not cooperate. Since when are 'victims of muggings' not innocent?"

(I don't know what s/he means by "tinfoil hat" ... but it sounds rather funny, even though it may be meant as some kind of "sly" insult ... lol ...)

Again, putting words in my mouth ... I never said, "large number of murders result when victims do no cooperate."

In fact, as far as I remember, the number of people murdered through muggings (by not cooperating with robbers) is quite low ... something in the range of less than 5% of all murders committed. Regarding who is "innocent" or not "innocent," generally-speaking, anyone with a brain well-bolted onto their body will know that if you refuse to collaborate with a mugger (or a group of muggers), you are "asking for trouble."

It's common sense.

If someone comes yelling to me, black eye and blood flowing from his broken nose and blurts out "I just got mugged! They surrounded me and demanded I hand over my knapsack and money ... but I refused to give it to them, the bastards! Hey, I wasn't gonna give in, you know, those guys are criminals! I told them to F-OFF ... and then they tried to take my bag ... but I kicked them hard, the bastards. One of them took out a gun and hit me across the face with it. I dropped like a fly and the other one kicked me in the eye ... and others beat the crap out of me too. They took my stuff!" ... I would reply something to the effect, "You asked for it 'dum-dum' -- as the alien in The Flintstones would say -- ! Why didn't you give them your bag and money and ask them to leave you with at least a bit of money to take a bus ... and ask them not to take your travel journal or other important things you want to keep but that they can't use or sell?"

It is pretty obvious to me that my invented "dum-dum" friend was not necessarily an "innocent" victim. In other words, he was in innocent victim of robbery, but he was certainly not a innocent victim of violence!

It comes down to common sense.

Now .. for all you Chavez-haters out there ... I will continue to investigate and write against the violent anti-Chavez sectors (people) who use deception, lies, malice and violence to express their frustrations or points of views.

I will never forget the crimes committed by the violent Venezuelan opposition (opposition to Chavez) against the millions of innocent Venezuelans (the majority poor!) in 2002 and 2003.

For all those out there, including the Chavez-haters (who are usually USA-lovers) , who support, espouse or promote the USA ... just to let you know ... I will continue to investigate and write against the USA, against its psychopathic leaders, against its criminal government, against its lying mainstream media, against its rotten human "values," against "Free Trade," against its inhuman social system and against its generally violent, arrogant and coercive nature.

I will never forget what the USA did to millions of innocent people during and after the Gulf War.

There's no excuse!

Brazil celebrates Friday oil self sufficiency

Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva will announce Friday that the country has become self sufficient in oil with a daily production of 1.9 million barrels per day.

On Friday Lula da Silva will officially activate oil rig P-50 in the Albacora Leste Campos basin, 120 kilometres offshore Rio Do Janeiro with proven reserves of 500 million barrels of oil and 7.3 billion cubic metres of natural gas.

The new rig will increase Petrobras production by 13.4% in 2006 reaching the 1.91 million barrels per day needed to ensure Brazil’s consumption. The rig cost 634 million US dollars and will extract 180.000 bpd.

“Self sufficiency is an extremely unusual phenomenon nowadays” said Sergio Gabrielli, Petrobras CEO in an interview with Folha do Sao Paulo adding that Brazil this year will have an oil surplus account equivalent to 3 billion US dollars reverting decades of deficits.

President Lula who is expected to announce his re-election bid in the coming weeks wants to make the achievement of oil self sufficiency a matter of national pride for Brazil and apparently a launching pad for his continued political aspirations. A massive television campaign costing over 15 million US dollars is paving the way for the Friday announcement.

With oil at 70 US dollars the barrel and possibly much higher in the coming weeks, “Brazil is achieving a strong defense against possible supply crisis or price speculations”, said Adriano Pires, head of Brazil’s Infrastructure Centre.

Compared to 2004, oil production in the coming six years is expected to increase 54%, exports 190% and imports will contract 65%, according to Petrobras Business Planning Office.

Brazil’s oil industry gained momentum in the mid nineties with deregulation and the growing participation of the private sector. The decisive moment happened in 2003 with the discovery of large offshore deposits in the Campos basin.

“We’ve had a production boom. In 1997 when we opened the oil market to the private sector production was 0,865 million bpd. This year we’ll be above 1.8 million barrels, which means doubling production”, said Mr. Pires.

However he also mentioned that other factors have influenced the achievement of the self sufficiency goal: “incredibly” low economic expansion rates and the growing demand for other alternative fuels such as alcohol and natural gas.

But Petrobras CEO Gabrielli cautioned that the fact “we are self sufficient does not mean oil prices in Brazil will be independent from those in the rest of the world”.

Petrobras reports that Brazil has sufficient oil reserves for the next ten years and in the coming five will be spending 500 million US dollars annually to consolidate production. By 2010 Brazil should have incorporated new wells representing an additional 1.5 million bpd.

