July 31, 2006

Eight Million Cubans Condemned Bush Plan Against the Island

More than eight million and a half members of the Committees to Protect the Revolution (CDR) condemned Bush’s plan that seeks the destruction of the Revolution and the annexation of the island.Juventud Rebelde daily published a CDR’s declaration to warn about the platform’s intention to maintain and worsen the hostility of the US government against Cuba and the interference in our national sovereignty.

The text sent by this huge group of grown ups over 14 years old brought together without distinction of sex, race or religion denounced that the so-called Bush Plan includes a secret attachment hidden out by Washington for “national security reasons” and to “warrant its effective application”.

What could be so bad that has to be kept as a secret? Is it a new Giron? Will the attacks against fishers at sea and coast towns be intensified? Is it that bomb and fire terrorist attacks to shops and cinemas will be repeated?, are some arguments presented by the declaration.

The CDR’s statement added that the White House has earmarked 80 million dollars plus the unknown amount assigned for the secret measures. With such funds US contributors pretend to finance their agents in the island.

The CDR represent a popular watching system created to counteract terrorist attacks supported by the United States.

After pointing out that Washington’s aim is to exterminate Cuban resistance with hunger and diseases, the mass community organization reiterates that no US plan could defeat the Revolution or the people in the island.

Another Failed US Plan on Cuba Recalled

The secret chapter of the latest Bush Plan on Cuba has among its numerous antecedents the “Patty Plan”, with which the US tried to assassinate Cuban President Fidel Castro on July 26, 1961.

An article published by Granma daily on Friday recalled a vast US government terrorist plan to destroy the Cuban revolutionary process, in which Guantanamo Naval Base, a Cuban territory illegally occupied by the US, was included.

On the 45th anniversary of the end of the Flaming Case, through which the Revolution thwarted that plot, Granma brought to public light unpublished elements of those events.

The daily recalled that after Cuba´s 1961 defeat of the mercenary invasion of Playa Giron, organized by the US, the White House contemplated the assassination of Cuban revolutionary leaders to plunge the Caribbean country into chaos and facilitate a US invasion.

To that end, US authorities even proposed assassination attempts against its own soldiers, noted Granma.

The Patty Operation, in which Cuba seized a huge quantity of weapons, including infantry arms, mortars, cannons and explosives, was one of the first and most dangerous assassination attempts targeting Cuban leaders.

Chavez Leads Electoral Race

Caracas
Venezuela is gearing up Monday to begin the electoral campaign defined by leading President Hugo Chavez over the fragmented opposition, which has a scarce 19 percent support.

Chavez´s followers are estimated at 55-60 percent although some of his campaign coordinators say it's about 70 percent and aspire to a ten-point rise by the December 3 elections.

That is based on Chavez´s policy of better redistribution of national wealth through programs to guarantee free health and education, subsidized food and fight unemployment.

The opposition has been unable to outline an attractive alternative program and centers its actions on criticizing and trying to disqualify the governmental projects.

Meanwhile, the National Assembly is establishing clear rules of advertising and financing before the campaigning takes off.

The parliament is inquiring into the origin of opposition group Sumate´s funds, ostensibly received from abroad, which violates national laws.

Sumate is planning to hold US-style primary elections in August 13 to select only one opposition candidate but it must first clear up from where its resources come.

Fidel Castro steps down temporarily due to illness, to undergo surgery

HAVANA
Fidel Castro announced Monday night in a letter read by his secretary live on state television that due to illness he was temporarily relinquishing the presidency to his brother and successor Raul, the defence minister.

In the letter read by his secretary Carlos Valenciaga, Castro, 79, said he had suffered gastrointestinal bleeding, apparently due to stress from recent public appearances in Argentina and Cuba, and had to undergo an operation.

Castro undergoes surgery

HAVANA
Cuban President Fidel Castro underwent surgery for intestinal bleeding and delegated power provisionally to his younger brother Raul, the Cuban leader said in a statement read out on state television on Monday by an aide.

Castro, who turns 80 on August 13 and has led Cuba since a 1959 revolution, delegated his posts as first secretary of the ruling Communist Party, commander in chief of the armed forces and president of the executive council of state to Raul Castro, his brother and designated successor.

Castro said he had overexerted himself on a trip to a summit of South American presidents and celebrations last week of his 1953 assault on a military garrison.

"This caused an acute intestinal crisis with sustained bleeding," said the statement signed by Castro and read out by aide Carlos Valenciaga.

Castro said the operation forced him to rest for several weeks and delegate his government functions to Raul, who is 75.

Castro steps aside after surgery

Cuban leader Fidel Castro has undergone surgery and temporarily handed power to his brother Raul.

A statement written by the president and read on TV by his secretary said Mr Castro had suffered internal bleeding.

It said this had been caused by stress following a trip to Argentina and last week's ceremonies marking the anniversary of Cuba's revolution.

Mr Castro, 79, has been in power since 1959. Raul Castro, the defence minister, is his designated successor.

Cuba has a communist, one-party system.

The BBC's Stephen Gibb in Havana says the fact that the Cuban leader did not appear in person to issue his statement has added to speculation about the gravity of his condition.

A major celebration of his 80th birthday had been planned for 13 August, but has now been postponed until December.

Handing over the reins of power will be a shock to many Cubans, 70% of whom have known no other leader, our correspondent adds.

Protestors block Mexico City traffic, tent city rises

MEXICO CITY
Supporters of leftist presidential runner-up Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador turned a two-mile stretch of Mexico City's main thoroughfare into a virtual tent city on Monday, blocking rush-hour traffic and grinding much of downtown to a halt.

City police made no attempt to interfere with the largely peaceful "permanent assembly," which Lopez Obrador organized to press his demand for a recount in his narrow loss to conservative Felipe Calderon in the July 2 presidential elections.

Calderon's camp accused Mexico City Mayor Alejandro Encinas of cooperating with the demonstrators and called for police to clear the demonstrators. But Encinas, a member of Lopez Obrador's Party of the Democratic Revolution, or PRD, called for calm as he sought negotiations with the protest organizers.

"We're going to act with moderation and intelligence in confronting difficult times on the national political scene, with the understanding that this is a national problem, not just a problem for Mexico City," he said.

The traffic blockage marks a new stage in the post-election dispute which until now has been marked by huge rallies and legal filings before a seven-member tribunal that must decide the case.

On Sunday, however, Lopez Obrador said he would keep his people in the streets - and perhaps even expand the protests - until the tribunal rules.

A ruling is due by Sept. 6, although it is unclear what Lopez Obrador's passionate supporters will do if the court does not order the vote-for-vote recount they are demanding.

Lopez Obrador spent the night in one of the encampments in the Zocalo, where an estimated 1.2 million of his supporters had rallied Sunday in what police said was the largest protest in Mexico's history.

His supporters vowed to remain peaceful, but tempers flared as the encampments paralyzed Mexico City's bustling center.

"We're defending democracy," said Eduardo Lopez, a 19-year-old student camped out with his girlfriend on the Paseo de la Reforma. "We have a constitutional right to protest. We're not breaking the law."

Angry taxi drivers and commuters took a different view.

"Lopez Obrador said his protests would remain peaceful and that they wouldn't interfere with the rights of ordinary citizens," said taxi driver Manuel Flores, who'd been stuck on a side street near the U.S. Embassy since 5 a.m. "With this blockade, they're trampling on our rights. We have no work. If this goes on, there's going to be trouble."

Heeding Lopez Obrador's call Sunday for a campaign of 47 "permanent assemblies," the protesters set up camps along the length of the Paseo de la Reforma, from famed Chapultepec Park to the Zocalo, in the heart of the city's historic center.

By Monday morning, the six-lane boulevard lined with high-rise hotels and office buildings had become a pedestrian mall dotted with tents. Traffic cops directed rush-hour commuters across the boulevard, but made no effort to dismantle the tents and metal barriers that the protesters had set up Sunday night. Local traffic was allowed to pass along two frontage roads alongside Reforma. But many suburban commuters were forced to take narrow side streets, where traffic crawled.

Some drivers honked their horns in support of the demonstration, others just glared.

"It all depends on whom you support," said newspaper hawker Fidel de la Cruz, who wasn't finding many customers on the main boulevard, which was bereft of cars. "People are really divided."

Most people interviewed ranted about the snarled commute.

"Stupid people, who can't accept the results," said exasperated Christine Garduno, 29, who normally takes a mini-bus from her subway stop but instead had to hustle scores of blocks to her job as a secretary. "If they want to have freedom of expression, that's fine. But don't make it so it affects everybody else," said accountant and black-suited Jose Luis Diaz Mares, 26.

At the monument to Christopher Columbus, midway down the Reforma, drivers navigated the traffic circle in irritation, forced to return the route they came. Independent taxi driver Antonio Campos Espinoza _ he had only two passengers in three hours of work _ cursed the protestors and figured he would return home for the day. Manuel Garcia, whose business sells tourist trips, busily worked the phones trying to arrange transportation for his clients.

"You think this would happen in the United States?" he said, shaking his head. "The police would yank them off the streets and take them to jail."

Instead, the local police - the department enjoys close ties to Lopez Obrador, the city's former mayor - received earfuls from angry commuters.

At the nearby intersection of Morales and Gonzalez streets, bank worker Beatriz Serrato Hernandez, 28, eased her tiny, squat sedan to the police line and peppered an officer with questions. His supervisor napped in the front seat of the patrol car.

In the grind that is Mexico City traffic, Serrato Hernandez's commute takes two hours on a normal morning.

"I'm so angry at this guy," she said of Lopez Obrador. "It took me another hour to get to work today."

With tents and police blocking her way, she figured she'd have to park in an unsafe parking lot nearby and go the rest of the way by foot. "I have no other choice," she said.

A block down, workers from the textbook company Ediciones Castillo, barked at police officers who wouldn't let them through a police line, even though it was a half-a-block away.

"We're used to marches, and they always let us into our offices," cried Daniela Luiselli. "But (Lopez Obrador) just wants a confrontation."

Nearby, protestor Eunice Medina Camacho brushed her teeth with bottled water. A nurse from Sinaloa state in northern Mexico, she was using vacation days to protest and had slept in a tent Sunday night. She asked commuters for forgiveness.

"We understand their concern," she said. "But we have to have justice in this country."

Bush sees Chavez as threat undermining democracy

President George W. Bush said on Monday he sees Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez as a threat to undermining democracy but not a military threat.

Chavez has threatened to shut his government U.S.-based refiners and sell oil to other nations if Washington decided to cut diplomatic ties, a prospect that Washington has not suggested it would do.

Bush told Fox News Channel's "Neil Cavuto" that Chavez' threat is an "indication that we've got to make sure we've got a wise energy policy in the United States" and repeated his desire to wean the country from its dependency on foreign oil.

As for whether he sees Chavez as a threat to the United States, Bush said: "No, not a military threat. We've got a very strong military and we can deal with any threat to the homeland there is. And will if we have to. But, no, I don't view him as a threat. I view him as a threat of undermining democracy."

Chavez signs deals with Vietnam

The President of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, has said he wants to work more closely with Vietnam as part of his alliance against American imperialism.

In Hanoi, the two countries signed a number of agreements including one on developing oil and gas reserves.

The radical, left-wing President spoke warmly of Vietnam's fight against the United States in the 1960s and 1970s.

However, Vietnam's communist leadership is more interested in co-operating with the United States than confronting it.

This is another leg of a world tour which has already taken President Chavez to Russia, Belarus and Iran.

In Vietnam, the two countries pledged to work together in oil, gas, mining and agriculture.

Cultural cancellations

Mr Chavez's original schedule had included a visit to the military museum which contains the wreckage of shot-down American aircraft.

He was also due to visit the 'Peace Village' which looks after children suffering from health problems blamed on defoliating chemicals used in the war by the US.

However, those elements of his trip have now been cancelled.

Vietnam has worked hard to build closer relations with Washington in the past 15 years.

The US Congress will soon hold a crucial vote which will determine whether Vietnam will join the World Trade Organisation this year.

These issues press more heavily on the current Vietnamese government than talk of alliances against imperialism.

Bolivian President Morales breaks nose in soccer game

LA PAZ, Bolivia
Bolivian President Evo Morales broke his nose Sunday when he was fouled by goalkeeper during an indoor soccer match and will sidelined for 48 hours, his office said.

Morales, a passionate soccer player and fan, was injured during a game in the central city of Cochabamba between his presidential team and a local squad, the Independence Warriors, the president's office said in a statement.

"In the game's 32nd minute, with the score tied 2-2, the local team's goalkeeper committed a foul against the President of the Republic that produced the injury to his nose," the statement said.

Morales was treated at a local clinic and instructed to rest for two days.

Morales, who was inaugurated as Bolivia's first Indian president in January, often plays soccer on weekends.

Bolivians Support Evo Morales

A new survey published on Sunday ratified the high popularity of Bolivian President Evo Morales, who is supported by 75 percent of the people, compared to the election decline by traditional parties.

The survey, carried out by the private company Equipos Mori, was carried out in the country´s five largest cities and its results were published in the weekly La Epoca.

The newspaper says that Morales´ 75-percent support can be considered high, despite a slight six-point decline compared to July 2005.

The same survey showed that 61 percent of those polled considers that the country has taken a good path under the Morales government, and 65 percent thinks that corruption has decreased during the current administration.

That support has resulted from the popular measures taken by the government, including the Agrarian Revolution, which will pave the way for a participative process that includes the mechanization of agriculture, after an emergent program to give fiscal lands to farmers, according to Land Deputy Minister Alejandro Almaraz.

Almaraz told the Cochabamba-based newspaper Los Tiempos that the new distribution of land will be based on consultations with social sectors and municipal authorities.

He added that the implementation of the agrarian reform kicked off in 1953 has failed and the majority of more than 80 million dollars invested over the past decade went to private companies hired for that purpose.

Over the past ten years, only 10.6 million hectares of land, barely 10 percent of the national territory, were distributed.

According to Almaraz, after announcing the new decree, the government will set the goal of verifying the legality of property until 2011 and the economic and social use of 96 million hectares out of a total of 106 million hectares, a process that will allow consolidating the right to agrarian property.

Protesters set up camp

MEXICO CITY
A fiery leftist who says he was robbed of victory in Mexico's presidential election set up protest camps to paralyse the heart of the capital on Sunday after hundreds of thousands of people marched to demand a vote recount.

1.2 million gather to demand recount


MEXICO CITY
A record 1.2 million people poured into Mexico City's central square Sunday in another show of force by backers of leftist Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador and his demand for a recount in the July 2 election, which conservative Felipe Calderon narrowly won.

The turnout was less than the 2 million that Lopez Obrador had promised two weeks ago, when he brought 1.1 million followers to the Zocalo, the city's historic central square.

But police said it was the largest demonstration in Mexico's history, and analysts said it was enough to lend momentum to Lopez Obrador's case, which Mexico's federal election tribunal is considering. It must declare a winner by Sept. 6.

"The electoral tribunal has to rule independently, but they have to be aware of public opinion," said John Ackerman, a law professor at the National Autonomous University of Mexico.

Lopez Obrador said he will not arrange another mass march but instead will organize 47 "permanent assemblies" of supporters to hold around-the-clock vigils throughout the city until the tribunal rules.

"We will be here until we have a recount of the votes that gives us a legitimate president," Lopez Obrador told the cheering crowd.

Lopez Obrador is seeking a vote-by-vote recount of the 41 million ballots cast. Calderon won by less than 1 percent.

The crowd estimates were made by the city's public safety department, which reported no incidents of violence.

July 30, 2006

Mexico leftist’s backers aim for massive protest



Wave after wave of supporters of Mexican presidential candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador of the Democratic Revolutionary Party (PRD) arrive for a massive rally 30 July, 2006 at Mexico City's Zocalo. Mexico's election tribunal took up the case after Lopez Obrador's organization delivered 900 pages documenting alleged vote fraud. It has until September 6 to issue a final ruling. AFP PHOTO/Susana GONZALEZ (Photo credit should read SUSANA GONZALEZ/AFP/Getty Images)
Susana Gonzalez / AFP - Getty Images
Updated: 11:43 a.m. ET July 30, 2006

MEXICO CITY - Tens of thousands of supporters of Mexico’s leftist candidate gathered in the capital Sunday for what they hoped would become the nation’s largest-ever street protest, demanding a vote-by-vote recount of an election they claim was marred by fraud.

It was the third rally convened by presidential hopeful Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador since the July 2 vote and there were concernLopez Obrador’s aides say they expect 1.5 million to 3 million people to attend the demonstration. While his supporters and city police have sometimes exaggerated crowd estimates, the former mayor has previously draw hundreds of thousands into the streets.

Even as demonstrators filled Mexico City’s historic city center Sunday, lawyers for his conservative opponent, ex-energy secretary Felipe Calderon, were preparing to argue in front of the Federal Electoral Tribunal—Mexico’s highest election court—that the election was fair and Calderon the winner. The tribunal is weighing challenges filed by both sides.

An official count gave Calderon an advantage of less than 0.6 percent over Lopez Obrador, about 240,000 votes out of 41 million-plus cast. The electoral court has until Sept. 6 to either declare a winner or annul the election. Mexico’s constitution limits presidents to one, six-year term and President Vicente Fox, of Calderon’s National Action Party, leaves office Dec. 1.

U.S. could scrap trade benefit programs

A top senator on Thursday threatened to scrap a U.S. program that waives import duties on thousands of products from developing countries, particularly India and Brazil, now that world trade talks have collapsed.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, whose committee has jurisdiction over trade, told reporters he was frustrated that many developing countries that benefit from the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program oppose opening their own markets as part of a new world trade deal.

"Why should we continue to give them preferential treatment and particularly a few countries that get the bulk of the GSP, like India and Brazil?" the Iowa Republican asked, spotlighting two countries that he said shared a big portion of blame for this week's collapse of the world trade talks.

"Right now, no GSP renewal. If I change my mind on that, it's surely not going to include India and Brazil," he said.

The United States imported US$26.7 billion worth of goods from 136 developing countries under GSP in 2005. The 32-year-old trade program, which must renewed periodically, expires at the end of the year.

U.S. Trade Representative Susan Schwab told reporters Wednesday that GSP should be renewed. But in a nod to the view expressed by Grassley and other lawmakers, she indicated the administration could use its administrative authority to exclude some countries or products from the program.

Grassley said he also opposed renewal of a trade preference program for the Andean nations of Peru, Colombia, Ecuador and Bolivia that dates back to 1991 and also expires at the end of this year. That program was created to help curb drug production in the region by creating other job opportunities through expanded duty-free access to the U.S. market for a long list of goods.

The United States has negotiated free trade pacts with Peru and Colombia that would lock in the trade benefits for those countries. However, negotiations with Ecuador have been frozen since Quito seized oil field operated by U.S. company Occidental Petroleum in May.

Bolivian President Evo Morales' decision this year to nationalize the energy industry and his close ties with Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, an ardent foe of the United States, also have strained relations with Washington.

"I'm not interested in supporting renewal of (the Andean Trade Promotion and Drug Eradication Act, or ATPDEA)," Grassley said. "Ecuador's got a chance to sit down and talk with us. They're nationalizing and confiscating private investment in that country. You know, why should we continue to give them some preferences?"

Bush administration officials said they have not taken an official position yet on Bolivia and Ecuador's request for the ATPDEA to be renewed.

"Ultimately this is a decision that is going to be made by our Congress. And it's one that we are evaluating closely," Assistant Secretary of State for the Western Hemisphere Tom Shannon told reporters.

ATPDEA has been "an important counterpoint to drug production in the region. It's produced hundreds of thousands of jobs in the region, so in that sense it's been a very, very successful program," Shannon said.

Leftist Ortega poised for a return to power

BY JIM WYSS
MANAGUA

Polls show Sandinista leader Daniel Ortega in a position to win Nicaragua's presidency and return to the office he once took by force.

For 16 years, Daniel Ortega has been trying to regain at the ballot box what he once seized through a revolution -- the presidency of Nicaragua.

After toppling the Somoza family dictatorship in 1979 and leading the nation for more than a decade as the head of the Marxist Sandinista party, Ortega has lost the last three elections.

But now, a confluence of forces -- from a fractured opposition to the unexpected death of a chief rival -- seems to be giving the Reagan-era icon of the left a fighting chance of winning the Nov. 5 presidential race.

Sitting on the patio of the walled-off home that doubles as his campaign headquarters, Ortega, 60, does the political math: Twice during the past three elections, he has won more than 40 percent of the votes.

However, thanks to changes pushed through the National Assembly by his party in 2000, 40 percent -- and not a simple majority -- will be enough to avoid a runoff in this year's five-way race.

''I'm convinced we are going to win the first round,'' he told The Miami Herald, still sporting the black mustache he wore at age 33, when he led the Sandinista guerrillas to power. ``I don't see any problem hitting that 40 percent mark again.''

Ortega, whose government enforced radical Marxist economic policies in the 1980s, now says he wants to give the state a larger but not dominant role in the economy of this deeply impoverished nation.

All of the major polls have Ortega leading the race, ahead of Eduardo Montealegre, a banker and former finance and foreign minister whose center-right Nicaraguan Liberal Alliance has emerged as a U.S. favorite.

FRAGMENTED CONTEST

It's not that ''El Comandante'' is particularly popular, but that the opposition is fractured, said Victor Borge of the Costa Rica-based polling firm Borge y Asociados.

''Daniel is no stronger than he has been in the past, and the anti-Sandinista vote remains firm,'' Borge said. ``The new phenomenon here is that we no longer have a two-party race. That's unprecedented.''

In the past, Ortega's foes have lined up behind the Liberal Constitutionalist Party, or PLC. But Montealegre and the emergence of the center-left Sandinista Renovation Movement, known as MRS, have splintered the antiOrtega vote.

To complicate the scenario even further, MRS presidential candidate Herty Lewites died of a heart attack July 2. The folksy former mayor of Managua was a Sandinista dissident and vocal critic of Ortega, but he also was seen as the primary suitor for some of Ortega's core left-leaning supporters. Now, it's unclear where those orphaned voters will end up.

None of the major polling firms has released results since Lewites' death. One pollster privately predicted that about two-thirds of MRS supporters would eventually drift back to the Ortega camp. But others expect that many will stick with Lewites' less charismatic but highly respected vice-presidential candidate, Edmundo Jarquín, now the MRS' presidential hopeful, or even jump to Montealegre's camp.

''For [MRS voters] to head back to the Sandinista Front would be a betrayal of everything Herty stood for,'' said Manuel Orozco, Central America director for the Washington-based Inter-American Dialogue. ``If anything, they are closer to Montealegre's position than Ortega's.''

LESS POLARIZED

But where some see an opposition in disarray, Ortega sees a maturing democracy. The fact that there are so many viable candidates is a sign that Nicaraguans have lost their Cold War views and may be ready to judge him on his platform, he argues.

''The problem here is we've never had normal elections,'' he said. ``We've always seen totally polarized elections -- Sandinista or anti-Sandinista.''

Ortega points to his reconciliation with his former nemesis in the Catholic Church and with Yatama, a Miskito Indian organization that took up arms against the Sandinistas during the CIA-financed contra war in the 1980s, as signs of progress.

''The reconciliation process in Nicaragua is much further along,'' he said.

A VIEW OF HISTORY

But while many voters may have forgotten or may be too young to remember Ortega's revolutionary past -- Marxist economic policies, alliances with Cuba and the Soviet Union, harsh media censorship and a dreaded military draft to fight in the contra war -- they haven't forgotten his more recent political shenanigans, Orozco said.

Particularly damaging was the deal he cut with former president and PLC strongman Arnoldo Alemán to share control of government branches such as the judicial system. That relationship -- called el pacto -- helped split the Sandinista party internally between reformers and hard-liners, and has continued even after Alemán was sentenced to 20 years on money-laundering and embezzlement charges.

''The people haven't forgotten the anti-democratic, corrupt and somewhat dirty methods the Sandinista Front has used to stay at the center of power,'' Orozco said. ``Those memories are still fresh.''

Ortega claims that the deals he cut with Alemán, a rabid anti-Sandinista, were in the interest of political stability.

Otherwise, ''we would be changing governments all the time like they do in Bolivia and Ecuador -- where the government doesn't hold up,'' he said.

Ortega came to prominence in 1979 after playing a leading role in the Sandinista Front guerrilla movement that overthrew U.S.-backed dictator Anastasio Somoza Debayle. As Ortega led the country ever more leftward, the Reagan administration fueled a bloody civil war by backing the contra guerrillas. In 1990, under pressure on the battlefield and struggling under a crippled economy, Ortega called for -- and lost -- free elections.

The days of the communist bloc are gone, but Ortega makes no bones about wanting to be a part of the revitalized Latin American left, led by such presidents as Hugo Chávez of Venezuela, Fidel Castro of Cuba and Evo Morales of Bolivia.

Among his proposals -- sure to rile Washington -- are plans to push for government control of ''strategic sectors,'' including telecommunications and power plants. He also said he plans to ''investigate'' the privatization process that put many state assets into the hands of national and international investors over the past decade.

''The neoliberal economic model is a source of corruption, and to talk about privatization is to talk about corruption,'' he told The Miami Herald. ``We need to investigate [privatizations] and look for the problems and the crimes, if they were committed, and then take corrective measures.''

A CHANGED MAN?

The tough talk plays well in this country, the second-poorest in the Western Hemisphere, where 50 percent of the nearly 5.6 million people live below the poverty line and where free-market reforms have been accompanied by painful price increases.

But it has also given ammunition to his opposition. Montealegre has called Ortega a ''puppet'' of Cuba and Venezuela who would scare investors away with his socialist policies.

Ortega maintains that he is not opposed to free markets as long as they are just, and that he is willing to work with any nation -- including the United States -- that has the best interest of Nicaragua in mind.

After all, he says, it was for Nicaragua that he took to the hills to overthrow Somoza, and it's for the country that he has been so insistent about regaining the presidency.

''To take power through the electoral process would close a cycle in Nicaragua's revolutionary struggle,'' he said. ``And of course it would be the beginning of a new cycle.''

100 Million Trees for Venezuela

[Thanks to Nobody for this story]
*
CARACAS
Jul 27
Venezuela has launched a five-year reforestation project for Orinoco headwaters and tributary rivers in which more than 900 conservation committees and students from more than 100 schools will help plant 100 million trees in a 150,000-hectare area.


"Campesinos who used to clear land for crops or cow pasture are now turning to agroforestry, which is more profitable and better for the local environment," Miguel Rodríguez, vice minister of environmental conservation, told Tierramérica.

President Hugo Chávez launched the program, entitled Misión Árbol (Tree Mission), on Jun. 4 (Tree Day), and then led school children in a day of planting in El Ávila National Park, which separates the Venezuelan capital from the Caribbean coast.

The next step entailed collecting seeds from fruit trees and native forest trees, with the help of 926 conservationist committees -- mostly rural women -- who submitted 495 projects in conjunction with the Environment Ministry and 95 schools.

Tree Mission -- which has a first-year budget of 23 million dollars -- will also finance the creation of tree nurseries.

The Ministry has created technical assistance and monitoring units to follow up with the projects.

"Nothing will be achieved if we just hand over the money -- between 15,000 and 25,000 dollars per project -- and walk away. Instead, we will ensure continuous monitoring, and distribute the funding through committees that verify targets are being met," said Rodríguez.

These committees are set up in areas the Ministry has determined to be in need of reforestation.

While program spans 33 basins and mini-basins, activity has focused on the northern zone in the great Orinoco plains, which sprawl across more than one million square kilometres of Venezuelan and Colombian territory.

However, the initiative has also reached out to several indigenous and mining communities in the southeast, where the government is trying to persuade those who illegally mine along the upper stretches of the Caroní and Caura rivers to switch to other activities. Forty-seven nurseries are expected to generate 500,000 seedlings to replant 680 hectares in the area -- only a small drop in the ocean.

The nurseries contain seedlings of native timber-yielding species whose commercial exploitation is currently banned, such as mahogany (Swietenia mahagoni), cedar (Cedrela adorata), laurel (Cordia alliodora), pochote (Bombacopsis quinata) and araguaney (Tabebula chrysantha), the national tree.

But the plan is not a panacea for Venezuela's deforestation woes. Rodríguez admitted that the planned reforestation will in five years cover an area equivalent to the amount of forest lost each year, which official estimates say total 140,000 of the country's total 90 million hectares.

Approximately half of Venezuela's territory -- largely in the south and south east -- is forested. Non-governmental ecological organisations disagree with government figures, charging that annual deforestation rates in recent years have climbed to between 240,000 and 500,000 hectares.