Panama Canal expansion to create 240,000 jobs

The planned expansion of the Panama Canal, to be financed by users, is expected to create some 240,000 jobs, said the water-way deputy manager Manuel Benitez.

“The Treasury will not have to pay one nickel for the project” Benitez said, adding that the proposal set forth by the Panama Canal Authority (ACP) "does not call for the central government to take any type of debt to cover the financing" of the construction.

As to employment "we’re talking of possibly more than 240,000 additional jobs" including direct and indirect positions, the ACP official said.

Benitez said construction of the third set of locks foreseen in the project would begin within 18-24 months after approval of the expansion in the referendum. Panama plans to hold a referendum later this year on expansion of the canal.

Under the Panamanian Constitution, the decision to expand the interoceanic waterway can only be made by the people in a referendum.

Construction of the new locks is expected to take about five years and "we will have to raise tolls immediately" to provide the initial project financing, Benitez said. The new locks are needed to accommodate the larger ships now in operation around the world.

Panamax vessels which are 230 meters long, 32.2 meters wide and have a 70,000-ton capacity are the largest vessels that can pass through the flood gates of Gatun, Pedro Miguel and Miraflores, which have remained unchanged since the canal was built.

The Panama Canal, which the United States begun building in 1904 opened on August 15, 1914, with the passage of the U.S. steamship Ancon. The 80-kilometer water-way links the Pacific and Atlantic oceans and has been under Panamanian management since December 31, 1999, when the United States surrendered it under the terms of the 1977 Torrijos-Carter accords.

The canal which is a main source of income for Panama had revenues of 1.2 billion US dollars in 2005, with 489 million US dollars paid to the Panamanian treasury according to ACP.

The U.S. ban on travel to Cuba devastates local families

by Kathy Johnston
A rare visit to SLO next week by a musician from Cuba brings into the spotlight the U.S. ban on travel to and from our Caribbean neighbor. It's a prohibition that hits especially close to home for two prominent local Cuban-Americans who aren't allowed to go back to see their families. Delvis Fernandez, the founder and president of the national Cuban American Alliance Education Fund, would like to take his blind 88-year-old mother Sara to Cuba to visit with her diabetic 86-year-old sister, whose leg was recently amputated. But their proposed trip is illegal under the U.S.

Administration's tightening regulations.

George "Jorge" Milanés of Los Osos wants to travel to Havana to see his dying 94-year-old aunt, Tia Carmen, who-in a typical Cuban extended family custom-helped raise him. However, U.S. rules forbid him to go. "What are we as a society if we violate the basic rights of the most fundamental part of civilization, the family?" asks Fernandez, who moved from his Washington, D.C. office to See Canyon to be closer to his sons and grandchildren.

"There is such pain among Cuban-Americans because of family separation. I want American people to be aware that the policy of the Bush Administration has exacerbated a tremendous problem," he adds.

Although other Americans are not allowed to travel to Cuba at all, Cuban-Americans are now allowed one trip every three years to visit family members. But under the new rules, "family" has been redefined only as mother, father, sister or brother. Aunts, uncles, cousins, nieces, and nephews don't qualify-which is the reason Fernandez is not allowed to accompany his aging mother on a visit to her sister.

"We could be detained, we could be arrested, if we go to see our family, if
we unite two elderly people, two loving sisters, in the twilight of their lives," Fernandez says with a deep sigh.

Administration officials say the travel ban is aimed at supporting the U.S. embargo and restricting the flow of funds to Fidel Castro's government, thereby hastening a regime change. That's also the reason Cubans are not permitted to travel into the U.S., where they might earn money.

Cuban guitarist and composer Pablo Menéndez, who comes to Cuesta College April 17, is virtually the only musician currently allowed to travel back and forth. But he's a special case. Born in Oakland, California, Pablo Menéndez went to Cuba in 1966, at age 14, to visit his father and study music. He's been living and playing music there ever since, an active part
of the Cuban music scene.

Members of Menéndez' Grammy-nominated band Mezcla (Spanish for "mixture") are not allowed to accompany him, so instead of a concert, he'll give a multimedia tribute to Cuban music. The event is cosponsored by the Central Coast Cuban American Alliance, a local group founded by Milanés after he revisited his birthplace in Cuba in 2000.

Milanés first met Pablo Menéndez 12 years ago, while attending a Northern California concert of Mezcla promoted by Carlos Santana. "Mezcla is the cleanest, freshest water I have ever tasted," gushes Santana.

Impressed by the band leader's blend of traditional African rhythms, Cuban songs, jazz, blues, and rock, Milanés made a point of seeing Pablo Menéndez' concert at Havana's premier jazz club, La Zorra y El Cuervo (The Fox and the Skunk). [Fox and Crow--L.A.] He's stayed in contact, and invited the Cuban musician to the Central Coast for next week's Cuesta College presentation.

With the Bush Administration's new definition of "family" for Cuban-Americans, Milanés cannot legally travel to Havana again, since he has only aunts, cousins, nieces and nephews there. His California-born children are not allowed a first-hand experience of their Cuban roots. "How gross is that, to hinge foreign policy on the separation of families, especially for a 'family values' kind of guy," Milanés fumes.

When Milanés was three, during Cuba's revolutionary struggle, a government-issued military bullet pierced the wall above his crib, so his uncle put him on a plane in Havana to join his parents in Miami. For Milanés, going back to Cuba after living 40 years in the U.S. was "life-altering."

"Stepping on Cuban soil in 2000, I almost got weak in the knees with the flush of feelings. I felt like I was home," Milanés says. Now, he says, to be legally allowed to visit, he would have to marry a Cuban-and would be allowed to see her only once every three years, even if they had children there.

Fernandez' story has a similar ring. He arrived in the U.S. from Cuba in 1957 at the age of 17 to attend college in Salt Lake City. With limited English skills, he enrolled in mathematics classes, eventually obtaining his Ph.D. and becoming a college math professor in the Bay Area.

Returning to Cuba to see his younger sister 22 years later was a dramatic experience for him. He had last seen her when she was just four years old.

"You have the hunger for connection, for commonality of day-to-day experiences, all those little things of life we're missing-that's what creates love," Fernandez says.

Later, his sister suffered an aneurysm, and her family in the U.S. couldn't go see her before she passed away. The experience was a catalyst for Fernandez to form the Cuban American Alliance Education Fund, which advocates for expanded trade, especially of food and medical supplies, and more liberal visitation policies. He's lobbied Congressional lawmakers, and last year testified before the U.S. Commission on Human Rights in Geneva.

But the U.S. rules on travel and trade keep tightening up, in spite of his efforts. Even educational and arts exchanges, like the one that took the SLO's Academy of Dance to Cuba in 2000, are no longer allowed.

Some Americans are refusing to follow the Administration's directives on Cuban travel, lured by the forbidden fruit that's closer to the U.S. than Santa Barbara is to SLO. In spite of the risk of fines up to $65,000, according to the Los Angeles Times, "many" Americans fly to Havana through the back door, from Canada, Jamaica, the Bahamas, or Mexico. At least 500 Americans were fined last year for traveling to Cuba, according to the Times.

From Fernandez' point of view, most Americans are not aware of the U.S. Administration's travel restrictions. "You'll find every American you talk to rejects the U.S. policy. We have to expose this cruelty so people will rise up and say, 'This is not right.' There comes a time when you have to say, 'Basta,' that's enough."

Surrounded in his See Canyon office by Cuban books, photos, and a bust of José Martí, Fernandez quotes the Cuban national hero: "To see a crime and do nothing is to commit that crime."

April 19, 2006

Chavez: Oil Will Be Destroyed if Attacked

ASUNCION, Paraguay
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez on Wednesday again raised the specter of U.S. designs to oust him and promised that his government will blow up his country's oil fields if the United States should ever attack.

U.S. officials have repeatedly denied any military plans against Chavez, but also call him a threat to stability in the region.

Speaking to other South American leaders, Chavez said his conflict with Washington is rooted in the U.S. thirst to control oil. He said the Americans will be denied that in Venezuela, which is the world's fifth-largest oil exporter and one of the biggest suppliers to the U.S. market.

If the United States attacks, Chavez said, ``We won't have any other alternative - blow up our own oil fields - but they aren't going to take that oil.''

Some of Chavez's political opponents at home call his warnings about a U.S. invasion far-fetched and contend he pursues the verbal conflict with Washington to encourage a sense of struggle against a foreign enemy as he heads toward the presidential election in December.

Chavez cited what he called a regular flow of threatening statements and actions from the U.S. government, from U.S. naval exercises being held this month in the Caribbean to U.S. questions about Venezuela's deepening ties with Iran.

``The latest they've invented is that we're sending uranium to Iran, and what's more yesterday it came out in the Venezuelan press that we're making a secret plan to bring Iranian nuclear missiles and install them in Venezuela,'' he said.

In that report, the Venezuelan newspaper 2001 cited unidentified U.S. intelligence sources as saying Iran and Venezuela made a secret deal to ship missiles to Venezuela and Cuba aboard oil tankers. It did not provide any details about its sources, and the report was roundly denied by Venezuelan officials as preposterous.

Chavez accused the United States of ``searching for an excuse for anything'' against Venezuela, noting U.S. warship are holding exercises this month in the Caribbean - ``there under our very noses.''