The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) says Venezuela has placed 56.9 million hectares, almost 60 percent of its territory, under some kind of environmental protection, which includes 11.3 million hectares of forest reserves.

However, the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) reported that the country's forestry cover shrank from 62 percent in 1977 down to 54 percent in 1995, which amounts to an annual deforestation rate of 400,000 hectares during this period.

Rodríguez believes current rates are much lower, and Environment Minister Jacqueline Farías has proposed a forestry census.

Biologist Diego Díaz, president of the Vitalis environmental organisation, told Tierramérica that both the FAO and UNDP rely on government statistics and "deforestation is more widespread than official statistics claim, because urban and agricultural areas continue to expand, and mining and unregistered logging takes a heavy toll."

"We are in favour of reforestation, but we haven't been told if this mission will be combined with adequate zoning plans and respect for land-use designations. Community involvement plays a key role. In other countries, unscrupulous people have been known to damage an area to get resources to reforest it," said Díaz.

He noted that "reforestation must replace all forest strata, not just trees," citing as an example an initiative Vitalis has undertaken with the private Metropolitan University to set up a native-plant greenhouse in El Ávila park.

The star tree is the Caracas walnut (Juglans venezuelensis), an almost-extinct species native to the area around the capital.

Rodríguez also highlighted the importance of "returning a sense of ownership to rural communities that are now able to do what many have always wanted: reclaim the land that provides them with a living."

(* Humberto Márquez is an IPS correspondent. Originally published July 22 by Latin American newspapers that are part of the Tierramérica network. Tierramérica is a specialised news service produced by IPS with the backing of the United Nations Development Programme and the United Nations Environment Programme.) (END/2006)

July 29, 2006

Here's how the Election Fraud was carried out in Mexico

As the days continue to pass after the Mexican presidential election, members of the Coalición por el Bien de Todos (Coalition for the Good of All) continue to present what is called "prueba superveniente", or emerging evidence, of the electoral fraud and how it was carried out.

    On election night I was a proud Mexican citizen, convinced that finally my country had reached a point in which actual democracy was viable; I was certain the elections had been clean and there had been no fraud. I even jumped on a few people on this site who derided our democracy and I strongly defended our electoral system.

    That was then. This is now. Back then, I thought (as many others did), that every political party (or at least the major ones) had representatives in EVERY voting station across the country. As the post-electoral debacle began and continued, it was revealed that this was clearly NOT the case.

    Today's most recent developments (story en español) brings us a much clearer picture of how this fraud was carried out. A key player in this operation is Elba Esther Gordillo, Teachers' Union longtime leader, longtime PRI official and general snake in the grass. Gordillo had a very public and nasty split with Roberto Madrazo within the PRI, which led her to "found" her own Party (Nueva Alianza) while still in the PRI. Shortly after the election she was caught on tape talking to a priista governor about negotiating with the PAN.

    Anyway, here's what the PRD and its allied parties are presenting as evidence of Gordillo and her party's collusion with the PAN:


    • In over 4,000 voting stations nation wide, where ONLY representatives of PAN or Nueva Alianza (or both) were present, Calderón's votes shot up dramatically, up to 80.77% (statistically impossible). In these voting stations ALONE, Calderón allegedly obtained 320,000 votes (remember the "official" margin between Calderón and AMLO was around 250,000).

    • In 485 voting stations nationwide, where there were ONLY representatives of Panal, Calderón beat AMLO by a 63.91 to 29.69% margin (!!!)

    • In 2,366 stations nationwide, where ONLY PAN reps were present, the percentages were 71.47 Calderón, 21.47 AMLO.

    • Even more scandalous are the results from stations in which only reps from PAN AND Panal were present: 80.77% for Calderón, 13.02% for López Obrador.


    This was revealed in a press conference held by Leonel Cota, national PRD president, and Senator Joel Ortega (PRD), who is also AMLO's campaign manager. Ortega also declared that Gordillo's involvement in this goes very deep and that it couldn't have been carried out without her input. The voting stations in which to carry out this fraud were carefully selected and had the protection and cover of local PRI or PAN governments.

    This revelation should be a bombshell for the TEPJF (federal electoral court), and should be a major step forward towards achieving a vote by vote recount.

    In the meantime, at least two million of us will be chanting and marching for our democracy tomorrow.

    Stay tuned.

    Tags: amlo, calderon, lopez obrador, mexico, elections, PRD, PAN, Bien de todos, election integrity, fraud, elba esther, gordillo, nueva alianza (all tags)

    Permalink | 33 comments

      • Please consider crossposting to (3+ / 0-)

        European Tribune.

        We've been looking for more coverage on the Mexico, and I've not had the time to do it justice.

        By the way, I have to do an "I told you so" about the comment you had on my diary about more serious acts of civil resistance coming after July 30. Did you see Lopez Obrador's interview with Univision where he refused to to discount the possibility of occupying highways and airports.

        • I don't know if it's an 'i told you so' though... (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          dsteffen

          I mean, certainly there is the POTENTIAL for things to begin to get violent, but that depends entirely on the reaction of the police forces and the people who control them. The citizenry that is fighting for its vote is firmly committed to its non-violent principles.

          I think they key here is we need to make the distinction: "serious acts of civil resistance" are not necessarily violent. What AMLO said about the airport and roads in the link you provided:

          Asimismo, al preguntarle tres veces si estaría dispuesto a que se "tomara" el aeropuerto de la ciudad de México como parte de sus acciones de resistencia civil, López Obrador dijo: "Vamos a consultar a la gente, vamos a consultar. Yo tengo que irle midiendo, tengo que ver la profundidad del movimiento, del ritmo".

          "O sea, ¿no descarta toma de aeropuertos, toma de carreteras?"

          "El límite es la no violencia, o para expresarlo de otra manera: es un movimiento pacífico" subrayó.

          When asked three times if he'd be willing to "take" the Mexico City airport as part of their civil resistance, AMLO said: "We will consult with the people, we will consult. I have to keep an eye on the pace, I need to see the depth of the movement, its rythm".

          "So, you don't dismiss the idea of taking airports and roads?"

          "Our limit is non-violence, or in other words: it's a peaceful movement."

          So, the way I see it is this: the ONLY way this can get violent is if the TEPJF refuses to do a vote by vote recount and police (and/or government) forces begin to crack down on the peaceful protestors. Violence will NOT be incited by AMLO or any of us on the Left. We are fully aware that peaceful resistance is our only recourse.

          As for taking roads and airports, we are within our right to stage such protests, all within the framework of non-violence and the defense of Democracy.

          voto por voto, casilla por casilla!

          by ourobouros on Sat Jul 29, 2006 at 07:31:57 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          • Dude, I understand the distinction (1+ / 0-)

            I am on your side.

            Lopez Obrador stated that the "limit is violence",
            I am not suggesting that the PRD or AMLO are inciting violence. I am suggesting that these demonstrations can only go on so long before there is either a recount, or further demonstrations are "discouraged" by the government through the use of force.

            I am also suggesting that one of the first targets for occupation would be the oil facilities in places like Tabasco that provide a full third of government revenues. You have to acknowledge that the occupation of oil facilities is a distinct possibility. If that happens, this story will be on the front page in the American media.

            • l know we're on the same side :) (3+ / 0-)

              and you're right... if violence DOES happen it will be initiated by the Right. I DO think however, that if the government employs force to "discourage" dissent, they will find out very quickly that it'll have the opposite effect.

              If they beat one of us to a pulp on a sidewalk, there will be THREE more of us to take his place. If they beat those three, there will be NINE demonstrating the next day.

              All peacefully, all democratically.

              As for the taking of oil refineries, it's certainly a possibility as it has already been done before (when Roberto Madrazo stole the Tabasco gubernatorial election from AMLO in 1994).

              For my part, in Mexico City, if the TEPFJ refuses to do a vote by vote recount, I am already preparing, with a group of friends, an urban resistance campaign where we will plaster the city with images of our call for democracy and repudiation of electoral fraud.

              voto por voto, casilla por casilla!

              by ourobouros on Sat Jul 29, 2006 at 07:51:09 AM PDT

              [ Parent ]

              • Cuidate (2+ / 0-)

                Recommended by:
                YucatanMan, ourobouros

                and you're right... if violence DOES happen it will be initiated by the Right. I DO think however, that if the government employs force to "discourage" dissent, they will find out very quickly that it'll have the opposite effect.

                Hence, my preoccupation. The Mexican Right is either too stubborn or ignorant to realize that this isn't 1988. Combine the determination of the Left to "take" what is the right of all human beings, self determination for all, with the stubborn insistence of the Mexican Right and you have a recipe for trouble. And you know what, the motherfuckers in the PAN are too busy exalting the how they are superior to the unwashed masses, to comprehend that they are lending legitimacy to Marcos and la otra.

                When a people are denied self determination through the ballot, then this lends legtimacy to those who would have us believe that justice comes from the end of a gun. Note I speak of Marcos not AMLO.

                If they beat one of us to a pulp on a sidewalk, there will be THREE more of us to take his place. If they beat those three, there will be NINE demonstrating the next day.

                All peacefully, all democratically.

                As for the taking of oil refineries, it's certainly a possibility as it has already been done before (when Roberto Madrazo stole the Tabasco gubernatorial election from AMLO in 1994).

                I suspect that this will be the only way that this issue breaks back into the mainstream media in the United States, and do you really want to think what the response from the Bush administration would be to this? Calderon and the gang can't keep this kicking the poor people to the curb bit up for much longer withhout incurring a situation in which they don't have the power control. If massive, peaceful occupations of highways, and oil facilities occur, where do you think Fox and the PAN will turn to bring in the firepower to restored order?

                Remember, that nearly 1/10th of US firepower in Iraq is in private hands. And Filibusters, private military actions against Latin American governments, were common in the 19th century. And now we have Blackwater and the rest, military power not bound by the power of law available for hires. Mercenaries........

                • One difference: liberals control Mexico City (3+ / 0-)

                  The largest overall security force in the nation is in Mexico City. Mexico City is now in its 2nd administration under the liberal PRD party, whose mayor Encinas supports AMLO.

                  I think the very presence of such law enforcement not under the control of the right-wing provides a bit of a check on notions of using police violence against democracy activists.

                  (However, the most corrupt and deadly of the armed agents in Mexico are by all accounts the federal police called "Judiciales", which fall under the department of the Treasury there and would sort of be like a combination of our FBI and a national SWAT force. Once the governmnent of Mexico -- the whole country -- offically asked the Treasury Police how many agents they had, and they refused to say.)

          • I will be with you in spirit (0 / 0)

            as will millions more.

            How is the weather?

            • beautiful weather in Mexico City today (0 / 0)

              clear and very sunny, temperatures in the mid 70s Fahrenheit. Hope it stays this way thru tomorrow; couldn't ask for better weather.

              El sol azteca brilla fuerte y cálido en el corazon de México :)

              voto por voto, casilla por casilla!

              by ourobouros on Sat Jul 29, 2006 at 10:45:07 AM PDT

              [ Parent ]

    • I support a total vote recount. If he won fair (8+ / 0-)

      and square why would he be afraid of a total recount. I guess they borrowed this from the Shrub's Florida play book. Shrub went to the Supreme Court to stop a total recount and the American people are paying a great price till this day.

      • very true... (4+ / 0-)

        in fact, what you state is one of our rallying cries and memes here: if you assert you won, why fear a recount? A simple question that has yet to be answered to the satisfaction of most Mexicans by Calderón.

        voto por voto, casilla por casilla!

        by ourobouros on Sat Jul 29, 2006 at 06:32:14 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      • sigh - made no difference (0 / 0)

        Florida legislature was moving to designate a slate of electors for Bush, once the first Florida Supreme Court decision came down. Constitutionally they have the authority to determine how electors are selected -- you hyave not constitutional right to vote for the electors of the president and vice president. Florida's 25 electoral votes were going to go the Bush.

        Those who can, do. Those who can do more, TEACH!

        by teacherken on Sat Jul 29, 2006 at 06:33:21 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    • it is unfortunate (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      peace voter, dsteffen

      that, because of the mess in Lebanon, and the 24-7 coverage thereof, the situation in Mexico has largely dropped off the radar here. Thanks for the info.

      Let's get some Democracy for America

      by murphy on Sat Jul 29, 2006 at 06:34:29 AM PDT

    • I have been suspicious (4+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      peace voter, lcrp, dsteffen, el cid

      since I heard Republican crews were there "helping" Calderon. I think they brought their dirty tricks across the border -- and didn't declare them, either. Good luck to you. Keep fighting!

      Why do you have to be a nonconformist like everybody else? - James Thurber

      by JuliaAnn on Sat Jul 29, 2006 at 06:35:04 AM PDT

      • yes, they certainly did (9+ / 0-)

        The brought in Dick Morris to "consult" for Calderón's strategy team. Morris and his crew were behind the swift-boating campaign against AMLO in which he was compared to Hugo Chavez and called a "danger to Mexico".

        Morris and his people were operating out of a Mexico City hotel. This is highly illegal, as it is expressly forbidden in Mexican electoral law for any foreigner to participate in any way in a political campaign.

        Sigh.

        We will prevail though. They will NOT steal our country again.

        voto por voto, casilla por casilla!

        by ourobouros on Sat Jul 29, 2006 at 06:41:15 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        • Thanks And A Tip O' The Hat... (0 / 0)

          ...to Dick Morris mentors....Bill and Hillary Clinton!

          He can stump for Joe Lieberman. He can work with George H.W. Bush for dubious disaster relief charities. She can protect the flag and take on videogame sex.

          But actually stand up for democracy in Mexico?

          Not even on their radar screens.

          Besides, AMLO isn't likely to do the CAFTA do, and corporate globalization was always more important to Bill & Hill than actual democracy, anyway.

        • Don't forget ChoicePoint's (2+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          ourobouros, el cid

          possession - illegally - of Mexican voter registration rolls. And the appearance of those rolls - on national TV, no less - on the PAN's own website after inputting a password based on Calderon's brother-in-law.

          Far from mis-reporting, the fraud ran long and deep to insure a PAN win. PAN has taken up the PRI banner of "permanent government" just as Karl Rove has the objective of "permanent Republican majority." However, Karl may have some problems with that now that the Middle East is falling apart, Iraq is falling farther apart, and the economy is slowing down due to interest rate hikes and a collapsing housing market. BUT, all that will not stop Republicans from pulling all the possible tricks to win elections.

          Just as the Spanish revolution was Hitler's proxy war for WWII, Mexico's elections are try-out zones for fraud techniques in the US. I cannot believe I write those words and 10 years ago would have dismissed those words as "crazy talk". However, it doesn't take tinfoil hats anymore to see what is happening.

    • You and I (9+ / 0-)

      Are on the same page. I felt the same as you election night, and even in the following days.

      I also have been talking here about Gordillo..she is in it up to her eyeballs. Watching here on television earlier this week with Calderon made me ill. I felt like slapping her ugly face. She has always been one of the biggest crooks in politics.

      As to the poll workers: Not only were many casillas un manned, but the poll workers themselves were often poorly educated and poorly trained.

      Poll workers were supposed to attend two training sessions, each about two hours long. But attendance was sporadic. Some people said they didn't have time. Others were bored by the classes or couldn't afford to travel to nearby cities where the classes were held.

      Poll workers were paid only 200 pesos – less than $20 – for their expenses.

      Just two weeks before the election, the IFE was still searching for 15 percent of the workers it needed for the election, said Hugo Concha, IFE's executive director of electoral training.

      “We were late training people,” he said.

      At thousands of polling places across the country, poll workers didn't show up on election day. In 11.60 percent of the polling places, people who either had no training or inadequate training were asked to fill in, Concha said.

      http://www.signonsandiego.com/...

       title=

    • Reminds me of someone (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      ManfromMiddletown, peace voter

      which led her to "found" her own Party (Nueva Alianza) while still in the PRI.

    • If Only We had Balls (3+ / 0-)

      If only we had the balls to stand up like the Mexican people are.

      • not too late, their bravery may yet help us (0 / 0)

        Their fight for democracy THERE may inspire us to fight the bastards more effectively HERE.

        And a loss for the new wave of right-wing election manipulation & fraud ANYWHERE is a victory for democracy EVERYWHERE.

        • not likely (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          ourobouros

          after the stole 2004 election talk on Ohio voter fraud was moreor less banned even at DKOS. The left in the U.S. is not very interested in structural issues like elections or the causes of particular policies.

          Om Lokaha Samastaha Sukhino Bhavantu (may all beings in all the worlds be happy)

          by Chris Cosmos on Sat Jul 29, 2006 at 09:33:24 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          • agree somewhat, but partly failure of leaders (0 / 0)

            I think that the possibility of a huge, popular, citizen-fueled reversal of a coordinated national right-wing election theft in our neighbor to the south could actually strengthen the hand of those who were fighting election fraud here.

            One thing people look to is victory. In the USA, there appeared to many people (certainly at the top but a lot of people I knew, ordinary people) that no amount of activism could reverse any election manipulation or fraud. It's hard to know, since by definition we didn't really try.

            But people are complicated, and the threat of a good example is ever-present.

    • I hope this doesnt get lost in the other stuff (5+ / 0-)

      So Important. recommended.

    • Recommended! (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      YucatanMan, eddienic
      Thanks for this diary. You've added much new iformation.

      Is the next big demonstration scheduled for tomorrow?

      ```
      peace

      • yes, tomorrow at 11 am local time (0 / 0)

        the march will begin at the anthropology Museum and head toward the Zocalo. City officials estimate attendance will be between 2 and 2.5 million. Of course, federal officials estimate a few dozen of us will show up :).

        voto por voto, casilla por casilla!

        by ourobouros on Sat Jul 29, 2006 at 07:34:02 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        • with only 12 people you can fill the Zocalo (2+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          ourobouros, mariachi mama

          The attendance estimates are just wildly optimistic, they never had a million plus people last time, just a dozen people with really, really big shirts. Or maybe it was done with mirrors.

          It just looked like a million-plus people because you liberal maniacs just won't shut up and admit that we must be quiet and always let right wingers win.

        • Breathtaking View (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          mariachi mama

          Whenever I'm in Mexico City, I enjoy running around Chapultepec Park one time, then running up the path to reach the Castillo. In the early morning, from that vantage point, you see (and feel) the energy that emanates from this metropolis. For me, it's a breathtaking view.

    • Calderon and his Regressive Policies (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      YucatanMan
      Great Diary.

      Here's what one Calderon Sycophant added to his Wiki entry.

      And yet, some Calderon Sycophants dare say that Calderon is to the left of President Clinton, when the truth is that he is FAR to the RIGHT of even Bush.

      -------------------------------------

      Daily Mass Catholic Pro-Lifer Wins Mexico Presidential Elections over Abortion Supporter

      By John-Henry Westen

      http://www.lifesite.net/...

      The Inter Press Service News Agency described Calderon saying: "He is known to be a devout, conservative Catholic, attending daily mass, and has not shied from acknowledging his stances against abortion, condom use, homosexual relations and euthanasia."

      ----------------------------------------

      • I have a bit of sympathy for this view (0 / 0)

        I think that in the particular case of Felipe Calderon, in many ways he is indeed to the right of Bush Jr.

        On the other hand, it's also true that US politics are so unbelievably right wing that what typically counts as "right wing" in most other nations, Latin America included especially, would be considered centrist or even leftist here.

        Similarly, if you took a typical Republican candidate here and plunked them down in most Latin American campaigns, they'd be considered so far right that they'd be lucky to be a 12th or 13th place party, much less a top 3.

    • Sugar O/T (5+ / 0-)

      Sorry way off topic, but the sugar dispute between the US and Mexico was settled, so now we get to have more American high fructose corn syrup shoved down our throats. The US soft drink manufacturers are salivating. Mexico needs to have a government that takes care of her citizens instead of letting corporations feed us poison.

      So maybe it's not so off topic.

      http://www.latimes.com/...

    • Calderon wants to raise taxes on middle-class (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      ourobouros

      Currently, Mexico collects less than 11% of GDP in taxes, compared to about 32% here, and as high as 50% in some Western European countries.

      There is no capital gains tax in Mexico. Roberto Hernandez, a friend of Calderon, sold his bank for over 10 billion dollars to Citigroup, and paid NOT ONE PESO in taxes.

      Calderon has said that's the way it should be.

      In fact, Calderon has vowed to slash the top marginal rate on the affluent, because he believes that the affluent pay more than their fair share in taxes.

      But if you're poor or middle-class, Calderon hopes to raise your tax burden.

      -----------------------------------------------

      http://mx.invertia.com/...

      POLITICA) PREPARA PAN OFENSIVA FISCAL VS POBRES: RAMIREZ

      Viernes, 28 de Julio de 2006, 9h58

      Fuente: InfoSel Financiero

      MEXICO, Julio. 28.- Alfonso Ramírez Cuellar, coordinador de las Finanzas Públicas de la bancada del PRD en la Cámara de Diputados, advirtió en torno la ofensiva fiscal que "preparan" los panistas contra los sectores de menores ingresos, mediante la imposición del IVA en alimentos y medicinas.
      De acuerdo con información de La Jornada, el presidente de la Comisión de Hacienda y Crédito Público, Gustavo Madero, señaló al IVA en alimentos y medicinas como una alternativa dentro de la reforma fiscal para elevar los ingresos del erario

      -------------------------------------------

    July 28, 2006

    Mexican Electoral Judges Face Hard Test

    by Julie Watson
    MEXICO CITY
    The future of Mexico's young democracy lies in the hands of seven judges who have the final word on a disputed presidential election that has strained class divisions and threatened the nation's stability, with one candidate calling for millions to protest.

    The magistrates - including Mexico's first female district judge and a respected author on ethics and democracy - have shown toughness and independence in thousands of electoral disputes, ruling against all three major parties.

    But they have never faced a challenge like this. Mexicans are counting on them to find a peaceful solution to a battle between Felipe Calderon, the ruling party candidate backed by the business community, and Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, a fiery populist.

    An official count gave Calderon a lead of less than 0.6 percent. Despite the uncertainty, he said Friday he was setting up a committee to lay the groundwork for his administration.

    In the next month, the Federal Electoral Tribunal will comb through mountains of paperwork documenting 364 complaints by the parties. It must issue a ruling by Sept. 6.

    The judges face three choices: declaring a winner, ordering a recount, or annulling the vote. Each could have grave consequences.
    ...

    !

    Love, love, love, love, love, love, love, love, love.

    There's nothing you can do that can't be done.

    Nothing you can sing that can't be sung.

    Nothing you can say but you can learn how to play the game

    It's easy.

    There's nothing you can make that can't be made.

    No one you can save that can't be saved.

    Nothing you can do but you can learn how to be in time

    It's easy.

    All you need is love, all you need is love,

    All you need is love, love, love is all you need.

    Love, love, love, love, love, love, love, love, love.

    All you need is love, all you need is love,

    All you need is love, love, love is all you need.

    There's nothing you can know that isn't known.

    Nothing you can see that isn't shown.

    Nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be.

    It's easy.

    All you need is love, all you need is love,

    All you need is love, love, love is all you need.

    All you need is love (all together now)

    All you need is love (everybody)

    All you need is love, love, love is all you need.

    July 27, 2006

    Mexican Leftist Says He Is President, Vows Protests

    MEXICO CITY
    The leftist contesting Mexico's July 2 election on the grounds of vote-rigging declared himself president on Wednesday and said his supporters would step up a campaign of civil disobedience next week.

    Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who lost the vote count to conservative rival Felipe Calderon by a tiny margin, said in a television interview that a rally on Sunday in Mexico City would show his backers have the energy to keep up protests.

    ``I am already president. I won the presidential election. I am president of Mexico by the will of the majority of Mexicans,'' Lopez Obrador told Univision's ``Here and Now'' show, scheduled to be aired on Thursday.

    ``I think the people will not tire,'' he added. ``We are going to beat (our opponents) because the people are on our side.''

    The leftist, whose fraud allegations are being examined by Mexico's electoral court, has torn into Calderon in countless interviews in recent days. His rival has opted to keep a lower profile and set about preparing his presidency.

    Despite strong rhetoric about a ``dirty war'' against him, Lopez Obrador has kept protest rallies by his backers peaceful. This week, supporters protested in the lobby of an upscale hotel and lit hundreds of candles in the Zocalo square.

    The leftist plans to announce a civil resistance campaign at a rally in central Mexico City on Sunday as the next step in pushing for a vote-by-vote recount.

    ``We are not going to sit here with our arms folded,'' he said in an advance copy of the interview made available to Reuters.

    Asked whether civil disobedience could include blocking roads and taking over Mexico's international airports or highways, Lopez Obrador said: ``Everything that could mean civil resistance. Everything that could mean defending the vote, defending democracy. The limit is nonviolence.''

    Financial markets, which are rooting for Calderon to be president, are keeping a close watch on tensions in Mexico, which slid into political crisis when Lopez Obrador contested the ruling party candidate's 0.58 percentage point win.

    Lopez Obrador says vote counts were manipulated at some 72,000 of the country's roughly 130,000 polling stations. He told Univision that tally sheets included some 1.5 million votes that were not backed up by voting slips.

    He said President Vicente Fox and Calderon were behind the fraud, as well as ``bandits'' within the IFE electoral institute that ran the election.

    ``President Fox has been saying openly for two or three years to anyone who will listen that there is no way I am going to be president. He had a hand in everything,'' he said.

    Lopez Obrador is a former Indian rights activist who blocked oil wells in his home state of Tabasco to protest pollution and who led a 560-mile (900-km) march to Mexico City after losing what he said was a rigged state election in 1994.

    This week, he wrote to Calderon and challenged him to agree to a vote-by-vote recount that both would respect. Calderon rejected the offer, insisting the election was clean.

    President Hugo Chavez says Venezuela's may develop its own nuclear energy industry

    by RIA Novosti
    Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez said Wednesday his country might develop its own nuclear energy industry.

    "We do not have the [civilian nuclear energy] program at present, but we could use the nuclear energy for civilian purposes in the future," Chavez told a news conference upon arrival to Moscow.

    The Venezuelan leader, who is on a visit to Russia as part of his European tour, earlier said he planned to sign an agreement Thursday in Moscow on the construction of a Kalashnikov assault rifle assembly plant in his country and was also considering the possibility of purchasing Tor M1 air defense missile systems from Russia.

    July 26, 2006

    Chavez hails Russia for defying US with arms sale

    Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez hailed Russia on Wednesday for defying a U.S. arms blockade by agreeing to sell fighter aircraft to his country.

    Chavez will sign a $1 billion deal to buy at least 24 Russian Sukhoi-30 jets to replace oil-rich Venezuela's U.S. F-16s.

    "I would like to thank Russia, the producer of armaments, because Russia has helped to sever the blockade that was tied by the United States around Venezuela," Chavez said in the city of Izhevsk in remarks reported in Russian by Interfax news agency.

    "American imperialism wants to hold the world in its fist, but it will not succeed in this ...," he said, according to Itar-Tass news agency, during an earlier stop in Volgograd.

    Chavez, who says he is preparing his armed forces to fend off a U.S. invasion, is set to cement growing ties with President Vladimir Putin at a Kremlin meeting on Thursday
    ...

    Food giants to boycott illegal Amazon soya

    by Felicity Lawrence and John Vidal
    Monday July 24, 2006

    · UK retailers expected to sign moratorium today

    · Move hailed as victory for consumer power

    Leading European supermarkets, food manufacturers and fast-food chains, including McDonald's, are expected to pledge today not to use soya illegally grown in the Amazon region in response to evidence that large areas of virgin forest are being felled for the crop.

    In a victory for consumer power, the companies say they will not deal with the four trading giants who dominate production in Brazil unless they can show they are not sourcing soya from areas being farmed illegally. The traders met in Sao Paolo last week and are expected to sign up to a moratorium on using soya grown in the Amazon.

    Article continues
    The deal has been brokered by Greenpeace which, in an investigation earlier this year, linked the illegal destruction of the forest to large-scale soya farming financed by US-based commodity multinationals Cargill, ADM and Bunge.

    Investigators say that they spent three years tracing the movement of soya from illegal plantations in the Amazon through the US-based firms to chicken factories in European countries including Britain. The Amazon-grown soya was found to be going into the supply chain of McDonald's, KFC, Tesco, Sainsbury's, Asda, Morrisons and Unilever. After the report was published in the Guardian, the companies feared a consumer backlash and pushed traders to clean up their supply chain.

    Under the moratorium, the big US-based traders, together with the Brazilian firm Gruppo Maggi, are expected to pledge not to buy soya from any areas of the rainforest cleared from now on. They will also pledge not to buy from soya plantations linked to slavery.