In Caracas, meanwhile, Venezuela's defense minister, Adm. Orlando Maniglia, said Chavez's military plans to hold its own exercises soon along the coasts and with neighboring countries' armed forces.

``We already have planned some future exercises with the government of Curacao, and also with the Dutch, with the navy and armed forces of Colombia,'' he said, without giving any details.'

But Venezuela also has problems with neighboring Colombia. It demanded Wednesday that Colombian President Alvaro Uribe investigate a Colombian magazine's allegations that Uribe's secret police plotted to assassinate Chavez.

``The government of President Uribe is obligated to thoroughly investigate and share its investigation with the Venezuelan government,'' Vice President Jose Vicente Rangel told reporters in Caracas.

Uribe has denied the accusations.

Venezuela quits Andean trade bloc

Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez says his country is withdrawing from the South American trade bloc, the Andean Community of Nations.

He told a summit in Paraguay that Venezuela was leaving because recent trade deals between Peru, Colombia and the US had killed off the community.

He has accused fellow members of being overly aligned with the US.

He has vowed to create economic and political unity in South America without the help of Washington.

'Fatal wound'

Mr Chavez has maintained a war of words with Washington, and argued that free trade deals are unfair to developing nations.

On Wednesday the Venezuelan leader told reporters at the summit in Asuncion that the Andean Community of Nations - made up of Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru - was "fatally wounded" and only served international elites.

Venezuela, however, is on track to becoming a full member of Mercosur, another South American trade bloc whose member governments are mostly left-wing.

The BBC's Greg Morsbach in Caracas said there are other projects under way to drive forward integration.

Bolivia's President Evo Morales has agreed to buy a 5% stake in the Latin American public news channel Telesur, which is jointly owned by Venezuela, Cuba, Argentina and Uruguay.

Interview with Oscar Olivera: The Streets and the State in Bolivia

by Benjamin Dangl
"Super dogs especial," yelled the hot dog vendor. His stand was an island in a street packed with World Social Forum participants. Other people sold Che Guevara hats, artesian jewelry, Hugo Chavez dolls and radical buttons in six languages. Drum circles and generators roared as I sat down next to the hot dog stand with Oscar Olivera.

The recent electoral victory of Evo Morales in Bolivia was a big topic of discussion at the Social Forum in Caracas, Venezuela. As people lined up at the stand for dinner, Olivera talked about the relationship between Bolivia’s social movements and the Morales administration.

Morales, an indigenous coca farmer and congressman with the Movement Toward Socialism (MAS) party, won the Bolivian presidential elections in a landslide victory on December 18, 2005. He has pledged to organize a constituent assembly to rewrite the constitution, change the rules of the US-led war on drugs in Bolivia, and protect the country’s gas reserves from corporate exploitation. Though various advances have been made since his inauguration in January, it is still unclear how far Morales will go with the radical changes he promised on the campaign trail.

Olivera was a key leader in the 2000 revolt in Cochabamba, Bolivia against the Bechtel Corporation’s privatization of the city’s water. He was involved in the 2003 uprisings against the Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada administration’s plan to privatize and export the nation’s gas reserves and continues to work closely with Bolivian labor groups. In this interview, he provides an inside look into the current geopolitical situation in Bolivia.

Benjamin Dangl: Please explain some of the differences between the social movements in Bolivia and what is happening here in Venezuela.

Oscar Olivera: There is a strong presence of the MAS party, fundamentally in the rural areas. But there are also people in urban and indigenous movements that are working autonomously, on the margin of the MAS, and without any possibility of becoming politicians. Regardless of whether you are with the MAS or working autonomously, these social movements have had a great capacity to unite in order to defend basic services and natural resources like water and gas. They have also united to say "enough" to the political parties of the right, which have established a monopoly on how political decisions are made. Within the social movements there is not one single leader, there is a collective leadership that has established an agenda which should be fulfilled with the new government. I am not able to say that much about Venezuela because I don’t know that much. I could speak with some people here, with some "leaders" [Olivera’s quotation marks], but what I would like to do is speak with the common people who I believe have the most valid opinion.

BD: There was a meeting among various Bolivian social movements held last December 5, 2005. What is this group of movements planning?

OO: This was a National Congress for the Defense of Water, Basic Services, Environment and Life. It was a gathering of social organizations, and we came together to fight for water and for life. The access to these basic services is vital for the people. For those living in rural areas, the contamination of rivers by mining and gas companies is a big issue. Since this meeting in December we have made an agenda that is ours and that should be met by the government of Evo Morales. For example, this agenda includes the creation of the Minister of Water, the elimination of excessive management positions [in the government], the preparation of a new law of potable water…we are bringing all of these proposals to the constituent assembly.

BD: What is being done autonomously among these social groups, outside of the state, in neighborhoods and cities, to distribute and defend these basic services?