    Where rainforest has already been cleared and land used illegally, they are expected to negotiate new systems to ensure farmers start complying with Brazilian law.

    Large-scale farmers have moved into the Amazon from states in southern Brazil, but the inquiry said few had legal title to the land. Environmental laws that required farmers developing land to retain 80% of it as forest and only use 20% for agriculture were being ignored.

    The traders were accused of providing illegal soya farmers with seed and finance to grow the crops and export them. The new deal will require the traders to check land titles and not to buy from farmers who have cleared more than 20% of forest.

    Cargill said in February that most supplies came from land that had earlier been deforested. Greenpeace disputed this. The mood among retailers and fast-food chains is that any raw material that causes embarrassment is unacceptable.

    Several British supermarkets buy Brazilian chicken linked to rainforest soya for their ready meals or special offers. Companies such as McDonald's were linked to rainforest destruction because meat factories in Europe were using Brazilian soya feed from the big traders. The companies are believed to have been highly influential in forcing the multinational traders to agree to reform.

    Environmental campaigners in Brazil welcomed the moratorium but warned it would be hard to undo the damage. Father Edilberto Sena, director of the Catholic radio station in the Amazon region and a leading protester against soya farming, said the deal was "a good start".

    "It's not a solution to the problem," he said. "Between 60,000 and 80,000 hectares [150,000-200,000 acres] of land in our region has already been destroyed ... To restore the forest and enforce this will require huge investment."

    Yesterday Karen Van Bergen, McDonald's vice-president, Europe, said: "McDonald's has had a long-standing policy not to source beef from recently deforested areas in the Amazon rainforest, so it was important to us to bring soya sourcing in line with this policy.

    "McDonald's Europe has already asked its suppliers, including Cargill, to source non-GM, non-Amazon feed for poultry as from next harvest."

    The British Retail Consortium, which represents all major supermarkets, said: "Retailers have responded positively to Greenpeace's concerns over the environmental impacts of soya farming in the Amazon by putting in place a system to trace the source of the soya used in all products."

    A Cargill spokeswoman said it was unable to comment on the moratorium ahead of the announcement, but added: "We have had good industry discussions in Brazil and we are very optimistic."

    Backstory

    The soya bean has been grown in China and used in different ways for thousands of years but almost half the world's production is now in the US, which produces 70m tonnes a year. Other leading producers are Argentina, China, India and, increasingly, Brazil, which is expected to overtake US output within a few years. The bulk of the crop is solvent extracted for vegetable oil, with soya meal used for animal feed. A tiny proportion is consumed directly as human food. Apart from foods, soya beans are now used in industrial products such as oils, soap, cosmetics, resins, plastics, inks, crayons, solvents, vodka and biodiesel. Clearing land for industrial soya farming is taking over from timber as the major driver of forest loss in some regions.

    Morales criticizes church hierarchy

    President Evo Morales said some members of the Roman Catholic Church hierarchy are behaving as if they were in ''the times of the Inquisition'' Tuesday as he defended his government's plan to remove Catholicism as the sole religion taught in schools.

    Morales' comments came a day after Education Minister Félix Patzi referred to Catholic ''monsignors'' as ''liars'' and said they have been serving the oligarchy for the 514 years since Spain colonized the country.

    ''I want to ask the [church] hierarchies that they understand freedom of religion and beliefs in our country,'' Morales told reporters. ``It's not possible to impose their views.''

    López Obrador files lawsuit for recount

    Andrés Manuel López Obrador filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday charging Mexico's national electoral board with criminal omission of duties for not stopping negative advertising in the final weeks of the campaign, his latest bid to force a recount in the July 2 presidential election.

    López Obrador, of the Democratic Revolutionary Party, fell 244,000 votes short of his competitor Felipe Calderón of the National Action Party and has since pressed his case for a recount of all 41 million votes cast, charging that the balloting was tainted by fraud and mismanagement.

    His appeal is now before a seven-judge federal electoral tribunal. Its decision, expected by Aug. 31, could go a number of ways: a partial or full recount, nullifying the election and calling for new balloting, or dismissal of López Obrador's appeal.

    During the campaign, López Obrador successfully filed a complaint to stop negative political ads that Calderón was running that depicted López Obrador as comparable to Venezuela's Hugo Chávez.

    South American Leaders Hold Summit


    Eight South and Central American chiefs of state gathered in Cordoba, Argentina from July 20-21 for the Southern Common Market summit, also known as the MERCOSUR.


    Argentine President Nestor Kirchner was the host, and other attendees included presidents who are full and associate members, plus a special guest, Cuban leader Fidel Castro.

    The meeting was the first with Venezuela as a full member, and its president, Hugo Chavez, received the regional block's support for the Venezuela candidature to the U.N.'s Security Council.

    For the smallest countries in the block, Uruguay and Paraguay, the final resolution promised to respect their differences from the larger nations and to protect their weak economies.

    Also present was Chilean President Michelle Bachelet and Bolivian President Evo Morales, both associate members of MERCOSUR.

    Cuba obtained an agreement that allows the communist nation to buy 2,700 products at preferential prices. This would be a rupture of the economic blockade that the United States has maintained for the island since 1962.

    The final resolution also called for the elimination of the agricultural subsidies that the United States and the European Union gave to their producers.

    The next step is to add Mexico as an associate member to increase intra-regional commerce.

    For Argentina and Brazil the challenge is to legitimize Morales and Venezualan President Hugo Chavez's administrations, which are viewed with distrust by the European Union.

    The only contentious point of the summit was the request that the Argentine government made to Cuba to allow dissident Hilda Molina to be free to leave the island, as he has relatives in Argentina.

    EZLN Comandantes Will Join the Struggle to Free Atenco Prisoners

    by Javier Salinas Cesareo, La Jornada
    SAN SALVADOR ATENCO, MEXICO, July 23

    They Will Travel to Central Mexico, Anounces Marcos; the FPDT Will Step Up Mobilizations

    Subcomandante Marcos announced that comandantes of the Zapatista Army of National Liberation (EZLN in its Spanish initials) will soon travel to the center of the country to join San Salvador Atenco’s Peoples’ Front for the Defense of the Earth (FPDT) in its struggle to free 27 of its members currently held in the Santiaguito and La Palma prisons.

    The featured speaker at a FPDT assembly on Sunday, Delegate Zero reiterated his support for the Atenco movement, and said that the EZLN’s “red alert” – decreed in May – will continue, although he did not specify the date on which the other Zapatistas will arrive.

    Marcos’ midday arrival at the San Salvador Atenco esplanade was a huge surprise. Even the Interior Ministry’s undercover agents monitoring the FPDT’s protest encampment in the town center were surprised by his arrival.

    More than 600 Atenco residents and members of the Other Campaign’s Sixth Commission met in the town’s Emiliano Zapata Auditorium to hold the assembly. More than 50 members of the Italian group Ya Basta were also there, displaying their solidarity with the FPDT’s struggle.

    Those in the assembly agreed to strengthen their joint mobilizations. They announced that on July 25 and 29 they will hold protests in Toluca (the state capital) and at Santiaguito prison respectively.

    The first protest will consist of a march to the capital building, and the second of a concert and cultural festival in front of the prison. On August 3 there will also be a marathon from Santiaguito to La Palma prison.

    During the assembly, Marcos emphasized the EZLN’s “red alert,” saying, “when they hit Atenco, they hit all of us.”

    He added that the “red alert” has been difficult, but that “rather than thinking about how we are doing, we are thinking about how things bust be for Nacho (Igancio del Valle), Felipe (Alvarez) and (Héctor) Galindo,” all prisoners in La Palma.

    Obstacles to the Prisoners’ Defense

    The lawyer for the 27 prisoners, Juan de Dios Hernández Monge, was also at the meeting and gave a report on the legal situation of those arrested during the police repression on May 3 and 4 in Atenco.

    He denounced the fact that, during the legal process against the Atenco prisoners, a series of obstacles have consistently been thrown in his path.

    “Out of a total of 12,000 pages of case files, after more than two months we have had access to only 269 pages, which constituted the formal order of imprisonment. We have suffered the same at appeals hearings, which have seen unjustifiable delays,” he said.

    He pointed out that looking toward the next hearing, which will take place August 9 in Santiaguito, there have already been irregularities. He explained that, on that day, only five of the 60 subpoenaed state police officers will testify on the arrests, even though the testimony hearing is supposed to be indivisible.

    If there are several witnesses, he explained, they should have to appear and testify in an organized fashion, in order to avoid people who have already testified being able to communicate with those who haven’t.

    “We are asking the judge for this hearing to be continuous in order to assure that the 60 police officers cannot communicate among themselves, but we have found that this judge is acting under orders and acting according to the interests he represents, which of course are not the interests of justice,” he said.

    The lawyer claimed that there are enough factors in the prosecutions to call for the acquittal of all 27 prisoners. “There are no direct, categorical charges, but rather generic charges from the police. There is no individualization of the offenses either. This means that it is impossible to assign corpus delicti or any provable responsibility to the compañeros,” he concluded.

    July 25, 2006

    US judge overturns Cuba book ban

    A judge has temporarily overturned a decision by Miami's school board to ban a controversial children's book about Cuba from school libraries.

    He said the book must stay on the shelves until a lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida (ACLU) against the school board is settled.

    Last month, the board voted to remove the book after complaints it was too positive about life under Fidel Castro.

    ACLU says the school board violated the US constitution with its ban.

    The Miami-Dade school authorities had removed all 24 books in the series, dealing with children living around the world.

    'Errors of omission'

    The Miami-Dade Student Government Association and the ACLU said removing the book violated students' constitutional right of access to information under the First Amendment.

    "By totally banning the Cuba books and the rest of the series, the school board is in fact prohibiting even the voluntary consideration of the themes contained in the books by students at their leisure," said US District Judge Alan Gold.

    "This goes to the heart of the First Amendment issue," he said.

    Judge Gold gave the school until the end of the day to put the books it had removed from the shelves back in the library.

    Juan Amador Rodriguez, the parent who had complained about the book, said he was surprised and disappointed at the judge's decision.

    "The book has errors. It has errors of omission, omission about the reality of the country," Mr Amador said.

    Chavez in Russia for arms deals

    Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is visiting Russia, where he is expected to sign deals to buy new fighter jets and helicopters.

    He will visit Volgograd - formerly Stalingrad - on Tuesday, and later the Urals town of Izhevsk, where Kalashnikov assault rifles are made.

    The US has tried to persuade Russia not to supply weapons to Venezuela.

    Mr Chavez is visiting several countries, lobbying for a Venezuelan seat on the UN Security Council.

    On Monday he signed a series of co-operation agreements with President Alexander Lukashenko of Belarus, covering topics such as technology, energy and agriculture.

    Both Mr Lukashenko and Mr Chavez are fierce critics of US policy.

    In Belarus they exchanged compliments about each other's strong leadership styles.

    "I'm impressed by your knowledge of military affairs," Mr Lukashenko told Mr Chavez as they toured an army museum.

    Strategic alliance

    The US has labelled Mr Lukashenko "Europe's last dictator".

    Sukhoi Su-30 fighter jet
    The Su-30: A long-range fighter that entered service in 1992
    Mr Chavez said the agreements were just the start of a Belarus-Venezuela strategic alliance.

    He will later visit Qatar, Iran, Vietnam and Mali.

    The planned arms deal with Russia is worth around $1bn (£542m), correspondents say.

    The US has voiced concerns about it, having banned such deals with Caracas for US manufacturers.

    Russia plans to deliver 30 Sukhoi Su-30 fighter jets and 30 helicopters to Venezuela.

    Venezuela also plans to buy 100,000 Russian-made AK-103 assault rifles and wants to set up factories on its soil to produce Kalashnikovs under licence.

    July 24, 2006

    Cuban, US and Honduran Doctors Work Together

    by Dan Bacher
    While the Bush administration has taken an increasingly hostile stance toward Cuba, U.S. and Cuban doctors worked together for the first time this May during an historic 7-day Medical Brigade to Honduras.

    The brigade, organized by Bill Camp, Executive Secretary of the Sacramento Central Labor Council, in collaboration with the Birthing Project and other organizations, provided badly needed medical care, medicine and supplies to the Garifuna people of the Atlantic coast of Honduras.

    The brigadistas included 24 North Americans, 4 Garifuna physicians (all recent graduates of the Latin American School of Medicine in Havana), 2 Garifuna Interns, 7 Cuban physicians and 3 Cuban journalists. They served 3116 patients in the communities of Limon, Punta Piedra, Ciriboya, Tochmacho, Batalla, El Pino, Orotina and La Ceiba.

    The Garifuna are a unique cultural and ethnic group found along the Caribbean coast of Honduras, Belize, Guatemala, Nicaragua and in the Caribbean islands. They first appeared in this region over 300 years ago, when escaped and shipwrecked West African slaves mixed with the native Caribs who provided them refuge on Saint Vincent Island. Their language, Garifuna, derives from the Arawak and Carib languages. The Garifuna have kept their African musical and religious traditions over the centuries.

    “This brigade set a new standard for Americans to build foreign policy,” said Camp. “We don't need George Bush to set our foreign policy. Here in California we are building a new foreign policy by expanding our cooperative efforts between Cuban and U.S. doctors and Honduran graduates of the Latin American School of Medicine.”

    The next brigade of Cuban, U.S. and Honduran doctors to the Honduran Garifuna communities is set from November 8 thru November 18. Meanwhile, another medical brigade sponsored by AHMEN (the Alabama Honduras Medical Education Network), was in Honduras through July 18.

    The brigade participants provided general medical, pediatric, dental and vision care. They also offered continuing education for midwives, gynecological care and screening and treatment of cervical cancer.

    “The people in the Garifuna communities live off fishing and growing their own crops,” said Kathyrn Hall-Trujillo, founder of the Birthing Project, who organized a number of volunteers from the project to participate in the brigade. “What they don't have is cash, cars and other resources. And access to health care is very hard in the remote communities.”

    Parasite infections are a problem among the Garifuna, so the brigadistas brought plenty of “worm medicine” with them. The brigade doctors removed a foreign object from one young boy's ear, treated one guy with a partially chopped off finger and removed a silver from another man's eye, according to Hall.

    Another medical problem that has recently entered Garifuna communities is the HIV virus; Hall met one little boy whose parents had both died of AIDS.

    “The Garifuna don't know about AIDS and how to protect themselves from it, since they don't have electricity and aren't tuned into the radio, TV and other media,” said Hall. “And the idea of wearing a condom goes against their whole culture.”

    Bill Camp become introduced to the Honduran Garifuna communities when his brother, Dr. Tom Camp, requested his support in constructing the first community clinic in the Garifuna community of Ciriboya. In the process, Camp became acquainted with the Honduran doctors studying in Cuba and decided to begin the medical brigades.

    Accompanying Camp and Hall were Birthing Project staff members Francisco Lefebre, Umsalaama Zaimah, CNM, Nonkululeku Tyehemba, Dr. Nevorn Askari, Elaine Quabner, Leona Spivey, Janeyne Sexton and Roland Allaha Wilkins; Bud McKinnney, Vice President, Local 162, Sheet Metal Workers Assocation, AFL-CIO; Dr. Cedric Edwards, the first U.S. Graduate of the Latin American School of Medicine of Cuba; noted photographer Arnold Trujillo; and Phil Nelson, a retired Sacramento fire chief. All members of the delegation, including staff members, raised funds to cover the trip expenses.

    “It was a great trip and I learned a lot,” said Nelson, who was born in Jamaica. “I was impressed that we saw over 3,000 people in just one week. It was clear that we were the only source of health care in the region. I will definitely go on the brigade again; those are my people and I was moved by the beautiful kids that I saw.”

    Dr. Luther Castillo Harry, coordinator of the Community Hospital of Ciriboya said the cooperative efforts by Cubans, Hondurans and North Americans are serving as a model for the future development of clinics and health care for Garifuna communities.

    “The Project Luagu Hatuadi Waduhenu (for the health of our communities) arose in 1999 as a initiative of the Garifuna students in Cuba seeking a way of contributing to the betterment of the health of our communities,” said Harry. “We decided to donate 15 days of our month of vacation working in the Honduran Garifuna communities, shoulder-to-shoulder with the Cuban doctors.”

    Harry cited the case of a 90-year-old grandmother who said, after being treated by a Garifuna doctor in the maternal tongue for the first time, “Now I can die -- it is the first time that a doctor has examined me without disgust.”

    Not only was the May brigade great for the patients, but also for the doctors themselves. “It was fantastic to have Cuban, U.S. and Honduran doctors all treating one patient,” said Camp. “The American doctors learned from the Cuban doctors, while the Cuban doctors learned from the U.S. doctors. And the Hondurans were able to share their expertise in working in the Garifuna communities with the Cuban and American doctors. It was a very exciting experience.”

    Sponsors of the medical brigade included CHIMES (California Honduras Institute for Medical Education and Supplies), PINCC (Prevention International Cervical Cancer), AHMEN and Project Luagu, Hatuadi Waduhenu.

    For more information, call Kathyrn Hall at 916-284-6330 or Bill Camp at 916-927-9772.

    Dan Bacher is an outdoor writer, alternative journalist and satirical songwriter from Sacramento, California. He is editor of the Central America Connection and contributes to numerous publications and websites, including Dissident Voice, CounterPunch, Because People Matter and the Sacramento News & Review. He can be reached at: danielbacher@hotmail.com.

    Paramilitary attacks University of Oaxaca

    [This is a shortened and edited babelfish translation of breaking news from mexico]

    Radio Universidad de Oaxaca reports that a strongly armed paramilitary commando tonight tried to take radio facilities which covers the ongoing popular mobilizations in Oaxaca. The aggression was repelled and paramilitaries fled while shooting with intend to kill.

    The teachers hold state and federal government officials responsible for the attack

    The radio signal that was interrupted for several minutes was restored via Internet and in radio frequency. In the studio they continue receiving threats of death via telephone.

    It has been confirmed that at the same time as the attack on the University radio station another commando evicted the city council of the autonomous municipality of Zaachila, fifteen kilometers south of Oaxaca

    http://mexico.indymedia.org/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=140

    Radio Universidad en Vivo
    http://www.uabjo.mx/radio/radioOnLine.php

    US-Venezuela clash over seat at UN Security Council

    July 17th
    * Venezuelan Executive Vice-President José Vicente Rangel ensured that Venezuela gaining a non-permanent seat at the United Nations Security Council would amount to a guarantee for the region rather than a factor of disturbance.

    In an interview with Chilean newspaper La Tercera, published on July 16th, Rangel claimed that the Venezuelan candidacy to the UN Security Council is "the most agglutinative in Latin America," the Vice-President Office said in a press release.

    "We have already secured support from the Southern Common Market (Mercosur) and the Caribbean Community and Common Market (Caricom). We will not be a factor of disturbance, conflict. We are not interested in that. We want to promote understanding in any scenario," he added.

    On July 16th, Ahmed Benhelli, the Assistant Secretary General for Political Affairs of the Arab League of Nations, said the Arab world is to support Venezuela candidacy.

    Benhelli made the announcement upon his arrival in Venezuela for the Second South America-Arab Countries Meeting.
    ...

    Argentina Soya-fication: Brings serious environmental, social and economic problems

    by Alberto Lapolla
    Genetically modified soya for animal fodder now accounts for 60% of our production of grains and almost the same percentage of land sown with arable crops. Far from being healthy it presents a real and growing problem for the national economy and the protection of our agricultural eco-system and also for the very lives of our people. Our country is one of 19 countries that allow the cultivation of genetically modified (GM) or transgenic seeds. It is also one of 5 that allow it on a large scale. Furthermore, Argentina is the world leader as regards the expansion of GM crops in relation to total production. 99% of the soya sown in our country is RR soya, that is GM soya, so as to make it resistant to the glyphosate herbicide. Since soya is a species with 95 to 99% closed pollination or self-fertilization, it's reasonable to reckon that non-GM soya (organic soya) does not exist in our territory. This alone would already be a serious problem. But there are many more. To start with, production has turned into monocultivation, a dangerous outcome from a strategic economic and environmental point of view of the nation's productive structure.

    Any model based on monocultivation is essentially unsustainable and weak from a structural point of view. However, the expansion of GM soya for animal feed monoculture brings with it other, equally serious problems.The first is the degradation of our productive system : we have stopped being a food-producing country and now produce animal feed, so that other countries - the most industrialized - may produce meat. We have cut back our own meat production - through reducing its area, the number of animals and the quality of the fields assigned to them - to produce "soya-fodder". We assign our very best land - of the best food-producing eco-system in the world - to produce animal feed so other countries may produce and export meat, instead of doing it ourselves.

    In the second place, in order to produce soya-fodder we have stopped producing innumerable other foodstuffs. The object of our agricultural production is no longer to produce food for our population and to export the rest, but rather that the country's whole agricultural system is placed at the service of producing raw materials in the form of soya-fodder, as well as oil and natural gas for export to industrialized countries. Argentina decided to abandon its food sovereignty when it lost its economic and political sovereignty.

    When Videla's (1) Economy Minister Martinez de la Hoz said "the market will decide if the country is going to produce steel or biscuits " he was referring to this change of model. The scientific, technological industrial nation from before 1976-1989 ceased to exist. With it went the nation that produced food for its large domestic market - its people - and inputs for industry. In a perverse neocolonial process, the country stopped producing steel, trucks, railway carriages, tractors, planes, tanks and ships. Together with the handover of its gas, its oil, its electrical energy, its highways and the destruction of its railways, it stopped producing food like maize, wheat, potatoes, yam, lentils, rice, fruits, garden products, cotton, mutton and foodstuffs in general, so as to make over its whole economy to the production of soya-fodder. So China and the European Union and other industrialized countries rear their cattle and produce meat to supply the gigantic emerging Asian markets, where humanity's future lies, with cheap soya-fodder that we sell them.

    In the third place, one must add the high enviromental contamination produced by the direct sowing-RR soya- glyphosate system, since it is based on the permanent use of agrotoxins. The last crop season used at least 150 million litres of glyphosate, 20 million litres of 2-4-D and 6 million litres of endosulfan. These last two added to the other ingredients accompanying glyphosate are highly cancerous. For example we have the serious cases of Ituzaingó Anexo in Córdoba, those of Loma Sene in Formosa and hundreds of cancer cases in Santa Fe.

    In the fourth place, in ecological and environmental terms, the whole direct sowing-RR soya-glyphosate system is nothing more than a huge experiment over 15 million hectares to select resistant weeds and unimaginable, irreversible vertical and horizontal genetic contamination.

    A fifth aspect of the problem is that the system produces a massive loss of labour : four of every 5 real jobs disappear as a result of the difference in operative time per person per hectare between the traditional system and the direct sowing system since the direct sowing-RR soya system requires just one operative for every 500 hectares.

    A sixth aspect linked to the previous one is the destruction of small businesses. Gardens, wild fruit gathering, bee keeping, native and artificial grasses and herbs or other cultivation, every kind of plant is destroyed near the flight paths or other applications of glyphosate as a result of drift, since it is a total herbicide. Nor is RR soya profitable on extensions of less than 300, 350 or 500 hectares depending on the region, which means that small and medium farmers have to lease their land or sell it.

    A seventh aspect is the "legal" robbery of ancestral land and the expulsion of people from the countryside. The direct sowing-RR soya-glyphosate system makes possible soya-fodder production in regions and places where before agriculture was not possible; so ancestral communities or those of limited means who got by on their lands from family production and gathering wild fruits are expelled by the mafia-like conspiracy of provincial and communal authorities, gangster-like legal studies and investment funds in the service of international financial capital. They take over enormous extensions of land that some estimates put at 35 million hectares in foreign hands. This clearly illegitimate development, doing away with rights written into the national constitution but not implemented, is bringing violence to the countryside.

    This series of factors entails misery, expulsion and destruction of family production together with the enrichment of a tiny section of the population - the country's whole rural population is not even 10% of the national total - seen in four wheel drive SUVs, high cost imported machinery, the construction of mansions and luxury expenses of every kind as well as scarcely legal deals in the majority of the communities caught up in the soya "business". All that is compounded by a brutal concentration of land : 6900 family businesses own 49.7% of the country's land. This wealth of the few joined with the proliferation of hunger and unemployment among the working population is expressed in the thousands of welfare plans for heads of household paid out in small rural communities where unemployment never existed before.

    It is good to remember that half the country's population is still below the poverty line and a quarter is in extreme poverty. One final point has to do with the dependence of producers vis-a-vis multinational businesses like Monsanto, owners of the seed patents which subsume the producer into permanent debt. In synthesis this genuine environmental, social and economic catastrophe has been brought about to produce soya-fodder so industrial countries can produce meat at low cost subsidised by hunger, unemployment, illness and environmental devastation for Argentina and the Argentineans.

    Note on the author: Alberto Lapolla is an Agronomist-Geneticist

    Translator's note
    1. General Jorge Rafael Videla led the military junta in Argentina from 1976 to 1981.

    Translated from Spanish into English by toni solo, a member of Tlaxcala (www.tlaxcala.es), the network of translators for linguistic diversity. This translation is Copyleft.

    Communist Party of Venezuela ready to provide leadership in 21st Century Socialism

    by Patrick J. O'Donoghue
    Speaking at the opening of the Communist Party of Venezuela (PCV) Twelfth Congress, Venezuelan Executive Vice President Jose Vicente Rangel says the debate on 21st Century Socialism is of vital importance.
    ...
    Rangel maintains that activists attending the Congress must remember their commitment to President Hugo Chavez Frias, namely that the Party is not made up of some kind of bureaucrats but members who are active in a process that creates a political identity, an ideology and a spirituality.

    New Socialism is an urgent task that needs attending, Rangel argues, especially now that it's time to deepen the revolution.

    "If the debate is not fully assumed, then the revolutionary process runs the risk of suffering turbulence and could regress to an unacceptable state."

    July 23, 2006

    Gunmen Attack Oaxaca Student Radio Station

    by REBECCA ROMERO, Associated Press Writer
    OAXACA, Mexico
    Gunmen attacked Oaxaca's university radio station, authorities said Sunday, the latest incident in a wave of confrontations and protests that have driven many tourists out of this historic Mexican city.

    Assailants fired rounds of ammunition into the station's windows while it was broadcasting late Saturday, the Oaxaca state government said. Nobody was hurt in the attack.

    Witnesses said the attack was carried out by at least 10 assailants wearing ski masks.

    The university radio station has supported a wave of protests aimed at ousting Oaxaca state governor Ulises Ruiz, who is accused of rigging the 2004 election to win office and of violently repressing dissent.

    Teachers Union leader Enrique Rueda, one of the protest leaders, accused Ruiz of being behind the shooting. "(Ruiz) has always responded to popular protests with aggression, threats, repression, and authoritarianism," Rueda said.

    However, Ruiz's office condemned the attack and said the state government was trying to negotiate with the protesters.

    Dozens of protesters, including teachers, students and leftist activists, went with sticks and stones Sunday to guard the radio station.

    The protests erupted in late June after police attacked a demonstration of striking teachers looking for a wage increase. Since then, thousands of demonstrators have camped out in the center of Oaxaca, spraying buildings with revolutionary slogans, smashing hotel windows and building makeshift barricades.

    The protests have paralyzed one of Mexico's top cultural tourist attractions, where visitors normally browse traditional markets for Indian handicrafts, hike ancient pyramids and stroll along cobblestone streets to sample mole dishes.

    Tourism is down by 75 percent, costing the city more than $45 million, according to the Mexican Employers Federation. Business leaders have asked the federal government to intervene.

    -

    Associated Press correspondent Ioan Grillo contributed to this report in Mexico City

    Border Fight Focuses on Water, Not Immigration

    by Randal Archibold
    Jul 7
    CALEXICO, Calif
    For more than 100 years, as their names imply, Calexico and its much larger sister city, Mexicali, south of the border, have embraced each other with a bonhomie born of mutual need and satisfaction in the infernal desert.

    The pedestrian gate into Mexico clangs ceaselessly as Mexicans lug back bulging bags from Wal-Mart and 99 Cent Stores in Calexico. The line into the United States slogs along, steady but slower, through an air-conditioned foyer as men and women trudge off to work and, during the school year, children wear the universal face that greets the coming day.

    Now, the ties that bind Calexico and Mexicali are being tested as a 20-year dispute over the rights to water leaking into Mexico from a canal on the American side is reaching a peak. Though the raging debate over illegal immigration in the United States has not upset border relations here, some say the fight over water could affect the number of Mexicans who try to cross here illegally.

    To slake the ever-growing thirst of San Diego, 100 miles to the west, the United States has a plan to replace a 23-mile segment of the earthen All-American Canal, which the federal government owns and the Colorado River feeds, with a concrete-lined parallel trough.

    The $225 million project would send more water to San Diego, by cutting off billions of leaked gallons — enough for 112,000 households a year — that have helped irrigate Mexican farms since the 1940's.

    But Mexican farmers and their advocates say the lined canal would effectively turn off the spigot for 25,000 people, including 400 farmers whose wells rely on the seepage that has helped turn the powdery fields east of Mexicali, an industrial city, into one of the biggest Mexican producers of onions, alfalfa, asparagus, squash and other crops.

    The farmers and their families ask what will they do if they cannot till the fields and answer that they will cross the border, illegally if they have to, in droves.

    "They can't build a fence high enough to stop us," said Gerónimo Hernández, a Mexicali farmer whose family has worked the fields for generations.

    Juan Ignácio Guajardo, a lawyer in Mexicali who is helping a civic group there and two environmental groups in Southern California fight the canal, said, "You can't have it both ways," adding, "You can't take our water away and then say, 'We don't want immigration, either.' "

    The dispute over the project was among the topics President Bush and President Vicente Fox of Mexico discussed in an April meeting in Mexico.

    [A federal judge ruled against environmental groups in the United States and a Mexicali civic association in a lawsuit against the project, dismissing some claims on June 26 on technicalities and deciding on July 3 that many of the predicted effects on Mexico were "highly speculative" and that the federal environmental law at issue did not apply beyond the border. The groups said they were preparing an appeal. In addition, a separate lawsuit is pending in state court.]

    On the American side, managers of the Imperial Irrigation District, which controls the canal and a vast water system that has turned swaths of the California desert in the Imperial and Coachella Valleys into some of the most fertile farmland anywhere, defend the plan.

    They say the 1944 international treaty on the distribution of water from the Colorado River, which feeds the canal, does not prohibit the concrete lining. New agreements among the states and water utilities along the Colorado have imposed limits on how much water can be tapped from the river, making every drop count that much more.

    "There is more need than water available," said the general manager of the irrigation district, Charles Hosken. "When you find a point to access water, I think it is our duty to go after it."

    Mr. Hosken acknowledged that the project, which has been mired in legal challenges and planning since the 1980's, "will have impact" on Mexico, but said, "The fact is, the water belongs to the United States, and we have never been compensated for it."

    He said he was particularly angry at opponents of the project who invoke the immigration debate, which while discussed here, has not set off the fiery passions found elsewhere.

    The notion that cutting off the leakage would drive up illegal immigration, he said, was "quite a stretch" and a "scare tactic" intended to take advantage of the charged atmosphere surrounding the debate.

    But opponents said the project was moving forward without enough consideration of its potential effects.

    The federal lawsuit contended that a study in 1994 of the project's environmental consequences was outdated and should be revised to take into account changes of the last 12 years.
    Page 2

    Protesters take historic town, driving out tourists and raising unrest fears in Mexico

    OAXACA, Mexico
    Protesters have taken over the center of folkloric Oaxaca, making tourists show identification at makeshift checkpoints, smashing the windows of quaint hotels and spray-painting revolutionary slogans. Police are nowhere in sight.

    It's not the tranquil cultural gem beloved by tourists from the United States and Europe. A month of protests to try to oust the governor have forced authorities to cancel many events, including the Guelaguetza dance festival.

    Most tourists are staying away, costing the city millions of dollars.

    The protests follow other eruptions of civil unrest and class conflict that have plagued President Vicente Fox as his term winds to a close.


    Supporters of leftist presidential candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador are holding nationwide demonstrations to demand a ballot-by-ballot recount in the disputed July 2 presidential election. Federal and state police clashed with striking miners in April and farm protesters in May, leaving four people dead.

    But the clashes in Oaxaca have paralyzed one of Mexico's top cultural tourist attractions, where visitors normally browse traditional markets for Indian handicrafts, hike ancient pyramids and stroll along cobblestone streets to sample mole dishes.

    The protests have reduced tourism by 75 percent, costing the city more than $45 million, according to the Mexican Employers Federation, a business lobby.

    "Most of the tourists have been scared off. It doesn't look safe when you have to go through a barricade and everybody is standing there with sticks and stones," said Chris Schroers, a German who manages a restaurant in the central plaza. "The police are not here. They don't dare to come into town."

    While there have been no reports of protesters attacking tourists, many visitors, including Lorena Valles, a 43-year-old from El Paso, Texas, have felt intimidated.

    Valles and a group of friends went to the city's main theater to see a play last weekend, only to find the event canceled and hundreds of protesters wrecking the auditorium.

    "There were people with masks and sticks and slingshots breaking the auditorium windows and setting the building on fire. That was kind of scary," Valles said. "The people here are normally very nice."

    The protest leaders, a mix of trade unionists and leftists, say their fight is not with the tourists but with Gov. Ulises Ruiz, whom they accuse of rigging the state election in 2004 and using force to repress dissent.

    Ruiz belongs to the Institutional Revolutionary Party, which has governed the state since 1929.

    The movement exploded in late June when police fired tear gas and attacked a demonstration of striking teachers demanding wage increases of about 20 percent.

    "We respect and welcome tourists, but it is important they understand that there is a climate of instability and the government is not meeting the demands of the people," said union leader Enrique Rueda.

    However, posters around the city declare the movement is also against the Guelaguetza dance festival because "only the rich and foreigners" can afford the $42 entrance fee.

    "We have seen the festival of our people become a circus that is just for whites and gringos and Europeans," said Rosendo Ramirez, 51, a spokesman for the Oaxaca People's Assembly, formed to coordinate the protests.

    Ramirez says the checkpoints were set up to weed out agitators. But he concedes the group has no control over many protesters, including some anarchists and communists who have come to Oaxaca to join the movement.

    Thousands have camped out in the city center, sleeping under tarpaulins. Speakers declare the revolution has arrived, while dozens hold political debates.

    Business leaders have called on the state to intervene, but state Interior Secretary Heliodoro Diaz says authorities have to tread carefully to avoid antagonizing the protesters.

    Hotel and restaurant owners are lobbying the Fox administration to help resolve the crisis. They also want the government to declare Oaxaca a disaster area and release federal funds normally reserved for areas hit by earthquakes and hurricanes.

    Fox's spokesman, Ruben Aguilar, has played down the problem, saying "it is annoying, but no more."

    Some analysts say Fox is hesitant to get involved because he himself is under fire from supporters of Lopez Obrador who claim the presidential election was tainted by fraud. Lopez Obrador lost to conservative Felipe Calderon of Fox's National Action Party by less than 0.6 percent, according to official vote tallies.

    Some fear the tensions might explode if federal troops are sent in.

    "There is rising social conflict in Mexico and the government appears impotent and unable to confront it," historian Lorenzo Meyer said. "If the government doesn't learn how to control these conflicts, they will only get worse as time goes on."

    The Popular Assembly lodges legal denunciation of Governor Ruiz

    by Nancy Davies
    Acting as alternative government of the state of Oaxaca, the Popular Assembly of the People of Oaxaca (APPO) has moved on the legal front to oust the governor of the state. On June 21 the nine-page legal complaint was handed to the national Congress.

    Based on the Constitution of the United States of Mexico, APPO issued its formal denunciation of Governor Ulises Ruiz Ortiz. The denunciation calls for revocation of his post as Governor of the Free and Sovereign State of Oaxaca.

    The call for Ruiz’ removal was composed and signed by seventy-two civil organizations, and members of CIESAS, the top-ranked institute for the study of society and anthropology in Mexico. It was handed to the legislature of Mexico on July 16, one month after the governor ordered a pre-dawn attack on sleeping teachers from the teachers union Section 22. Some teachers were accompanied by children and family members in their encampment in the zocalo of Oaxaca City. The attack was made by police supported by helicopters firing tear gas canisters.

    Within days the teachers’ strike had changed into a state-wide popular social movement, with its single demand the removal of Governor Ruiz. Ruiz is a member of the Partido Revolucionario Democratico, the PRI, which has controlled Oaxaca for more than seventy-five years.

    The denunciation is being circulated to the national and foreign press. Meanwhile, outbreaks of the struggle to control town governments continue throughout the state. On July 20 the blockade and occupation of the government buildings for the legislature, juridical offices, and executive offices of Oaxaca organized by APPO were carried out.

    July 22, 2006

    Guatemala Reacts to Intl Arrest Orders For Ex-Dictators & Military Leaders Responsible for Genocide

    by albert id
    Guatemalan human rights activists met with members of the UN High Commission for Human Rights to discuss state amnesty laws on Wednesday in response to a landmark decision by a Spanish judge on July 7 to issue international arrest orders against former dictators and top military officers on charges of genocide after more than two decades of impunity.

    Efraín Ríos Montt, who served as president of the Guatemalan National Congress as recently as 2004, is one of eight individuals sought for crimes including genocide, terrorism, torture and illegal detention.

    According to a UN-sponsored Truth Commission the 36-year civil conflict, in which Ríos Montt´s presidency (1982-1983) was one of the bloodiest, resulted in the death or disappearance of upwards of 200,000 people– the overwhelming majority of whom were indigenous Maya. They calculate that at least 626 state-led massacres occurred during this period.

    HIJOS-Guatemala | Network in Solidarity with the People of Guatemala | Amnesty Intl on Guatemala

    In June, Spain’s National Court Judge Santiago Pedraz launched a fact-finding mission to Guatemala to investigate claims filed in 1999 by Nobel Peace Prize laureate Rigoberta Menchu Tum. In particular, Pedraz was looking into the 1980 government-led siege of the Spanish Embassy in Guatemala City which resulted in 35 deaths (including Menchu Tum’s father), in addition to the murder of four Spanish priests.

    Although Pedraz had planned to collect testimony from the accused during his trip, their defense lawyers filed multiple appeals and successfully prevented the hearings.

    Ríos Montt’s lawyer, Francisco Palomo, told the Guatemalan daily El Periodico that the Spanish court’s move would not affect the former president. “The [Guatemalan] amnesty decree was a phase prior to the Peace Accords which also protected Rigoberta Menchu, without recognizing her as a terrorist, as well as my client in September of 1990, without recognizing that he had not committed a single illegal act.”



    Also listed in the Spanish arrest orders are ex-presidents Óscar Mejía Víctores and recently deceased Romeo Lucas Garcia. Pedraz explained that due to a lack of adequate documentation of Romeo Garcia´s death, his name was also included in the official calls for capture and detention.

    At downtown Constitution Plaza last Sunday, activists spread out hundreds of photographs of persons murdered and disappeared during the era of intensified military violence along with pictures of street protests from the same time period and more recently completed exhumations of mass graves.

    Lawyers with the Centro de Acción Legal en Derechos Humanos (Center for Human Rights Legal Action), who have attempted since 2000 to advance charges of genocide against the accused through Guatemalan courts, emphasized that the Spanish arrest orders spring from the failure of the state’s justice system to hold the men accountable for their crimes.

    Raúl Nájera, a member of HIJOS-Guatemala, an organization comprised of daughters and sons of persons disappeared or killed by the military, told people gathered on the plaza, “If the order for capture is not executed, Guatemala itself will become the prison for those guilty of genocide.”

    July 21, 2006

    Mercosur trade summit opens with Cuba's Castro as guest

    CORDOBA, Argentina
    Cuban leader Fidel Castro arrived at a Mercosur trade summit, with his ally, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, attending as a member for the first time.
    Castro, nearly 80, appeared in an olive military uniform at the door of a Cubana airliner.

    Chavez arrived earlier at Argentina's second-largest city in the Andes foothills promising that "Mercosur will enter a new phase" raising "the banner of social concerns".

    With all five Mercosur presidents politically left of center, the political moment "could not be more favorable for Castro's visit," an Argentine diplomat told AFP before the Cuban president's arrival was confirmed.

    Castro, who turns 80 on August 13, rarely travels outside of Cuba. Cuba is not a Mercosur member, but he is expected to sign an agreement easing trade with the South American free-trade zone.

    Chavez joined the presidents of Mercosur's founding members -- Argentina's Nestor Kirchner, Brazil's Luiz Inacio Lula Da Silva, Paraguay's Nicanor Duarte and Uruguay's Tabare Vazquez -- along with Chavez, Michelle Bachelet of Chile and Evo Morales of Bolivia, leaders of Mercosur's associate members.

    Mexican Foreign Minister Ernesto Derbez will also attend as an observer.

    Castro last traveled to Argentina in 2003 for Kirchner's presidential inauguration. At the time he was the keynote speaker at a vast rally at the law faculty at the University of Buenos Aires.

    Leftist militants here in Cordoba, some 600 kilometers (375 miles) northwest of Buenos Aires, plan a rally at the local university headlining Chavez, Morales and possibly Kirchner. They now hope that Castro will join the speakers.

    But Castro's presence, still larger than life in Latin America, threatens to eclipse what was supposed to be the main event, Venezuela's first-time summit appearance as a full member.

    Venezuela is the world's eighth largest oil producer and fifth largest oil exporter. It became the fifth Mercosur member at a special July 4 summit.

    With its new member, the bloc now has a total population of more than 250 million people, a gross regional product of over one trillion dollars and regional trade surpassing 300 billion dollars.

    Non-governmental organizations are on hand as well, hoping for a more sympathetic ear from the left-leaning heads of state.

    "Within Mercosur we need a space to discuss our problems as do the heads of state and to have the right to participate in the design of public policy," said Gabriela Pereira, of the International Network of Environmental Clubs, operating in 28 countries.

    Chavez said that Venezuela will be better off in Mercosur than in the Andean Community, and recently quit that trade bloc comprising Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru.

    Under the agreement granting Venezuela's membership, the Argentine and Brazilian markets will be open to Venezuela in 2010, while the more fragile markets of Uruguay and Paraguay will open in 2013. In turn, Mercosur partners would have access to Venezuela's market by 2012.

    Morales, another leftist leader, is to meet privately with the leaders of Brazil, Argentina and Chile during the summit, his spokesman said in La Paz.

    Morales will also lobby Chile's socialist president Bachelet, about ceding landlocked Bolivia access to the Pacific, which it lost in an 1879-1881 war to Chile.

    He will also discuss possible natural gas exports to Mexico with Derbez, the spokesman said.

    Morales, elected by a landslide in December, has an 81 percent popularity rating in Bolivia, while Argentina's Kirchner has 80 percent support and Venezuela's Chavez have 70 percent, according to Mexico's Consulta-Mitofsky pollsters, based on data from each country.

    Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay formed Mercosur in 1991 with the aim of creating a South American common market. Chile and Bolivia became associate members in 1996.

    Mexico: On the Brink?

    by Oread Daily
    Protesters have taken over the center of folkloric Oaxaca. Police are nowhere in sight. Since the attack on teachers by police on June 14, Oaxaca has been in a state of civil rebellion, Two weeks ago,the Popular Assembly of the People of Oaxaca (APPO, by its Spanish initials) declared itself the governing body of Oaxaca. The Popular Assembly (which formed in June) convened representatives of Oaxaca’s state regions and municipalities, unions, non-governmental organizations, social organizations, cooperatives, and parents. APPO is urging everyone to organize popular assemblies at every level: neighborhoods, street blocks, unions, and towns. “No leader is going to solve our problems,” members of APPO repeat.

    According to Narco News, the Popular Assembly of Oaxaca "aims at nothing less than expanding the traditional idea of general assemblies of citizens to form a new state government. Such assemblies, under usos y costumbres, oversee the execution of their resolutions by their municipal authorities. That is to say, 'the executive branch' (the authorities) is charged with accomplishing the tasks the assembly gives it. The municipal president, foremost among the authorities, leads (as the Zapatistas’ phrase explains) by obeying."

    "For the population of Oaxaca, the idea of governing by consensus remains part of the common cultural heritage. Therefore, as APPO was convoked, the modest people who comprise 80% of Oaxaca’s population, recognized it immediately. And they support it, despite the obvious difficulties of convening authorities from around the state. Since these authorities receive no pay, a trip to the capital city is not easy. But it’s happening."

    The rising tide of popular movements in southern states which include Oaxaca may also provide support to those contesting the recent presidential election. Although the popular movements are more radical than the "defeated" candidate, there are growing indications that they could view the "election fight" as one front of their battle.

    Por el Bien de Todos leftwing coalition presidential candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador (AMLO) asserted he will not recognize any ruling of the Judicial Power Electoral Court (TEPJF) without a vote-by-vote recount.

    Prensa Latina reports AMLO ratified his stance in an interview on Friday, describing the July 2 elections as a fraud and condemning the triumphant seizure of power by governing candidate Felipe Calderon, of the National Action Party (PAN).

    "Vote recount is the best for the nation," noted ANLO, who buttressed his request by producing 21 packages of 30,000 votes with alleged arithmetic errors.

    He said his coalition possesses evidence of errors in 50,000 polling booths, although there are indications of 72,000, accounting for nearly 1.5 million votes.

    For further background from the Oread Daily go to http://oreaddaily.blogspot.com/2006/06/teachers-fight-repression-in-oaxaca.html.

    Politics of Listening in the Other Campaign

    by Jihn Gibler
    Time and Urgency: Reflections on the Politics of Listening in the Other Campaign
    A Defense and a Critique

    Many of the criticisms leveled against the Other Campaign can be attributed to the failure or the refusal to take seriously the goal of the campaign’s first phase: listening.


    Photo: D.R. John Gibler
    The initial structure of the Other Campaign called for two six-month phases that would lay the groundwork for a national anti-capitalist grassroots organizing movement. In the first phase, Subcomandante Marco would travel through all 31 states and the federal district to listen to the voices, the stories of resistance, and the organizing strategies of the underdogs of the Mexican Left (los de abajo y a la izquierda). In the second phase, commanders from the indigenous leadership of the Zapatista Army of National Liberation (EZLN) would travel out in delegations to all 31 states and the federal district—a total of 32 delegations—where they would stay for the entire six-month period, organizing with those who had signed on to the Sixth Declaration from the Lacandon Jungle and joined the Other Campaign.

    These plans were brutally interrupted when hundreds of municipal and state police attacked flower vendors in Texcoco on May 3, and then over 3,500 federal, state, and municipal police raided the town of San Salvador Atenco on May 4. The Other Campaign suspended the listening trek to stand in solidarity with the hundreds of people who were beaten, raped, molested and taken prisoner during the police raids, and to organize to demand their release.

    I. A Defense

    Since the beginning, the Other Campaign has been critiqued for going against the elections, for slamming the Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD) and its presidential candidate, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, for not attending Bolivian President Evo Morales’ inauguration, for ignoring the National Dialogue (a left organization with links to opposition political parties) and for being so stridently anti-capitalist. These critiques take aim at the whole enterprise of grassroots organizing outside of political parties, governments, and corporations; that is, of drawing such sharp lines of inclusion and exclusion. The Other Campaign drew these lines and has not looked back since.

    But others have launched critiques of the Other Campaign that purport to stem from within the overall goals of the campaign and take aim thus not at the structure of the project, but its implementation. Guillermo Almeyra, for example, recently published in the magazine Memoria one of the most sweeping critiques of the Other Campaign (original Spanish here), a critique that serves as a model for how the politics of listening are mischaracterized and underestimated.

    Almeyra has published hostile critiques of the Other Campaign for months. Almeyra has also never, to my knowledge, attended an Other Campaign event. I followed the campaign from the beginning (deviating from the trail three times to attend a national gathering of jaraneros (players of a kind of folk music native to Veracruz) in Tlacotlalpan, the people’s water forum in Mexico City, and to report on militarization in Guerrero) and I never once saw Guillermo Almeyra. A few of Almeyra’s former students also followed the campaign and confirmed that they had not seen him either. I do not call out Almeyra’s absence from the campaign trail to justify simply discarding his criticism, or to play some kind of an insider-outsider card. I do think it is curious that he would dedicate so much ink to criticizing the Other Campaign without putting in some hours to actually see what it is all about or, said another way, that he would verbally knife a 6-month listening tour without ever actually going to listen (imagine a university professor publishing critiques of Marx without having read his books).

    Almerya writes that the Other Campaign: “is a campaign directed towards making contact with those who cannot express themselves – that is exactly its primary quality – but not a campaign whose objective is organizing or raising the political level of those who participate in their events…”

    This is false. The stated objective of the campaign is precisely to organize and consolidate a national movement. The Sixth Declaration from the Lacandon Jungle summarizes this objective as follows:

    We are going to go to listen to, and talk directly with, without intermediaries or mediation, the simple and humble of the Mexican people, and, according to what we hear and learn, we are going to go about building, along with those people who, like us, are humble and simple, a national program of struggle, but a program which will be clearly of the left, or anti-capitalist, or anti-neoliberal, or for justice, democracy and liberty for the Mexican people.

    Whether or not the campaign succeeds or fails, stumbles or leaps, or is faithful or not to this objective is another matter, but it is misguided to strip the campaign of its own stated goal.

    Almeyra continues:

    Nor does it teach what capitalism is (it only divides society into the “rich” and the “poor”), or about what the State is (they simply say “we have to throw the rich out to Miami,” without saying how, nor by what means, nor how the potential expelled and the state forces will react, in addition to the United States). It is not educating politically (it says “we’ll take the lands away from them,” “we’ll expropriate the banks,” without even outlining the minimal necessary conditions for being able to do that). It is a campaign of anti-electoral and antiestablishment agitation, but not an organizing anti-capitalist campaign.

    Almeyra makes two principal confusions here: 1) that the first phase of the campaign is the only phase and 2) that Subcomandante Marcos’ speeches (which were reported daily in La Jornada) are the only voices of the Other Campaign. Almeyra criticizes the Other Campaign for not doing now what it said it would do later. But he does not call that out, he simply ignores the proposed organizing phase to come and attacks the listening phase for not doing the organizing work. Second, Almeyra writes in his parenthetical clauses about the campaign that “it only divides” and “they simply say” and then quotes elements of Marcos’ speeches thus conflating all the voices of the Other Campaign into Marcos’. Both of these confusions stem from Almeyra’s disregard for the place of listening in the Other Campaign, one by arguing that the listening should be subverted with top-down organizing at the get-go, and two by boiling the underdogs’ voices into Marcos’ (again this later mistake, most likely a result of his selectively pulling Marcos quotes from La Jornada—that paper also covered the daily participation of the underdogs—and never going out on the road to listen).

    This hits at an important point, an apparent contradiction in the first phase of the Other Campaign: if this whole unruly road trip is really about listening, why does Marcos talk so much? My answer to this question might be too generous, but it is what I came to observe over the months of listening both to thousands of people who came to talk and to Marcos’ daily speeches. Marcos gets up on town square kiosks, stands on the tops of vans and trucks out in the countryside to convoke, to call people to participate, to raise awareness about the social space that the Other Campaign is opening. Not every speech was as successful, or even as focused—try giving 2 or 3 speeches a day, seven days a week for four months—as the best, but this was the role of these speeches. Marcos’ involvement here harkens back to days of organizing when the working class had zero access to the then available media, and thus toured around standing on soapboxes to spread their visions of social change.

    Almeyra continues:

    Quickly leaving aside the histrionic-folkloric aspects (Marcos’ motorcycle tour with his chicken mascot in the back), the journey never became anything more than making contact with sectors in struggle or those marginalized by the actions of the parties (which is undoubtedly very important, but it is also not sufficient). It sounded out their level of understanding, listened to their demands, saw their level of organization and decision-making, but they did not propose anything, even autonomy and self-management (fundamental victories of the Chiapaneco Zapatistas), nor did they discuss anything or present a program for the country (or the basic problems which it must confront) or organize.

    Again, two confusions here: 1) Almeyra writes in the past tense, “the journey never became anything more…” as if the Other Campaign, or even the first phase of it, was finished and 2) he undercuts the value and commitment to listening by criticizing the Other Campaign writing that “they did not propose anything.” No, they did propose something: they proposed traveling across the country to listen to people. The EZLN could have organized a national tour to export their model of autonomous municipalities, but they did not want to organize from the top down. They called out, with the Sixth Declaration, for organizing from the bottom up, hence first by listening. And they set out to walk their talk by traveling across the entire country to sit down and listen, everyday, all day.

    Some of Almeyra’s statements are simply venomous:

    …the Other Campaign is not concerned about elevating the level of comprehension of those people who come to it. It does not try to present an anti-capitalist project for the country, nor does it talk about the country’s great problems…

    Almeyra was not there, how could he thus issue such a sweeping condemnation?

    The Other Campaign cannot organize because it does politics in a sectarian and primitive way, and it seeks power, but by inadequate methods like simple agitation against “the rich.”

    The Other Campaign does politics in a “primitive way,” he writes (“primitivo” in Spanish). Considering the cultural baggage the word ‘primitive’ brings with it—500 years of colonialism and despotism—how should one understand the discrediting accusation from a well-established university professor that a largely indigenous and rural peasant political movement is “primitive?” Latent classism, or racism? Or is Almeyra just so eager to condemn that he is not careful with his words?

    When Marcos exclaims “screw the correlation of forces!” he is teaching vulgar voluntarismo [willfulness] to his followers, who are ignorant of what battle is being unleashed, of what the enemy’s methods are, of how there is consensus on those methods in certain sectors, and this leads them to a lack of organizational and political preparation. By replacing reason and considered commitment with rage and improvisation, he leads them to disastrous adventures, as in Atenco.

    Beneath the outrageous and truly dumbfounding accusation that Marcos’ statement in some way led to the brutal police repression in San Salvador Atenco, there is a point of interest here. Many of Marcos’ speeches take extremely complex situations and burst through them with strong, simplified and often unsupported conclusions, such as his famous response to the correlation of forces: screw them. But he also backs up these aphorisms with analysis, such as in his interview in the May 2006 issue of Rebeldia magazine where he explained that what he meant to target was the way in which intellectuals use the correlation of forces analysis to justify not doing anything to fight deeply rooted, and guarded, systems of oppression.

    I see part of Marcos’ role in the first phase of the Other Campaign as that of the convoker. His highly simplified speaking strategy is that of the encourager, the one who calls out: “Don’t get muddled in doubts and fears and endless complications, join us, organize from the grassroots! Don’t let anyone tell you it is impossible to change the world! The strongest military forces in the history of the globe back transnational capitalism and US imperialism, so what, screw them! Let’s get to work! We’ll figure out a way to beat them!” This is not the strategy for overthrowing capitalism, but the call to get on board with the fight.

    In summary, Almeyra’s criticisms of the Other Campaign stem from confusions about: the process of the campaign (listen first, then organize); the voices of that campaign (he conflates all down to Marcos); and the value of listening (evident both in his impatience with the time it takes to even begin to listen and his failure to show up and listen himself).

    II. A Critique

    The Other Campaign, however, is not beyond criticism. Taking the value of listening in the Other Campaign as a kind of diving rod to gauge the success of the movement, the two-day national assembly held on June 30 and July 1, was for me, a deeply disturbing experience. The failure to listen characterized the assembly even before it began.

    A week before the assembly, members of the Mexico City sector of the Other Campaign began to hand out flyers convoking a march from the Angel of Independence to the Zocalo on July 2. One of the main topics on the agenda for the assembly was precisely to decide what action to take on July 2. Yet, the Mexico City group jumped the gun, handing out unsigned flyers in the name of the Other Campaign days before the meetings.

    I approached one woman handing out the flyers and asked how it was they were already calling for a march before the assembly. “Well, it is what we decided in the metropolitan sector,” she told me. “And what about the compañeros traveling from all 31 states to attend the meeting? How can you decide what everyone will do on July 2 before their proposals have also been heard?”

    She was silent. No response.

    After six months of a national movement built on listening to the voices of the underdogs, it was extremely unsettling to see the Mexico City contingency parade their disregard for listening by drafting, designing, printing and distributing flyers that entirely preempted the voices, ideas, and proposals of all the other participants around the country.

    But it gets worse. At the end of the marathon first day of the assembly, only 40 minutes before the Venustiano Carranza theatre was to close, the Mexico City representatives on the facilitation team (la mesa) forced the issue of what to do on July 2—it was originally scheduled for discussion the following morning—onto the table when there was no time to truly listen to, much less debate and consider, the various proposals, and when the Mexico City group could call a vote and win by majority. By mildly disguised bullying the Mexico City group thus won their proposal (representatives from the states denounced the Mexico City group’s “mayoriteo” or majoritizing). Is this the Other Campaign?

    Throughout the two day assembly the din of chattering was constant, and only dipped to near total silence when Marcos stood up to speak. Again, this is the national gathering of a movement founded on listening?