OO: Since December we haven’t been able to do almost anything. It’s been an electoral time period. Everyone was concerned with what president would enter the government. With this government I believe we will demand that access to basic services is a right that all citizens should have. We will also work toward the strengthening of autonomous organizations, such as the cooperatives, the water committees…to obtain our own management of water.

BD: How does this dream of self-organizing relate to indigenous traditions and history in Bolivia?

OO: Now we are in front of a new government, a new political party and state scenario. I believe something will be constructed based on the values and customs of our ancestors. A fundamental part of this should be that the community be in charge, that the community makes decisions, not someone from above. I believe we are now in a process of ideological debate regarding the recuperation of our values. We should continue working with the people in an organized manner. It’s a process we’ve been in for some ten years, which has made this solidarity from the ground up possible.

BD: Bolivian Vice President Alvaro Garcia Linera has said that the social movements in Bolivia are currently very strong but aren’t united enough to collaborate with the state. What do think of this perspective?

OO: I don’t know what Alvaro Garcia Linera said, but collaboration is not what [we’re] looking for. We’re working to establish a common horizon between the government and the social movements, to make sure that this agenda which the people have proposed is met.

BD: Could something be done within the constituent assembly to facilitate the collaboration between the government and the social movements?

OO: It’s not about collaboration; it’s about working together for a new society. The constituent assembly is a scenario where we will all be able to discuss. Yet what we’re afraid of is that the MAS will try to control the constituent assembly and I don’t think this would be good.

Canada to push for IMF reform at meeting

Canada will push for a reform process for the voting structure of the International Monetary Fund when finance leaders of the Group of Seven leading economies meet later this week, a senior government official said on Wednesday.

The official, speaking to reporters on the condition of anonymity, said Canada will also stress that more progress is needed to resolve global imbalances over the medium term.

Canada maintains it has borne the brunt of global current account imbalances, as the Canadian dollar has surged 40 percent since 2002 versus the U.S. dollar, outpacing other currencies and making the country's exports less competitive.

G7 finance ministers and central bank governors are scheduled to meet in Washington on Friday ahead of the spring meetings of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank.
...

IMF hikes L.America econ outlook on commodity boom

Booming energy, mineral and agricultural commodities prices should raise Latin American economic growth this year to 4.3 percent and 3.6 percent next year, the International Monetary Fund on Wednesday.

The forecasts in its semiannual World Economic Outlook were up from September's 3.8 percent outlook for this year, but Brazil's gross domestic product was expected to grow 3.5 percent -- unchanged from September's IMF report.

Mexican growth was pegged at 3.5 percent this year and 3.1 percent next year. Argentine growth was hiked to 7.3 percent this year from September's forecast of 4.2 percent but is expected to slow to 4 percent next year, the IMF said.
...

Marynberg Buys in Venezuela as Chavez Hits Capitalism

Diego Marynberg, manager of the best- performing Latin American fund this year, sees opportunity in Venezuelan stocks where others see danger.

Marynberg's $90 million Geo Equity Opportunities I Ltd., based in the British Virgin Islands and managed from New York and Argentina, is up 31 percent this year. It's the best performance in local currency terms of 134 funds with Latin American equities, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

About 90 percent of the fund is in Venezuelan companies, with the rest in cash. President Hugo Chavez is spending the nation's oil wealth on the poor to solidify his power, raising concern about instability should energy prices drop.

``There is indeed the political risk, but the discount the market is charging for that is just too high,'' Marynberg, 36, said by phone from his Buenos Aires office. ``At the end of the day, Venezuela is the richest country in Latin America.''
...

Bolivian ministers held hostage

La Paz
Three Bolivian ministers have been taken hostage in the border town of Puerto Suarez by local officials who want the government to approve a Brazilian company's mining project in the area, says defence minister Walker San Miguel.

San Miguel said: "They are being held, practically as hostages, by residents of that town who are demanding ... that the national government grant an environmental licence to the EBX company."

He identified the three officials as minister of planning and development Carlos Villegas, minister of economic development Celinda Sosa and minister of mining and metals Walter Villarroel.

San Miguel demanded "the immediate release" of his three colleagues, who had traveled to Puerto Suarez to avert an indefinite strike.
...

Government would not support aggression against Venezuela

Dominican Republic would not support any aggression against Venezuela nor against its president Hugo Chávez, said yesterday the Government’s spokesman Robert Rodriguez Marchena, in response to allegations from diverse sectors that the purpose of the military exercises being conducted in the Caribbean is to intimidate Chávez’s Government, which maintains frequent clashes with United States president George W. Bush.

"Dominican Republic would not support any aggression against Venezuela. We are a country which has been invaded in two occasions, reason why could hardly support such an action against countries friends," stated Rodriguez.

He said that the Dominican and Venezuelan nations have had good historical bonds, in addition to the good relations between Chávez and president Leonel Fernandez.

On Monday afternoon United States ambassador Hans Hertell denied that the regional military exercises in which soldiers from Dominican Republic, Honduras, Panama, Colombia and the United States participate, are preparations to attack Venezuela.

In separate statements, Armed Forces minister Sigfrido Pared Perez said that the presence in the country of foreign troops is part of the joint exercises with several nations in the hemisphere, which had planned those operations in each of the participant countries since 1988.

Pared Perez said that participating in the military exercises are United States, France, Germany, Central America and other countries with which we maintain bilateral relations and military cooperation agreements.

He said that currently several Venezuela Armed Forces officers participate in courses and joint exercises with the Dominican Army and Navy.

The United States guided missile destroyer Stout arrived in the country on Monday and will be in Dominican territory for three, as part of the training with some 30 Dominican sailors.

United States rejects

A cable from the French Press Agency datelined in Miami says that the United States rejected the accusations that its naval exercises in the Caribbean are destined to intimidate Venezuelan’s government or others in the region, and affirmed that it is an operation for training and cooperation, denominated "Society of the Américas."

"I know that there is a concern from that Government but what I can say is that Society of the Américas is not centered around any country in particular," said the spokesman for the Miami-based U.S. Southern Commando, lieutenant Chris Loundermon to the AFP, when asked about Venezuela’s concern for the presence of 6,500 American sailors in Caribbean water.

The operation involves different types of military cooperation with Colombia, Dominican Republic, Nicaragua, Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago, he said.

Bolivia Holds 4-Way Energy Summit

La Paz
Bolivia's President Evo Morales is meeting Wednesday in Asuncion with his counterparts from Paraguay, Uruguay and Venezuela to discuss an ambitious energy integration project.

According to government sources, the aim of the four-way summit is to make possible Bolivian gas supply to Paraguay and Uruguay through a pipeline whose construction will be financed by Venezuela.

The issue will be analyzed by Morales together with his counterparts from Paraguay, Nicanor Duarte, Uruguay's Tabare Vazquez and Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, whose aim is to sign an understanding memorandum.

The state Bolivian News Agency (ABI) stated the summit will establish links among gas producers from Bolivia and Venezuela and those who demand the resource: Paraguay and Uruguay.

The gas pipeline will be 327 miles long in Paraguay and 190 miles in Bolivia, the construction investment is valued at $460 million and the finish date is at least three years, ABI reported.

Haiti to join Venezuelan oil-supply pact

Haiti will soon join a Venezuelan oil pact that supplies Caribbean countries with fuel under preferential terms, President-elect Rene Preval said....

April 18, 2006

Chavez Begins Training Civilian Militia

President Hugo Chavez constantly warns Venezuelans a U.S. invasion is imminent.

Now he's begun training a civilian militia as well as the Venezuelan army to resist in the only way possible against a much better-equipped force: by taking to the hills and fighting a guerrilla war.

Supporters of the president, a former paratroop commander, are increasingly taking up his call. Chavez wants 1 million armed men and women in the army reserve, and 150,000 have already joined, surpassing the regular military's force of 100,000. Now Venezuelans are also organizing neighborhood-based militia units for Chavez's Territorial Guard.

Critics of Chavez say the real goal of the mobilization is to create the means to suppress internal dissent and defend Chavez's presidency at all costs. Thousands of Territorial Guard volunteers - housewives, students, construction workers - are undergoing training, earning $7.45 per session.

``We're going to be a country of soldiers,'' declares Roberto Salazar, an unemployed 49-year-old, after scrambling under barbed wire, wading through a mud trench and skirting burning tires with other volunteers.

Venezuela's citizen-soldiers come mostly from the slums where Chavez draws his fiercest support. They train on weekends, learning how to handle assault rifles and run obstacle courses through clouds of tear gas.

``Venezuelans need to know how to be military people so that we can defend our fatherland and our president,'' Salazar says.

Chavez insists the plotters of a 2002 coup that briefly unseated him had Washington's blessing. The United States quickly recognized the interim leaders; U.S. intelligence documents indicate the CIA knew dissident military officers were plotting against Chavez.

Chavez now says all Venezuelans must be prepared for a ``war of resistance,'' and has noted that the hills around Caracas provide excellent cover.

U.S. troops would ``bite the dust,'' he maintains, if they try to oust him and seize Venezuela's vast oil reserves. Top defense officials say Venezuela must prepare for ``asymmetrical'' war - military parlance for using non-conventional means against a traditional army.

Venezuela's army reserve has grown from 30,000 in 2004, says Gen. Alberto Muller Rojas, a top military adviser to Chavez.