    Most of the urban participants in the Other Campaign—and here I include myself as an “intergalactic” signatory of the Sixth Declaration accompanying the first phase of the campaign as a correspondent with various alternative media—were raised in a largely individualistic, capitalist culture and do not really know how to communicate and make decisions collectively in large assemblies. I think it is paramount to call this out: we don’t know how to carry out assemblies, or large group decision-making gatherings, and we need to learn.

    The march itself on July 2 was colorful and energetic. I felt however, that it was unsuccessful at communicating its main political messages—there is no democracy when there are political prisoners; vote or don’t vote: organize—or pulling people into the energy. The march and the gathering in the Zócalo were products for the consumption of the participants only. But not even all of the participants really paid attention: once the march arrived in the Zócalo many huddled in groups to eat, drink, sell stuff and chat rather than listen to the manifesto being read from the stage.

    We have much still to learn about listening.

    III. Time and Urgency

    So what is with the pompous title to this series of notes? Time and Urgency: Reflections on the Politics of Listening in the Other Campaign? It points to what I think is the central tension at this point in the Other Campaign: a tension between the time necessary to build from below, and the urgency felt in the wake of Atenco, Sicartsa, Oaxaca and in the context of the State intervention in and the resulting colossal mess of the federal elections. Things are falling apart. They have been for some time, but we stand here now, and we feel the intensity of what falls around us.

    Among many who followed the caravan of the Other Campaign across the country, the Big Question is whether or when the journey will continue north. The question should not be, to continue the caravan, or not to continue? Rather, how can the Other Campaign continue building the base of a national grassroots anti-capitalist movement, continue listening in the north while not only continuing, but stepping up its struggle for the release of the political prisoners?

    Time and urgency should not be seen as opposing forces, imposing a decision to give priority to one or the other. Both must fuel the spirit and direction of the organizing. Deeply entrenched cultures and institutions of oppression will be uprooted through slow, considered organizing from the bottom up, but the scale and force of state repression demand a simultaneous stepping up of the intensity, breaking out of the box of marches and town square speeches to carry out more diverse and creative actions that communicate and convoke.

    Doing maths in Mexico

    byJames K Galbraith
    Jul 17
    The election was stolen. It's not in doubt. Colin Powell admits it. The National Democratic Institute and the International Republican Institute both admit it. Senator Richard Lugar of Indiana - a Republican - was emphatic: there had been "a concerted and forceful program of election-day fraud and abuse"; he "had heard" of employers telling their workers how to vote; yet he had also seen the fire of the resisting young, "not prepared to be intimidated".
    In Washington, Zbigniew Brzezinski has demanded that the results be set aside and a new vote taken, under the eye - no less - of the United Nations. In The New York Times, Steven Lee Myers decried "the use of government resources on behalf of loyal candidates and the state's control over the media" - factors, he said, were akin to practices in "Putin's Russia".


    I wrote those words two years ago, for Salon. They referred, of course, to the election in the Ukraine, where the presidential candidate favoured by the powerful neighbouring state (Russia) had claimed a tainted victory in a tight race. The thunder from America, citadel of democracy, was overwhelming. Nothing mattered more than to see the vote annulled, a new election held. The subsequent installation of Viktor Yuschenko as President of Ukraine was widely celebrated as a great triumph for democracy.

    But that, of course, was in another country. Two weeks have now passed since the presidential vote in Mexico, pitting Andrés Manuel López Obrador of the party for a Democratic Revolution (PRD) against Felipe Calderón of the ruling National Action party (PAN). The candidate who trailed, López Obrador, has explicitly charged that the count was cooked. He has challenged the result in court. No final resolution is due before September.

    Yet the stalwarts of democracy outside Mexico are silent. Bush has congratulated Calderón, not waiting for the court to rule. Reuters and Bloomberg echo the confidence of the elites that Calderón will win in court - never mind whether he won at the polls. When The New York Times is heard from, the headlines tell us of the "leftist claims" about the occurrence of fraud, while Calderón is described as "presidential." The Times never doubted that fraud did occur in Ukraine. In Mexico on the other hand, it seemingly renounces any duty to examine the facts on the ground.

    Here's one difference between the two situations. In Ukraine, it was extremely hard to learn exactly what the evidence of fraudulence actually was. In Mexico, it is extremely easy. That is because the Mexican electoral authority, known as IFE, posted the ongoing count on its website in real time, an initiative called PREP. Independent scholars kept a record of PREP as the night progressed. A statistical analysis of that record does not, of course, constitute proof. But it brings to mind Henry David Thoreau's remark that circumstantial evidence can be very strong, as when you find a trout in the milk.

    To begin with, a simple matter. According to an article by Roberto González Amador in La Jornada, the vote totals don't match the percentages reported. Given the just over 15m votes Calderón was said to have earned, the percentage reported for him, 35.89%, could only be obtained by including invalid ballots in the total reported. If, on the other hand, one takes the overall vote total and the percentage reported for Calderón as correct, then his total vote must have been substantially less than was reported.

    The same is true for AMLO and the other candidates, and there is a total shortfall of over a million votes between what can be justified by the official percentages of the valid votes, and the sum of votes reported. The discrepancy proves nothing, but even if it is only a simple error, it certainly seems to cast doubt over the competence of the count.

    Let's turn to the harder stuff. An analysis by the physicist Luis Mochán of UNAM based on the realtime evolution of the vote count and the distribution of vote totals by polling place can be found here, and in greater detail in Spanish, here. It's not easy reading, but is immensely worthwhile. It's possible that Mochán's work inaugurates a new era in realtime checking for vote fraud, made possible by the simplicity of Mexico's first-past-the-post direct vote and the rich electoral data sets that can be made instantly available. Call it the age of transparency, in collision with an oligarchy of thugs.

    Mochán's work calls attention to at least four important anomalies in the count.

    1. Calderón's percentage lead in the count started at around seven percentage points, and diminished steadily in percentage terms through the first part of the count. This corresponded to a remarkably constant absolute differential between Calderón and AMLO as the count progressed. Is this normal? The count depended on the arrival of the boxes; if this were absolutely random then the proportions should have held roughly constant while absolute differentials widened, as actually happened to the differential between Calderón and the third major candidate, Madrazo of the PRI, for most of the evening. Why did the Calderón-AMLO differential follow a different rule?

    2. The PREP results went on view only after the first 10,000 boxes had been processed. If those first 10,000 boxes resembled what came later, then extrapolating backward should produce a line intersecting the origin - each candidate should have started with zero votes. For Calderón this is the case, but for AMLO it is not: the AMLO intercept is actually at minus 126,000 votes. Thus, the first 10,000 boxes were markedly different from those that followed. How?

    3. There are gross anomalies in the number of votes counted per five-minute interval as the count finishes. Over the course of the evening, the pattern of vote counts set a normal range for this variable. As the last boxes came in, however, it was radically violated, with many more votes piled in, per interval, than was normal before. Moreover, toward the very end, PREP reset the box count, which regressed from 127,936 at 13.17 on July 3 to 127,713 at 13.50, meaning that records for 223 boxes disappeared. 33 minutes had by then passed with no updates. When they resumed, there were updates with absurd results: more than 6000 votes per box at 13:57, and then updates with large negative votes per box at 13:57 and 14:03.

    4. From a statistical point of view, the distribution across boxes of votes earned by each candidate should be smooth. For Madrazo it is. But for Calderón and AMLO it isn't. In Calderón's case, the distribution appears to be shifted out, with the shift localized among the last 40,000 boxes counted. In the case of AMLO, the distribution tails off abruptly from its peak. It is in the difference between the slightly fat distribution for Calderón and the shaved distribution for AMLO that the difference in the final outcome is to be found. A graph of the differences in Calderón and AMLO's votes per box, which ought to follow a normal curve, does not. Over a certain range, Calderón's margins appear abnormally large.

    Professor Mochán does not claim to explain these anomalies. More time and closer investigation remain necessary. But he does conclude that it "is reasonable to suspect that there could have been a manipulation of the results reported by the PREP." It is true that the PREP is not an official count - that was done at the district offices, with equally serious anomalies alleged. But PREP reported the box-by-box results as they flowed in-and as such it constitutes a vital instrument for the detection of patterns of manipulation and fraud.

    Let me go further than Mochán. The evidence he assembles is consistent with the following possibilities:

    1. That Felipe Calderón started the night with an advantage in total votes, a gift from the authorities.

    2. That as the count progressed this advantage was maintained by misreporting of the actual results. This enabled Calderón to claim that he had led through the entire process - an argument greatly repeated but spurious in any case because it is only the final count that matters.

    3. That toward the end of the count, further adjustments were made to support the appearance of a victory by Calderón.

    Add these elements together, and there is no reason to accept the almost universal view that the election was close. AMLO might have won by a mile.

    If you want sound and colour, there's plenty of that too: actual tally sheets showing that votes counted for AMLO were reduced, taped conspiratorial telephone conversations, videotapes that may or may not show guilty behaviour; the endorsement of Calderón by Fox; the inclusion of PAN themes in corporate advertising. As a Mexican correspondent writes, "the fraud is a p-r-o-c-e-s-s." In late news, La Jornada on July 16 charges that 40% of the vote packets have been illegally reopened by the IFE since the election. This amounts to a pre-emptive strike against the credibility of any recount. The charges, if true, are tantamount to proof of fraud, evidence prima facie that AMLO won the election.

    Is it time to move on? The numbers suggest otherwise. By demonstrating the possibility of detecting fraud before the results of an election are officially decided, they also inaugurate a new phase in the struggle for the recognition of a democratic vote. The Mexican people, who marched through their capital today, appear determined to carry that struggle forward until justice is won. Unlike the so-called Democratic Party in the United States six years back, Andres Manuel López Obrador appears, for now, determined not to compromise with fraud.

    And for those of us outside Mexico, we must decide where we stand: with democracy ... or quietly on the sidelines?

    July 20, 2006

    A Recount!

    by Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador
    "I call on the candidate of the Right to accept a review of the voting records and a vote by vote recount"

    Speech of Andrés Manuel López Obrador in the second information assembly in Mexico City's Zocalo, Sunday July 16th 2006

    from La Jornada, published in Rebelion July 17th 2006

    Friends,

    My deep thanks to all of you for your presence in this Second Information Assembly. With all my heart, many thanks to those of you who have come from different parts of the country marching, in an organized caravan or on your own account, in all those cases, of your own free will and paying the cost out of your own pockets.

    There are citizens here from Aguascalientes, Baja California, Baja California Sur, Campeche, Coahuila, Colima, Chiapas, Chihuahua, Durango, Estado de México, Guanajuato, Guerrero, Hidalgo, Jalisco, Michoacán, Morelos, Nayarit, Nuevo León, Oaxaca, Puebla, Querétaro, Quintana Roo, San Luis Potosí, Sinaloa, Sonora, Tabasco, Tamaulipas, Tlaxcala, Veracruz, Yucatán, Zacatecas and from the Federal District. You and I know that this effort is not in vain. The cause we are defending is of great historic importance for Mexico.

    You are here not just to support one person, but to defend the right of a people, that can never be given up, to elect its government freely. That is precisely why we ought to have the central object of our movement very clear. We are not only battling for the right to our legitimate triumph in the presidential election but for a higher cause, that of making democracy prevail in our country.

    We cannot accept a regression, a retreat from democracy. In our country's recent political history, opening the space to be able to have free, equitable, clean elections has cost many sacrifices, including the lives of thousands of Mexicans.

    We cannot accept that with illegality, money and tricks a privileged group wants to impose an illegitimate president. We cannot accept that the right of our people to a better life by democratic means be wiped out.

    We cannot permit that they take away from us the right to hope. That is why, I repeat, the general objective of this movement is the defence of democracy.

    In the use of our faculties and rights, we are applying to the Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judicial Power to order the opening of the electoral packets and to carry out an authentic recount of the votes.

    It is no accident that the slogan "vote by vote, box by box" has come from the people and has a good basis and solid reasons. I can inform you that as well as the hostile disposition of the IFE (1) during the electoral campaign, and the manipulation of the count systems and the inequity in the purchase of publicity in the communications media and the war of dirty tricks and the use of public programs and resources to help the candidate of the Right, and likewise the determined intervention of the President of the Republic, I can now tell you, and on top of all that, the results of the voting control records and the count were falsified.

    For example, from the review we have carried out, 60 per cent of the total number of 130,788 voting records have "arithmetical errors" in quotes, that is to say there are thousands of voting control records where the total vote plus the unused ballots is greater or less than the number of votes received, thousands of voting control records where the total vote is greater or less than the number of ballots deposited and thousands of voting control records where the total vote plus the unused ballots is greater or less than the nominal list, by 10.

    I can clarify further., there are more than a million and a half votes that are not based on electoral ballot papers or, put another way, the voting control records do not reflect the true vote because they add up to more or to fewer votes than the votes actually deposited in the ballot boxes.

    From our point of view, this explains, in good measure, why, when it was permitted to open some electoral packets and do a recount in the District Councils, cases appeared where the candidate of the Right, fraudulently, had 100 to 200 votes more than they should and ourselves up to 100 votes less than we should, according to the box.

    All this evidence was duly presented in the dissenting appeal that we made to the Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judicial Power. So this institution has the quantitative and qualitative elements to be able to order the opening of the electoral packets and that they be counted vote by vote, box by box.

    I am absolutely certain that if a recount is carried out it will be shown that we won the elections of July 2nd cleanly, legally and legitimately.

    From this public square I call on the candidate of the Right to act responsibly and accept without any excuses, a review of the voting records and a vote by vote recount of all the boxes in the country. If he argues that he won, he has no reason to say no. Who owes nothing, fears nothing. I suggest that he considers the fact that not all the water of all the world's oceans can wash away the stain of a fraudulent election.

    I also remind him that Mexico, our great country, and its people do not deserve to have a spurious President of the Republic with neither moral nor political authority.

    Furthermore I repeat : it is not good enough for our adversaries to take refuge in legaloid arguments, or arguments of lack of time or of a technical nature in order to refuse to open the electoral packets when what is at stake is the country's democracy and political stability No one should be afraid that an election gets cleaned up, resolved and accepted before the eyes of Mexico and the world.

    Transparency is not much to ask for. We repeat every last one of our demands:

    For the political, economic and financial stability of the country ... vote by vote, box by box!
    To move on and leave behind the political culture of mistrust.......vote by vote, box by box!
    So all we Mexicans can be at peace with our civic conscience and with our selves....vote by vote, box by box!
    To contribute to social peace....vote by vote, box by box!
    So money no longer wins out over the people's dignity and morale.... vote by vote, box by box!
    So not one Mexican who voted on July 2nd is left feeling dissatisfied or insulted....vote by vote, box by box!
    So the doors to democracy are never slammed shut.......vote by vote, box by box!
    To hold up high the honour of Mexico....vote by vote, box by box!
    To strengthen the institutions......vote by vote, box by box!
    To keep faith with legality....vote by vote, box by box!
    To banish irrational confrontation .....vote by vote, box by box!
    To build reconciliation and unity among Mexicans....vote by vote, box by box!

    Friends,

    While the Tribunal deliberates on our demand, I put for your consideration the following actions:

    1. To reinforce the citizen camps located outside the 300 District Councils where the electoral packets are located. These camps are essential to avoid the illegal introduction or wihdrawal of ballots from the electoral packets The proposal is that these 300 camps turn into centres for decision making, information and communication in support of our cause where people from civil society, artists and intellectuals can meet and participate.

    2. To carry out starting this week the first actions of civil peaceful resistance. For that purpose a citizen committee will be formed to decide what type of actions and in what circumstances they will be carried out in practice.

    3. To celebrate the Third Informative Assembly on Sunday July 30th with a march like today's from the Museum of Antrhopology and History to the Zocalo at 11 in the morning. We know that our adversaries are counting on, among other things, the demoralisation and exhaustion of our movement. We are going to show them once more that when they want to trample on citizens' dignity and rights and attack democacy there are always women and men of principle and conviction who neither weary, nor much less surrender. As Carlos Monsivais has said, “anyone who only knows despondency and depression will never be worthy of pessimism".

    Friends

    All of those present and those who could not come, we ought to be proud of living these moments, so decisive for Mexico's public life.

    I am convinced that not even with all the apparatus of the State, used menacingly, nor with all the money of a privileged elite, nor with all the manipulation that has been put into play will they be able to crush the free conscious and responsible will of millions of Mexicans. Let us not forget that we are millions of Mexicans ready to make our rights prevail. And this is the most powerful force.

    I take this chance to acknowledge the leaders of the parties of the Coalition, the PRD, the PT , the Convergence and the networks of citizens and civil society for their fitting and faithful behaviour. We are living through times of definition and trial and all of us will know how to measure up to things.

    As for my part, I again say to you : you can trust me that I am not going to betray the people of Mexico. Furthermore, I am convinced I am not alone, because we are all united.

    Translated from Spanish into English by toni solo, a member of Tlaxcala (www.tlaxcala.es), the network of translators for linguistic diversity. This translation is Copyleft.

    Translator's Notes
    1. Mexico's Federal Electoral Institute

    The Telenovela Continues: Much Drama and Confusion in the Wake of Mexican Election

    “It doesn’t matter, whoever wins it’s all the same,” said a shopkeeper and tourism promoter in the Pacific coast city of Puerto Vallarta.

    “The US wants (conservative Felipe) Calderon to win, so he will win,” laughed the owner of a mountain bike rental outfit in the same city, adding that he didn’t want populist candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador to triumph because “he’s crazy” and “he’s just like (Venezuelan president Hugo) Chavez.”

    The Telenovela Continues: Much Drama and Confusion in the Wake of Mexican Election

    By Kari Lydersen
    Infoshop News (news.infoshop.org)
    July 19, 2006

    “It doesn’t matter, whoever wins it’s all the same,” said a shopkeeper and tourism promoter in the Pacific coast city of Puerto Vallarta.

    “The US wants (conservative Felipe) Calderon to win, so he will win,” laughed the owner of a mountain bike rental outfit in the same city, adding that he didn’t want populist candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador to triumph because “he’s crazy” and “he’s just like (Venezuelan president Hugo) Chavez.”

    These sentiments were common refrains in the lead-up and aftermath of Mexico’s July 2 presidential elections. The final vote tabulation showed conservative PAN candidate Calderon beating populist PRD candidate Lopez Obrador by 0.6 percent (35.88 percent to 35.31), with only 244,000 votes out of 41 million cast separating them. A final ruling from the country’s supreme electoral council (called TRIFE or TEPJF) will be announced by September 6. Lopez Obrador’s camp is calling for a complete recount of the ballots, a move which it is unclear whether the TRIFE is legally authorized to make without annulling and re-doing the election.

    “If Obrador gets a recount, the legal battle gets a whole lot more intense,” said Michael Lettieri, a research fellow with the Council on Hemispheric Affairs who covered the election from Mexico. “The PAN has no intention of backing down, and the legal team they’d be capable of mounting would be impressive. If it goes to the Supreme Court it could be a huge mess.”

    Mexico-based independent journalist and author John Ross thinks a recount is possible, since he describes the seven-judge non-partisan TRIFE as “a quirky kind of independent panel.”

    “This is the last go round for the judges,” who are at the end of their 10-year term, he said. “They don’t have anything to lose. They have annulled elections, ordered recounts and done independent stuff in the past even when political parties tried to put pressure on them.”

    Most agree the presidential contest was cleaner than elections of Mexico past, like 1988 when it is widely believed the election was stolen from leftist Cuauhtemoc Cardenas through a “computer crash,” and 1994 with the assassination of PRI candidate Donaldo Colosio. But the election was nonetheless characterized by dirty campaigning that evoked cynicism and disgust in the populace; allegations of institutional bias and instances of fraud; and the shadow of US influence, not through direct intervention but rather through Mexico’s economic dependency on its northern neighbor.

    Abstention in the election was about 41 percent, with many feeling so disillusioned that they didn’t vote at all. Tom Hansen, director of the Mexico Solidarity Network and a doctoral student in Mexico City, said that in 50 interviews with taxi drivers in Chiapas and Oaxaca, “whatever their ultimate choice, without exception they began the conversation by saying that all politicians are crooks and sin verguenzas (shameless), and if they were voting, they would be voting for the lesser of two evils.”

    A year ago, former Mexico City mayor Lopez Obrador, also known as “Peje” or AMLO, was the darling of the Mexican people, with sky-high approval ratings and much public sympathy because of the ruling PAN’s clumsy attempt to knock him off the ballot with an obscure criminal charge. But during the six-month campaign season, the race developed into a tight match between Lopez Obrador, Calderon and even PRI candidate Roberto Madrazo, who ended up a distant third with only 22 percent of the vote.

    Calderon’s camp went all out to portray Lopez Obrador as a fiscally irresponsible, anti-American leftist and friend of Chavez and Fidel Castro, a depiction which independent analysts say is far from the truth. Lopez Obrador is known for promoting social programs and aiding the poor, but he is also relatively conciliatory toward big business. Among other things, the PAN ran TV ads proclaiming Lopez Obrador “a danger to Mexico;” the ads were eventually banned by IFE.

    “You would see Lopez Obrador’s mug and then it would cut to Chavez or (Zapatista leader) Subcomandante Marcos or a lynching that happened in the southern part of the city several years ago and then it would come up with the word ‘Danger,’” said Ross. “Sometimes those ran four times during one commercial break.”

    “Those ads couldn’t have been more outrageous,” said Lettieri. “They were completely unevidenced, shameful fear-mongering. And the sad part is they were devastatingly effective. There was a large undecided population. The incessant repetition of ‘Lopez Obrador is Chavez’ worked to plant a seed of doubt.”

    The US administration’s antipathy toward Chavez is well known, and many Mexican voters likely feared alienation from the US if Lopez Obrador were to win. With about 85 percent of Mexican exports heading to US markets; a hoped-for immigration agreement with the US pending and remittances from immigrants in the US making up a huge part of the Mexican economy, the Bush administration only needed to make its support of Calderon known to influence the election. Lettieri thinks this was a major reason for Lopez Obrador’s plummeting support between spring 2005 and the election.

    “Before people started getting invested in the election, it was very easy to jump on the Lopez Obrador bandwagon,” he said. “If voters saw Lopez Obrador as a radical who wasn’t going to get along with Washington, they probably voted for Calderon, which was a safe choice.”
    Lettieri noted that in general, Calderon ran a “very US-style media campaign,” compared to Lopez Obrador’s less media-savvy campaign which saw him traversing the countryside for 300 community appearances.

    “US-style campaigns are spreading across Latin America, on both sides (of the political spectrum),” said Lettieri. “But Lopez Obrador was the antithesis of that. His was a very grassroots campaign.”

    The first ballot count announced by the Federal Electoral Institute (IFE) showed Calderon solidly in the lead and mysteriously left out about three million ballots from areas that favored Lopez Obrador. This bolstered allegations of IFE’s pro-PAN bias; and brought up to half a million Lopez Obrador supporters into Mexico City’s zocalo in protest. Lopez Obrador has continued to call for nonviolent civic demonstrations nationwide in favor of his Coalicion Por el Bien de Todos (“Coalition for the good of all,” including the PRD, Labor Party and Convergence Party).

    “The practices we saw in this electoral process were sophisticated but they represent the same defrauding we have always seen,” Lopez Obrador was quoted as saying.

    Currently TRIFE is recounting ballot boxes that show evidence of tampering or irregularities. It remains to be seen how they will deal with Lopez Obrador’s call for a full recount.

    While international observers and independent analysts have reported the election was clean, Lopez Obrador’s party has lodged formal complaints of fraud with TRIFE and has documented some eyebrow-raising incidents. Citizens calling an 800 number set up by the PRD reported ballot boxes stuffed and dumped and PAN voters bussed to the polls. And the Mexico Solidarity Network reported that in 781 precincts, the vote totals exceeded the number of registered voters.

    “It was a fraudulent election,” Ross said bluntly, comparing it to Cardenas’s 1988 defeat.

    Lopez Obrador also complained during the campaign of television ads by private companies that violated campaign regulations. These included spots by the Jumex juice company and Sabritos potato chip company which used a blue background – the PAN’s color – and seemed clearly crafted as follow-ups to previously-run PAN TV ads.

    Lopez Obrador also alleges that President Fox actively supported Calderon, in violation of prohibitions against the president participating in the campaign. And a report by the Mexico Solidarity Network also noted that Mexicans received unsolicited text and phone messages the night before the election telling them to vote for Calderon; even though campaigning officially ended the Wednesday before the Sunday election.

    Much was made of the north-south divide in the results, with the poorer, more heavily indigenous south generally going for Lopez Obrador and the better-off north going for Calderon. But Hansen of the Mexico Solidarity Network thinks that bi-polarity was over-simplified.

    “The real winner was ‘I don’t trust any of these crooks,’” he said. “Even in the northern states where Calderon won overwhelmingly, he hardly ever took more than 50 percent of the votes. In DF (Mexico City) where Peje won overwhelmingly, he didn’t win 50 percent of the vote. From the perspective of the people who live there, the blue-yellow (PAN-PRD) division is something that shows up nicely on a map, but doesn’t explain the many nuances of political struggle that happen at the local and regional level.”

    These struggles include the “Otra Campana” of Zapatista leader Subcomandante Marcos and several instances of uprisings and bloody repression in the two months proceeding the election, which show that strong arm tactics in Mexico are far from a thing of the past. On May 4 at least one person was killed and scores were imprisoned by police in Atenco, the municipality near Mexico City where there have been ongoing struggles over land. The conflict was sparked by the eviction of unlicensed flower vendors from a market. And on June 14, tens of thousands of striking teachers who were carrying out a planton (encampment protest) in Oaxaca City were attacked with rubber bullets and tear gas. Both sides took hostages; teachers allege they were beaten and raped by police while detained. Two steelworkers were also recently killed during a strike in Michoacan. Ross thinks these incidents worked to Calderon’s advantage.

    “With these three events, there was a feeling that social unrest is reaching some cresting level, and the forces of repression ought to be brought in to quell things,” he said. “I think it served Calderon’s purposes because it created this atmosphere of fear, and only Calderon with the mano duro (iron fist) could calm things down.”

    He thinks the demonstration that Lopez Obrador has called for the Mexico City zocalo on July 30 will draw 1.5 million people, which would make it the biggest in the country’s history.

    “The demonstrations are growing exponentially,” he said. “Lopez Obrador hopes that will impress on the seven judges (of TRIFE) that this is a historic moment.”

    ---------

    Kari Lydersen is a freelance writer whose work has appeared in the
    Washington Post, In These Times, LiP Magazine, Clamor, and The New Standard.

    July 19, 2006

    Opposition candidates must submit to SUMATE/USA whims and withdraw...

    by Carlos Pietri
    The news is that Sumate has returned to the monticule and made some warming throws. The problem in this is that, after warming up, they established, in a very clear way, that they would only assume the primary commitment if all the players signed an irrevocable authorization whereby all the candidates would retire from the December presidential elections if/when/whenever they (SUMATE) demand it.

    They have smoothed over that the fact that the privately-owned (opposition) media have deceived the international community to believe that the opposition has a high level of support and that they represent the "real Democracy" in our country.

    They want issue an order to their "unique candidate" to withdraw from the presidential electoral process at the last minute on some excuse ... because the electoral conditions "were not fulfilled" ad nauseum.

    Sumate's withdrawal and that of its candidate at the end of November, would start a virtual social subversion (as in previous years thru "Guarimbas") thus justifying to the world a request for US Marines to participate in our country to "protect" ... but never to "invade" ... as their ploy in obedience to imperialist security and defense doctrines.

    It is such a pity that the people of the United States of America are allowed to finance this NGO with such great amounts of money to "promote" Democracy in our country…

    I wonder what they mean when they say to "promote" Democracy?

    Could it be to assure the non-participation of their allies in any elections?

    or

    Will they only will participate if they have a chance to manipulate the process like they've already done in Peru, USA, Costa Rica, Colombia and are now trying to do in Mexico?

    In just a few words, to achieve SUMATE's participation in the selection of a unified opposition candidate, the opposition pre-candidates must resign to their individual authority and political sovereignty ... and adhere to the whims of a group of coup participants who, the international community should know is financed by a foreign government...

    July 18, 2006

    Election crisis in Mexico deepens as one million protestors demand recount

    by Rafael Azul
    The disputed vote in this month’s presidential elections has become the focal point of deep social antagonisms in Mexico. The growing social discontent was on display July 16, when over one million supporters of presidential candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador gathered in Mexico City to demand a full recount and an investigation into charges of election fraud.

    The official count of the votes cast on July 2 gave the presidency to Felipe Calderón, the candidate of the conservative National Action Party (PAN), by a margin of less than 244,000 votes, or 0.58 percent.

    At the rally, which was the largest protest demonstration in Mexico’s history, López Obrador, who ran as the candidate of the Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD), made a brief speech in which he called on his followers to organize to guard the ballot boxes, now stored in 300 locations around the country.

    López Obrador reminded his supporters of some of the charges that the PRD has presented to the Elections Tribunal (TEPJF). According to these charges:

    * Sixty percent of the ballot boxes were tampered with, resulting in a discrepancy of nearly a million between the number of votes that were reported by the electoral authorities and the numbers attached to the ballot boxes.

    * Partial recounts of a few ballot boxes produced results that were at odds with the official tally for those boxes, giving Calderón between 100 and 200 more votes, and López Obrador 100 votes less, per ballot box.

    López Obrador rejected what he described as “legalistic arguments” and challenged Felipe Calderón, his opponent, to agree to the recount.

    López Obrador also called on his followers to prepare for acts of civil disobedience. Another mass demonstration will take place on July 30th.

    Rules that govern the TEPJF clearly indicate that if there is evidence that any of the above charges are true, a recount is justified. The seven judges of the TEPJF have other options however, including nullifying the results of the contested ballot boxes.

    In its appeal to the TEPJF, the PRD has contested 50,000 ballot boxes, but is demanding a recount of all 41.7 million votes. The PAN has contested 500 boxes.

    Were the TEPJF only to nullify disputed boxes, it would be statistically very difficult for López Obrador to overcome the 244,000 vote margin that separates him from the PAN candidate.

    The TEPJF also has the power to nullify the entire election and call for a new vote if it determines that constitutional principles were “violated in an important manner, placing doubt on the credibility or legitimacy of the vote.”

    A second appeal by the PRD charges that the administration of current president Vincente Fox engaged in dirty tricks, including vote-buying and improper campaigning by Fox on Calderón’s behalf.

    The TEPJF is required to make a decision by the end of August and declare a winner by September 6.

    Last week, TEPJF President Leonel Castillo González became a target of the pro-PAN media when he indicated that, in the context of the thin margin of victory for Calderón, “legitimacy is more important than legality.” TEPJF had already been attacked by the media when, in the days leading up to the election, it forced the PAN to withdraw TV commercials that compared López Obrador to Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez and declared him a “danger to Mexico.”

    Calderón and the PAN have denounced López Obrador and demanded that the TEPJF not give in to what they call the “blackmail” of protests. Calderón is also accusing López Obrador of wanting an annulment of the vote, rather than simply a recount.

    The political crisis in Mexico reflects a deeper social crisis, a product of enormous inequality and deepening misery for millions of Mexican workers. Within this context, López Obrador’s essential function is to keep the discontent of masses of people within legal and establishment channels.

    Throughout the elections, López Obrador has sought to walk a political tightrope. On the one hand, he has sought to appeal to the demands of Mexican workers for social programs and jobs and, in the process, has made demagogic attacks on Mexico’s ruling oligarchy. On the other hand, he has sought to assure Mexican and foreign business that as president he would not carry out any policies that would seriously challenge the political and economic domination of the ruling elite.

    López Obrador’s basic role has continued into the post-election crisis, a fact that was highlighted in his remarks at the rally, when he sought to argue that a full recount would lead to conditions of financial stability and social harmony. The greatest fear of Mexico’s political elite is that the social discontent that plagues the country will find expression outside the political establishment.

    The Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), which ruled Mexico from the party’s formation after the Mexican Revolution until it was defeated by Fox and the PAN, accepted the announced results of the election even after it was clear that López Obrador and the PRD were going to challenge Calderón’s narrow victory. It is blocking with the PAN in the election dispute.

    Guatemala urged to act on murders

    Guatemala is still failing to take action over the high number of murders of women and girls in the country, according to Amnesty International.

    The rights group said there has been little progress since June 2005, when it called on the authorities to act.

    Up to 70% of murders of women are not investigated and no arrests are made in 97% of cases, Amnesty says.

    It adds that some officials recognise how serious the problem is, but many still tend to blame the victims.

    Amnesty's latest report cites police figures which show that 229 women and girls were killed in Guatemala in the first six months of 2006.

    Many of the murders were exceptionally brutal, with the victims suffering sexual violence, mutilation and dismemberment.

    Amnesty says that it knows of only two convictions out of 665 murders of women in 2005.

    Training

    Among the cases highlighted in the report is that of Cristina Hernandez, who was forced into a car outside her home on 27 July 2005.

    Her father tried in vain to give chase and then went to a police to report the abduction and to ask the officers to set up roadblocks.

    Her father said the officers refused, arguing that girls often ran off with boyfriends and that they could not begin a search for 24 hours.

    Cristina's body was found the next morning. She had been shot four times and bitten all over her body.

    Her family, afraid for their safety, went into hiding. Her killers are still at large.

    Amnesty says that in many cases, there is a failure to carry out even basic investigations, process the crime scene and preserve potential evidence.

    Heavy case loads, lack of equipment and the shortage of police investigators mean that few cases are pursued vigorously.

    Amnesty is calling on the Guatemalan authorities to improve the quality of criminal investigations, including providing more training for investigators.

    It also says there should be more efforts to guarantee the safety of witnesses and family members, and to follow up reported abductions of women and girls.

    Israel calls Venezuelan diplomat for consultation

    Israel has called Freddy Iván Morillo, Chargé d'Affaires of the Venezuelan Embassy in Tel Aviv, for consultation following President Hugo Chávez' statements last July 14th condemning Israeli military attacks against Lebanon and the Gaza Strip.

    "Following Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez' statements, the (Israeli) Assistant General Director for Latin American Affairs Dorit Shavit called Venezuelan Embassy Chargé d'Affaires for clarification," said the Israeli Foreign Affairs Ministry in a communiqué, as quoted by Efe.

    Last July 15th, the Venezuelan Foreign Affairs Ministry issued a communiqué entitled "Venezuela condemns the attacks of the State of Israel against the peoples of Palestine and Lebanon" endorsing Chávez remarks on July 14th, when the Venezuelan ruler labeled the Israeli attacks as "insanity with atomic bombs."

    "Where will this madness is going to? Behind this madness there is the US empire lust for domination. Their lust for domination knows no bounds and could lead the world to the holocaust. God save us!," Chávez exclaimed.

    In its communiqué, the Israeli Foreign Affairs Ministry added: "We have clearly told the (Venezuelan) Chargé d'Affaires that Israel is shocked as the Venezuelan President's words lack balance."

    The document also stressed that such remarks "have completely dismissed all of the events that have lead to this escalation."

    Venezuelans repatriated
    Meanwhile, the Venezuelan Foreign Affairs minister Alí Rodríguez Araque instructed Venezuelan ambassador to Lebanon Zoed Karam to evacuate Venezuelans, both tourists or residents, and to move to neighboring Cyprus.

    In Lebanon there are some 5,000 Venezuelan nationals.

    For purposes of evacuation, both Karam and Venezuelan consul Ricardo Salas are implementing land evacuation to Syria and sea evacuation to Cyprus.

    The Venezuelan Foreign Affairs Ministry said it is taking the necessary steps before Israel "to obtain assurances that no attacks will be launched against our Embassy in Lebanon."

    Meanwhile, Lebanese residents in Venezuela are to stage a march next July 20th to the Embassies of the United States and Israel.

    Translated by Maryflor Suárez R.

    July 17, 2006

    WHY DEMOCRATS DON’T COUNT, by Greg Palast

    The Exit polls said he won, but the “official” tally took his victory away. His supporters found they were scrubbed off voter rolls. Violence and intimidation kept even more of his voters away from the polls. Hundreds of thousands of ballots supposedly showed no choice for president — like ballots with hanging chads.

    And the officials in charge of this suspect election refused to re-count those votes in public. Everyone knew full well a fair count would certainly change the outcome.

    You’ve heard this story before: Gore 2000. Kerry 2004.

    But Lopez Obrador 2006 is made out of very different stuff than the scarecrow candidates who, oddly, call themselves “Democrats.”

    For six years now, I’ve had this crazy fantasy in my head. In it, an election is stolen and the guy who’s declared the loser stands up in front of the White House and says three magic words: “Count the votes.”

    This past Saturday, my dream came true. Unfortunately, it was in Spanish — but I’ll take what I can get. There was Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, presidential challenger, standing in the “Zocalo” — the square in front of Mexico’s White House, telling the ruling clique inside, “Count the votes!“

    Most important, his simple demand was echoed by half a million pissed-off, activated voters chanting with him, “Vota por vota!” — vote by vote.

    And you know what? I think they are going to have to listen. I suspect that the rulers of Mexico, a vicious, puffed-up, arrogant elite, may well have to count those votes. But, for that to happen, someone had to ask them to do it — in no uncertain terms.

    Traveling the USA, I’m asked again and again ‘Why don’t Democrats stand up when their elections are stolen?’

    The answer: for the same reason jellyfish don’t stand up… they’re invertebrates.

    I’m beginning to find that answer a bit too glib (though darn funny). Because it’s not about electoral cojones; it’s about a devotion to democracy deep in the bone. Yet weirdly, candidates that call themselves “Democrats” seem kind of, well, indifferent to democracy.

    Why? Elections are the radical tool of the working class — the great leveler of the powerless against the too-powerful. But the candidates themselves, both Republican and Democrat, tend to come from the privileged and pampered class. Votes are just the surfboards on which their ambitions ride.

    Right now in Mexico’s capitol, nearly a million ballots sit in tied bundles uncounted. That’s four times the “official” margin of victory of the ruling party over Lopez Obrador. Supposedly, they’re “votos nulos” — null votes, unreadable. But, not surprisingly, when a few packets were opened, the majority of these supposedly unreadable votes were Lopez Obrador’s.

    If you think that’s a Mexican game, think again. Because that’s exactly what happened in Florida and Ohio.

    In Florida, 179,855 ballots supposedly showed no vote for President. A closer look by the US Civil Rights Commission statisticians showed that 54% of those Florida “votos nulos” were cast by African-Americans. Did Black folk forget to vote for President, couldn’t make up their minds or, as one TV network implied, were too dumb to figure out the ballot? Not at all. Machines can’t count some ballots. But people can. For example, several voters wrote in, “Al Gore,” which the machines rejected as his name was already printed on the ballot. The write-in could fool a machine but a human has no problem figuring out that voter’s intent.

    The National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago reviewed all 179,855 “uncountable” votes and found the majority attempted to choose Gore. And they would have been counted — but Florida’s Secretary of State, Katherine Harris, ordered a halt.

    So Bush was elected not by counting the votes but by preventing their count. And he was reelected the same way in 2004 when a quarter million votes were nullified in Ohio.

    But why fixate on Florida and Ohio? Here’s a nasty little fact about voting in the Land of the Free not reported in your newspapers: 3,600,380 ballots were cast in the November 2004 presidential election that were never counted. In 2000, the uncounted ballots totaled just under two million.

    And where were the Democrats? In 2004, behind the huge jump in uncounted votes was a mass challenge campaign aimed at poor, Black and Hispanic voters by the Republican Party — pushing these voters, mostly Democrats, to “provisional ballots.” They could have been counted, if someone had fought for it. Hundreds of lawyers were on stand-by but the head of the biggest legal team told me in confidence — and in frustration — that the Kerry campaign told them to stand down.

    Recently, Al Gore was asked if the election of 2000 was stolen. “There may come a time when I speak on that, but it’s not now,” said the beta dog. (I suspect that if Al Gore were found bleeding in an alley, he’d answer the question, Who shot you? with “There may come a time when I speak on that…”).

    Lopez Obrador is of a different breed. At the rally last Saturday in Mexico City, he played video and audio tapes of the evidence of fraud on a screen eighty feet tall. Imagine if Gore had projected the “scrub sheets” of purged Black voters on a ten-story-high screen in front of the White House.

    Lopez Obrador put political force behind his legal demands by calling on voters from every state in Mexico to march to the capital. Two million are expected to arrive this Sunday. The result: the word among the political classes is that the election may be annulled. Even the conservative Financial Times has warned Mexico’s elite not to “fool itself” by ignoring the demand for a full vote count.

    North-of-the-Border Democrats just don’t get it. The Republican Party is pushing “provisional” ballots, pushing voter ID requirements, compiling secret challenge lists, scrubbing voter registries and selling us vote-nullifying ballot boxes: they get it completely. The GOP knows the key to their electoral domination is not in winning over their opponents’ votes, but in not counting them.

    The un-Gore of Mexico City has a lesson for the Blue-party gringos. Either the Democrats demand that all votes count, or the Democrats will count for nothing.

    1 million Mexicans demand recount

    by Kevin Diaz

    MEXICO CITY
    Blaring horns and beating drums, an estimated 1 million protesters from all over Mexico converged on the capital Sunday to call for a recount in the country's still-undecided July 2 presidential election.

    The outpouring was by far the largest demonstration yet in support of former Mexico City mayor Andrés Manuel López Obrador, a left-leaning populist who cites fraud in his narrow loss to conservative ruling party candidate Felipe Calderón.

    The Roman Catholic Church canceled Mass at the downtown cathedral as protesters overwhelmed the massive central plaza and spilled for blocks down nearby streets, The Associated Press reported. Protesters filling the Zócalo square and side streets numbered about 1.1 million, making it the second-largest protest in the city's history, Ricardo Olayo, the chief spokesman for Mexico City police told Bloomberg News.

    Organizers of López Obrador's Party of the Democratic Revolution, known as the PRD, distributed copies of newspaper editorials worldwide calling for a recount, if not for López Obrador then to affirm Mexico's nascent democracy and Calderón's victory.

    López Obrador asked his followers to continue a campaign of "passive civil resistance in the defense of democracy." The protests will end, he said, when there's a recount.

    Calderón denies any fraud and opposes a recount, saying that recent elections in Germany and Italy were closer than his. Uncertified results give him a margin of victory of fewer than 244,000 votes out of 41 million.

    Despite concerns about possible violence and social unrest, police reported no serious incidents among the festive columns of marchers converging on the Zócalo, Mexico City's historic central square.

    "Demanding a recount of every vote is not violence, it is democracy," said Mexican actress and political activist Jesusa Rodriguez, one of the leaders of the march. "It is those who oppose a recount who are complicit in violence."

    The demonstration was a massive reprise of a rally last weekend that brought some 300,000 people to the Zócalo.

    One million Mexicans said: “You are not alone, Lopez Obrador”

    by Hernan Etchaleco, Pravda.Ru
    About one million Mexicans demanded a new vote recount of Mexico presidential election.

    Amid calls for a civil resistance campaign to protest fraud, around one million of Mexicans Sunday demanded a new vote recount of the presidential election and backed the bid of the defeated leftist candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador to challenge the official results in courts. The impressive crowd marched through the country’s capital to El Zocalo square, the historical center of the city, chanting “You are not alone” to make public the support of the masses to the leader of the Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD).

    "We are going to start peaceful civil resistance to defend democracy," Lopez Obrador told supporters, some of whom walked, traveled on battered old buses or even rode on horseback to the capital from around the country. According to observers, the size of the protest, bigger than a similar demonstration last week, gave Lopez Obrador a lift in his attempt to persuade an election court to declare him winner.

    According to the official results released by the Mexican Federal Electroal Institute (IFE) three days after the July 2 vote, conservative ruling party candidate Felipe Calderon won by 0.58 percentage point, or just over 240,000 votes.

    Along last week, Lopez Obrador presented what he called “clear evidence” of the fraud comitted by government officials during the election day. At least two videotapes where made public of members of the electoral council introducing ballots in the already closed poll boxes.

    The IFE rejected allegations and confirmed the results released two weeks ago. According to analysts, the dispute threatens to further divide Mexico along geographic and class lines. Lopez Obrador won in the mainly poor southern states, while Calderon swept most of the more-affluent north and northwest.

    After the legal demand filed by Lopez Obrador, the electoral tribunal has to decide by September 6 whether to ratify the IFE numbers or ask for a full recount of the votes. In the meantime fears of a political gridlock and even unrest and violence have been raisen in a key Latin American country.

    Chavez's foes decide on primary

    [DO NOT FORGET THAT THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT HAS ALREADY PAID THE CHOICEPOINT COMPANY FOR THEIR VOTER ROLL LISTS. EXPECT MAJOR FRAUD IN THE VENEZUELA ELECTION, AS IN MEXICO. CHECK HTTP://GREGPALAST.COM]

    CARACAS, VENEZUELA
    Candidates see joint effort as best chance for victory

    Candidates who will oppose Hugo Chavez in Venezuela's December presidential election have decided to participate in a winner-take-all primary Aug. 13 to decide on a single candidate whom they all promise to support.

    It is a measure of the opposition's weakness that politicians from the nine disparate parties decided on the joint primary in a bid to galvanize an opposition that has largely given up hope of defeating Chavez.

    Major opposition parties boycotted last December's congressional elections after accusing Chavez of rigging the system. Chavez backers said the opposition merely was acknowledging it probably would lose.

    Polls show Manuel Rosales, governor of Zulia state, and Julio Borges, a former assemblyman and TV show host, are the leading opposition figures, but both still trail by a wide margin.

    Chavez has parlayed his country's enormous oil wealth into a welfare program he calls "socialism for the 21st century." Some 3.5 million people are thought to receive cash monthly from the government through health and education initiatives, retail and industrial cooperatives, and other programs.

    Critics say Chavez is an autocrat who dispenses largesse at his discretion.

    Although a strong favorite to win a third term, Chavez is not invincible, pollsters say.

    July 16, 2006

    Mexican leftist faces test in capital vote march

    MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - The leftist claiming fraud in Mexico's presidential election two weeks ago faces a test of his strength on Sunday when he heads a huge rally through the capital in support of his call for a vote recount.

    Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who pulled a crowd of 100,000 protesters last weekend, hopes for an even bigger demonstration of support at a march through the city's main Reforma avenue.

    Lopez Obrador, 52, is trying to put pressure on an election court that will rule on his charge that conservative Felipe Calderon, the government and electoral officials stole the presidency from him through fraud.

    Calderon came from behind in opinion polls to win the July 2 election by a fraction of a percentage point. The court must rule by early September on who actually won the vote, which split the nation between right and left only six years after President Vicente Fox ended 71 years of single-party rule.

    Officials from Lopez Obrador's Party of the Democratic Revolution have told the Mexican media they expect up to half a million people on the march.

    Protesters will walk past the U.S. Embassy, international hotels and a business district before holding a mass rally in the Zocalo square, once the center of the Aztec world and now home to the National Palace seat of government and the city's Spanish colonial cathedral.

    The square, one of the largest in the world, has become the focus of protests to back Lopez Obrador, who was the capital's popular mayor until quitting last year to run for president.

    "We'll move in and live here if need be," said leftist Juan Carlos Escandon, gathering signatures in favor of Lopez Obrador in the Zocalo.

    Strong vote for recount in Mex. elex

    "They say that history repeats itself, but this time it is not going to happen because we are not going to allow it," said Víctor Hugo Lozano, a 42-year-old restaurant worker from Oaxaca, Mexico.

    On Thursday, Lozano took part in a "Vigil for Democracy" at the Mexican consulate in Manhattan. Participants in the vigil demanded a vote-by-vote recount of the July 2 Mexican presidential election results.

    "The Mexican community [here] wants to be sure that there is still some democracy in Mexico," said Joel Magallán, a Jesuit brother who is executive director of Asociación Tepeyac, a Mexican advocacy group that organized the vigil.

    Lozano and Magallán were referring to the fact that according to the official count, left-winger Andrés Manuel López Obrador, of the Party of the Democratic Revolution, lost the presidential contest by 0.6% to conservative Felipe Calderón, of the National Action Party (PAN), the party in power. PAN is the favorite of Washington and the Mexican business class.

    They also were talking about how López Obrador's followers are sure that massive fraud was committed.

    "It is not the first time," Lozano added. "It also happened in 1988, when the Institutional Revolutionary Party, in power those days, stole the election from Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas."

    The 1988 election story is a sordid one. Cárdenas, the Party of the Democratic Revolution candidate, was ahead in the vote count against Carlos Salinas de Gortari, of Institutional Revolutionary Party. Then, in the middle of the night, the computer system at election headquarters crashed. When it was restored hours later, Salinas - one of Mexico's most reviled public figures - was declared the winner.

    Those days, López Obrador was one of the main architects of the Cárdenas' campaign.

    Today in Mexico City, hundreds of thousands of López Obrador's supporters from all over the country will hold a massive rally to demand a recount. Calderón, outgoing President Vicente Fox and their party fiercely oppose it.

    "What is their problem with the recount?" asked López Calderón during a TV interview. "El que nada debe, nada teme." (If you have done nothing wrong, you have no reason to worry.)

    Vigil participants delivered a letter for Fox to the Mexican consulate.

    "In the name of Mexican immigrants who are Tepeyac members and other Mexican immigrants in New York," the letter read in part, "we want to ask for your impartial intervention in this electoral process to guarantee a transfer of power and a strong democratic government."

    To expect impartiality from Fox may be asking too much, not only because Calderón belongs to his party but also because López Obrador promised to be the president of the many millions of poor Mexicans.

    Despite Fox's glowing assessment of the state of his country's economy, under his presidency, 4 million desperate Mexicans risked life and limb to get to the U.S., hoping for a better life.

    Ironically, while President Bush rushed to congratulate Calderón even before he was declared president, López Obrador, who has said he will create more public works and social programs for the poor and renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement, would probably be more effective at curbing illegal immigration to the U.S.

    "We come to the U.S. out of necessity," said Fausto Romero, 23, a restaurant worker from Puebla. "In Mexico, we can't even buy food for our families. But with jobs and more opportunities, we would never leave."

    In the midst of so much uncertainty, one thing is 100% sure in Mexico: Without a recount, its democracy will have lost whatever credibility it may have had.

    July 15, 2006

    Me, Hugo and George

    When I was growing up in Bellflower, Ca., I never, as a child with a good imagination, could have ever imagined that my life would take the peculiar turn that it has. I could not have foreseen giving birth to a child that would eventually be wrongfully and devastatingly killed in war or that I would be meeting with world leaders or be nominated for the Noble Peace Prize.

    Along with the Vice President of Spain, Foreign Minister of Ireland, Attorney General of Australia and countless parliamentarians from all over the globe, one of the world leaders that I have met and spent a good amount of time with on my journey is President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela. Due to the propaganda media and the ignorance of many of my fellow Americans, I have been heavily criticized for my visit. I would like to remind my neighbors all over the country that we do have diplomatic relations with Venezuela and we are not at war with that country.

    On a recent appearance that I made on MSNBC's Hardball which was being guest hosted by Norah O' Donnell, she introduced me as someone who has been photographed with "dictator" Hugo Chavez. After the introduction and in a very short subsequent break, I looked at her and said: "You know President Chavez is not a dictator. He has been democratically elected to his office 8 times."

    To which she replied: "We had a big discussion about that and we decided that he ruled like a dictator." That statement really shocked, yet irritated me, because I can't believe that MSNBC and Norah O'Donnell would perpetuate the myth that President Chavez is a dictator and mislead and misinform their viewers, because contrary to facts, they "decided that he ruled like a dictator."

    "Then you should call George Bush a dictator." I said right before we were given the signal that the interview was beginning.

    During the segment which Norah called an interview and I would like to better term as an "attack," (I gave her a hug after the attack: it seemed like she really needed one) we got on the subject of Hugo Chavez and I ended up admitting that I would rather have him as a leader than George Bush. Since this truthful admission, which comes from experience and research, my life has been threatened several times and the hate mail to the GSFP website has increased dramatically.

    There are many brilliant pieces written from a more scholarly point of view defending the administration of President Chavez and trying to educate our corporate owned media-misled citizenry about the politics, economics and civil society of Venezuela. Most recently and notably an article by Jeff Cohen entitled, "Go to Venezuela, You Idiot." So, instead of writing a scholarly piece, I would like to make some personal observations about the regimes of George Bush and Hugo Chavez.

    First of all and most importantly and as far as I can recall, Hugo has not invaded any countries in baseless wars of aggression justified by lies. George has. As a matter of fact, instead of using "Cowboy Diplomacy" and "Bring 'em on" rhetoric, President Chavez has skillfully used his country's resources as a diplomatic tool to make friends and coerce good behavior from other countries. George uses our children in the Armed Forces to strong arm his way into other countries making enemies for the USA and leaving death and destruction wherever he goes.

    Secondly, Hugo is an effective orator who can lecture on any topic for hours (believe me!). He is smart, personable, has a great sense of humor, and takes the time to get to know people on a human level. (He never called me "Mom" once the entire time I was with him---unlike George). I was with him three times in Venezuela and each time he gave lengthy speeches about American (North and South) history never using a single note: tying our histories together with the present in very meaningful ways. On the other hand, George Bush can barely speak when he is reading from a teleprompter and looks like a deer caught in headlights when he has to speak off the cuff or answer a question that he hasn't been well prepared for. He thinks that people want to put food on their families and if he doesn't know a word, he can just make one up.

    When Ms. O' Donnell called President Chavez a dictator, I bet she didn't even know that our CIA orchestrated a coup attempt against President Chavez in 2002 and in the last electoral referendum that Chavez agreed to submit to in 2004, he was re-confirmed as President with 60 percent of the vote which was certified by an international election commission headed by "left-wing, nutcase," Jimmy Carter. George Bush attained his office by two heavily tainted elections that should more rightly be called coups. To steal two elections and say and act like you have a mandate to destroy the world; to circumvent Congress at every turn with "signing statements" and just not telling them things; to wiretapping Americans without proper warrants; to reading our emails and looking at bank records without warrants; to illegally detaining people and torturing them; to insisting on staying a course in Iraq that is killing nearly more innocent people per month than were killed in our country on 9/11; to authorizing the leak of covert agents' names; to selling our democracy to the highest bidders such as the likes of Jack Abramoff; to appointing avowed U.N. hater John Bolton to the U.N. in a recess appointment because he knew that a normal confirmation process would fail; to allowing the neocons to take over our foreign policy to the detriment of our nation; to etc, etc---I ask Norah O' Donnell and MSNBC who is the dictator here? George or Hugo?

    The media is far freer in Venezuela than it is here in the US. Stations after station are hostile to the Chavez government even openly calling for his over throw at times. Our corporate owned media are either very ill-informed about world affairs or current events, thereby keeping us ill-informed, or they are complicit propaganda tools of this administration. Heaven forbid that one of the outlets, such as the New York Times, should truthfully report that BushCo did something illegal, then the outlet will be accused of doing something wrong! Conversely, we have cheerleaders in the same outlet such as Judith Miller who conspired with Scooter Libby to out CIA agent Valerie Plame. I would love to see a segment where MSNBC show hosts are brought together to discuss such subjects as the high-jacking of our democracy and/or George's lies and war of terror on the world, instead of me.

    One of the reasons that President Chavez is demonized and threatened by BushCo is that he has forced American companies in his country to pay their fair share of taxes and do business properly in Venezuela. Hugo is resisting the corporate colonialism that has characterized US forced relations with South America since the USA has been a country. And one thing that we all know, or should know, BushCo is especially beholden and subservient to the corporations.

    Hugo Chavez also wants to finally realize Simon de Bolivar's vision of a united South America which can be together stronger to live more peacefully with the US and stand in solidarity against the constant meddling of all of our regimes in their affairs. North Americans should know about the despicable history of US interference in South America before they throw stones at people who want to have fully autonomous countries with control over their own natural resources.

    Hugo is also doing something that George would never think of doing: he is taking from the rich to help the poor. Literacy is currently almost 100% in Venezuela and social programs in health and education have dramatically improved since he took office and while the poverty rate is still high, it has made vast improvements. George is a reverse Robin Hood and even steals from our grandchildren's future to further enrich the already obscenely rich of the present. I would rather live under a President like Hugo who tries to improve living conditions in his country than someone like George who is demolishing our social structures and making the poor, poorer.

    I will readily admit that I did say that I would rather have President Chavez than President Bush, but I didn't say that I would rather live in Venezuela. I am an American and I love my country which I believe is on a distinctly disordered course right now. I also believe that my country can do better and I am willing to fight to realize a vision for America where the rich share with the poor and we achieve 100% literacy and schools, day care centers, parks and clinics are built instead of prisons and the already bloated military industrial war complex.

    While the world seems to be coming apart at the seams, it is also important for our main stream, corporate owned media to get their facts straight and report the news truthfully and with integrity instead of being tools for war and greed. Thousands of people are dying while the media are carrying out vendettas for Karl Rove.