The reservists are to be issued some of the army's older Belgian FAL assault rifles once Venezuela receives 100,000 new Kalashnikovs from Russia - approximately one for every regular soldier.

U.S. officials express concern that Chavez could be trying to export revolution. Chavez calls that an invention, and says the weapons will be needed for the 1 million Venezuelans he wants to arm. The civilian militias will not be issued firearms but their commanders say weapons would be made available in an emergency.

Critics also accuse Chavez of trying, Cuban-style, to consolidate power by assigning soldiers community tasks like serving as crossing guards and treating the poor in health clinics.

``The military devotion to Chavez is one of two keys to Chavez's survival. The other is the devotion of the poor,'' says Larry Birns of the Washington-based Council on Hemispheric Affairs. ``It's an act of desperation to form an armed civilian militia. He may have reached that point where he feels a faction of the military is untrustworthy.''

Rather than trying to topple Chavez with an invasion, it's more likely Washington is trying to undermine him by courting potential rivals within the military, Birns says.

Chavez has in turn sought to reward loyalty, granting handsome pay raises throughout the military. He expelled a U.S. military attache in February, accusing him of espionage. Washington expelled a Venezuelan diplomat in retaliation and has denied any attempts to overthrow Chavez.

In a recent interview, U.S. Ambassador William Brownfield resisted making judgments about the reserve force.

It's up to Venezuela's government and people to decide ``how big a reserve force they want, what sort of chain of command they believe this reserve force should have, whether this reserve force should in fact be located in each and every block or town or village throughout the country,'' Brownfield said.

Chavez reminds his people the United States invaded Grenada and Panama to topple regimes it considered hostile. In both cases, resistance quickly crumbled.

Cuba's defeat of a CIA-trained force at the Bay of Pigs in 1961 is the model Chavez wants to follow.

Chavez marked that battle's 45th anniversary on Tuesday, appearing with Cuban Foreign Minister Felipe Perez Roque and describing the 2002 coup attempt as Venezuela's own Bay of Pigs. Chavez said his military had detected a U.S. aircraft carrier and submarines off the coast and U.S. planes and helicopters over land at the time. And he criticized U.S. naval exercises in the Caribbean this month as another threat to both Venezuela and Cuba.

``We aren't afraid of them, and if they decide to return we're going to defeat them,'' he said.

Chavez also recently said the National Guard has even enlisted an army of 500 Indians to defend the country with poison-tipped arrows. He added: ``If they had to take a good shot at any invader, you'd be done for in 30 seconds, my dear gringo.''

Chavez says US warships threaten Venezuela, Cuba

by Greg Brosnan
CARACAS, Venezuela
President Hugo Chavez, who accuses Washington of planning to invade Venezuela, said on Tuesday recent deployment of U.S. warships in the Caribbean Sea threatened his country and its ally Cuba.

Four U.S. warships, including an aircraft carrier, and 6,500 sailors, are in a two-month deployment in the Caribbean Sea dubbed "Partnership of the Americas" by the U.S. Navy.

"They are doing maneuvers right here," Chavez told a student meeting in the country's west. "This is a threat, not just against us, against Venezuela, against Cuba."

Chavez has repeatedly accused the United States of trying to oust him. U.S. officials say the self-styled socialist revolutionary and friend of Cuban President Fidel Castro threatens regional stability.

Chavez, who has created a civilian reserve to resist the assault he says Washington is planning, has threatened to repel U.S. forces with arrows coated with poison.

The United States, a leading buyer of oil from Venezuela, the world's No. 5 exporter, has dismissed his invasion talk as a ridiculous invention aimed at stirring up his supporters.

At least one warship has come as close to Venezuela as the Dutch island of Aruba, about 15 miles (24 km) off its coast.

The Florida-based U.S. Southern Command has said the operations, which include visits to countries including Venezuela's neighboring U.S. ally Colombia, focus on threats such as "narco-terrorism and human-trafficking."

Voices of the struggle in Bolivia

Bolivia’s radical president, Evo Morales, came to power following a wave of mass struggles. Some of those in the movement spoke to Socialist Worker

On Thursday 30 March, at Cochabamba airport in Bolivia, police attacked protesters with tear gas, rubber bullets and riot batons.

The protesters were demanding that the country’s new president, Evo Morales, step in to nationalise the failing airline Lloyd Aéreo Boliviano.

Among those attacked was Oscar Olivera, leader of the Cochabamba Factory Workers’ Union. Seven years ago Olivera led a crucial struggle against water privatisation in the city of Cochabamba.

That successful struggle marked the dawn of a new era of popular mobilisation in Bolivia. Two mass risings followed, in October 2003 and June 2005.

Each brought down an unpopular president, and each threw up powerful new forms of organisation from below.

The victory of Morales in presidential elections held in December 2005 was, above all, a reflection of those mass movements.