    Yes, I would rather have President Chavez than George Bush. But truthfully, I would rather have countless numbers of people as my president than George Bush. George Bush is an out of control criminal that needs to be impeached for his lies; removed from office for his transgressions; and imprisoned for his crimes against humanity.

    George should never have been President in the first place and he has been president of my country for far too long already.

    Cindy Sheehan is the mother of Spc. Casey Austin Sheehan who was KIA in Iraq on 04/04/04. She is a co-founder and President of Gold Star Families for Peace and the author of two books: Not One More Mother's Child and Dear President Bush. She is currently on Day 12 of the Troops Home Fast.

    Come to Camp Casey in August to hold George accountable and stand up for peace!

    Mexico, heal thyself

    by Jason Lee Steorts
    If there is a leitmotif in the immigration debate to vex a conservative soul, it is the idea that border enforcement is anti-Mexican. This idea is vexatious because it ascribes the worst possible motives to border-enforcement advocates while disregarding the substance of their position.

    But it is also vexatious for the simpler reason that it isn't true. Reasonable people can disagree about whether the social and economic effects of illegal immigration on the United States are positive or negative; and reasonable people can plausibly claim that Mexico benefits from the remittances that illegal immigrants send home.

    What is considerably less plausible is the notion that Mexico's long-term interests are advanced by the exodus of 10 percent or more of its population.

    "It's easier to blame other people than to blame yourself," says Fredo Arias-King, who served as a foreign-policy adviser to Mexican President Vicente Fox during his 2000 campaign. "You can export your problems to the unwitting United States. But it's not good for Mexico when American politicians don't stand up for their own dignity. Instead they just say, 'Yes, of course, we should help the (illegal) Mexicans.'"

    Those Mexicans leave their country for a simple reason: They are poor and the opportunities they lack at home can be found here.

    Their poverty in turn has its own causes -- structural problems that have afflicted the Mexican economy for generations because no political force has the will and the means to solve them.

    While doing so would probably be hard under any circumstances, it is much harder when millions of the poorest Mexicans -- those who have the most reason to demand reform -- quit their country altogether. Mexico's politicians have, in effect, deported their most dissatisfied constituency.

    Norman Bailey, a former special assistant to Ronald Reagan for international economic affairs, explains that "Mexico has a safety valve which most other countries don't have. Most countries either collapse or they do the necessary thing.

    "Mexico has never been in the position of being forced to do the necessary thing."

    That may be the best way of explaining what Arias-King experienced as an adviser to Fox. In a paper forthcoming from the Center for Immigration Studies, he writes that meetings with the candidate involved far less discussion about "tak(ing) tough decisions to reform Mexico" than about "get(ting) more concessions from the United States." And that is of course the strategy that Fox -- through his vigorous advocacy of the Bush guest-worker-cum-amnesty plan -- has pursued.

    The most important message America can send to Fox's successor is: Heal thyself.

    Try this

    The answer, distilled to its essence, is freer markets. Despite Mexico's entry into NAFTA and the privatization push of former President Carlos Salinas, huge sectors of the Mexican economy are still dominated by monopolies and oligarchies.

    This is, in part, because the privatization of state enterprises was botched by Russian-style cronyism, most notoriously in the case of Telmex, the Mexican phone company. It was bought by a group of investors whose principal was Carlos Slim, a friend and supporter of Salinas.

    The deal turned a public monopoly into a private one, to the benefit of almost no one but Slim, who now is the world's third-richest man. Similarly anti-competitive structures exist in other sectors.

    Even more damaging to the Mexican economy, however, is the state-owned energy monopoly. Only two countries in the world forbid foreign investment in oil exploration. One is North Korea; the other is Mexico. State ownership of energy resources was enshrined in the Mexican Constitution with the nationalization of the oil industry in 1938.

    Not surprisingly, the public sector is failing where the private would succeed. Mexico is the fifth-largest oil producer in the world, but Pemex, the state oil company, is going broke. That's because the government takes almost all of its profits to fill state coffers.

    The Mexican tax system is rife with corruption and evasion. According to a recent study, 40 percent of businesses and 70 percent of professionals and small-business owners either cheat on their taxes or pay nothing at all -- so the government leans on Pemex to make up the difference. It contributes fully a third of state revenue.

    Despite high oil prices, Pemex is in debt by $85 billion and lacks the capital to invest in new exploration and development. More than half of its oil comes from a single field that is running dry; industry analysts predict that all of Mexico's proven reserves could be exhausted in 10 to 12 years.

    That might not be a problem if Pemex had the money and technology to sink new wells in the Gulf of Mexico but it has neither.

    And the one obvious solution -- calling in foreign investors, as even Fidel Castro's Cuba has done -- is forbidden. Mexico's statism has also made it an importer of natural gas and gasoline since Pemex lacks the money to build refineries or to tap the country's huge natural-gas reserves.

    Perhaps even more relevant to migration patterns are Mexico's socialistic farming practices. The government expropriated large farms -- and, later, mid-sized and small ones -- and redistributed them in tiny plots to farmers within larger collectives. By the time the program was discontinued in 1992, the size of the new plots being given out had shrunk to a mere 1.4 hectares (just under 3.5 acres).

    Such small tracts are incapable of growing crops at competitive prices. The government only made things worse by subsidizing the farmers' production and then subsidizing the harvested crops a second time at market. Meanwhile, the ejidatarios were denied property rights. They could neither sell nor rent their land. They could bequeath it to only one heir (though many subdivided it illegally, with the result that large numbers of peasants now work land to which they have no legal claim).

    Neither could they pledge it as a loan guarantee, making it impossible for them to secure private credit. A constitutional amendment in 1992 allowed ejidatarios to obtain full property rights but officials whose power depends on the ejido system have blocked the amendment's implementation so successfully that, after 10 years, only 1 percent of the land had been privatized.

    Even as the rural poor have stayed poor, the industrialized northern cities -- which flourished under NAFTA in the 1990s -- are seeing their competitiveness eroded.

    Much of Mexico's export growth in the '90s was fueled by its maquiladora plants, which specialized in the assembly of manufactured goods -- a low-skill, low-cost activity. But China's accession to the WTO undermined Mexico's privileged access to the U.S. market and offered comparable labor at significantly lower costs.

    At the same time, Mexico has done little to create a business climate more favorable to investors or to make its workers more competitive in higher-skill, higher-wage sectors.

    Improving the business climate would require, principally, a combination of labor reform and tax reform. And starting a business in Mexico can be a bureaucratic nightmare. All of this gives pause to potential investors.

    The solutions aren't especially complicated. So why does nothing change? Arias-King thinks the problem lies in Mexico's political culture, which has traditionally been dominated by the oligarchic elite. "We don't have economic problems; our problems are really political in nature," he says.

    What this probably means is that a great many Mexicans will remain much poorer than is needful for much longer than is excusable. It is right to feel sympathy for them. But precisely this sympathy compels us to say: The fault, dear Mexico, lies not in your stars, but in yourself.

    Jason Lee Steorts is deputy managing editor of National Review magazine, where a longer version of this commentary appears in the July 17 issue. Copyright 2006 by National Review Inc., 215 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10016. Reprinted by permission

    Mexico's leftist presidential candidate calls for protest camps outside electoral offices

    MEXICO CITY
    Mexico's leftist presidential candidate called on supporters Friday to set up protest camps outside the nation's 300 electoral offices to prevent alleged tampering of ballots in the July 2 election.

    Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador pledged to stop calling protests if there is a manual, ballot-by-ballot recount of the vote. He also said he would never recognize the results as legitimate if they confirm the apparent victory of conservative Felipe Calderon.

    “I am not going to recognize these elections as clean,” Lopez Obrador said.

    An official vote tally gave Calderon a 244,000-vote advantage. But the Federal Electoral Tribunal must decide on a slew of appeals by Aug. 31 and declare a president-elect by Sept. 6 – a decision that cannot be appealed.

    In a nearly 900-page legal challenge, Lopez Obrador claims widespread vote fraud and illicit government and corporate support for Calderon.

    He objected to electoral officials opening ballot boxes, arguing officials are trying to fix the vote. Electoral authorities say they are simply extracting documents that political parties have requested to support legal challenges.

    Lopez Obrador called on his supporters to “set up camp outside the 300 district council offices ... peacefully, and the camps should have video cameras.”

    In an interview with the national Azteca television network Friday, Calderon urged viewers “that we not respond to provocations, that we trust our authorities, that we respect our laws and get to work for a Mexico that lives in peace.”

    Calderon has rejected Lopez Obrador's demand for a manual recount of all 41 million votes, but said “if the (electoral) tribunal should order a recount at some polling place, we would understand there was a legal basis for it.”

    President Vicente Fox's spokesman, Ruben Aguilar, defended electoral authorities, claiming polls show that the majority of Mexicans trust them.

    Aguilar said, however, that “it is necessary to continue polishing and improving our electoral system to make it even better.”

    Fox, during an event later in the day, remarked that Mexico's government institutions – one of which is the Federal Electoral Institute – have been “key for overcoming difficulties in the past, key to overcoming difficulties in the future and will always be an undeniable ingredient for achieving the goals to come.”

    “Today, more than ever, we have the responsibility to take care of these institutions, to nourish, strengthen and respect them,” Fox said.

    Lopez Obrador, who often has used street protests to get his way, was calling a massive rally Sunday in Mexico City's main plaza. Lopez Obrador aide Jesus Ortega said more than 70,000 people had begun their journey to the capital. “We hope Sunday's march will be historic,” he said. Supporters also gathered at the Federal Electoral Tribunal on Friday to demand a recount.

    Mexican stocks dropped for the fifth day in a row Friday, giving up nearly all the gains made since the July 2 vote. The peso initially rallied on news of Calderon's apparent victory, but the currency has stalled amid the confusion about who won.

    Shell finalises agreement with Venezuela

    Royal Dutch Shell PLC became the first major oil company to finalize a joint venture agreement with the Venezuelan government that brings oil pumping operations under state control.

    The Anglo-Dutch company signed a new contract replacing its previous agreement to independently pump oil at the Urdaneta West field, the state-run Petroleos de Venezuela SA, or PDVSA, said in a statement late on Friday.

    The new contract gives PDVSA a 60 per cent stake in operations at the 45,000-barrel-a-day oil field and leaves Shell with the remaining 40 per cent.

    Further details of the contract terms were not immediately available.
    ...

    Chavez lashes out at U.S. over Mideast

    CARACAS, Venezuela
    Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said Friday that American support of Israel is responsible for flaming tensions in the Middle East.

    Israel launched its attack on Lebanon after Hezbollah carried out a brazen cross-border raid Wednesday, capturing two soldiers.

    "The fundamental blame falls again on the U.S. empire. It's the empire that armed and supported the abuses of the Israeli elite, which has invaded, abused and defied the United Nations for a long time," Chavez said.

    The Venezuelan president said Israel was using excessive force _ destroying critical civilian infrastructure and killing and injuring civilians.

    An ally of Cuba's Fidel Castro, Chavez frequently lashes out at President Bush and U.S. policy.

    "The U.S. empire's desire to dominate has no limits and that could take this world to a real Holocaust," Chavez said.

    Chavez: US support of Israel leading to a "Holocaust"

    by Haaretz Service and News Agencies
    Jul 7

    Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said Friday that U.S. backing of Israel is responsible for flaming tensions in the Middle East and putting the world on course toward another "Holocaust."

    "The fundamental blame falls again on the U.S. empire. It's the empire that armed and supported the abuses of the Israeli elite, which has invaded, abused and defied the United Nations for a long time," Chavez said in a speech during a military act in Caracas.

    "I'll seize this opportunity to condemn categorically and fully the aggression that the Israeli elite is carrying out against innocents over there in the Middle East," he said.

    Chavez was referring to a new explosion of Mideast violence this week as Israel Air Force war planes began striking Lebanon after Hezbollah guerrillas captured two Israeli soldiers and killed eight others Wednesday in a cross-border raid into Israel. In response, Hezbollah has fired hundreds of rockets at northern Israel.

    The Venezuelan leader charged that Israel is using excessive force.

    "Are we going to bomb cities and tell them that we won't stop bombing until they return the soldier? That's crazy," he said.

    "Worse, it's craziness with nuclear bombs. (The Israelis) have their weapons of mass destruction and nobody criticizes them, nobody says anything because the empire is behind them," Chavez said.

    Blaming the escalation on Washington's undue influence, Chavez said: "The U.S. empire's desire to dominate has no limits and that could take this world to a real Holocaust. May God save us."

    Chavez is one of the most ferocious critics of U.S. foreign policy, even though his oil-producing country remains closely tied to the United States, its top market, through billions of dollars (euros) in annual crude sales.

    Chavez has had his brushes lately with the some of the neo-con-aligned Major American Jewish Organizations, like the Simon Weisenthal Center. The Weisenthal Center accused him of anti-Semitism, charges dismissed as spurious by some of the more liberal Major Jewish organizations. The incident echoed the earlier tarring of the Nicaraguan Sandinista regime as "anti-Semitic."

    Writer Without Borders

    by Scott Witmer

    Eduardo Galeano writes "only words that really deserve to be there."

    Eduardo Galeano disdains borders, both in life and in literature. Exiled from his native Uruguay after the 1973 military coup, he returned to Montevideo in 1985, where he continues to live and write. Galeano’s books subvert the distinctions between history, poetry, memoir, political analysis and cultural anthropology. With a graceful sense of craft, he uses “only words that really deserve to be there” to convey a humanely moral perspective on matters both personal and political. His writing honors the experiences of everyday life as a contrast to the mass media that “manipulates consciousness, conceals reality and stifles the creative imagination … in order to impose ways of life and patterns of consumption.” By multiplying seldom heard voices, Galeano refutes the official lies that pass for history—his work represents an eloquent, literary incarnation of social justice.

    His most recent book, Voices of Time: A Life in Stories (Metropolitan Books), combines 333 prose poems into a fluid mosaic of humor, despair, beauty and hope. During a recent visit to Chicago, Galeano talked with In These Times about his life and work.

    Your book Open Veins of Latin America (1971) analyzes the brutal exploitation of Latin American resources by the U.S. and European powers. That book, now a classic, was published at the beginning of an especially turbulent period of Latin American history. What was your life like at that time?

    I was working as a journalist, always in independent jobs, working for weeklies—the mad adventures of independent journalism. So I earned my living quite difficultly, writing other things or editing books on the sexual life of bees, or something like this. I was also working in the publishing department of the University of Montevideo. And at night I went home to work on the book. It took four years of researching and collecting the information I needed, and some 90 nights to write the book.

    Did you ever sleep?

    I suppose I did not. I remember now, I was drinking rivers of coffee. Later I developed an allergy to coffee, but fortunately I overcame it, and now I’m a very good coffee drinker. I love it.

    You were then forced into exile in Argentina, where you edited Crisis.

    In the beginning of 1973, I was in jail for a short period in Uruguay and I decided prison life was not healthy, so I went to Buenos Aires. The magazine was a beautiful experience. We invented it with a small group of friends, trying to open a new way of speaking about culture.

    Did you continue to publish when the military regime initiated censorship?

    For two or three months, and after that it was impossible to go on. We were obliged to choose between silence and humiliation. We could stay alive if we accepted the obligation to lie, or we could shut up. We decided to shut up entirely and not pretend to be free, because that would give an alibi to the military regime to say, “See, there is freedom of expression here.” Many members of our staff were killed or disappeared or jailed or went into exile, and so it was a good decision to go away and abandon it. We left behind a very good memory of an exceptional cultural magazine. We showed that it was possible to have a different conception of culture. Not culture made by professional people to be consumed by non-professional people, like workers or anonymous people. Instead, we were trying to hear their voices. Not only to speak about reality, but asking reality, “What would you tell me?” This conversation with reality was the key to our success. That’s why one of the first decrees of the military regime was to forbid the diffusion of “non-specialized opinions.” We were trying to show that the best voices come from non-specialized mouths.

    In the middle of 1976, I was obliged to fly away from Argentina because I was supposed to be on the death squad list to be killed. Many of my friends had been killed, and being dead is so boring, so I chose exile in Spain.

    In Spain you began writing the Memory of Fire trilogy, an epic tapestry covering more than five centuries of American history and culture. What motivated you to undertake such a monumental project?

    It scared me at the beginning. It was first conceived as a way to tell Latin American history. Then a close friend of mine, the Argentinian poet Juan Gelman, told me, “Why not go with all Americas, not just South America or Central America? We share a common origin and a lot of common stories interlinked, and we may perhaps have a common destiny. Not the official destiny built by the professional liars inside the sanctuaries of power, but a counter-history could help to find a counter-destiny.” He tempted me with his words and so I covered all the Americas as a way of promoting the fact that “America” is all America, from Alaska to Chile.

    Immigration, which remains a crucial issue in the United States, recurs as an important motif in your new book, Voices of Time. Could you talk about how immigration is perceived in Latin America as opposed to how it is perceived here?

    It always depends on your point of view. Immigration may be perceived as a menace, as intrusion, or as a legitimate right. We are all immigrants. Except for a few black people in South Africa, we all come from some other part of the world. We all come from Africa, which is not good news for the ignorant racists. I’m sorry, but we have all been blacks once upon a time. So we are all immigrants. This is our way of life since forever. It’s the same with butterflies, with animals, with birds. We humans are the only ones that create borders for immigration, saying, “You cannot go inside this line. This is the end of a country, and here begins another one.” I’m afraid our time will be remembered as a sad period of human life in which money was free, but people were not.

    Why are we seeing a resurgence of the left in Latin America?

    This is the popular will, the will to change reality. They have been cheated by all those years of so-called liberal experience, which is not liberal at all. It’s just liberal for money. And it won’t be easy to get out of it, because we have become prisoners of what I call “the culture of impotence.” It’s very difficult in Latin America to build a democracy after so many years of military terror and in a non-democratic world that will veto your attempt to change something. The experts will come. Not soldiers, now—experts. Sometimes experts are even more dangerous than soldiers. They say, “You cannot. The market is irritated. The market may be angry.” It is as if the market is an unknown but very active and cruel god punishing us because we are trying to commit the cardinal sin of changing reality.

    Just look at Evo Morales, the president of Bolivia. Bolivia was the richest country in all of the Americas at the beginning of the conquest period. They were the owners of the silver, which made possible the enrichment of Europe. Bolivia is now the poorest country in South America. Her richness was her main damnation. Morales is now trying to break with this shameful and humiliating tradition of always working for another’s prosperity. When he nationalized the gas and the oil, it was a scandal all over the world. “How could he? It’s terrible!” Why is it terrible? Because recovering dignity is a cardinal sin. But he’s also committing another cardinal sin: He’s doing what he promised he would do. We in Latin America are suffering with special intensity the divorce between words and facts. When you say yes, you do no. When you say more or less, you do less or more. So facts and words are never encountering each other. When they pass each other by random accident, they don’t say, “Hello, how are you?” because they have never met before. We are trained to lie. We are trained to accept lies as a way of life.

    You have said, “Reality is not destiny; it’s a challenge. … We are not doomed to accept it as it is.” How do we avoid becoming cynical when change seems impossible?

    By keeping alive the memory of dignity. It’s the only way. By telling and repeating that we are not born last year; we are born from a long tradition of betrayals, but also a long tradition of dignity. Here in Chicago, for instance, it is important to recover the memory of May First. The first time I came here, years ago, I was amazed that most people I encountered didn’t know that this universal worker’s fiesta—at once a tragedy and a fiesta, an homage paid to the Haymarket martyrs at the end of the 19th century—came from Chicago. And Chicago has deleted this memory, which is so important for the entire world. In present times, it’s more important than ever, because each May First, crowds and crowds of people, different languages, different cultures, different continents, all celebrate the right to organize. Nowadays, the most important enterprises in the world, like Wal-Mart, forbid unions. They are deleting a tradition of two centuries of working-class fights. It’s important for Chicago and for the entire world to recover memory. Not to visit it, like when you visit a museum, but to get from it fresh water for your thirst for justice, for beauty. It’s a way of knowing that tomorrow is not just another name for today, because yesterday tells you that time is going on.

    July 14, 2006

    Backers of Obrador demand vote recount

    MONTERREY, Mexico, AP
    Tens of thousands of supporters of a fiery leftist who claims Mexico's presidential election was rigged against him streamed out of towns and cities across the nation on their way to the capital to demand a recount of the ballots.

    Carrying duffel bags and placards boosting Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador's Democratic Revolution Party, the protesters gathered Wednesday in Mexico's 300 electoral districts from where they began their trip to Mexico City. A mass rally is planned there for Sunday.

    They hope to pressure the Federal Electoral Tribunal to order a ballot-by-ballot recount of the 41 million votes cast in the July 2 election, which the official tally showed conservative Felipe Calderon winning by 244,000 votes -- a 0.6 percent margin. The tribunal, which has the final say on the vote, will in the coming days start weighing the appeals and fraud allegations.

    President Vicente Fox of Calderon's National Action Party has denied interfering in the election, and monitors from the European Union said they found no irregularities. Calderon has called for calm and started forming a transitional team to take office, angering Lopez Obrador.

    Lawyers for Lopez Obrador, who has pledged to rule for the poor, submitted to the electoral tribunal dozens of boxes filled with videos and other alleged proof of misconduct. The leftist says a manual recount will swing the vote in his favor -- something denied by Calderon's party.

    Late Wednesday, Lopez Obrador aide Jesus Ortega said more than 40,000 people had begun their journey to Mexico City and promised that Sunday's demonstration would be "gigantic."

    "I hope that it will be an extraordinary, gigantic march that reflects the anger over the fraud," Ortega said.

    In the northern industrial city of Monterrey, about 120 protesters at a downtown plaza hung banners that read "No to electoral fraud! Obrador is president!"

    Gelasia Loredo, a 66-year-old retiree who lives on a monthly pension of US$150 (euro120), said she traveled by bus 440 miles (700 kilometers) to Mexico City last year to defend Lopez Obrador when he faced criminal charges, which were later dropped.

    "They've been sabotaging him from the beginning," Loredo said. "The people with money are just a handful, but we, the poor, are millions and we're going to defend him."

    Lopez Obrador said Wednesday that there had been "fascist attacks" against him. Among these he said, were television advertisements financed by a business consortium, including a potato chip maker, that warned of radical changes to Mexico without mentioning Lopez Obrador by name. The leftist also repeated claims that Fox was "a traitor to democracy" and was involved in election fraud.

    In Mexico City, Luis Herrera, 30, marched with about 100 Lopez Obrador supporters in a protest. "If the electoral tribunal disappoints us, I believe there is going to be a big problem," he said.

    Lopez Obrador has promised the protests will be peaceful, although one of his top advisers said Wednesday that people could get restless.

    "There is no problem of the country being ungovernable right now, but as more time passes, there will be," Manuel Camacho Solis told reporters.

    Throughout his political career, Lopez Obrador has used street protests to pressure the government and the courts.

    Last year, as Mexico City mayor, he led huge demonstrations that eventually forced Fox's administration to drop a legal case that would have kept Lopez Obrador out of the presidential race.

    On Saturday, more than 100,000 of his supporters gathered in Mexico City's central plaza to listen to his allegations of fraud.

    In Lopez Obrador's home state of Tabasco on Wednesday, dozens of supporters carrying signs that read "Vote by vote! No to electoral fraud!" began a 60-mile (100-kilometer) march.

    Many of them supported their native son in 1995 during months of protesting after Lopez Obrador lost the state governor's race. The demonstrators will travel the last 370 miles (600 kilometers) of their journey to Mexico City by bus, organizers said.

    The law allows a re-count only for specific polling places where credible evidence of irregularities exist. The leftist's supporters say that applies to at least 50,000 of the approximately 130,000 polling places.

    Under Mexican law, no president-elect can be declared until the appeals process is completed. The widely respected tribunal has overturned two gubernatorial races in recent years, both for meddling by the ruling party.

    A winner must be declared by Sept. 6.

    Mexico: demand grows for recount

    by Bill Weinberg

    Joining the estimated 500,000 who took to the streets of Mexico City July 8 to demand a recount in the contested presidential elections is, of all places, the Financial Times. The upper-crust British daily supported the officially victorious conservative candidate Felip Calderon, but in an editorial noting populist challenger Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador's demands for a total recount, opined: "That is exactly what Mexico's electoral authorities should do." (La Jornada, July 11; FT, July 10)

    This indicates that even conservatives fear a crisis of legitimacy in the Mexican system, and sense thte potential for a social explosion. Another strong critic of Lopez Obrador who is accusing the government of fraud is Subcommander Marcos of the Zapatista rebels, who said in an interview with the daily La Jornada: "It is a question of a fraud orchestrated from Los Pinos [the presidential residence] and the central command of the PAN [Calderon's National Action Party], placing in crisis the democracy, legality and supposed neutrality of the IFE [Federal Electoral Institute]." (AP, July 7)

    Writes Roger Burbach in a commentary online at (among other places) Niburu July 10:

    Over half a million people took to the streets of Mexico City on Saturday to protest the fraudulent election of Felipe Calderon. Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, the real winner of the presidential election, told the huge crowd, "the elections were fraudulent from the start," adding the incumbent president, Vincente Fox "has betrayed democracy."

    The reason Fox and his National Action Party (PAN) pulled out all the stops to steal the election is quite simple-they are desperately afraid of the growing class rebellion by Mexico's poor and oppressed. The campaign slogan of Lopez Obrador was straight forward: "For the good of all, the poor first." In a country where almost half the population lives below the poverty line Lopez Obrador pledged to provide a stipend to the elderly and health care for the poor... He also promised to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement with the United States, particularly the clauses that allow the importation of cheap subsidized grains that undermine Mexico's peasant producers.

    Mexico has had two major social upheavals in its history. One came with the independence movement in 1810, and the other with the revolution that began in 1910. The current fraudulent election results could spark Mexico's next social rebellion, four years before the exact century mark.

    July 13, 2006

    Democracy in Mexico Part II

    by Stephen Lendman
    There's much happening in Mexico in the aftermath of the nation's most contentious election ever, but it began many months before the first vote was cast. The popularity of leftist opposition candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador of the Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD) scared the ruling National Action Party (PAN) enough to get them to try to deny him the right to run for president in the election just concluded. In April, 2005, a commission of four members of the Chamber of Deputies (Mexico's Congress) held there was sufficient cause to suspect Obrador committed a crime when he ordered the construction of a service road to a hospital ignoring a judge's order against doing it. Obrador said he was just widening the road and stopped when he learned of the court order. The full Chamber ignored his explanation and then voted to strip him of his government immunity from prosecution so he could be indicted, have to stand trial and be constitutionally barred from holding or running for high office. The transparent scheme didn't work because the people of Mexico wouldn't tolerate it and turned out in mass street protests to support him.

    That mass support succeeded in getting the ruling PAN to back down from its attempt to keep Obrador off the ballot but not in the shoddy campaign tactics they decided to use against him. Because of his popularity, Obrador was a serious candidate who would likely win easily in a fair election. But there's nothing fair about Mexican politics where the notions of dirty tricks and hardball tactics could have been invented. From early on in the campaign, the Mexican corporate media and ruling business-friendly right wing parties attacked Obrador viciously as an evil twin of Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, falsely accusing him of receiving campaign funds from the Venezuelan President and being guilty of corruption during his time as mayor of Mexico City. The ads also accused him of being a "danger" for Mexico. In addition, government instigated street violence in an attempt to break a teachers strike in Oaxaca and to disrupt events in San Salvador Atenco created tension, stoked fear and were effectively used as political and PR tools to turn enough of the public against Lopez Obrador to erase his once insurmountable lead in the polls to a slim one on election day - an advantage easily overcome with the shenanigans the ruling party had in mind to use to assure its candidate won.

    But Lopez Obrador was lucky PAN officials and their conspiratorial Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) allies didn't intend for him what state officials plotted and pulled off against two other noted state adversaries in the past who paid dearly. General Emiliano Zapata, the Mexican peasant rebel leader who supported agrarian reform and land redistribution in the battles of the Mexican Revolution (a Mexican Simon Bolivar), was assassinated by government troops in 1919. Then in March, 1994, leading opposition candidate Luis Donaldo Colosio met the same fate on the campaign trail in Tijuana. Obrador survived the shabby scheme to keep him off the ballot, was able to run as the opposition candidate, and only paid the price of a defeat at the polls (so far) in an election clearly stolen from him.

    At this point Lopez Obrador is not going gentley "into that good night." Given the clear election irregularities, he's demanded the ballot boxes be opened and all votes be recounted manually. He has every right to ask for that and more with what already is known about the fraud committed against him. The preliminary vote totals were manipulated to show PAN candidate Felipe Calderon would be the winner, initially 3 million votes were never counted and only in hindsight 2.5 million of them were added to the totals, 900,000 supposedly void, blank and annulled ballots were declared null, discarded and never included in the official totals, 700,000 additional votes disappeared from missing precincts, thousands of voters were denied their franchise in strong Obrador precincts and much more.