But, at Cochabamba airport, as police attacked those occupying the runway, a weary Olivera turned to a reporter and said, “Evo is tear gassing his brothers.”

Two trade union militants, Samuel Segas and Demeizio Sirito, spoke to Socialist Worker about the dispute. They said, “After years of mismanagement and corruption the airline has a debt of over $60 million.

“The action was started by pilots and co-pilots but spread to all sections of the workforce. We started with a hunger strike and moved on to occupy four main airports – Cochabamba, Tarija, Santa Cruz and La Paz.

“In Cochabamba we are discussing how we can seize control of the company as workers. We hope ­workers across the world will support us in this ambitious project.”

Support

In many ways the Cochabamba airport struggle is an exception – most recent protests have been met with dialogue from the government and Morales remains popular. Recent polls have suggested that he has an approval rating of around 80 percent.

His support is even greater in areas with a large indigenous population, made up of descendents of the original inhabitants of the region, who have faced oppression and exclusion for over 400 years.

Morales is the first wholly indigenous president in Latin America.

Even more importantly, he is seen as representing a break with the neo-liberal policies of privatisation, deregulation and the rule of the corporations, which have dominated the region for 20 years.

Hugo Blanco, a left wing Peruvian peasant leader, was invited to the Bolivian president’s inauguration.

He wrote of the mood in the country, “An atmosphere of revolutionary process floated in the air and imbued the people...

“Evo spoke clearly against neo-liberalism. This atmosphere is also reflected in the fact that the ministry of justice is headed by a woman domestic servant who suffered physical, psychological and sexual abuse, which are a sort of ‘custom’ in our countries.

“It can be seen by the fact that the ministry of labour is occupied by a trade unionist.”

However, other ministries, including the ministry of defence, the finance ministry and the ministry of public works and services, are firmly in the hands of the right.

Having risen to power on the back of a powerful popular movement, Morales faces a dilemma. He feels the pressure from the movement from below.

But he also faces pressure from other forces – the Bolivian elite, those surrounding him in the state, the White House and the multinationals.

Morales told Newsnight’s Paul Mason in a recent interview, “You want to issue one decree to help the poor, the indigenous people, the popular movements, the workers... but there’s another law. Another padlock. It’s full of padlocks that mean you can’t transform things from the palace... I feel like a prisoner of the neo-liberal laws.”

Protest

As well as the airport protest, recent weeks have also seen a two-day general strike across Cochabamba, a national two-day stoppage by health workers demanding a 10 percent wage rise and action by teachers and transport workers.

These are signs that, while much of the movement is happy to coexist with Morales and the government led by his MAS party, it has not gone away.

In particular, those in the movement are watching to see whether Morales will fulfil two key promises. The first is the demand for nationalisation of the country’s huge gas resources, and the channelling of the revenue into poverty alleviation programmes.

The second demand is for a constituent assembly to rewrite the country’s constitution. Such an assembly could draw together the social forces that have led the battle against neo-liberalism.

Some of those in the movements involved in the earlier uprisings are waiting until the assembly is convened in August before seriously pressing their demands.

Special report by Guy Smallman, Valerie Mealla and Roger Cox in Bolivia, and Joseph Choonara in London

‘We have to continue the mobilisations’

Oscar Olivera is a leader of the successful struggle in 1999-2000 to stop water privatisation in the Cochabamba region

‘The most important consequence of the 1999-2000 struggle has been the development of hundreds of organisations that have been gaining victories small and large.

I believe the people have a much greater capacity to organise today. People are not prepared to accept injustices from governments any more, not even that of Evo Morales.

There are four main demands. Firstly there’s the fundamental point of nationalisation – not just of oil and gas but of other previously state-run industries. The second thing is the constituent assembly – the opening up of a space where people can decide how this country is run.

The third point is redistribution of land. The fourth is immunity – preventing the rich from robbing and killing people and bringing justice for earlier crimes.

Evo Morales is someone who used to be our brother, who used to struggle with us. What has his government done on these points?

It is clear that he will not nationalise in the way we are demanding. On the constituent assembly he has made an agreement with the right wing to exclude the social movements and grassroots trade unions.

On redistribution of land he will not take on the landowners. Only on the subject of immunity are things moving, but far too slowly.

We are pessimistic about what any government can do. We know that to achieve our demands we have to continue with mass mobilisations.’

Translation by Shaun Dey

Bolivia Economy Busts Neolib Chains

The Bolivian economy will grow 4,1 percent this year, a specialized organization reported on Tuesday, as the government prepares alternatives to neoliberal economic policy.

The perspectives of this growth were planned by the Center for the Analysis of Economic and Social Policies (UDAPE), as part of a comprehensive assessment of the economy in 2005 and its perspectives for 2006.

The mentioned o