    In addition, it was learned that Felipe Calderon's brother-in-law Diego Hildebrando Zavala wrote the vote-counting software, and it's already been hacked. This new discovery is especially disturbing as whoever controls the Federal Electoral Institute (IFE) computer systems can manipulate the vote process, control which votes get counted, which ones don't, and what the final vote tally will be. The opportunity and temptation for fraud was therefore in the hands of the declared winner's close family member and ally with every reason to believe he'd take full advantage. Why wouldn't he and the ruling party as well given the history of Mexican elections and the underhanded and hardball tactics the country's entrenched power interests are known to use. They'd never be willing to give up what they've always had an iron grip on and won't if they can get away with their scheme. But the way to stop them is with a full, vote-by-vote independently supervised manual recount and do it before any cast, counted or discared votes are manipulated or destroyed. That's the only antidote for computer fraud as well as to be able to salvage and include in the total as many of the known uncounted and valid discarded votes as possible. It all sounds like Florida, 2000 deja vu all over again, but we know how that one turned out.

    Still, Lopez Obrador said he'll contest the election and demand a full recount. If he follows through on his challenge, he'll have to await a ruling by the Electoral Tribunal, known as Trife, which has until September 6 to consider his case. The new president takes office on December 1 so it's possible the electoral challenge will succeed. In the past, Trife has reversed some local elections including one in Obrador's home district of Tabasco in 2000, but it's very unlikely to reverse this one given the overwhelming pressure against it which in Mexico may include real and intimidating physical threats officials take very seriously.

    The people of Mexico may have other ideas though. As many as 500,000 Obrador supporters (the corporate media lied and reported 100,000) held a mass protest demonstration against the announced election outcome in Mexico City's huge Zocalo plaza on July 8 to demand a full recount. The huge crowd chanted "No to fraud," and "You're not alone," as Lopez Obrador announced plans for a "national march for democracy" to begin on July 12 in each of Mexico's 300 election districts, converging in Mexico City on July 16, again in the Zocalo. He also accused President Fox of violating Mexican law that stipulates a president can't endorse or campaign for a candidate which the PAN did by running government sponsored advertisements touting its achievements. He went on to call President Fox a "traitor to democracy" and said the "stability of the nation" is at risk if a full vote recount isn't taken. Mr. Obrador also told an assembled news conference "I am going to defend our victory. This isn't over." The people of Mexico who support him certainly hope so.

    The July 2 elections were also to elect members of Mexico's Chamber of Deputies. According to the official IFE count on July 7, the PAN won 206 of the 500 seats, followed by For the Good of All coalition consisting of the PRD and smaller Workers Party (PT) and Convergence Party with 160 seats. The Alliance for Mexico comprised of the PRI and small Green Ecological Party of Mexico (PVEM) won 121 seats. An incomplete final count in the Senate projected the PAN with 53 seats, 38 for the PRI coalition, 36 for the PRD coalition and 1 for PANAL.

    Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.

    Mexicans travel to poll protest

    Supporters of the left-wing candidate in Mexico's general election, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, have begun converging on the capital, Mexico City.

    Rallies are expected to begin in the city's vast main square, the Zocalo, leading up to a huge march on Sunday.

    Mr Lopez Obrador is demanding a manual recount of votes cast in the presidential election.

    Results show his conservative opponent Felipe Calderon won by a margin of only 0.57 of a percentage point.

    Carrying banners and wearing the yellow colours of Mexico's left-wing Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD), supporters of Mr Lopez Obrador are making the long journey to the Zocalo.

    Buses are leaving from 300 polling stations across Mexico, and will stop off at towns along the route to pick up more activists and hold local demonstrations.

    'I won'

    Mr Lopez Obrador has demanded a vote-by-vote recount, and has presented some 900 pages of alleged evidence of electoral irregularities to the Federal Electoral Tribunal, which must make a ruling by 6 September.

    "I won the presidential election, I am more and more sure of that," Mr Lopez Obrador, the former mayor of Mexico City, told a news conference on Wednesday, Reuters news agency reported.

    Supporters of Mr Lopez Obrador joined a mass rally in Mexico City last weekend, to call for a recount.

    His ruling-party rival, Felipe Calderon, has said a complete vote count would be illegal, though the law does allow for recounts at specific polling stations where irregularities are reported.

    Victory tour

    Mr Calderon, of National Action Party (Pan), has said he will respect the tribunal's decision, but in the meantime is making preparations for government.

    He has named two senior aides to head his transitional team, and is planning a victory tour of Mexico.

    In an interview with the Washington Post newspaper on Tuesday, Mr Calderon said he would try to avoid "the escalation of tensions" by refusing to call his supporters into the streets to counter Mr Lopez Obrador's.

    But Mr Calderon said he expected Mr Lopez Obrador to continue calling for massive protests.

    Electoral observers from the European Union have said they found no irregularities in the vote count.

    July 12, 2006

    Death by Video: Mexico’s Election Fraud Is Coming Undone

    by Al Giordano
    Video and Audio Evidence, an Outraged Citizenry, and Panic from the White House Are Converging to Make López Obrador the Next Mexican President

    Part III of a Special Series for The Narco News Bulletin

    July 11, 2006

    At six p.m. last night, Monday, July 10, neighbors of the office of the Federal Electoral Institute (IFE, in its Spanish initials) in Comalcalco, Tabasco, witnessed a crime against democracy. They didn’t just stand there. They did something about it. And this one small example of the fighting spirit of the Mexican people explains why the historic presidential election fraud of July 2, 2006 will not stand.

    Nine days after the fact, neither the IFE, nor President Vicente Fox, nor his National Action Party (PAN), nor their candidate Felipe Calderón, nor the Commercial Media at their service, have been able to reassert control over the juggernaut of facts, audio and video evidence, and public outrage that today tramples their anti-democratic gambit. The Fraud of 2006, and those who attempted it, are drowning under an authentically democratic tide. Take, for example, what just occurred in the Tabasco town of Comalcalco.


    A picture saves 70,000 votes: Monday night in Comalcalco, Tabasco.
    Photo: D.R. 2006 La Jornada
    Study this photograph from today’s La Jornada. A campaign truck covered with PAN party logos, slogans, and the faces of three of their candidates – the one in the middle is Calderón – is parked in front of a building. From the balcony of the colonial-style structure shines an illuminated sign with three large letters: I… F… E. Citizens have arrived by foot and by bicycle and have blocked the entrances to the IFE building and the PAN truck. Not all of them appear in the photo, but there are 500 of them and they are hopping mad. Trapped inside are at least ten IFE officials who, according to eyewitnesses, illegally entered the building, brought sealed ballot boxes out into the patio, and began to open them, breaking the official seals. They were seen revising anew the “actas” with the vote tallies and recounting the ballots, without, as the law requires, the presence of representatives from all the political parties. The neighbors sounded the alarm and the electoral delinquents have been caught in the act.

    Where are the soldiers of the Mexican Army that supposedly are guarding the ballot boxes at the 300 IFE offices like this one throughout the country? What about the police? The events last night in Comalcalco reveal the ugly truth: the highest authorities of the nation, in their complicity with an obvious electoral fraud, have forfeited their legitimacy and the people have self-organized to fill the power vacuum. They have converted the IFE offices into a prison for white-collar criminals and have seized the PAN truck that, the neighbors believe, was waiting to carry their votes to democracy’s graveyard.

    La Jornada reports:

    “The electoral assistants argued that the (IFE) district council president, Tomás Alfonso Castellanos, told them to enter the offices and for that reason the military soldiers that guarded the locale allowed them to enter.”

    The IFE electoral district with its seat in Comalcalco delivered a punishing 70,000 vote margin of victory to presidential candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador of the Democratic Revolution Party (PRD) over the PAN’s Calderón: 73,473 for Obrador vs. only 3,863 for Calderón. Voter turnout in this district, at 70.08 percent, exceeded the national average of 58.9 percent. The PAN has almost no votes to protect in Comalcalco. The PAN party truck – now held by the citizens – was there to haul away and “disappear” the votes cast for Obrador.

    When local PRD officials contacted the IFE boss in the Tabasco state capital of Villahermosa, Aída Castillo, to report the tampering of the ballots and ask about the alibi that the IFE had authorized the opening of sealed ballot boxes, Castillo, reports La Jornada, said she was “surprised” by the news. The locals then contacted a notary public to come take legal testimony about the unauthorized break-in. PRD officials then headed to the offices of the Special Prosecutor for Attention to Electoral Crimes in Villahermosa to file a legal complaint. Federal Senator César Raúl Ojeda of the PRD, a close ally of López Obrador, headed to Comalcalco as La Jornada filed its story last night and, at press time, the ten IFE officials and the PAN truck chauffer, caught red-handed, were still held prisoner inside the offices.

    This story reveals some presumptions on the part of the electoral delinquents of the IFE and the PAN. The most important one is that even they now believe that a recount is inevitable. If they truly believed their own publicly stated hype – that the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (Trife, as it is known) will not require a recount – there would have been no need to sneak into enemy territory and illegally open ballot boxes. The criminal operation would only be necessary if a recount is in the cards and, thus, the need to disappear López Obrador’s votes. The other presumption that this crime story unmasks is that the IFE and the PAN know that a recount will show López Obrador the rightful winner of the presidential election. For if, as PAN insists, it already counts with a majority of votes nationwide, there would be no necessity to unseal and tamper with the Comalcalco ballot boxes that contain 20 Obrador votes for every single Calderón vote.

    The jig is up. In the absence of a legitimate governmental authority, the people of Comalcalco have offered a preview of what will occur, soon, throughout Mexico if the government of Vicente Fox continues in its attempts to steal the 2006 election.

    Terms of Denouement

    On Monday, the PAN party of Calderón and Fox offered another indication that it knows it did not receive enough legitimate votes to sustain its claim that Calderón won the election. After eight days of insisting that there must not be a recount, that it would be “illegal” to have one, that the Trife judges will never allow it, the PAN filed a motion with the Trife yesterday calling for recounts in six states won by López Obrador: Mexico City, Veracruz, Oaxaca, Guerrero, State of Mexico and Tabasco. It has now adopted the very same legal recourse that, in previous days, the PAN viciously attacked. The legal maneuver reveals the PAN’s lack of faith in its own claims that it won the election and also demonstrates that the PAN now believes a recount is, contrary to its public claims, going to occur.

    In the days before, PAN officials claimed that the elections were “clean, transparent and without irregularities.” The latest move indicates that its spokesmen don’t believe their own claims.


    IFE Official in the PAN-stronghold of Salamanca, Guanajuato, caught on video tape, stuffs a ballot box.
    Photo: D.R. 2006 La Jornada
    Also on Monday, candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador released a video in which an election official in Salamanca, Guanajuato (the PAN-dominated state that Narco News has compared to Florida in U.S. post-electoral conflicts due to the high concentration of documented irregularities and outright frauds carried out by election officials there) is caught stuffing many ballots into a ballot box. Captured on video, he sports a blue-and-white shirt (PAN’s campaign and logo colors) and has quite the guilty look on his face as he stuffs one ballot after another into the box. In the Salamanca district, IFE reported that Calderón received 93,062 votes to 23,278 for Obrador. The video – so newsworthy that even pro-PAN TV Azteca broadcast it yesterday – has further fueled the public anger; an image worth a thousand words and a to-be-determined part of seventy thousand votes. (As soon as someone gets it online, Narco News will link to it; in the meantime, here is a photo of the perp caught in the act.)

    Video, audio and photographic evidence of election fraud surges daily. It is the dominant news story in Mexico. Obrador released a similar video of election officials in PAN-controlled Querétaro changing the vote tallies to create more votes for its candidate. The PAN does not deny the facts. It simply claims that those cases amounted to normal, allowed, functions by election officials. The public temper rises with every such justification.

    On Saturday, during a massive “informational assembly” on the Mexico City Zócalo, Obrador played hardball. Through the speakers, before half-a-million people, he played audiotape of an election-day telephone conversation between Fox’s transportation secretary Pedro Cerisola and Tamaulipas Governor Eugenio Hernández Flores, and of a similar conversation between that same governor and the detested national teachers’ union president Elba Esther Gordillo. The full transcription of those conversations can be read in Spanish here. The governor of that northern Gulf of Mexico border state is a member of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) and so is the teachers’ union leader. On the tape, she tells the governor that his party’s candidate, Roberto Madrazo, is, according to exit polls, far behind, and urges the PRI governor to contact PAN candidate Felipe Calderón “to sell him what you have,” because “the PRI has already fallen.” She repeats: “Given the fall, I think it would be interesting for you to speak with Felipe (Calderón) and sell it to him.”

    Gordillo said, in that recorded telephone conversation, that she knew that “the hard vote has already been cast.” Clearly she wasn’t trying to convince the PRI governor to turn out new votes for Calderón. The only thing the governor would have available to “sell” at that point in the Election Day was how the votes would be counted. The governor, Hernández, thanked her for her call and reassured her, “yes, I think everything is going well.” He also offered to call a neighboring PRI governor in Coahuila to cut the same deal. In the taped conversation with the Secretary of Transportation, the governor pledged to speak with the rest of the PRI governors – indicating they had a meeting scheduled in Toluca that day – saying, “sure, we are with this… that’s how it is. That is our conviction and that is how a group of friends and colleagues decided some weeks ago when we saw that this could close this way, that it could occur.”


    Andrés Manuel López Obrador revealed more video proof of electoral fraud on Tuesday.
    Photo: D.R. 2006 El Universal
    The wide interpretation on the Zócalo and throughout Mexico is that the PRI governors cut a deal with Fox and the PAN to not only turn a blind eye to election fraud in their states to favor Calderón, but also to actively use their powers as governors to participate in making it happen: after all, the PRI wrote the book on how to commit election fraud during the decades that it governed the country prior to Fox and the PAN.

    The death by video, audio, digital photos and eyewitness reports by the Mexican citizenry now cuts at Calderón’s non-existent “victory” daily. Today, Tuesday, López Obrador presented two more videos. One, from election night in Zacapoaxtla, Puebla, which shows IFE officials preventing the public counting of votes required by law. The other, from the Tabasco town where this report began: Comalcoalco. It shows the IFE officials illegally opening the sealed ballot boxes there yesterday. Every single day, new evidence of blatant fraud appears. The revolution may not be televised, but it is being videotaped.

    Bush Backpedals from Calderón

    Still more bad news for Calderón and those who seek to impose him in a fraudulent presidency arrived on Monday. It came from Washington, DC, during a White House press briefing by Tony Snow, press secretary for George W. Bush.

    It’s no secret that the Bush administration has rooted for Calderón, the right-winger in the Mexican contest. The U.S. president even called Calderón to congratulate him last week. The best evidence that political reality has changed in few days is how the White House is suddenly hanging Calderón out to dry. Part of the story is that Calderón, in a political maneuver designed to mask the volatile fact that he has been Bush’s boy all along, issued a statement last week – after Bush called him – that postured to be against the construction of a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. At Monday’s White House press briefing, reporters asked the Bush press secretary for a response. In the transcript, the reporters’ questions are indicated by the letter Q, and the White House press secretary’s responses by the words “Mr. Snow”:

    Q All right, then what do you think—or what does the administration say about a foreign politician denouncing domestic legislation in the United States, and particularly Calderon’s denunciation of stronger border security and an extended fence?

    MR. SNOW: Last time I checked, Calderon did not have any official authority over the activities of the United States government.

    Q Can I follow up on that?

    MR. SNOW: Yes, very quickly. Sure.

    Q The call the President made to Calderon to congratulate him, that means that the U.S. government already recognized him as the President-elect of Mexico? Can you explain what —

    MR. SNOW: Well, I believe the electoral commission had, in fact, declared him President. And according to the laws of Mexico, at this point, he is President. Should there be a recount, should there be another adjustment, should there be a change, then the President will acknowledge that, as well—Mexico, obviously having the ability to decide who, as a result of transparent elections, is the President of the country.

    It is newsworthy to note that the White House press secretary is confused on certain facts. The president of Mexico today and through December 1 is Vicente Fox, not Calderón, who is not even president-elect. The IFE – “the electoral commission” referred to by Snow – does not have the legal authority to declare the winner. That power, under the Mexican Constitution, is reserved for the Trife electoral tribunal, which has so far remained mum, awaiting the legal challenges and documentation to be able to rule on them.

    But the more earthshaking declaration out of the White House yesterday was the verbal smackdown of Calderón – “Last time I checked, Calderon did not have any official authority” – and the declaration that “the President will acknowledge” the results of a recount.

    The bigger problem for George W. Bush than that of who is president of Mexico is that of who is president of the United States. The exploding story of massive electoral fraud in Mexico next-door is having an unintended consequence: It is awakening historic memory of the electoral frauds carried out to make Bush president up North.

    If Mexican authorities continue to stonewall and impose Calderón as president, they will provoke 300 Comalcalcos at each of IFE’s regional headquarters and its national seat, converting those offices, as occurred last night in Tabasco, into white collar prisons, from which the electoral delinquents will not escape. That kind of turn of events will bring with it Bolivian-style highway blockades, and the corresponding halt of the flow of food, oil and other necessities from fertile Southern Mexico to Northern Mexico (as dry season begins; provoking a massive exodus of immigrants across the border while simultaneously stopping the flow of food and goods to the United States). And, with the fresh history of the political rise of a Mexican-American immigrant protest movement on the U.S. side of the border, the conflict will not be containable only in Mexico.

    The consequences of trying to impose a Mexican president by fraud have already grown out of anybody’s control: Not Fox, not Bush, not even López Obrador would be able to hold back the masses. What occurred last night in Comalcalco, Tabasco is a glimpse of the nightmare to come for those in power if they do not permit the Mexican electorate’s will.

    The IFE and the PAN are in check, soon to be checkmate. In that political reality, the only path for survival by those in power is to permit a recount of ballots, and hope that no more signs of tampering occur in its course. As of last night, the only feasible path for the system became to get out of the way of the presidency of Andrés Manuel López Obrador. This electoral game will soon be over. And then a whole “other” chapter will begin.

    To be continued…

    Greg Palast with Amy Goodman on the Mexican Election

    In Mexico, populist candidate Andres Manuel López Obrador released a preliminary video yesterday of what he says proves he was cheated out of last week's presidential election. In a video shot in the central state of Guanajuato, the footage shows an apparent supporter of Calderon's National Action Party stuffing a ballot box on the day of the elections. Investigative reporter Greg Palast travels to Mexico City to report on the disputed election. [includes rush transcript] We turn now to the Mexican presidential elections. Last week, election authorities announced that conservative candidate Felipe Calderón, a former energy minister, had defeated Andres Manuel López Obrador by a razor slim margin. This was after electoral officials recounted ballot tallies from the initial vote. The recount showed that Calderon won the presidency by the closest margin in Mexico's history - around two-hundred-twenty-thousand votes of forty-one million cast - or just over half a percentage point.

    But Lopez Obrador has refused to concede citing electoral fraud. On Sunday, Lopez Obrador and his supporters filed a request for a full vote-by-vote recount of the election. They have also called for supporters to begin marching on the capital today and to join up for a huge march in Mexico City on Sunday.

    Yesterday, Obrador released a preliminary video of what it says proves he was cheated out of last week's Presidential election. In a video shot in the central state of Guanajuato, the footage shows an apparent supporter of Calderon's National Action Party stuffing a ballot box on the day of the elections. Mexico"s Federal Electoral Court will review the case, which includes videos, campaign propaganda and electoral documents. The court has until September 6 to declare a winner. Meanwhile, yesterday Felipe Calderon announced his plans for a victory tour through Mexico.

    Investigative reporter Greg Palast was in Mexico City to cover the story. He filed this report.

    * Greg Palast reports from Mexico City. Special thanks to Rick Rowely and Jacquie Soohen of Big Noise Films.

    RUSH TRANSCRIPT

    This transcript is available free of charge. However, donations help us provide closed captioning for the deaf and hard of hearing on our TV broadcast. Thank you for your generous contribution.
    Donate - $25, $50, $100, more...

    AMY GOODMAN: Investigative reporter Greg Palast was in Mexico City to cover the story. He filed this report.

    GREG PALAST: July 3rd, I was in my office in London when the phone rang. It was Mexico City. I was told, “Take a look at the Mexican papers.” The exit polls in the presidential election there showed a clear win for Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, the left wing's candidate for president, but the official count gave the election to George Bush's ally, Felipe Calderon, of the rightwing ruling party, the PAN. Hmmm. Exit polls that don't match the official vote count. I had heard that story before. In Ohio in 2004, John Kerry led Bush in the exit polls, and in 2000, Al Gore won in the Florida exit polls. But in both cases, George Bush won in the official count.

    So I booked the first flight out to Mexico City to answer the question: Did Felipe Calderon of the conservative PAN, the party in power, win the presidential election fairly or was this just another Florida con salsa?” The official numbers just didn't add up. So my first stop was to meet one of Mexico's top numbers experts, statistician Victor Romero of Mexico's National University. Dr. Romero had charted the official government elections returns from each of Mexico's 113,000 voting stations.

    VICTOR ROMERO: The way I did this was, a friend of mine, that he had the results second by second.

    GREG PALAST: Well, randomly, this can't happen.

    VICTOR ROMERO: Can’t happen.

    GREG PALAST: So what did happen then? Beside -- there’s a miracle here.

    VICTOR ROMERO: It’s a miracle.

    GREG PALAST: How did the miracle occur?

    VICTOR ROMERO: How did the miracle occur? I don't know.

    GREG PALAST: On a computer printout, Dr. Romero showed how the official tallies matched the exit polls, with challenger Lopez Obrador ahead by 2% all night. That is, until the very end, when several precincts came in for the ruling party by 10-to-1, and then 100-to-1, putting their candidate Felipe Calderon over the top, literally in the last minutes. The doctor found that statistically improbable.

    VICTOR ROMERO: We reached the point I said, “It’s over.” But then, from 71% ‘til the very end, there was not a single moment in which the difference from one report to the next became bigger.

    GREG PALAST: So it didn't change at all. Just was perfect.

    VICTOR ROMERO: Perfect, perfect. And so we just couldn't believe it. I mean, it fell -- with 5% to go, it fell one full point.

    GREG PALAST: So then, what happened?

    VICTOR ROMERO: Another miracle. Statistically, it's a second miracle. But now it is --

    GREG PALAST: Well, are you a religious man?

    VICTOR ROMERO: I’m not a religious man.

    GREG PALAST: So you don't believe in miracles?

    VICTOR ROMERO: No, but other people do, so, you know. They say that it works even if you don’t believe in them, so.

    GREG PALAST: The results may not seem so miraculous if you take a look at these voter sheets. This is from a district in Guanajuato, which shows that Calderon picked up 192 votes, but Obrador, the challenger, got only 12. And here’s how this miraculous total can be explained. We were given a videotape of a poll worker, seen here stuffing ballots into the unguarded cardboard ballot box. Mexico has virtually zero ballot security in rural areas. There is no system for accounting for unused paper ballots. Stuffing them into the cardboard boxes is absurdly easy.

    Despite the evidence of ballot stuffing, the conflict with exit polls and the miraculous returns, the Federal Election Commission in Mexico named Calderon the winner by a margin thin as a tortilla, by less than 0.5%. The rush to announce a winner was all the more surprising given the wave of other reported irregularities. This is Cesar Yanez who directed the campaign for Lopez Obrador’s party, the PRD. He noted there were 300,000 fewer votes for president than for senator, a drop-off that voting experts say never happens without fraud. Yanez guessed maybe they ate their votes.

    The Federal Election Commission's rush to announce a winner caught my attention because of the astonishingly high pile of supposedly uncountable votes: nearly one million blank unreadable ballots, four times the alleged margin of victory. The smell of Florida was unmistakable. In the 2000 U.S. election, Florida's Secretary of State Katherine Harris stopped a hand count of 179,000 supposedly blank ballots. Mexico's Electoral Commission, taking the exact same stance as Harris, is refusing to have a public hand count of those supposedly blank one million ballots.

    Yanez noted that the commission agreed to open a fragment of 1% of the ballot packets. In most cases, ballots that were totaled as blank were, in fact, votes for Obrador. Each box opened produced enough newfound votes for Obrador that opening all the boxes should statistically change the outcome of the election. But all the boxes won't be opened. The ruling party, the PAN, and the Electoral Commission refuse a full public recount, and the government says that it's over.

    Felipe Calderon and his ally George Bush say it's all over, but there are hundreds of thousands of people here who say, not until all the votes are counted one by one. On Saturday, half a million Obrador supporters filled the capital to make one simple demand: voto pro voto, count every vote.

    We’ve come here to the ruling party's compound to ask Felipe Calderon exactly why he doesn't want to count all the votes.

    “Mr. Calderon, why not count all the ballots?” would be a question from England.

    Calderon gave me the brush-off, but the man tipped to be his foreign minister, Arturo Sarukhan, defended his man.

    ARTURO SARUKHAN: There is a process called the rule of law in this country, and it is not to be used willy-nilly to bend depending on whether you fancy the results of an election or you don't fancy the results of an election. What we have said is that we are convinced that what was not obtained through the ballot box should not be obtained through the streets.

    GREG PALAST: But in Washington, President Bush was too impatient for the full vote count. While the European Union was waiting for a full legal review, Bush called Calderon to congratulate him on his victory, and evidence suggests that George Bush may have secretly tried to help in that victory. We have obtained from U.S. FBI files a copy of a secret government contract with a private firm, ChoicePoint of Alpharetta, Georgia. ChoicePoint, you may recall, is the company that provided a list to Katherine Harris in 2000, which permitted her office to wrongly scrub thousands of African Americans from Florida voter rolls.

    ChoicePoint, this document indicates, was back in the vote list business in Mexico at the request of the Bush administration. While the cover of their September 2001 contract says it is to gather intelligence for counterterrorism investigations, the still classified appendix, which we have, clarifies that the contract is limited to gathering citizen files and voter lists of Latin American nations, specifically those nations which have leftist presidents or leading leftist candidates for president.

    The company, we have learned, did, in fact, obtain the voter files of Venezuela and Mexico for the FBI. It's difficult to imagine how these files will help in the war on terror, but they can be very useful in influencing Latin American elections. And, indeed, we filmed voters in Mexico who found themselves mysteriously scrubbed from voter rolls.

    SCRUBBED VOTER: I wasn't able to vote. I wasn't on the list. I waited seven hours here for nothing, seven hours in the rain, seven hours hungry, just so the electoral representatives could laugh at me. The Electoral Commission is a real fraud. I tell you that as a Mexican.

    GREG PALAST: In Mexico City, I met with an Obrador supporter who discovered that, in fact, the ruling party, the PAN, had somehow got a hold of the voter files. She discovered this information after she obtained the secret passwords to the party's website from a whistleblower. We were not allowed to film her face.

    OBRADOR SUPPORTER: I can't tell you how they were using this information, but I can assure you this is illegal. This is a crime.

    GREG PALAST: Are you aware of the fact that a contractor for George Bush and the U.S. FBI obtained all these citizen files?

    OBRADOR SUPPORTER: Yes, ChoicePoint was the name of the company who got that. Yes, we were aware of that.

    GREG PALAST: But we don't know where this information comes from?

    OBRADOR SUPPORTER: We know that it’s in the official page of the candidate.

    GREG PALAST: But they’re not supposed to have these for these purposes?

    OBRADOR SUPPORTER: No, no, no. They’re not supposed to have it. And, of course, they are by no way supposed to use it. That's a crime.

    GREG PALAST: But it could be very helpful.

    OBRADOR SUPPORTER: Well, much more than we ever thought.

    GREG PALAST: She showed me on a computer how to get into the hidden pages of the PAN's website.

    OBRADOR SUPPORTER: This was Calderon's page, right? If you go into the user hildebrando117 and you typed in the password, you could type your name, any name. You could find all her information, where she lives, where she stay, or everything. These are the electoral votes.

    GREG PALAST: Our source believes that the vote-counting software was key to the election victory. She showed us proof that the candidate's brother-in-law was paid to write the vote-counting software.

    Was the election stolen?

    OBRADOR SUPPORTER: Yes, we can be sure of that. The election was definitely stolen. And people should be there counting the votes one by one. Democracy doesn't have a time limit.

    GREG PALAST: Thank you very much for your time.

    OBRADOR SUPPORTER: Thank you.

    GREG PALAST: We promise not to show your face.

    OBRADOR SUPPORTER: Thank you.